E-cigarette Industry in Malaysia Urges Enforcement of Public Health Law

Feb.08.2025
E-cigarette Industry in Malaysia Urges Enforcement of Public Health Law
Malaysia urged to strengthen enforcement of Public Health Act 2024 for e-cigarettes instead of considering a total ban.

According to a recent report by The Sun, industry insiders in the e-cigarette sector have pointed out that the Malaysian Ministry of Health should focus on strengthening enforcement of the 2024 Public Health Smoking Act (Bill 852) rather than reconsidering the possibility of a complete ban.


Bill 852 regulates the sale, packaging, and use of tobacco products (including e-cigarettes). Ridhwan Rosli, Secretary General of the Malaysian Vape Chamber of Commerce (MVCC), stated that any sudden policy reversal would only exacerbate uncertainty. The e-cigarette industry has always supported responsible regulation and a comprehensive ban has been proven ineffective. Bans cannot eliminate demand, but only push products towards a harder-to-control black market.


Previously, reports indicated that the Ministry of Health is prepared to reconsider a complete ban on e-cigarettes if necessary. Health Minister Dzulkefly Ahmad stated that the priority is to regulate and control the use of e-cigarettes, including through mandatory product registration.


Ross highlighted that the Bill 852 is being implemented in phases, stressing that all stakeholders, including industry participants, should be given enough time to fully adapt to these regulations. Ross explicitly stated that e-cigarette products are intended only for adult smokers who wish to quit. Instead of ineffective bans, it is more important to ensure through education that e-cigarettes are seen as a harm reduction tool rather than a gateway for non-smokers.


We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

New York’s Lawsuit Against Puff Bar and Other Flavored Vape Companies Survives Key Court Challenge
New York’s Lawsuit Against Puff Bar and Other Flavored Vape Companies Survives Key Court Challenge
According to Law360, a federal judge ruled that makers and distributors of flavored vape brands such as Puff Bar cannot escape New York’s lawsuit seeking to hold them responsible for the youth vaping epidemic. The court found that the state had adequately alleged the companies misrepresented how safe vaping is.
Apr.07 by 2FIRSTS.ai
German Environment Minister Plans Bill to Ban Disposable E-Cigarettes This Year
German Environment Minister Plans Bill to Ban Disposable E-Cigarettes This Year
German Federal Environment Minister Carsten Schneider said he is preparing legislation to ban disposable e-cigarettes and will present a bill this year. Industry data estimated that legal e-cigarette sales in Germany rose by about one quarter in 2025 to €2.4 billion. Refillable devices are not expected to be affected by the ban.
May.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Russian Vape Industry Proposes State Monopoly on E-Liquid Production as Alternative to Ban
Russian Vape Industry Proposes State Monopoly on E-Liquid Production as Alternative to Ban
Russian business groups are trying to persuade the authorities to abandon plans to ban the sale of e-cigarettes and related liquids at both the federal and regional levels.
Apr.03 by 2FIRSTS.ai
BAT Uzbekistan and Regulators Discuss Production Modernization and Export Expansion
BAT Uzbekistan and Regulators Discuss Production Modernization and Export Expansion
A meeting was held at the Department for Combating Economic Crimes under the General Prosecutor’s Office of Uzbekistan with representatives of British American Tobacco Uzbekistan. Participants included the department’s leadership, the Inspectorate for Regulation of the Alcohol and Tobacco Market, and business representatives.
May.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai
AIR Shares Drop 18.6% in Nasdaq Debut, Testing Hookah’s Move Toward Public Markets
AIR Shares Drop 18.6% in Nasdaq Debut, Testing Hookah’s Move Toward Public Markets
AIR Global’s Nasdaq debut under ticker AIIR ended with a 18.6% first-day decline, giving the global hookah industry a rare public-market reference point. Beyond one company’s share move, the listing raises a broader question: can a culturally rooted, fragmented and venue-based category evolve into a more scalable and investable consumer sector?
Special Report
May.19
Malaysian Court Rules Liquid Nicotine Exemption Irrational, Renewing Vape Regulation Debate
Malaysian Court Rules Liquid Nicotine Exemption Irrational, Renewing Vape Regulation Debate
Malaysia’s High Court ruled that the government’s earlier decision to remove liquid nicotine from the country’s Poisons List was “irrational,” reigniting debate over vape regulation, illicit trade, and youth protection.
Regulations
May.18