Failing to Topple GEEKBAR: What Challenges Are Brands Facing in the US?

Market by 2FIRSTS, edited by Sophia Lv
Jul.18.2024
Failing to Topple GEEKBAR: What Challenges Are Brands Facing in the US?
China's e-cigarette exports to the US in May 2024 reached $336 million, up 34.9% YoY, signaling fierce competition.

According to the updated trade data from the General Administration of Customs of China, in May 2024, China's exports of e-cigarettes to the United States amounted to approximately $336 million, an increase of 2.4% compared to the previous month and a 34.9% increase compared to the same period last year. The export volume was approximately 7,649.48 tons, an increase of 2.57% month-on-month and a 44.61% increase year-on-year.

 

Failing to Topple GEEKBAR: What Challenges Are Brands Facing in the US?
Houston e-cigarette store shelves | Photo source: provided by the interviewee

 

The United States, as the world's largest e-cigarette market, has always been an important territory that major e-cigarette companies compete for, and is also one of the most fiercely competitive markets. Although some e-cigarette companies may currently face challenges entering the US market, the industry generally believes that the importance of the US market cannot be ignored, and it is a key area that must be valued and actively pursued in the long-term strategy.

 

Recently, 2FIRSTS gained insight into the current status of the American e-cigarette market by engaging with several industry professionals.

 

Distributors Hesitant to Accept "Old Stock" as Demand for New Products Continues to Rise

 

An e-cigarette industry professional in Texas provided an overview of the market in the state. Texas is considered one of the most competitive areas in the e-cigarette market in the United States, with Houston and Dallas being preferred entry points for new products entering the American market. This is because these two markets are more receptive to new products and have a fast turnover rate, allowing products to quickly gain market feedback. Additionally, once a product finds success in these areas, its influence will rapidly spread to surrounding regions.

 

Failing to Topple GEEKBAR: What Challenges Are Brands Facing in the US?
Houston e-cigarette store shelves | Image source: Provided by the interviewee

 

According to feedback from industry practitioners, in these two markets known for rapid iteration, many distributors are only willing to sell new products with strong gimmicks, and are no longer interested in older products with fewer features. For these products, they only want to accept brand replacements with new products, or to consign them.

 

Some industry practitioners also believe that some novel and unique products can attract the attention of distributors and achieve considerable sales in the early stages. It is this situation that has made the competition for new products in the American market increasingly fierce. The screens of new products are getting bigger; the number of atomizing cores is increasing, from "dual cores" to "four cores," and even "six cores"; the number of puffs is also constantly increasing, with some claiming to be able to use 2000 puffs in just 1 milliliter; in terms of smart functions, many innovations have been born, such as phone access and AI voice wake-up functions.

 

Failing to Topple GEEKBAR: What Challenges Are Brands Facing in the US?
Voice wake-up function e-cigarette released by iJOY | Image source: iJOY

 

Consignment Model Intensifies Competition, Small Businesses Lack Ability to Cope

 

Furthermore, for e-cigarette companies operating in the US market, the consignment model mentioned above is not unfamiliar. Consignment refers to the practice of some e-cigarette companies adopting fast-moving consumer goods sales strategies, directly supplying products to retail stores, promoting them locally, delivering goods before receiving payment, and paying a certain commission.

 

A U.S. market practitioner further explained the consignment model of e-cigarettes in the market: From the perspective of wholesalers, first-tier wholesalers need to pay the manufacturer in order to purchase goods. Typically, first-tier wholesalers will set a trial sales period of 30/60/90 days based on their partnership with second-tier wholesalers and agreements with the brand. During this period, if product sales are poor, second-tier wholesalers can return the goods and receive a settlement at the end of the term; on the other hand, if sales are strong, second-tier wholesalers will need to pay again to replenish inventory after selling out.

 

From the perspective of retail stores, brands will first try to provide a certain amount of goods to retail stores for trial sales. This method reduces the financial risk for the stores and helps the higher-level wholesalers expand their sales channels. For the brand, it helps to accelerate the product launch process. After the trial sales end, if the product is well-received in the market, the store will pay the wholesaler for the goods in order to order more products.

 

However, the consignment model may be manageable for large and medium-sized enterprises, but it has created significant cash flow pressure for many small and medium-sized e-cigarette companies. This has placed them in a tough dilemma of struggling to achieve profitability in the short term.

 

Geekbar Dominates with no Competition from Dealers

 

In the US market, some brands are striving to innovate with flashy gimmicks and trying methods like trade-ins and consignment to replace old products, but they have not achieved much success. At the same time, old products are facing serious inventory backlog issues. In stark contrast, GEEKBAR has shown a completely different picture, being at the opposite end of the spectrum.

 

Some market insiders in the United States estimate that GEEKBAR may have captured over 90% of the market share in the US. The three products released by GEEKBAR - PULSE, PULSE X, and SKYVIEW - are actively purchased by distributors as long as there is sufficient stock, with demand remaining strong and even leading to frequent shortages. At the same time, GEEKBAR's sales speed is extremely fast. Some stores are able to sell hundreds of GEEKBAR products on average every day. Some store owners have reported that 90% of their sales come from the GEEKBAR brand.

 

Failing to Topple GEEKBAR: What Challenges Are Brands Facing in the US?
GEEKBAR PULSE X | Image Source: GEEKBAR

 

Geekbar has undoubtedly become the largest e-cigarette brand in the United States after ELFBAR. Many industry insiders believe that its market monopoly even surpasses that of ELFBAR. Some industry insiders have pointed out that this monopoly situation is not what distributors had hoped for, but due to various factors, they are unable to fully promote every new product, so products must rely on their own competitiveness to establish a foothold in the market. This is also one of the main reasons driving various brands to aggressively innovate and strive for publicity in the American market.

