Concerns raised by Malaysian e-cigarette consumers towards upcoming smoking law

Sep.20.2024
Concerns raised by Malaysian e-cigarette consumers towards upcoming smoking law
Malaysian e-cigarette consumers express concerns over upcoming smoking law, with majority opposing retail display ban, survey finds.

According to a report by Focus Malaysia on September 19, a group of e-cigarette consumers in Malaysia have expressed concerns about some key provisions of the upcoming Public Health (Control of Smoking) Act 2024 (Act 852). Recently, the Malaysian Vape Association (MVA) conducted a survey to gather opinions on the legislation, receiving almost 500 responses.


The results of the investigation indicate that...


71.3% of respondents are against the ban on retail display. Among them, the inability to browse products before purchasing (39.7%) and difficulties during the purchasing process (38.3%) are the main reasons for dissatisfaction; if the ban on retail display takes effect, consumers may seek illegal alternatives (47.4%) or return to smoking (44.5%). Only 8.1% of respondents said they would completely quit using e-cigarettes under restrictions; the majority of e-cigarette users are former smokers or those transitioning from traditional cigarettes to e-cigarettes (74.4%), and 81.9% of users use e-liquid containing nicotine, with 96.5% using e-liquids with nicotine levels below 40 milligrams.


The President of the Malaysian Vape Association, Khairil Azizi Khairuddin, stated that the investigation results indicate that the ban on retail display is not a solution. Restricting consumers' ability to browse and choose legal products will only push them towards a black market with questionable quality and safety.


Kairil also stated that regulatory agencies should consider the impact of such restrictions on consumer behavior. E-cigarette users should have the right to make informed choices, and implementing a retail display ban would strip away this right.


Kairil calls on the Ministry of Health to reconsider the implementation of the ban on retail displays.


The Bill No. 852 should prioritize measures to encourage smokers to switch to e-cigarettes, rather than imposing strict requirements on e-cigarettes and treating them no differently than tobacco regulations. Otherwise, smokers will continue to smoke, or e-cigarette users will turn to the black market, weakening the potential impact of e-cigarettes in reducing smoking rates in Malaysia.


We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Chinese Disposable Brands OXBAR, LYCO Challenge Vuse and JUUL: Pennsylvania’s Pending List Offers a Glimpse of the Future Legal Vape Market
Chinese Disposable Brands OXBAR, LYCO Challenge Vuse and JUUL: Pennsylvania’s Pending List Offers a Glimpse of the Future Legal Vape Market
Pennsylvania’s June 26 ENDS Pending Certifications list previews the state’s future legal vape market, placing Vuse, JUUL and Logic alongside Chinese-linked disposable brands OXBAR and LYCO. Shaped by PMTA eligibility and state rules, the list shows competition shifting from market share to market access.
Special Report
Jul.06
Putin Signs Russia’s Tobacco and Nicotine Product Licensing Law, Banning Unlicensed Sales From 2027
Putin Signs Russia’s Tobacco and Nicotine Product Licensing Law, Banning Unlicensed Sales From 2027
Russian President Vladimir Putin has signed a law introducing mandatory licensing for wholesale and retail trade in tobacco and nicotine-containing products, with the system taking effect on October 1, 2026, and unlicensed operations banned from March 1, 2027, while vape and e-liquid retail may also face uncertainty from temporary regional sales-ban powers.
Jul.01
Former ATF Official’s Claims on Chinese Vape Companies and 6-Methyl Nicotine Fuel US Regulatory Debate
Former ATF Official’s Claims on Chinese Vape Companies and 6-Methyl Nicotine Fuel US Regulatory Debate
Former ATF Deputy Director Edgar Domenech has warned that some Chinese vape companies may be using 6-methyl nicotine, a nicotine analogue, raising new questions over how US regulators should classify emerging nicotine compounds.
Jul.13
UK Local Council Proposes £5 Refundable Deposit on Vape Devices
UK Local Council Proposes £5 Refundable Deposit on Vape Devices
Norwich City Council is set to debate a proposed vape deposit scheme that would require consumers to pay an extra refundable £5 per device at purchase, with the money returned when the device is handed back, as recent recycling-facility fires, including a major Widnes blaze reportedly very likely caused by a vape, draw greater attention to the risks of improperly discarded lithium-battery devices.
Jul.01
FDA Proposes Foreign Tobacco Factory Registration Rule to Tighten Import Oversight
FDA Proposes Foreign Tobacco Factory Registration Rule to Tighten Import Oversight
The FDA has proposed a rule requiring foreign tobacco manufacturers to register facilities and list products before exporting to the U.S. If finalized, the rule could affect overseas OEM/ODM factories, contract manufacturers, specification developers, bulk product makers, and repackaging or relabeling firms. FDA says the proposal would help identify unauthorized imported tobacco products, including e-cigarettes.
Special Report
Jun.26
BP, Marathon and Valero Warn U.S. Gas-Station Stores: Illegal Vape Sales Could Bring Heavy Fines and Card-Processing Limits
BP, Marathon and Valero Warn U.S. Gas-Station Stores: Illegal Vape Sales Could Bring Heavy Fines and Card-Processing Limits
Fiserv and service station operators including BP, Marathon Petroleum and Valero have warned U.S. partners and gas-station convenience-store owners that selling illegal vapes could lead to heavy fines, breach brand agreements and even put stores’ card-processing access at risk, according to Reuters.
Regulations
Jul.07 by 2Firsts Perspectives