Controversy Surrounding Indonesia's Tobacco and E-Cigarette Regulation Draft

Sep.19.2024
Controversy Surrounding Indonesia's Tobacco and E-Cigarette Regulation Draft
Indonesia's Health Ministry is asked to suspend discussions on tobacco and e-cigarette safety regulations, sparking industry concerns.

According to a report from Metrotv News on September 18, the Indonesian Ministry of Health has been asked to suspend discussions on the draft of the 2024 Tobacco and E-cigarette Product Safety Regulation (RPMK). The regulation has been criticized for restricting the market space for tobacco and e-cigarette products, and potentially harming Indonesia's tobacco farming and tobacco industry chain.


According to reports, this suggestion was put forward during a national dialogue event held at the Ashley Hotel in Jakarta on September 17 by pesantren and the Community Development Center (P3M).


The event was attended by a total of 50 representatives from government agencies, farmers' associations, trade unions, retailers associations, businesses, tobacco industry associations, civil society alliances, academia, religious leaders, and media. P3M Director Sarmidi Husna expressed concerns about the RPMK 2024 draft primarily due to its proposed plain packaging regulations, which are seen as restrictive to the tobacco industry. Husna noted that there was insufficient public participation in the drafting process, making it unrepresentative.


Husna further explained that some provisions in the draft may cause harm to tobacco farmers, small and medium-sized enterprises, various associations, and the tobacco industry, triggering strong opposition from various parties.


Benguet Saragih, from the Disease Control Working Group at the Ministry of Health, clarified that RPMK 2024 is not aimed at getting people to quit smoking, but rather is intended to prevent children from smoking.


In response, the Chairman of the National Association of Islamic Scholars (PBNU), Miftah Faqih, emphasized that the process of formulating any laws must include a balanced participation from all parties and focus on the common good, otherwise these laws will be ineffective and unfair. The representative of the Ministry of Industry, Nugraha Prasetya Yogi, also stated that the Ministry of Industry was not included in the previous law-making process, which is very detrimental to trade and industry.


Union representative Sudarto pointed out that since the enactment of the 2003 Health Law and Government Regulation No. 28 of 2004, tobacco regulations have gradually been implemented, significantly impacting the tobacco leaf and tobacco products industry. Sudarto emphasized that industrial policies and tax policies have also been used to suppress legal tobacco consumption, leading to the frequent appearance of illegal tobacco products.


Gunawan from the Indonesian Commission for Social Justice and Human Rights (IHCS) is calling for the coordination of existing regulations and laws to protect the interests of tobacco farmers. Indonesian parliament member Muhammad Misbakhun mentioned that the influence of international giants has caused local economies and tobacco farmers to go bankrupt, and therefore calls for the government to be a facilitator in finding a solution to the problem.


Representatives from the Indonesian Tobacco Association, Budiman, believe that restricting the sale of tobacco products will have negative effects on production, employment, and raw material sourcing. Additionally, Kusnasi Mudi, the Secretary General of the National Tobacco Growers Association (APTI), also stated that the government needs to reexamine this regulation and communicate with the entire industry chain to prevent significant impact on the future development of the industry.


