Boosted LLC and Owner Cory Vigil Receive Permanent Injunction from FDA and DOJ

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Jun.17.2024
Boosted LLC and Owner Cory Vigil Receive Permanent Injunction from FDA and DOJ
Boosted LLC and owner Cory Vigil face permanent injunction for violating FD&C Act by selling unauthorized tobacco products.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced on its official website on June 14th that the Federal District Court of Colorado has issued a permanent injunction against Boosted LLC (dba Boosted E-Juice, Boosted, Live Boosted) and its owner Cory Vigil. The ruling prohibits them from manufacturing, selling, or distributing any new tobacco products unless they meet certain requirements.

 

According to a lawsuit filed by the US Department of Justice (DOJ) on behalf of the FDA, the defendant has been warned for serious violations of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) regarding pre-market review requirements for new tobacco products, as they did not obtain market authorization from the FDA before selling them. The FDA has warned that continued violations may lead to further legal action, including injunctions.

 

In order to avoid litigation, the defendant signed a consent judgment, which is a written agreement signed by a federal judge and issued as a court order. According to the consent judgment, the defendant agreed not to manufacture, sell, or distribute any new tobacco products until certain requirements are met. These requirements include obtaining FDA marketing authorization for the new tobacco products, FDA inspecting the defendant's facilities to determine compliance with the law, and FDA notifying the defendant in writing that they appear to be in compliance with the law.

 

The FDA and the Department of Justice have initiated an injunction for the eighth time, beginning in October 2022, in order to enforce pre-market review requirements for new tobacco products. The Department of Justice has taken legal action in court under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Therefore, on behalf of the FDA, the Department of Justice filed consent decrees for permanent injunction against defendants in the district of Colorado (each manufacturer's respective U.S. District Court).

 

FDA Center for Tobacco Products (CTP) Director Brian King stated:

 

The FDA consistently and resolutely enforces the law, especially after issuing clear warnings and explaining what companies need to do to comply. Those who disregard the law will be held accountable, and we are committed to using all our powers to hold them responsible.

 

The FDA has made it clear that it will work together with federal partners, including the Department of Justice, to take enforcement actions and seek permanent injunctions against illegal behavior.

 

This action is part of a comprehensive approach to coordinated enforcement by the FDA and other federal agencies. Last year, in a joint operation at Los Angeles International Airport, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection seized over $18 million worth of illegal e-cigarettes. In addition, the FDA has issued 678 warning letters to companies suspected of manufacturing, selling, and/or distributing unauthorized novel tobacco products, issued over 550 warning letters to retailers, filed civil penalty complaints against 57 manufacturers and 140 retailers for selling unauthorized tobacco products.

 

The eight manufacturers who received permanent injunctions are as follows:

 

Boosted LLC and Owner Cory Vigil Receive Permanent Injunction from FDA and DOJ

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Russia’s Vape Device Labeling Regime Enters Force: Registration Starts in September, Mandatory Coding in December
Russia’s Vape Device Labeling Regime Enters Force: Registration Starts in September, Mandatory Coding in December
Russia's digital labeling regime for reusable e-cigarettes and similar personal vaping devices entered its first mandatory phase in September 2026. From September 1, manufacturers, importers and other market participants must register with the national Chestny ZNAK tracking system. From December 1, newly manufactured and imported covered devices will be required to carry digital identification codes and be reported as entering circulation. Russia has also issued new operational guidance for imports, marking the transition from a voluntary pilot to phased mandatory implementation.
Sep.15
 $20 Million, a Permanent Injunction and Distributor Controls: Posh Deal Tightens Illinois Vape Compliance
$20 Million, a Permanent Injunction and Distributor Controls: Posh Deal Tightens Illinois Vape Compliance
An Illinois court ordered three companies tied to Posh vapes to pay $20 million and permanently restricted the sale, marketing and distribution in Illinois of products lacking required FDA authorization. The consent order also imposes downstream distributor controls, age-verification measures and social-media marketing limits, creating a new state-level compliance benchmark for disposable vape businesses.
Regulations
Aug.05
InterTabac 2026: Further Sessions on Regulation, Market Access and Innovation Confirmed; 2FIRSTS to Host China Market Forum
InterTabac 2026: Further Sessions on Regulation, Market Access and Innovation Confirmed; 2FIRSTS to Host China Market Forum
InterTabac 2026 will bring together international experts to discuss European regulation, tax policy, Track & Trace, market access, retail impacts, consumer behavior and innovation. Sessions will also examine Poland’s tobacco-growing perspective and the growing fragmentation of Europe’s tobacco and nicotine market. Media partner 2FIRSTS will host the second “2FIRSTS Connect at InterTabac” on September 16, focusing on developments in China’s tobacco and nicotine industry.
Aug.06
FDA Revises Import Alert 98-07 Rules, Bringing May Enforcement Priorities Into Unauthorized ENDS Detentions
FDA Revises Import Alert 98-07 Rules, Bringing May Enforcement Priorities Into Unauthorized ENDS Detentions
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has revised the rules under Import Alert 98-07 to incorporate its May 2026 enforcement-priority policy for certain electronic nicotine delivery systems marketed without premarket authorization. The alert continues to allow detention without physical examination, or DWPE, for ENDS lacking required marketing authorization, while directing field divisions to apply the May risk-based framework. When necessary, detention or refusal decisions must also undergo review by the FDA's Center for Tobacco Products. Products including PACHA and Vuse Pro have already emerged as industry examples of the May policy, although enforcement discretion does not constitute FDA marketing authorization.
News
Sep.28 by 2Firsts Perspectives
China’s Zhengzhou Tobacco Research Institute develops end-to-end heated tobacco analysis to trace aerosol compound origins
China’s Zhengzhou Tobacco Research Institute develops end-to-end heated tobacco analysis to trace aerosol compound origins
The Zhengzhou Tobacco Research Institute of China National Tobacco Corporation has filed a patent application for an end-to-end method to analyze the migration and transformation of chemical compounds in heated tobacco products. Using GC-Orbitrap/MS non-targeted analysis, the method compares tobacco substrate and aerosol samples to distinguish compounds transferred directly from the substrate from those newly formed during heating, while also calculating transfer rates. In an example involving nine heated tobacco products, the patent identified 17 newly formed thermal decomposition compounds and 38 transferred compounds.
Aug.13
Yinghe-Controlled Vape Maker SKE Ordered to Post £569,039 Security as It Pursues Crystal Bar Design Infringement Case in UK
Yinghe-Controlled Vape Maker SKE Ordered to Post £569,039 Security as It Pursues Crystal Bar Design Infringement Case in UK
The UK High Court has ordered Chinese vape manufacturer Shenzhen SKE Technology to provide £569,039 ($776,000) in security for costs in its design infringement proceedings against Vapepen London and other defendants over its Crystal Bar vape product. The court did not accept the defendants’ main argument that recovering costs from a China-based company would face significant enforcement obstacles, but found that SKE had not sufficiently disclosed its own financial position. The order is procedural and does not determine the underlying infringement claims.
News
Aug.21