Controversy Surrounding Indonesia's Tobacco and E-Cigarette Regulation Draft

Sep.19.2024
Controversy Surrounding Indonesia's Tobacco and E-Cigarette Regulation Draft
Indonesia's Health Ministry is asked to suspend discussions on tobacco and e-cigarette safety regulations, sparking industry concerns.

According to a report from Metrotv News on September 18, the Indonesian Ministry of Health has been asked to suspend discussions on the draft of the 2024 Tobacco and E-cigarette Product Safety Regulation (RPMK). The regulation has been criticized for restricting the market space for tobacco and e-cigarette products, and potentially harming Indonesia's tobacco farming and tobacco industry chain.


According to reports, this suggestion was put forward during a national dialogue event held at the Ashley Hotel in Jakarta on September 17 by pesantren and the Community Development Center (P3M).


The event was attended by a total of 50 representatives from government agencies, farmers' associations, trade unions, retailers associations, businesses, tobacco industry associations, civil society alliances, academia, religious leaders, and media. P3M Director Sarmidi Husna expressed concerns about the RPMK 2024 draft primarily due to its proposed plain packaging regulations, which are seen as restrictive to the tobacco industry. Husna noted that there was insufficient public participation in the drafting process, making it unrepresentative.


Husna further explained that some provisions in the draft may cause harm to tobacco farmers, small and medium-sized enterprises, various associations, and the tobacco industry, triggering strong opposition from various parties.


Benguet Saragih, from the Disease Control Working Group at the Ministry of Health, clarified that RPMK 2024 is not aimed at getting people to quit smoking, but rather is intended to prevent children from smoking.


In response, the Chairman of the National Association of Islamic Scholars (PBNU), Miftah Faqih, emphasized that the process of formulating any laws must include a balanced participation from all parties and focus on the common good, otherwise these laws will be ineffective and unfair. The representative of the Ministry of Industry, Nugraha Prasetya Yogi, also stated that the Ministry of Industry was not included in the previous law-making process, which is very detrimental to trade and industry.


Union representative Sudarto pointed out that since the enactment of the 2003 Health Law and Government Regulation No. 28 of 2004, tobacco regulations have gradually been implemented, significantly impacting the tobacco leaf and tobacco products industry. Sudarto emphasized that industrial policies and tax policies have also been used to suppress legal tobacco consumption, leading to the frequent appearance of illegal tobacco products.


Gunawan from the Indonesian Commission for Social Justice and Human Rights (IHCS) is calling for the coordination of existing regulations and laws to protect the interests of tobacco farmers. Indonesian parliament member Muhammad Misbakhun mentioned that the influence of international giants has caused local economies and tobacco farmers to go bankrupt, and therefore calls for the government to be a facilitator in finding a solution to the problem.


Representatives from the Indonesian Tobacco Association, Budiman, believe that restricting the sale of tobacco products will have negative effects on production, employment, and raw material sourcing. Additionally, Kusnasi Mudi, the Secretary General of the National Tobacco Growers Association (APTI), also stated that the government needs to reexamine this regulation and communicate with the entire industry chain to prevent significant impact on the future development of the industry.


We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

JAMA Study: U.S. Vape Directories Fail to Sustainably Curb Unlisted Sales as Product Shifts May Redistribute Brand Share 2Firsts Recommended
JAMA Study: U.S. Vape Directories Fail to Sustainably Curb Unlisted Sales as Product Shifts May Redistribute Brand Share 2Firsts Recommended
A study by CDC Foundation researchers found no sustained decline in e-cigarette sales across Alabama, Oklahoma and Louisiana, the first three U.S. states to implement e-cigarette directory laws. Louisiana initially saw a significant sales decline, followed by a rebound and a persistent reduction in product availability. Sales also shifted from nontobacco-flavored disposables toward prefilled cartridges, with Vuse Alto driving much of the increase in menthol cartridges. By April 2025, unlisted products still accounted for more than half of e-cigarette nicotine sales in all three states.
Sep.18
JTI Proposes 25-Cent Irish Cigarette Tax Increase, Says It Could Raise €45 Million
JTI Proposes 25-Cent Irish Cigarette Tax Increase, Says It Could Raise €45 Million
Japan Tobacco International's Irish business has proposed a €0.25 tax increase on a pack of 20 cigarettes in its pre-Budget 2027 submission, below the €0.50-or-more increases typically imposed in recent Irish budgets. JTI says the proposal could generate around €45 million in additional Exchequer revenue while limiting further movement toward illicit and non-Irish-tax-paid tobacco. Revenue's existing estimate for a comparable €0.25 increase, including pro-rata rises on other tobacco products, is about €18 million for a full year.
JTI
Sep.18 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Australia Extends Illicit Tobacco Crackdown From Tougher Penalties to Customs and Logistics Supply Chains
Australia Extends Illicit Tobacco Crackdown From Tougher Penalties to Customs and Logistics Supply Chains
Australia's federal government introduced a new illicit tobacco enforcement bill on September 10 that would strengthen evidentiary presumptions, representative sampling, seizure and forfeiture procedures, proceeds-of-crime powers and obligations for customs and logistics operators. The proposal follows the Combatting Illicit Tobacco Act 2026, which took effect in August and increased penalties while expanding investigative and asset-recovery tools. Together, the reforms extend Australia's crackdown from tougher criminal sanctions into import, logistics and evidentiary enforcement.
Sep.14
JUUL2 Sued Within a Week of FDA Authorization as AJ Marketing Alleges Infringement of Programmable Vape Patent
JUUL2 Sued Within a Week of FDA Authorization as AJ Marketing Alleges Infringement of Programmable Vape Patent
Less than a week after JUUL2 received U.S. FDA marketing authorization on August 28, 2026, JUUL Labs was sued for patent infringement in federal court in Delaware. AJ Marketing LLC filed the complaint on September 3, alleging that both JUUL 1 and JUUL2 infringe U.S. Patent No. 8,851,068 B2. The patent covers aspects of programmable electronic vaporization devices, including controls over dose delivery, usage frequency and operating parameters. The plaintiff is seeking reasonable royalties and ongoing royalties tied to the remaining life of the patent. JUUL has not yet publicly responded to the case.
Sep.10
Arizona Turns to a 50% Retail Vape Tax as Tobacco Tax Revenue Falls 47% From 2008
Arizona Turns to a 50% Retail Vape Tax as Tobacco Tax Revenue Falls 47% From 2008
Arizona's First Things First is pushing for an excise tax equal to 50% of the retail price of vaping products, estimating that the measure could generate about $100 million annually. The agency says its tobacco-tax revenue has fallen 47% from 2008 levels. Arizona has attempted to broaden its nicotine tax base in each of the past two years: a 2025 bill proposed a 50% wholesale-price tax, while a 2026 measure shifted to a 50% retail-price tax covering alternative nicotine products and vapor products. Separately, the state enacted HB 4001 this year to establish a new licensing and sales framework for alternative nicotine products.
Sep.21
Australia Brings in Deloitte to Support Illicit Tobacco and Vape Enforcement Across Data, Processes and Project Delivery
Australia Brings in Deloitte to Support Illicit Tobacco and Vape Enforcement Across Data, Processes and Project Delivery
Australia’s Department of Home Affairs has hired Deloitte to provide data analytics, business-process, communications and project-delivery support to the Office of the Illicit Tobacco and E-Cigarette Commissioner. The government says Deloitte personnel do not provide policy advice to the Commissioner or the Australian government, with policy development and decision-making remaining with public officials. The arrangement has nevertheless drawn scrutiny because Deloitte has previously provided professional services to several tobacco and vaping companies.
Sep.03