FDA Launches Searchable Tobacco Product Database for Retailers Compliance

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Mar.29.2024
FDA Launches Searchable Tobacco Product Database for Retailers Compliance
FDA launches searchable database for tobacco products, providing key information for retailers and public, accessible at www.fda.gov/searchtobacco.

According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the FDA has launched a searchable tobacco product database. This is a new user-friendly list that allows individuals to search for tobacco products (including e-cigarettes) legally available for sale in the United States. The database is designed to provide key information to the public, particularly retailers, all in one easily accessible place. This database is updated monthly and can be accessed at www.fda.gov/searchtobacco.

 

FDA Launches Searchable Tobacco Product Database for Retailers Compliance
Source of image: fda www.fda.gov/searchtobacco

 

In the database, the FDA provides information on three categories of products:

 

  • New tobacco products authorized for the market through one of three marketing pathways by the FDA; 
  • Existing tobacco products established through voluntary determinations (on the market since February 15, 2007); 
  • Temporary tobacco products that have been removed from review.

 

"The Center for Tobacco Products (CTP) remains committed to providing information that enhances transparency in a useful, timely, and user-friendly manner. We hope this database will become an asset to all parties, including retailers, and will be used to promote compliance with regulations," said Dr. Brian King, Director of the FDA Center for Tobacco Products.

 

At the time of launch, the database contained nearly 17,000 tobacco products, with over 12,000 being existing tobacco products. For each entry, the FDA provides information about the tobacco product, including the product name, company, category, subcategory, authorized agency for sale in the US, and the date of FDA action.

 

In addition, the database also includes links to regulatory and scientific documents, such as ordering letters, decision summaries, as well as environmental assessments (EAs) and related documents associated with tobacco product applications.

 

In order to help explain some terminology and background information of the database content, the FDA has also developed a searchable Tobacco Product Database - Additional information webpage. This webpage also includes answers to potential questions about the database, including questions about unauthorized products pending applications. Generally, the FDA cannot provide information about pending applications to protect proprietary information. Additionally, for new products that require authorization, a pending application does not mean that the product can be safely marketed.

 

The launch of this public database is part of the center's ongoing commitment to providing resources for regulated industries and clearly communicating agency actions to the public. Other recent activities aimed at enhancing transparency include the listing of activities in the center's quarterly updates on evaluations conducted by the Reagan-Yudell Foundation.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

NJOY and Altria ask federal court to halt ITC proceeding, alleging multiple constitutional defects
NJOY and Altria ask federal court to halt ITC proceeding, alleging multiple constitutional defects
A filing in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Richmond Division) shows NJOY and Altria entities submitted a plaintiffs’ reply supporting their motion for summary judgment, arguing the challenged ITC proceeding is unconstitutional on multiple grounds, including ALJ appointment authority, removal protections, and Article III limits under the Jarkesy framework. The plaintiffs seek summary judgment and a permanent injunction barring continuation of the ITC proceeding.
Jan.08 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Fourth Circuit weighs federal preemption challenge to North Carolina’s vape sales restrictions
Fourth Circuit weighs federal preemption challenge to North Carolina’s vape sales restrictions
Vape manufacturers and sellers urged the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit to find that the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) preempts North Carolina’s new law restricting the sale of certain e-cigarette/ENDS products.
Feb.03 by 2FIRSTS.ai
West Virginia Bill Seeks to Replace Per-mL Vape Liquid Tax With 50% Sales-Price Tax
West Virginia Bill Seeks to Replace Per-mL Vape Liquid Tax With 50% Sales-Price Tax
West Virginia proposes tax rate adjustments on e-cigarette devices and e-liquids, with penalties for late reporting. Effective from July 1, 2026.
Feb.02 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Polish Government to Amend E-Cigarette Definitions, Applying  PLN 40 Excise Tax to Magnetic-attachment Devices
Polish Government to Amend E-Cigarette Definitions, Applying PLN 40 Excise Tax to Magnetic-attachment Devices
Poland plans to amend its excise tax regulations on e-cigarettes to address a loophole created by the emergence of electromagnetic iMagnetic-attachment devices in 2025. Under the proposal, products incorporating ferromagnetic components will be classified as e-cigarettes and subject to an excise tax of PLN 40 (about USD 11.2) per unit. The revised rules are expected to take effect 14 days after promulgation.
Dec.26 by 2FIRSTS.ai
KT&G’s Heated Tobacco Brand “lil” Named to Korea’s Brand Hall of Fame for Eighth Consecutive Year
KT&G’s Heated Tobacco Brand “lil” Named to Korea’s Brand Hall of Fame for Eighth Consecutive Year
KT&G said its heated tobacco brand “lil” was selected as an outstanding brand in the heated tobacco category of the “2026 Korea Brand Hall of Fame,” marking its eighth straight year on the list. The awards are organized by the Industrial Policy Research Institute (IPS) and determined through a composite evaluation of customer satisfaction, brand value and market performance.
Jan.26 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Vape sellers sue to block Texas law banning e-liquids from China and other “foreign adversaries”
Vape sellers sue to block Texas law banning e-liquids from China and other “foreign adversaries”
A group of vape distributors and retailers has sued to block enforcement of a Texas law that criminalizes selling or marketing vape products containing e-liquids made wholly or partly in China or in countries designated as “foreign adversaries” by the U.S. Commerce Secretary. The plaintiffs argue the law violates the U.S. Constitution because only Congress may regulate foreign commerce.
Feb.03 by 2FIRSTS.ai