We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

JUUL2 Sued Within a Week of FDA Authorization as AJ Marketing Alleges Infringement of Programmable Vape Patent
JUUL2 Sued Within a Week of FDA Authorization as AJ Marketing Alleges Infringement of Programmable Vape Patent
Less than a week after JUUL2 received U.S. FDA marketing authorization on August 28, 2026, JUUL Labs was sued for patent infringement in federal court in Delaware. AJ Marketing LLC filed the complaint on September 3, alleging that both JUUL 1 and JUUL2 infringe U.S. Patent No. 8,851,068 B2. The patent covers aspects of programmable electronic vaporization devices, including controls over dose delivery, usage frequency and operating parameters. The plaintiff is seeking reasonable royalties and ongoing royalties tied to the remaining life of the patent. JUUL has not yet publicly responded to the case.
Sep.10
Zhang Xiaotang Appointed Deputy Director of China’s Tobacco Regulator, Adding Another Finance-Background Official to Top Leadership
Zhang Xiaotang Appointed Deputy Director of China’s Tobacco Regulator, Adding Another Finance-Background Official to Top Leadership
China’s State Council has appointed Zhang Xiaotang as deputy director of the State Tobacco Monopoly Administration, with the regulator’s official website now listing him as a Party leadership group member and deputy director. Zhang previously led Hebei China Tobacco and earlier headed the STMA’s finance and audit department. His appointment follows the elevation earlier this year of former tax official Yao Laiying to head the STMA, adding another senior official with a strong fiscal or financial-management background to China Tobacco’s top leadership in 2026.
News
Sep.20
JTI Invests ₱2.1 Billion to Upgrade Batangas Manufacturing Hub, Adds First Southeast Asia DIET Facility
JTI Invests ₱2.1 Billion to Upgrade Batangas Manufacturing Hub, Adds First Southeast Asia DIET Facility
JTI Asia Manufacturing Corp. has invested ₱2.1 billion, or about $37 million, in its manufacturing site in Malvar, Batangas, Philippines, to expand tobacco-processing capabilities. About ₱1.9 billion is allocated to JTI's first Dry Ice Expanded Tobacco, or DIET, facility in Southeast Asia, while more than ₱177 million has been spent on expanding its Controlled Atmosphere treatment facility. The Batangas plant supplies the Philippine market and exports to 22 overseas markets, making it one of JTI's key manufacturing hubs in Asia.
Sep.24
China Tobacco Hubei explores staged nicotine pouch delivery, using dynamic membranes to slow early release and gradient particles to sustain later delivery
China Tobacco Hubei explores staged nicotine pouch delivery, using dynamic membranes to slow early release and gradient particles to sustain later delivery
China Tobacco Hubei Industrial Co., Ltd. disclosed several oral nicotine-related patent applications in August 2026, including two that approach staged nicotine release from different directions. One uses a high-viscosity membrane that forms inside the pouch after contact with saliva to slow rapid early release, while the other uses gradient particles with a faster-disintegrating outer layer and a slower core to create a fast-to-sustained release profile. Together, the filings explore how nicotine pouches could balance initial delivery with release later in use.
Sep.03
Inside Nicotine-Pouch M&A Through Imperial's Yoik Deal: Latham, KPMG, PwC, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley Form the Adviser Lineup
Inside Nicotine-Pouch M&A Through Imperial's Yoik Deal: Latham, KPMG, PwC, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley Form the Adviser Lineup
Imperial Brands' acquisition of Swedish Helwit owner Yoik Group AB has highlighted the professional-services firms supporting cross-border oral nicotine M&A. Latham & Watkins and KPMG advised Imperial, while PwC and TM & Partners advised Yoik. KPMG also appeared on Imperial's acquisition of Black Buffalo earlier in 2026, while PwC played an extensive role in KT&G's acquisition of Swedish nicotine-pouch company Another Snus Factory. Imperial's public disclosures put the global modern oral nicotine delivery market at approximately £8.8 billion in retail sales and 23.5 billion pouches in 2024
Sep.20
Swedish Match Faces Broader Labeling Order After ZYN Inspection, Documents Obtained by 2Firsts Show
Swedish Match Faces Broader Labeling Order After ZYN Inspection, Documents Obtained by 2Firsts Show
Documents obtained by 2Firsts show that Sweden's Public Health Agency ordered Swedish Match to revise ingredient labels beyond the five ZYN products inspected. The dispute centers on whether flavoring ingredients must be individually disclosed, with Swedish Match citing trade-secret protection and the regulator insisting on full ingredient disclosure. The company faces a conditional penalty of SEK 2 million per month for noncompliance. As of October 22, the agency had received no appeal, despite the company's stated intention to challenge the decision.
Oct.22