DTI Tightens Monitoring on Vape Shops in Manila

Jun.08.2023
DTI Tightens Monitoring on Vape Shops in Manila
DTI tightens monitoring of e-cigarette shops in Manila to ensure compliance with vape regulation laws.

On June 8th, according to the Philippine News Agency, Fred Pascual, the Secretary of the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) of the Philippines, ordered the strengthening of monitoring of e-cigarette shops in the National Capital Region (NCR) to ensure compliance with sales restrictions outlined in the Vaporized Nicotine and Non-Nicotine Products Regulation Act. DTI has monitored a total of 29,167 shops, including 583 physical stores and 28,584 online stores.


Minister Pascal of the Department of Trade and Industry stated:


The Department of Trade and Industry, through its Fair Trade Enforcement Bureau (FTEB), will continue to enhance its monitoring of these businesses. The goal is to ensure a balance between the interests of the companies/manufacturers while protecting the youth from the harmful effects of these substances.


As of June 1st, DTI has monitored a total of 29,167 stores, including 583 physical stores and 28,584 online shops.


Out of the 583 physical stores monitored, 229 were found to be compliant while 214 were not. On the other hand, only 175 out of 28,584 online stores that underwent physical inspections were compliant, while 2,809 were found to be non-compliant. An additional 26,986 online stores are currently undergoing physical inspections.


Based on the monitoring results stated above, the Fair Trade Enforcement Bureau (FTEB) has issued violation notices/reasons for non-compliance to 72 businesses. The Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) also seized 13,784 products from non-compliant shops, with a retail value of approximately 4.25 million Philippine pesos (equivalent to around 540,000 yuan).


The vast majority of companies that have received notice letters for reasons of non-compliance are engaged in the following violations:


The fourth regulation pertains to the packaging requirements for products. The fifth regulation pertains to the sale of nicotine and non-nicotine products, as well as their equipment or new tobacco products. The sixth regulation pertains to restrictions on the dissemination, advertising, and sponsorship of products. The eighth regulation prohibits the use of vape products in public places. As of June 1st, the DTI's adjudication department has received 74 formal charges, with 73 against physical stores and 1 against an online store. The DTI is monitoring major social media and e-commerce platforms to ensure that minors cannot purchase these substances online.


The Philippines has recently intensified its crackdown on illegal e-cigarettes, targeting both brick-and-mortar stores and online retailers. This comes after the passage of the Vaporous Nicotine and Non-Nicotine Products Regulation Act in 2022, which aims to regulate the import, manufacturing, sale, packaging, distribution, use and dissemination of vaporized nicotine and non-nicotine products (including e-cigarettes) and new tobacco products.


The Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) has mandated stricter supervision of vaporizer shops in the metropolitan area of Manila.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

As JUUL2 Wins FDA Authorization, Harm Reduction Journal Highlights the Role of Real-World Evidence in Nicotine Product Regulation
As JUUL2 Wins FDA Authorization, Harm Reduction Journal Highlights the Role of Real-World Evidence in Nicotine Product Regulation
A commentary published in the international open-access, peer-reviewed Harm Reduction Journal argues that randomized controlled trials remain central to evaluating smoking cessation efficacy but cannot alone capture real-world uptake, complete switching, longer-term use and population impact of non-combustible nicotine products such as e-cigarettes, heated tobacco and nicotine pouches. The authors frame impact as “reach × efficacy” and call for real-world evidence to complement RCTs. Three days after publication, the FDA authorized three JUUL2 products and highlighted complete switching among adult smokers in explaining its decision, providing a timely regulatory backdrop to the debate.
Sep.08
Malaysia Liquid Nicotine Returns to Poisons List, Leaving Vape Retail and RM354 Million Tax Collection in Legal Uncertainty
Malaysia Liquid Nicotine Returns to Poisons List, Leaving Vape Retail and RM354 Million Tax Collection in Legal Uncertainty
Malaysia’s withdrawal of its appeal in a landmark liquid-nicotine case has left a High Court ruling that struck down the 2023 nicotine exemption in force, bringing liquid and gel nicotine used in vaping products back under the Poisons Act 1952. At the same time, the Control of Smoking Products for Public Health Act 2024 continues to provide a regulatory framework for vaping products, creating uncertainty over retail sales, taxation and existing inventory. MPs are calling for nicotine vape sales and excise collection to stop, including refunds of more than RM354 million collected since 2023, while industry and consumer groups are asking the government to clarify the current legal position.
Sep.04
U.S. Appeals Court Says BAT Must Face Class Action Over Cigarette Labels
U.S. Appeals Court Says BAT Must Face Class Action Over Cigarette Labels
A U.S. appeals court ruled that British American Tobacco (BAT) must continue facing a consumer class action lawsuit over cigarette labels. The ruling allows the case to proceed but does not determine that BAT violated the law or is liable for damages. The case highlights ongoing legal risks facing major tobacco companies related to product labeling, consumer disclosures and product liability claims.
Jul.31
Russian Strikes Destroy JTI and Imperial Brands Ukraine Warehouses, With Losses Reaching Tens of Millions of Hryvnias
Russian Strikes Destroy JTI and Imperial Brands Ukraine Warehouses, With Losses Reaching Tens of Millions of Hryvnias
According to Ukrainska Pravda, Russian strikes on the Kyiv region during the night of Aug. 4-5, 2026, damaged warehouses storing products of Japan Tobacco International (JTI) and Imperial Brands Ukraine. JTI said a finished goods warehouse in Kyiv Oblast was destroyed, with no employees injured, and that it did not expect disruptions to retail supplies. Imperial Brands Ukraine said products stored at warehouses of distributors and retail partners were affected and estimated losses from the strikes at “tens of millions of Ukrainian hryvnias” (roughly hundreds of thousands of U.S. dollars).
JTI
Aug.07
SMOORE’s DOJO by VAPORESSO to Launch New Global Brand Identity on September 1
SMOORE’s DOJO by VAPORESSO to Launch New Global Brand Identity on September 1
According to recent LinkedIn posts from people at VAPORESSO, SMOORE and a German distribution partner, vape brand DOJO will begin rolling out a new global brand identity on September 1, 2026, led by a redesigned handwritten logo. The new visual system will be gradually applied across product packaging, marketing materials and digital assets over the following months. Fabio Corsaro, Head of Marketing and Purchasing at MG Wesel GmbH, said the rebrand was related to trademark issues, but that explanation has not been publicly confirmed by DOJO, VAPORESSO or SMOORE. DOJO is currently promoting its Blast X product in Germany.
Aug.31
Yinghe-Controlled Vape Maker SKE Ordered to Post £569,039 Security as It Pursues Crystal Bar Design Infringement Case in UK
Yinghe-Controlled Vape Maker SKE Ordered to Post £569,039 Security as It Pursues Crystal Bar Design Infringement Case in UK
The UK High Court has ordered Chinese vape manufacturer Shenzhen SKE Technology to provide £569,039 ($776,000) in security for costs in its design infringement proceedings against Vapepen London and other defendants over its Crystal Bar vape product. The court did not accept the defendants’ main argument that recovering costs from a China-based company would face significant enforcement obstacles, but found that SKE had not sufficiently disclosed its own financial position. The order is procedural and does not determine the underlying infringement claims.
News
Aug.21