According to the Post Courier's report on May 20th, David Towe, the Commissioner of Papua New Guinea Customs, clarified over the weekend that the cigarette manufacturing company that was searched and closed in Lae last week had actually been complying with all customs requirements and had already obtained operational permits.
In a post he shared on a business networking platform, he stated that compliance managers from customs are part of a team of government agencies that inspect businesses. They informed the government team that the company had a license to manufacture cigarettes, but their advice was ignored.
In his post, he stated: "I would like to inform everyone that this facility is a tobacco manufacturing factory licensed by the Papua New Guinea Customs Service with permission from the Parliament. New Britain Tobacco Limited obtained a manufacturing license under the Consumption Tax Act 1965 in March 2024, and they have met all the regulations and conditions set by customs. Our compliance officer was on site during the search and confirmed that the facility is licensed."
After weeks of continuous monitoring, a joint team conducted an on-site inspection of the factory in Lahore on May 7. It was found that the factory did not meet certain local and central government regulations, leading to the suspension of its operations.
Papua New Guinea Islands Police District Commander, Perou N. Dranu, also stated yesterday that health, labor, provincial construction committee, and other regulations have not yet been met by any factory, therefore customs approval does not grant it the authority to manufacture tobacco.
He said, "The final decision lies with the local government health and sanitation office in Label. Although the factory has been in operation since March, the review committee has not yet sat down to review all the licenses mentioned above."
James Barasulu, the Regional Operations Manager and Assistant Commissioner of the Papua New Guinea Customs Authority, informed the Director General of Customs in a brief report that a newspaper article published last week was misleading.
Notice
1. This article is provided exclusively for professional research purposes related to industry, technology and policy. Any reference to brands or products is made solely for the purpose of objective description and does not constitute an endorsement, recommendation, or promotion of any brand or product.
2. The use of nicotine products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and heated tobacco products, is associated with significant health risks. Users are required to comply with all relevant laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.
3. This article is strictly restricted from being accessed or viewed by individuals under the legal age.
Copyright
This article is either an original work by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with the original source clearly indicated. The copyright and usage rights of this article belong to 2Firsts or the original source. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other unauthorized use of this article by any entity or individual is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally responsible. For copyright-related matters, please contact: info@2firsts.com
AI Assistance Disclaimer
This article may have utilized AI to enhance translation and editing efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, errors may occur. Readers are advised to refer to the sources provided for more accurate information.
This article should not be used as a basis for any investment decisions or advice, and 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any errors in the content.
