FDA Criticized for Lack of Action on Nicotine Alternatives

Sep.22.2022
FDA Criticized for Lack of Action on Nicotine Alternatives
FDA criticized for failing to regulate safe nicotine substitutes, with delays in PMTA and Juul marketing refusal.

The FDA has faced scrutiny for various reasons related to its handling of safer alternatives to nicotine products. This is no secret. Last month, the agency was heavily criticized by Senators Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Susan Collins (R-Maine). In a letter referencing a report by STAT, the Senators stated that the FDA "seems to be failing again in protecting our nation's children" for not taking action on the ban of synthetic nicotine announced earlier this year.


Similarly, Matt Myers, the chairman of the Smoke-Free Kids movement, emphasized that the FDA should exercise its power to withdraw products from the market. "All unauthorized synthetic nicotine products are currently illegal and must be immediately removed from the market in accordance with the law, rather than on some unspecified date in the future.


Moreover, the organization has continuously faced condemnation for failing to comply with the deadline and timely completion of the PMTA process. To make matters worse, the FDA has been forced to temporarily suspend the newly released Juul Marketing Denial Order (MDO).


To ensure that the mistakes are being taken seriously, Commissioner Califf has announced an evaluation of the Center for Tobacco Products (CTP). In a press release, he stated that he has discussed the assessment with the leaders of the relevant centers and offices, who welcome the opportunity to work towards improvement. "Each field is filled with diligent and talented individuals who devote their careers to various scientific, policy, legal, and administrative activities. FDA employees should receive the best possible support so that they can fulfill their steadfast commitment to public health and the American public we serve," he added.


The review will be conducted by the non-profit organization, Reagan-Udall Foundation along with undisclosed experts. The aim is to assess the "processes and procedures, resources, and organizational structure" of the Food Plan and CTP.


I don't think this will bring about a huge change," said a former CTP employee quoted by Filter. "It's unclear at this point whether the Reagan-Udall Foundation is an anti-vaping collaborator or if it will become a true partner for millions of adult users of e-cigarette products trying to quit smoking.


The FDA has failed to fulfill its regulatory mandate without remorse, by not approving electronic cigarette products that could benefit public health. This is not a matter of the system being overwhelmed or underfunded - the agency collects nearly $1 billion in user fees annually.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information and is only intended for industry exchange and learning purposes.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the truthfulness and accuracy of the content. The translation of this article is only intended for industry-related research and communication.


Due to limitations in the level of translation, the compiled article may not fully match the original text. Please refer to the original text for accuracy.


2FIRSTS maintains complete alignment with the Chinese government on any issues pertaining to domestic affairs, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, and foreign relations.


The copyright of compiled information belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us for deletion.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Australia’s Tobacco Tax Debate Intensifies as One Nation’s Barnaby Joyce Warns of Illicit Market Growth
Australia’s Tobacco Tax Debate Intensifies as One Nation’s Barnaby Joyce Warns of Illicit Market Growth
Australian One Nation MP Barnaby Joyce has criticised continued tobacco excise increases, arguing that higher taxes are driving consumers toward illicit tobacco markets and benefiting organised crime groups.
Regulations
Jul.13 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Malaysia Nicotine Vape Market Faces Legal Uncertainty Over Tax and Poisons List Ruling
Malaysia Nicotine Vape Market Faces Legal Uncertainty Over Tax and Poisons List Ruling
Malaysia’s Finance Minister Anwar Ibrahim said duties and taxes on nicotine-containing vape products will be determined in line with the Court of Appeal’s ruling on whether liquid or gel nicotine can be exempted from the Poisons List under the Poisons Act 1952, a case that could affect the legal basis for vape taxation, retail sales and future ban policy.
Jun.29
BAT UK Director Tolga Kilic Says Illicit Nicotine Market Squeezes Legal Retailers Amid Rising Compliance Costs
BAT UK Director Tolga Kilic Says Illicit Nicotine Market Squeezes Legal Retailers Amid Rising Compliance Costs
UK retail publication Grocery Trader has published a viewpoint article from Tolga Kilic, Commercial Director for BAT UK & Ireland, discussing the impact of illicit nicotine products on legitimate retail channels. Kilic said illegal vapes and other illicit nicotine products create competitive pressure for compliant retailers and called for stronger market controls and supply-chain oversight. The comments come as the UK advances policies including the disposable vape ban and Vaping Products Duty, creating a more complex operating environment for legal vape retailers.
Jul.28
France Vape Market 2026: Use Reaches 7.9% Amid Tax, Regulatory and Scientific Debate
France Vape Market 2026: Use Reaches 7.9% Amid Tax, Regulatory and Scientific Debate
France remains one of Europe’s active vape markets in 2026, with adult vaping prevalence rising to 7.9%; at the same time, e-liquid taxation, public-space restrictions, advertising compliance and health-risk debate are pushing the industry into a critical policy period.
Jun.23
Reuters: India Seeks to Dismiss Adani Nicotine Pouch Challenge as Mumbai Airport Dispute Moves to Court
Reuters: India Seeks to Dismiss Adani Nicotine Pouch Challenge as Mumbai Airport Dispute Moves to Court
Reuters reported on July 13, 2026, that India is seeking to dismiss Adani Airports’ legal challenge over nicotine pouch sales at Mumbai International Airport’s duty-free shops. Adani denies wrongdoing and argues that existing drug and cosmetics regulations do not apply to duty-free sales or nicotine pouches.
Innovation
Jul.14 by 2Firsts Perspectives
UK Councils Seize More Than 1.3 Million Non-Compliant Vapes One Year After Disposable Ban
UK Councils Seize More Than 1.3 Million Non-Compliant Vapes One Year After Disposable Ban
One year after the UK disposable vape ban came into force, local authorities continue to seize illegal and non-compliant vaping products. FOI data compiled by nicotine retailer Northerner shows more than 1.3 million products were seized between June 2025 and May 2026, with Bolton recording the highest number of seizures and Swansea reporting the highest estimated value.
Jul.21