Canada Tightens Regulation on E-Cigarette Production and Sales

Nov.08.2022
Canada Tightens Regulation on E-Cigarette Production and Sales
Canada strengthens regulations for e-cigarette production and sales including a new excise stamp and consumer tax.

Canada is strengthening its regulatory system for the production and sale of electronic cigarette products.


Starting October 1st, manufacturers and importers of e-cigarettes in Canada are required to obtain a license or register with the Canada Revenue Agency, affix a vaping excise stamp on their products, and pay a consumption tax. From October 1st to December 31st, there will be a transition period, after which only stamped e-cigarette products can be sold at retail stores. These changes stem from amendments to the 2001 Excise Tax Act and its 2022 Federal Budget Regulations.


Robert Kreklewetz, an indirect tax, customs, and trade lawyer at Millar Kreklewetz LLP, stated that these changes, from a tax perspective, essentially mean that the federal government is treating electronic cigarettes as tobacco products.


A federal excise tax of $2.91 is imposed on 20 packs of cigarettes, while approximately two milliliters of vaping liquid would require a $1 tariff. He added that this applies to nicotine-free e-liquids.


Kreklewetz stated that when e-cigarettes first emerged, like with any new technology, the government's response and action was slow. There was a lack of regulation from a product perspective, creating a bit of a wild west situation. Similarly, there was a lack of regulation from a taxation perspective, with the exception of federal sales tax, treating e-cigarettes like any other commodity. However, there was no specific consumption tax or cigarette system in place for e-cigarettes. But now, all of that has changed.


Canada also regulates electronic cigarette products through the Tobacco and Vaping Products Act and the Food and Drugs Act, and has established regulations that limit the concentration of nicotine and prescribe packaging and labeling standards.


Kreklewetz stated that tax policies are typically aligned with public policies. He proposed imposing a consumption tax, also known as a sin tax, on electronic cigarettes because they are a less harmful alternative to smoking. This would reduce incentives for smokers to switch to electronic cigarettes.


The Canadian Ministry of Health has stated that the health risks of chemicals found in electronic cigarette products, including the main liquids used in them - vegetable glycerin and propylene glycol - are still not fully understood. While these chemicals are considered safe for use in cosmetics and sweeteners, inhaling them over a long period of time is considered "unknown and still being evaluated." Similarly, the chemicals used to flavor the vaping oils are typically used by food manufacturers and are safe for consumption, but the effects of inhaling these chemicals have not yet been thoroughly tested.


Certainly, nicotine is highly addictive. The Canadian Department of Health warns that nicotine addiction in children and adolescents can "affect memory and attention," "alter the development of their brains," lower impulse control, and cause cognitive and behavioral issues.


The Canadian Department of Health has stated in its resource on "e-cigarettes and quitting smoking" that while the best choice for smokers is to quit smoking altogether, switching to e-cigarettes will "reduce your exposure to harmful and carcinogenic chemicals" and involve "short-term health improvements." E-cigarette products only contain "a small fraction of the 7,000 chemicals found in tobacco smoke," the Canadian Department of Health noted. When using e-cigarettes to quit smoking, some evidence suggests that they are associated with higher success rates.


Kreklewetz stated that if electronic cigarettes are viewed as a means for current smokers to quit smoking and switch to nicotine replacement products, then every dollar of tax paid on electronic cigarettes is simply an economic deterrent to quitting smoking. If the cost of vaping is the same as smoking, then why would anyone want to switch?


He said, "This is the vague logic that I see in the new tax system. The federal government's way of working these days is depleting new sources of revenue. Therefore, people may see the e-cigarette tax more as a tax grab than good public policy.


Statement:


This article is compiled based on third-party information and is intended solely for industry exchanges and learning.


This article does not reflect the opinion of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the authenticity and accuracy of the content. The translation of this article is only intended for industry exchange and research purposes.


Due to limitations in our ability to translate accurately, this article may not fully reflect the original text. Please refer to the original article for the most accurate representation.


2FIRSTS is fully aligned with the position and statements of the Chinese government on all domestic, cross-strait and international issues.


