FDA Funding Bill Delays Proposed Tobacco Regulations on E-cigarettes

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Jun.18.2024
FDA Funding Bill Delays Proposed Tobacco Regulations on E-cigarettes
The US FDA funding bill with a language provision could delay tobacco regulations amid partisan division in Congress.

According to a report by Halfwheel on June 17, a recently passed bill funded by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) includes a language provision that, if passed, would delay the proposed tobacco regulations until the FDA completes regulatory adjustments for e-cigarette products.

 

Last week, the House Agriculture Subcommittee, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and related agencies passed their expected appropriations bill for the 2025 fiscal year. The vote followed party lines, with Republicans voting in favor and Democrats voting against. The bill has now been referred to the full House Appropriations Committee, which may make amendments before the bill is taken to a full vote in the U.S. House of Representatives.

 

In this situation, the language provisions in the bill text typically reflect certain senators' attitudes towards FDA actions. As an executive agency, the FDA essentially has the authority to make policies without congressional approval. Annual appropriations bills give elected officials the opportunity to withhold funding to force the FDA to change its course of action.

 

The bill includes provisions relating to tobacco and nicotine products, prohibiting the FDA from using funds to enforce three key regulatory policies.

 

It is prohibited to sell mint-flavored cigarettes in the United States, as well as flavored cigars. There are restrictions on nicotine content in products. When legislators introduce these provisions, they often provide direct instructions, such as stating that the FDA cannot use funds for a specific purpose. In this case, the provision specifies that funds cannot be used to enforce the above-mentioned policies unless the FDA completes a series of adjustments related to the regulation of e-cigarette products. These adjustments include:

 

1. The updated "Industry Priority Enforcement Guidance" (January 2020) expands the priority enforcement scope for disposable flavored e-cigarette products (technical term for e-cigarette products) beyond pod-based products. 2. Issuing final rules requiring foreign manufacturers to register. 3. Collaborating with Customs and Border Protection as well as the United States Postal Service to prevent the import of products that have received market refusal orders (i.e. FDA refusal letters). 4. Publicly authorizing a list of approved products. 5. Issuing "Import Alerts" for products that may be in violation. 6. Submitting quarterly reports to Congress on the progress of non-compliant products.

 

Even if these provisions are passed, they may not necessarily affect the FDA's regulation of tobacco and e-cigarette products. In April of this year, the White House announced a delayed proposed ban on menthol cigarette sales. Most people believe that this delay also impacted the proposed ban on flavored cigars, possibly due to the upcoming elections.

 

Although the FDA proposed creating limits on nicotine in early 2018, there has been little progress in actually implementing these restrictions since then.

 

It is more likely that these funding restrictions will not ultimately become law. The committee markings are just the first step in the FDA funding approval and allocation process. Recently, Congress typically relies on omnibus appropriations bills, a process of packaging various appropriations bills into one large funding bill. The language passed by the committee is usually seen as the starting point for the omnibus appropriations bill, but last-minute changes are also common in this process.

 

For example, last year, the committee approved a stricter provision that directly prohibits the FDA from implementing a ban on menthol cigarettes, flavored cigars, and nicotine restrictions, without any proposed changes for e-cigarette products.

 

Earlier, according to Axios, Republican lawmakers lost a private space in the Capitol building where they could enjoy cigars due to changes in the role of the House committee chair. This has made them nervous and prompted them to request House Speaker Mike Johnson to address the issue.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Exclusive Analysis | Smoore H1 Revenue Rises 19.9% Amid Growth Concentration, Profit Pressure and Slowing Momentum
Exclusive Analysis | Smoore H1 Revenue Rises 19.9% Amid Growth Concentration, Profit Pressure and Slowing Momentum
Smoore’s first-half 2026 revenue rose 19.9%, but the results revealed growing structural risks beneath the headline growth. Heat-not-burn contributed about 61% of incremental revenue and remains driven largely by one core customer, while traditional vaping markets diverged, own-brand growth slowed and China enterprise revenue declined further. Gross profit and adjusted profit lagged revenue growth, while second-quarter revenue growth slowed to about 1.9%, putting greater focus on the quality, concentration and sustainability of Smoore’s expansion.
Capital Markets
Aug.20
Why AIRSCREAM Built its European Production Hub for Regulated Market Growth
Why AIRSCREAM Built its European Production Hub for Regulated Market Growth
AIRSCREAM’s production hub in the Czech Republic brings nicotine pouch manufacturing, e-liquid bottling, product documentation, warehousing and international logistics into one operation, giving brands and commercial partners a practical platform from which to launch, expand and enter new markets.
Market
Sep.16 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Australia’s Victoria Steps Up Illegal Tobacco Enforcement With Store Closures and Penalties of Up to A$2.5 Million
Australia’s Victoria Steps Up Illegal Tobacco Enforcement With Store Closures and Penalties of Up to A$2.5 Million
Australia’s state of Victoria has activated new powers allowing Tobacco Licensing Victoria and police to shut premises suspected of selling, supplying or possessing illicit tobacco for up to 90 days. Longer closures can be ordered by a magistrates’ court. Businesses subject to closure orders must generally cease all trading and will be placed on a public list. Breaching a closure order can carry penalties of up to A$2.5 million and 20 years in prison.
Sep.10
2Firsts Data|China’s Vape-Related Exports Rose 3.3% in August 2026 as UK Shipments Jumped 51.4% and U.S. Exports Fell 12.4%
2Firsts Data|China’s Vape-Related Exports Rose 3.3% in August 2026 as UK Shipments Jumped 51.4% and U.S. Exports Fell 12.4%
China exported $979 million of vape-related products in August 2026, up 3.3% from a year earlier but down 6.4% from July. The UK replaced the U.S. as the main source of growth: UK-bound shipments jumped 51.4% to a 2026 high of $177 million, while exports to the U.S. fell 12.4% to $339 million. Shipments to markets outside the U.S. increased 14.2%, broadening growth beyond the market that had driven July’s rebound.
News
Sep.23 by 2Firsts Perspectives
UAE Sets Dh1-Per-ml Minimum Excise Price for Vape Liquids From Sept. 1 While Keeping 100% Tax Rate
UAE Sets Dh1-Per-ml Minimum Excise Price for Vape Liquids From Sept. 1 While Keeping 100% Tax Rate
The UAE Ministry of Finance will introduce a minimum excise price for e-liquids used in vaping and electronic smoking devices from September 1, 2026. The minimum excise price will be set at AED 1 per millilitre. The existing 100% excise tax rate will continue to apply to tobacco and electronic smoking products. The measure changes the minimum taxable base rather than the tax rate, with the UAE government saying it aims to establish unified tax standards, improve market compliance and prevent pricing loopholes.
Regulations
Aug.07 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Malaysia’s Vape Rules Face Review as Health Minister Dzulkefly Ahmad Addresses Dropped Nicotine Appeal
Malaysia’s Vape Rules Face Review as Health Minister Dzulkefly Ahmad Addresses Dropped Nicotine Appeal
According to Free Malaysia Today on August 26, 2026, Malaysia’s Health Minister Dzulkefly Ahmad said the Health Ministry would explain the government’s decision to withdraw its appeal against a High Court ruling involving the exemption of liquid nicotine used in vape products from the Poisons List. The High Court previously ruled that the exemption decision was irrational. Dzulkefly said withdrawing the appeal did not mean the government would stop regulating vaping, and that future regulatory approaches would continue under existing legal frameworks.
Aug.28