 

Some industry insiders have expressed concerns about this. They believe that on one hand, the difficulty in dealing with old inventory has led to severe stockpiling. On the other hand, companies are constantly forced to innovate and release new products, leading to overcapacity and fierce competition, which could ultimately result in market backlash.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

North Carolina Tightens Vape Product Directory Enforcement, Expands State and Local Powers as Violators Face Fines, Product Seizures and License Suspension or Revocation
North Carolina Tightens Vape Product Directory Enforcement, Expands State and Local Powers as Violators Face Fines, Product Seizures and License Suspension or Revocation
North Carolina has expanded enforcement of its vapor product directory rules, authorizing more state and local law enforcement participation and establishing a task force led by the State Bureau of Investigation. The legislation requires at least one unannounced compliance inspection annually for retailers, distributors and wholesalers handling covered products. Penalties effective October 1, 2026, include civil fines of $500–$750 for a first violation and $1,000–$1,500 for repeated violations within 12 months, along with potential license suspension or revocation. Manufacturers may face penalties of $10,000 per unlisted product. The measures strengthen the product directory system established in 2024.
Regulations
Oct.28
F1 Faces Renewed Pressure Over Tobacco and Nicotine Sponsorships as 67 Groups Target ZYN and VELO Ahead of Madrid Race
F1 Faces Renewed Pressure Over Tobacco and Nicotine Sponsorships as 67 Groups Target ZYN and VELO Ahead of Madrid Race
Ahead of the Formula 1 race in Madrid, 67 Spanish and international public-health, medical and consumer organizations have sent an open letter to F1 President and CEO Stefano Domenicali calling for an end to sponsorships linked to the tobacco and nicotine industry, including nicotine pouches, vaping products and heated tobacco. The letter focuses on Philip Morris International’s ZYN partnership with Ferrari and British American Tobacco’s long-running partnership with McLaren and exposure for VELO. The campaign follows a March letter in which more than 160 organizations worldwide made a similar request to Formula 1.
Sep.10
Product | SnowPlus Launches Nicotine-Free DASH in South Korea, Localising an Established Disposable Platform
Product | SnowPlus Launches Nicotine-Free DASH in South Korea, Localising an Established Disposable Platform
SnowPlus has introduced a nicotine-free version of DASH in South Korea, adapting an existing overseas disposable platform for the local market. The Korean version retains the series’ flat duckbill-style mouthpiece, ceramic heating architecture and disposable form factor while reducing nicotine content to 0%. By comparison, the overseas DASH 4000 platform typically features 7.5ml of prefilled e-liquid, up to 4,000 puffs and a 530mAh rechargeable battery, with nicotine-containing variants available in some markets. The product update centers on formulation localisation rather than a new hardware generation.
Aug.31
Special Report | How Capital Is Reassessing the Global Tobacco and Modern Nicotine Industry: Lessons from a New York Forum
Special Report | How Capital Is Reassessing the Global Tobacco and Modern Nicotine Industry: Lessons from a New York Forum
Capital is reassessing the global tobacco and modern nicotine industry as heated tobacco, vaping and nicotine pouches reshape demand, profitability and regulation. At the 2026 New Approaches Summit in New York, investors and analysts examined whether smoke-free growth can sustain earnings, how regulation shapes startup value, and whether shareholder engagement can be more effective than divestment. The debate points to a broader shift: tobacco transition is increasingly becoming a capital-allocation, governance and valuation question.
Capital Markets
Oct.05
German Bundestag Passes Tobacco Tax Hikes: Vape Liquid Duty to Reach €0.44/ml, Heated Tobacco Taxes to Rise and Cigarettes Seen Near €12 a Pack
German Bundestag Passes Tobacco Tax Hikes: Vape Liquid Duty to Reach €0.44/ml, Heated Tobacco Taxes to Rise and Cigarettes Seen Near €12 a Pack
Germany's Bundestag passed amendments to the Tobacco Tax Act on October 15, 2026, setting out annual excise tax increases from 2027 through 2030 for e-cigarette liquids, heated tobacco, cigarettes and other tobacco products. Under the Finance Committee's amended bill, duty on qualifying e-liquids will rise from €0.32/ml in 2026 to €0.44/ml in 2030, an increase of 37.5%. Heated tobacco will retain its tax calculation based on 80% of the corresponding cigarette excise duty. The average price of a 20-cigarette pack is projected to approach €12 by 2030, with some brands potentially reaching €14. The legislation is projected to generate approximately €11.8 billion in additional tax revenue over four years and remains subject to further legislative procedures.
Regulations
Oct.19
Smoore Seeks to Toss CCELL Price-Fixing Claim as Court Weighs Vertical Distribution Versus Horizontal Conspiracy
Smoore Seeks to Toss CCELL Price-Fixing Claim as Court Weighs Vertical Distribution Versus Horizontal Conspiracy
Smoore and four authorized U.S. CCELL distributors are asking a California federal court to permanently dismiss a core antitrust claim brought by direct purchasers. Plaintiffs allege that Smoore coordinated minimum wholesale prices, customer allocation and limits on price competition among distributors, amounting to a per se unlawful horizontal conspiracy. The defendants say the alleged conduct reflects ordinary vertical relationships between a manufacturer and its distributors. The court previously dismissed a similar claim, and the latest dispute centers on whether the second amended complaint adds sufficient facts to establish a horizontal agreement.
Sep.14