The copyright of compiled information belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us for deletion.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

JUUL2 Sued Within a Week of FDA Authorization as AJ Marketing Alleges Infringement of Programmable Vape Patent
JUUL2 Sued Within a Week of FDA Authorization as AJ Marketing Alleges Infringement of Programmable Vape Patent
Less than a week after JUUL2 received U.S. FDA marketing authorization on August 28, 2026, JUUL Labs was sued for patent infringement in federal court in Delaware. AJ Marketing LLC filed the complaint on September 3, alleging that both JUUL 1 and JUUL2 infringe U.S. Patent No. 8,851,068 B2. The patent covers aspects of programmable electronic vaporization devices, including controls over dose delivery, usage frequency and operating parameters. The plaintiff is seeking reasonable royalties and ongoing royalties tied to the remaining life of the patent. JUUL has not yet publicly responded to the case.
Sep.10
Ukraine Raises Excise Stamp Fees for Tobacco, Heated Tobacco and Vape Liquids by 30.5% as Parliament Backs E-Excise Delay to 2027
Ukraine Raises Excise Stamp Fees for Tobacco, Heated Tobacco and Vape Liquids by 30.5% as Parliament Backs E-Excise Delay to 2027
Ukraine's Cabinet of Ministers adopted Resolution No. 1259 on October 15, 2026, increasing excise stamp production fees for tobacco products and e-cigarette liquids by approximately 30.5%, from UAH 0.1643 to UAH 0.2144 per stamp. Fees for alcoholic beverages rose by about 30.2%. Separately, Ukraine's parliament passed Bill No. 15532 on October 13, proposing to postpone the full implementation of electronic excise stamps and traceability for alcohol, tobacco and e-cigarette liquids from November 1, 2026, to July 1, 2027. Parliament cited additional testing, configuration and integration requirements. The bill was sent to the president for signature on October 19.
Regulations
Oct.21
Juul Sublicense Reshapes Vuse Alto Patent Bill as Court Ends R.J. Reynolds’ 5.25% Royalty Obligation to Altria
Juul Sublicense Reshapes Vuse Alto Patent Bill as Court Ends R.J. Reynolds’ 5.25% Royalty Obligation to Altria
According to Law360 on August 31, 2026, a federal judge in North Carolina ruled that a patent sublicense between R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co. and Juul Labs Inc. relieves Reynolds of its obligation to continue paying royalties to Altria Client Services LLC over Vuse Alto. A jury had previously found that Vuse Alto infringed three Altria patents and awarded approximately $95.2 million in past damages, after which Reynolds was ordered to pay an ongoing royalty equal to 5.25% of positive net sales. The new ruling finds that a valid sublicense can eliminate future infringement, potentially ending what Altria described as hundreds of millions of dollars in future royalties.
Sep.01
Product | DOJO Launches 0+6ml BLAST7K Fresh in UK in September, Retaining 2+8ml Pod Compatibility Ahead of October Per-Milliliter Vaping Duty
Product | DOJO Launches 0+6ml BLAST7K Fresh in UK in September, Retaining 2+8ml Pod Compatibility Ahead of October Per-Milliliter Vaping Duty
DOJO officially launched the BLAST7K Fresh on September 17, 2026, introducing a UK-market prefilled pod product with 6ml of e-liquid and a manufacturer-rated capacity of up to 7,000 puffs. The device features a 1000mAh rechargeable battery, the INSTA-JUICED structure and COREX BLAST dual-mesh technology, while retaining compatibility with existing BLAST pods. The launch comes less than two weeks before the UK's Vaping Products Duty takes effect on October 1. At the new duty rate, 6ml of vaping liquid would correspond to £1.32 in VPD. DOJO has not stated that the product's 6ml format was designed in response to the new duty.
Sep.20
UK HMRC Launches Vape Duty Stamps on October 1, Ushering in Supply-Chain Traceability as Chinese Exporters Face New Compliance Hurdles
UK HMRC Launches Vape Duty Stamps on October 1, Ushering in Supply-Chain Traceability as Chinese Exporters Face New Compliance Hurdles
HM Revenue & Customs put the UK's Vaping Products Duty and Vaping Duty Stamps Scheme into effect on October 1. All vaping liquids manufactured in or imported into the UK are now subject to duty at £2.20 per 10ml, regardless of nicotine content. The stamp regime will introduce digital functionality designed to provide traceability throughout the supply chain, with approved manufacturers, importers and warehousekeepers required to report product movements and retailers and consumers eventually able to scan stamps to verify authenticity. China exported $177 million of vape-related products to the UK in August, up 51.4% year over year, increasing the significance of the new compliance regime for China's Shenzhen-centered vape supply chain.
Regulations
Oct.04
2Firsts Interview | Cigarette Sales Fall as Smokeless Alternatives Gain in U.S. Convenience Stores, NACS Says
2Firsts Interview | Cigarette Sales Fall as Smokeless Alternatives Gain in U.S. Convenience Stores, NACS Says
Ahead of the 2026 NACS Show, 2Firsts interviewed Chris Rapanick, NACS managing director of research, on changes reshaping the U.S. convenience-store tobacco and nicotine market. NACS data show cigarette sales declining while smokeless alternatives, including nicotine pouches, continue to grow. The interview also examines higher OTP margins, shifting backbar space, weaker store traffic, regulatory uncertainty and NACS’ outlook for 2027, offering a retailer-side view of one of the world’s largest nicotine markets.
Interview
Oct.03