Boosted LLC and Owner Cory Vigil Receive Permanent Injunction from FDA and DOJ

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Jun.17.2024
Boosted LLC and Owner Cory Vigil Receive Permanent Injunction from FDA and DOJ
Boosted LLC and owner Cory Vigil face permanent injunction for violating FD&C Act by selling unauthorized tobacco products.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced on its official website on June 14th that the Federal District Court of Colorado has issued a permanent injunction against Boosted LLC (dba Boosted E-Juice, Boosted, Live Boosted) and its owner Cory Vigil. The ruling prohibits them from manufacturing, selling, or distributing any new tobacco products unless they meet certain requirements.

 

According to a lawsuit filed by the US Department of Justice (DOJ) on behalf of the FDA, the defendant has been warned for serious violations of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) regarding pre-market review requirements for new tobacco products, as they did not obtain market authorization from the FDA before selling them. The FDA has warned that continued violations may lead to further legal action, including injunctions.

 

In order to avoid litigation, the defendant signed a consent judgment, which is a written agreement signed by a federal judge and issued as a court order. According to the consent judgment, the defendant agreed not to manufacture, sell, or distribute any new tobacco products until certain requirements are met. These requirements include obtaining FDA marketing authorization for the new tobacco products, FDA inspecting the defendant's facilities to determine compliance with the law, and FDA notifying the defendant in writing that they appear to be in compliance with the law.

 

The FDA and the Department of Justice have initiated an injunction for the eighth time, beginning in October 2022, in order to enforce pre-market review requirements for new tobacco products. The Department of Justice has taken legal action in court under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Therefore, on behalf of the FDA, the Department of Justice filed consent decrees for permanent injunction against defendants in the district of Colorado (each manufacturer's respective U.S. District Court).

 

FDA Center for Tobacco Products (CTP) Director Brian King stated:

 

The FDA consistently and resolutely enforces the law, especially after issuing clear warnings and explaining what companies need to do to comply. Those who disregard the law will be held accountable, and we are committed to using all our powers to hold them responsible.

 

The FDA has made it clear that it will work together with federal partners, including the Department of Justice, to take enforcement actions and seek permanent injunctions against illegal behavior.

 

This action is part of a comprehensive approach to coordinated enforcement by the FDA and other federal agencies. Last year, in a joint operation at Los Angeles International Airport, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection seized over $18 million worth of illegal e-cigarettes. In addition, the FDA has issued 678 warning letters to companies suspected of manufacturing, selling, and/or distributing unauthorized novel tobacco products, issued over 550 warning letters to retailers, filed civil penalty complaints against 57 manufacturers and 140 retailers for selling unauthorized tobacco products.

 

The eight manufacturers who received permanent injunctions are as follows:

 

Boosted LLC and Owner Cory Vigil Receive Permanent Injunction from FDA and DOJ

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Product | JTI Launches Ploom AURA Teal Electric Pop in South Korea, Its First Dual-Color Edition
Product | JTI Launches Ploom AURA Teal Electric Pop in South Korea, Its First Dual-Color Edition
JTI Korea launched the Ploom AURA Teal Electric Pop limited edition in South Korea on September 1, 2026, marking the first dual-color design in the Ploom AURA range. The device combines a dark green body with teal accents and is accompanied by matching Front Panel, Back Cover and Pocket Bag accessories. The standalone device is priced at KRW 29,000, with three additional device-and-accessory bundles available. The release continues JTI Korea's use of limited colorways and interchangeable accessories to expand the Ploom AURA portfolio without introducing a new hardware platform.
Sep.03
U.S. Ninth Circuit Upholds FDA Denial of MH Global’s Flavored Vape PMTA Applications
U.S. Ninth Circuit Upholds FDA Denial of MH Global’s Flavored Vape PMTA Applications
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld the FDA’s denial of MH Global LLC’s applications to market flavored electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS). The court ruled that FDA’s comparative-efficacy framework, which requires applicants to show that flavored products provide greater cessation or switching benefits than tobacco-flavored alternatives, is consistent with the Tobacco Control Act’s “appropriate for the protection of the public health” standard. The court also found that FDA was not required to establish the framework through notice-and-comment rulemaking.
Aug.26
From Border-Logistics Insiders to Retail Service Stations, Australia Mounts a Sweeping Crackdown on the Illicit Nicotine Trade as iGET Vapes Surface in A$80 Million Crime Networks
From Border-Logistics Insiders to Retail Service Stations, Australia Mounts a Sweeping Crackdown on the Illicit Nicotine Trade as iGET Vapes Surface in A$80 Million Crime Networks
Australian authorities have disclosed two major enforcement actions that go beyond product seizures and retail closures to examine how illicit tobacco and vape networks operate. On Aug. 14, the Multi Agency Strike Team said seven people had been charged and two criminal networks were valued by authorities at a combined A$80 million, or about US$56.8 million. Investigators allege the groups used bonded warehouses, freight businesses and “trusted insiders” in legitimate industries to circumvent border controls. In a separate operation on Aug. 11, more than 100 service stations were targeted as authorities sought information on illicit tobacco importation, distribution networks and the movement of sales proceeds.
Aug.17
Malaysia Withdraws Appeal Against Liquid Nicotine Ruling as Vape Regulation Framework Enters New Phase
Malaysia Withdraws Appeal Against Liquid Nicotine Ruling as Vape Regulation Framework Enters New Phase
Malaysia’s government has withdrawn its appeal against a High Court ruling concerning the regulatory status of liquid nicotine used in vape and e-cigarette products, according to reports by New Straits Times, Free Malaysia Today and CodeBlue on August 18, 2026. The Kuala Lumpur High Court ruled on May 15 that the government’s decision to remove liquid nicotine from the scheduled poisons list under the Poisons Act 1952 was irrational and made without proper consultation with the Poisons Board. The withdrawal ends the government’s appeal process, while the future regulatory framework for nicotine vape products remains under discussion.
Aug.21
Australia’s Victoria Steps Up Illegal Tobacco Enforcement With Store Closures and Penalties of Up to A$2.5 Million
Australia’s Victoria Steps Up Illegal Tobacco Enforcement With Store Closures and Penalties of Up to A$2.5 Million
Australia’s state of Victoria has activated new powers allowing Tobacco Licensing Victoria and police to shut premises suspected of selling, supplying or possessing illicit tobacco for up to 90 days. Longer closures can be ordered by a magistrates’ court. Businesses subject to closure orders must generally cease all trading and will be placed on a public list. Breaching a closure order can carry penalties of up to A$2.5 million and 20 years in prison.
Sep.10
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
According to VitalLaw on August 27, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated an FDA marketing denial order (MDO) against NicQuid LLC, ruling that the agency’s comparative-efficacy standard for electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) applications had become a substantive rule requiring notice-and-comment rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The court did not reject FDA’s authority to compare the public health benefits and risks of flavored vapes, but held that the agency could not establish a broadly binding standard through informal adjudications. The case was remanded to FDA for further proceedings.
Aug.28