Canada to Lift Flavor Ban on E-Cigarettes After 3 Years

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Apr.12.2024
Canada to Lift Flavor Ban on E-Cigarettes After 3 Years
Canada to lift 3-year flavor ban on e-cigarettes, requiring manufacturers to use approved ingredients, sparking backlash from consumers.

According to a report by Vaping360 on April 11th, Canada will lift the 3-year-old ban on flavored e-cigarettes. The ban was initially approved by the government in June 2021 but has been dormant ever since.

 

According to the regulation, Health Canada will provide manufacturers with a list of up to 100 permitted flavoring ingredients and mandate that only these ingredients can be used to make e-liquid, but only for tobacco, menthol, and mint flavors.

 

At the same time, the use of any type of sweeteners is strictly prohibited. The agency stated in 2021 that an estimated 80-85% of existing products will need to be reformulated to meet the new requirements. Additionally, the regulation will specify "sensory attribute standards to prevent sensations other than those typical of tobacco or mint/menthol from being perceived." In other words, manufacturers will not be able to add caramel to tobacco flavors, or fruit flavors to mint flavors.

 

Five provinces in Canada have already banned flavored e-cigarettes. Quebec has been enforcing the ban since last October, while New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, the Northwest Territories, and Prince Edward Island have implemented similar regulations. Nunavut has also passed the ban, but has not yet set a specific implementation date. However, despite these flavor bans being in place, over 70% of Canadians can still purchase flavored e-cigarettes.

 

Canadian Health Minister Mark Holland is vigorously pushing to lift the long-standing ban, with support from the Heart and Stroke Foundation, the Canadian Cancer Society, the Canadian Lung Association, and some smaller anti-tobacco non-governmental organizations.

 

During a recent press conference, Holland stated: "I have previously collaborated with the Heart and Stroke Foundation to address the issue of e-cigarettes. At that time, when the information was uncertain, they advised that e-cigarettes be seen as a smoking cessation tool rather than taking action. Unfortunately, this led to the tobacco industry attracting a group of young people who had never been exposed to nicotine to something that threatens their health. This has had extremely adverse consequences for our healthcare system." Canadian e-cigarette consumers have expressed that the ban will have a destructive impact on the legal consumption of e-cigarettes and will cause irreversible harm to the independent e-cigarette industry. Canada has around 1.8 million e-cigarette users, with the majority preferring flavors that are not permitted by the health department. The proposed regulations will force many people to return to smoking and create a vibrant disposable e-cigarette "black market.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Over 160 organizations urge Formula 1 to end all tobacco sponsorships, including nicotine pouches
Over 160 organizations urge Formula 1 to end all tobacco sponsorships, including nicotine pouches
On March 4, 2026, more than 160 public interest organizations worldwide sent a letter to Formula 1 urging it to expand its 2006 prohibition on cigarette sponsorships to include nicotine pouches and other tobacco products. The letter states that Philip Morris International sponsors Ferrari to promote ZYN pouches, while British American Tobacco sponsors McLaren with its Velo brand, with logos displayed on cars and drivers’ race suits and promoted on social media.
Mar.06 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Swedish Politicians Ask European Commission to Clarify Legality of France’s Nicotine Pouch Ban
Swedish Politicians Ask European Commission to Clarify Legality of France’s Nicotine Pouch Ban
France’s ban on oral nicotine pouches has triggered an immediate response in Sweden. Swedish Minister for Foreign Trade Benjamin Dousa said Sweden had mobilized strongly against the ban and argued that it constitutes a clear obstacle to the free movement of goods within the EU single market. Swedish officials say the measure affects a strategically important domestic industry and conflicts with Sweden’s harm-reduction approach to public health.
Apr.14 by 2FIRSTS.ai
South Dakota Legislature Approves Two Nicotine Licensing Bills Pending Governor’s Decision
South Dakota Legislature Approves Two Nicotine Licensing Bills Pending Governor’s Decision
The South Dakota Legislature gave final approval on Tuesday to two proposals requiring state licenses for businesses that sell nicotine products. Under the bills, wholesalers, distributors and retailers of nicotine products in the state would need to be licensed by the government.
Mar.12 by 2FIRSTS.ai
West Virginia Bill Would Direct USD 2.9 Million of Juul Settlement to Youth Tobacco and Vaping Prevention
West Virginia Bill Would Direct USD 2.9 Million of Juul Settlement to Youth Tobacco and Vaping Prevention
A bill completed during West Virginia’s 2026 regular legislative session would make a one-time allocation of USD 2.9 million from the state’s USD 7.9 million settlement with Juul to youth tobacco prevention and cessation programs.
Mar.19 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Patent Reveals China Tobacco Hubei Industrial Testing Animal Model for Heated Tobacco Safety Evaluation
Patent Reveals China Tobacco Hubei Industrial Testing Animal Model for Heated Tobacco Safety Evaluation
China Tobacco Hubei Industrial Co., Ltd. has published a patent describing a laboratory method to evaluate the reproductive and developmental safety of heated tobacco products using non-human animal exposure models. The approach introduces a structured toxicological testing framework that could support safety verification, quality control, and regulatory evidence generation for heated tobacco products.
Mar.09
Special Report | Breeze and Glas Seek White House Review as FDA Advances Flavored ENDS Guidance
Special Report | Breeze and Glas Seek White House Review as FDA Advances Flavored ENDS Guidance
Breeze Smoke and Glas, Inc. have separately requested White House review under Executive Order 12866 as the FDA advances draft guidance on flavored ENDS (RIN 0910-ZC78). The guidance aims to clarify evidentiary standards under the statutory “appropriate for the protection of public health” (APPH) framework. The parallel filings highlight industry concern over regulatory predictability, particularly as Glas’s PMTA review status has recently drawn market attention.
Special Report
Mar.03