DTI Tightens Monitoring on Vape Shops in Manila

Jun.08.2023
DTI Tightens Monitoring on Vape Shops in Manila
DTI tightens monitoring of e-cigarette shops in Manila to ensure compliance with vape regulation laws.

On June 8th, according to the Philippine News Agency, Fred Pascual, the Secretary of the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) of the Philippines, ordered the strengthening of monitoring of e-cigarette shops in the National Capital Region (NCR) to ensure compliance with sales restrictions outlined in the Vaporized Nicotine and Non-Nicotine Products Regulation Act. DTI has monitored a total of 29,167 shops, including 583 physical stores and 28,584 online stores.


Minister Pascal of the Department of Trade and Industry stated:


The Department of Trade and Industry, through its Fair Trade Enforcement Bureau (FTEB), will continue to enhance its monitoring of these businesses. The goal is to ensure a balance between the interests of the companies/manufacturers while protecting the youth from the harmful effects of these substances.


As of June 1st, DTI has monitored a total of 29,167 stores, including 583 physical stores and 28,584 online shops.


Out of the 583 physical stores monitored, 229 were found to be compliant while 214 were not. On the other hand, only 175 out of 28,584 online stores that underwent physical inspections were compliant, while 2,809 were found to be non-compliant. An additional 26,986 online stores are currently undergoing physical inspections.


Based on the monitoring results stated above, the Fair Trade Enforcement Bureau (FTEB) has issued violation notices/reasons for non-compliance to 72 businesses. The Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) also seized 13,784 products from non-compliant shops, with a retail value of approximately 4.25 million Philippine pesos (equivalent to around 540,000 yuan).


The vast majority of companies that have received notice letters for reasons of non-compliance are engaged in the following violations:


The fourth regulation pertains to the packaging requirements for products. The fifth regulation pertains to the sale of nicotine and non-nicotine products, as well as their equipment or new tobacco products. The sixth regulation pertains to restrictions on the dissemination, advertising, and sponsorship of products. The eighth regulation prohibits the use of vape products in public places. As of June 1st, the DTI's adjudication department has received 74 formal charges, with 73 against physical stores and 1 against an online store. The DTI is monitoring major social media and e-commerce platforms to ensure that minors cannot purchase these substances online.


The Philippines has recently intensified its crackdown on illegal e-cigarettes, targeting both brick-and-mortar stores and online retailers. This comes after the passage of the Vaporous Nicotine and Non-Nicotine Products Regulation Act in 2022, which aims to regulate the import, manufacturing, sale, packaging, distribution, use and dissemination of vaporized nicotine and non-nicotine products (including e-cigarettes) and new tobacco products.


The Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) has mandated stricter supervision of vaporizer shops in the metropolitan area of Manila.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

JUUL2 Sued Within a Week of FDA Authorization as AJ Marketing Alleges Infringement of Programmable Vape Patent
JUUL2 Sued Within a Week of FDA Authorization as AJ Marketing Alleges Infringement of Programmable Vape Patent
Less than a week after JUUL2 received U.S. FDA marketing authorization on August 28, 2026, JUUL Labs was sued for patent infringement in federal court in Delaware. AJ Marketing LLC filed the complaint on September 3, alleging that both JUUL 1 and JUUL2 infringe U.S. Patent No. 8,851,068 B2. The patent covers aspects of programmable electronic vaporization devices, including controls over dose delivery, usage frequency and operating parameters. The plaintiff is seeking reasonable royalties and ongoing royalties tied to the remaining life of the patent. JUUL has not yet publicly responded to the case.
Sep.10
Major U.S.  Vape Distributor Demand Vape Pays at Least $300,000 for White House Lobbying Amid Enforcement Pressure
Major U.S. Vape Distributor Demand Vape Pays at Least $300,000 for White House Lobbying Amid Enforcement Pressure
New York vape distributor Ecto World, which operates as Demand Vape, hired political consultant Roger Stone to lobby the Executive Office of the President on regulation of vaping and related products while facing state enforcement and multiple lawsuits. Public lobbying disclosures show that Ecto World paid at least $300,000 for the work through June 30, 2026. Separately, New York State announced in March that more than 28,500 pounds of vaping products tied to the company had been seized, while New York City and the state have pursued legal or enforcement actions. Public records do not show that the lobbying directly changed any specific regulatory or enforcement outcome.
Sep.08
Swedish Match Faces Broader Labeling Order After ZYN Inspection, Documents Obtained by 2Firsts Show
Swedish Match Faces Broader Labeling Order After ZYN Inspection, Documents Obtained by 2Firsts Show
Documents obtained by 2Firsts show that Sweden's Public Health Agency ordered Swedish Match to revise ingredient labels beyond the five ZYN products inspected. The dispute centers on whether flavoring ingredients must be individually disclosed, with Swedish Match citing trade-secret protection and the regulator insisting on full ingredient disclosure. The company faces a conditional penalty of SEK 2 million per month for noncompliance. As of October 22, the agency had received no appeal, despite the company's stated intention to challenge the decision.
Oct.22
India Duty-Free Nicotine Pouch Sales Face Regulatory Test as ZYN, FOX Classification Remains Open
India Duty-Free Nicotine Pouch Sales Face Regulatory Test as ZYN, FOX Classification Remains Open
The Bombay High Court has ruled that airport duty-free shops are not exempt from India's domestic regulatory laws merely because they operate beyond the customs barrier, leaving in place a sales halt covering ZYN and FOX nicotine pouches at Mumbai's international airport. The court, however, did not determine that the products necessarily qualify as "drugs" under India's Drugs and Cosmetics Act. The retailers have four weeks to submit product information to the appropriate authorities, including CDSCO, which must complete its review within 30 days of receiving the submissions.
Sep.24
Product | PMI Launches ZYN Melts in UK, Extending ZYN Beyond Nicotine Pouches Into Dissolvable Tablets
Product | PMI Launches ZYN Melts in UK, Extending ZYN Beyond Nicotine Pouches Into Dissolvable Tablets
Philip Morris International (PMI) has launched ZYN Melts in the UK, introducing a fully dissolvable oral nicotine tablet format alongside the brand's existing nicotine pouches. The range includes Cool Mint and Peppermint, each offered at 1mg and 2mg of nicotine per tablet, creating four SKUs. Each can contains 20 tablets and is priced at £6.50 in the UK. Unlike ZYN nicotine pouches, Melts are placed between the upper lip and gum and dissolve completely during use.
News
Sep.29 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Pennsylvania Vape Directory Law Survives Court Challenge From Nova Distro and Others Amid Similar Rulings Across States
Pennsylvania Vape Directory Law Survives Court Challenge From Nova Distro and Others Amid Similar Rulings Across States
A U.S. federal court upheld Pennsylvania's vape directory law on October 14, rejecting a challenge brought by Nova Distro, 101 Distributors and companies operating Tobacco Hut retail stores. Court records show that vaping accounts for about 60% of Tobacco Hut's profits and that the chain held approximately $2 million in inventory potentially subject to seizure under the law as of June 2. Pennsylvania began enforcement on October 19. The ruling follows similar appellate decisions in other states, even as new research shows that unlisted vaping products continue to account for substantial sales in states with established directories.
Regulations
Oct.22