U.S. Vape Firms Urge Federal Court to Block North Carolina’s New Rules, Citing Unconstitutionality and Business Threats

Jul.16.2025
U.S. Vape Firms Urge Federal Court to Block North Carolina’s New Rules, Citing Unconstitutionality and Business Threats
Vape groups asked the U.S. Fourth Circuit to block a North Carolina law they say, pushed by Reynolds American, threatens quit-smoking products and violates federal authority under the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause.

Key points:

 

·The e-cigarette industry is urging the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals to block a sales ban on e-cigarettes in North Carolina. 

 

·The ban was pushed by Reynolds American Inc. and aims to combat e-cigarette products that help people quit smoking. 

 

·The industry argues that the law infringes on federal power and violates the supremacy clause of the U.S. Constitution. 

 

·The court had previously denied the industry's request for an injunction, but the industry is now appealing.


【2Firsts News Flash】According to a report by Law360 on July 14, e-cigarette stakeholders in the United States are urging the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals to temporarily block North Carolina officials from enforcing a law that could prevent the sale of multiple e-cigarette products in the state. They claim that the law, which they say is supported by tobacco giant Reynolds American Inc., targets products that help people quit smoking.

 

The American Vaping Association (VTA) and its co-plaintiffs argue that the law (Senate Bill 31 of 2024) gives state tax officials the authority to fine e-cigarette retailers, wholesalers, and manufacturers who do not have authorization from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). However, states cannot enforce FDA regulations because it infringes on federal power, violating the supremacy clause of the US Constitution, stakeholders in the e-cigarette industry claim in a filing submitted to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals.

 

The plaintiffs in the e-cigarette industry are asking the court to block the state law from taking effect so they can challenge it in federal court. They believe that their arguments may likely succeed on the merits and that their businesses will suffer if the law goes into effect, so they argue that an injunction is appropriate.

 

“The plaintiff sells mostly electronic nicotine delivery systems in their professional e-cigarette store that have not yet received FDA market authorization and therefore do not qualify for inclusion in the [North Carolina] directory. Without the sales revenue from these products, the appellant would face the risk of business closure, employee layoffs, and potential bankruptcy.”

 

Motion was made during the meeting.

 

The plaintiffs in the e-cigarette industry claim that this law gives the state tax department the power to fine retailers and manufacturers of e-cigarettes who sell products not authorized by the FDA. According to court records, retailers selling these unapproved products could face fines up to $5,000, as well as other penalties such as temporary suspension of their license, complete revocation of their license, and confiscation of products.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

FDA Unifies Tobacco Registration and Product Listing Form Across Product Categories
FDA Unifies Tobacco Registration and Product Listing Form Across Product Categories
The U.S. FDA has consolidated two tobacco establishment registration and product listing forms into a redesigned Form FDA 3741 covering all regulated product categories, including e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products and nicotine pouches. The current requirements remain limited to domestic establishments. Separately, the FDA has proposed extending registration and product listing requirements to foreign manufacturers, signaling greater regulatory attention to manufacturing entities and product-level information across the tobacco and nicotine supply chain.
FDA
Sep.30
China Tobacco Hubei explores staged nicotine pouch delivery, using dynamic membranes to slow early release and gradient particles to sustain later delivery
China Tobacco Hubei explores staged nicotine pouch delivery, using dynamic membranes to slow early release and gradient particles to sustain later delivery
China Tobacco Hubei Industrial Co., Ltd. disclosed several oral nicotine-related patent applications in August 2026, including two that approach staged nicotine release from different directions. One uses a high-viscosity membrane that forms inside the pouch after contact with saliva to slow rapid early release, while the other uses gradient particles with a faster-disintegrating outer layer and a slower core to create a fast-to-sustained release profile. Together, the filings explore how nicotine pouches could balance initial delivery with release later in use.
Sep.03
How Large Is France’s Off-Channel Tobacco Market? Logista Says It Has Become Structural, While the Official Estimate Is 17.7% and Some Industry Studies Put It Above 50%
How Large Is France’s Off-Channel Tobacco Market? Logista Says It Has Become Structural, While the Official Estimate Is 17.7% and Some Industry Studies Put It Above 50%
Logista France says tobacco consumption outside France’s official tobacconist network has become a large and structural market phenomenon, but official and industry estimates differ sharply. France’s TAFE study estimates that 17.7% of tobacco consumption escaped domestic taxation in 2023, with most of that volume attributed to cross-border purchasing rather than street sales. Some industry studies use broader off-channel definitions and put the figure above 50%. Meanwhile, French Customs seized 547.94 tonnes of tobacco in 2025, up 12%, showing continued pressure from illicit trade.
Sep.04
Pennsylvania Vape Directory Enforcement Starts Oct. 19, Barring Retail Sales of Unlisted Products
Pennsylvania Vape Directory Enforcement Starts Oct. 19, Barring Retail Sales of Unlisted Products
Pennsylvania's Act 57 vape directory regime will reach the end of its 120-day inventory transition period on Oct. 19. Nicotine-containing e-cigarettes intended for retail sale in the state that are not listed on the Attorney General's ENDS directory will then be barred from retail sale and treated as contraband subject to seizure, forfeiture and destruction. Manufacturers face annual product certification, brand- and style-based fees and a minimum $50,000 surety bond, while retailers and wholesalers must source through licensed channels and monitor the directory.
Regulations
Oct.08
Virginia Tobacco Retail Permit Takes Effect October 1, Covering Vapes as More Than 3,000 Businesses Apply in September
Virginia Tobacco Retail Permit Takes Effect October 1, Covering Vapes as More Than 3,000 Businesses Apply in September
Virginia's new retail tobacco permit system took effect October 1, requiring sellers of vapes, nicotine products and related devices and accessories to obtain a Retail Tobacco Permit for each business location. Virginia ABC said more than 3,000 businesses applied in September alone, creating a processing backlog. Qualifying applicants that filed before October 1 may temporarily operate under a Letter of Authorization. The new store-level permit also sits alongside Virginia's existing vape product directory, where sales of unlisted liquid nicotine or nicotine vapor products can trigger civil penalties starting at $5,000.
Regulations
Oct.03
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
According to VitalLaw on August 27, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated an FDA marketing denial order (MDO) against NicQuid LLC, ruling that the agency’s comparative-efficacy standard for electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) applications had become a substantive rule requiring notice-and-comment rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The court did not reject FDA’s authority to compare the public health benefits and risks of flavored vapes, but held that the agency could not establish a broadly binding standard through informal adjudications. The case was remanded to FDA for further proceedings.
Aug.28