FDA Marketing Application Review Expected to Complete by June 30th

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Jan.23.2024
FDA Marketing Application Review Expected to Complete by June 30th
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has announced plans to complete all covered marketing applications by June 30.

According to tobacco industry reporter sources, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of the United States has stated that it aims to complete all the marketing applications by June 30.

 

In its latest court order status report, the organization stated that further review is needed in recent judicial decisions, including the decision by the District Court of Fontem US (a subsidiary of Imperial Tobacco) in the case.

 

In addition, several of these incomplete applications involve complex scientific issues that require careful scrutiny and consideration.

 

In the Fontem case, the court issued a unanimous decision supporting the regulatory agency's refusal to approve Fontem's application to sell flavored e-cigarette products, aligning with previous precedents set by the district circuit court. However, the court rejected the FDA's refusal of Fontem's application for flavorless products.

 

The organization stated that they are also facing challenges from manufacturers' requests to modify their Pre-Market Tobacco Product Applications (PMTAs) after several court rulings have been made.

 

These modifications consist of a wealth of data and scientific explanations," the agency wrote. "The length of these modifications varies from a few pages to several hundred pages and is received in a rolling manner, with the most recent modification submitted in December 2023.

 

Furthermore, on January 3rd, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) displayed "arbitrary and capricious" behavior in rejecting the pre-market tobacco product applications (PMTAs) of Wages and White Lion Investments (also known as Triton Distribution) and Vapetasia.

 

The court, in Judge Andrew S. Oldham's opinion, stated that the FDA "has been leading e-cigarette manufacturers on a wild goose chase," providing them with approval conditions for selling flavored e-cigarette products and then rejecting all applications.

 

Regulatory agencies have been ordered by the court to regularly submit status reports on pending PMTAs for new tobacco products on the market until August 8, 2016.

 

In order to legally sell such new tobacco products in the United States, the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act requires the FDA to conduct a substantive review of each new tobacco product's pre-market tobacco application (PMTA) and issue a marketing authorization allowing the sale of that product.

 

The court-imposed deadline stems from a lawsuit filed by a health organization against the FDA, seeking a court order to establish a final review deadline of September 9, 2020, for the submission of PMTAs to the agency.

 

The original deadline set was September 9, 2021, but the FDA was unable to complete the review by that date due to the overwhelming number of PMTA submissions from manufacturers.

 

The FDA submitted its latest and seventh status report on October 23, 2023. In these reports, the FDA provided updates on the progress of pending PMTA "covering applications" being reviewed by the agency.

 

Covered applications" refer to new e-cigarette/vapor products on the market as of August 8, 2016, which were submitted to the FDA for PMTA by brands such as Juul, Vuse, Njoy, Logic, Blu, Smok, Suorin, or Puff Bar before September 9, 2020, and account for 2% or more of retail sales volume in various NielsenIQ e-cigarette sales reports.

 

The organization further states that they anticipate taking action on 94% of the pending applications by March 31st. The FDA also indicates that they will submit another status report by April 22nd or earlier.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Charlie’s Says 30 PACHA Vape SKUs Tentatively Identified for FDA’s Non-Priority Enforcement Public List
Charlie’s Says 30 PACHA Vape SKUs Tentatively Identified for FDA’s Non-Priority Enforcement Public List
Charlie’s Holdings said the U.S. Food and Drug Administration notified the company on June 23, 2026, that 30 PACHA vape SKUs with submitted PMTAs had been tentatively identified for inclusion on a planned public-facing FDA webpage. Under enforcement guidance issued by FDA in May, the webpage is intended to identify certain unauthorized products for which the agency generally does not intend to prioritize enforcement of premarket authorization requirements. Charlie’s disclosed the development alongside second-quarter revenue of $3.8 million, up 116% year over year.
Aug.25
China Tobacco Yunnan files patent for cellulose-free nicotine pouch scaffold to replace microcrystalline cellulose
China Tobacco Yunnan files patent for cellulose-free nicotine pouch scaffold to replace microcrystalline cellulose
China Tobacco Yunnan Industrial Co., Ltd. has filed a patent application for a cellulose-free scaffold material for nicotine pouches, proposing a combination of bioceramic material, polydextrose and sugar alcohols to replace conventional microcrystalline cellulose and cellulose derivatives. The filing aims to address issues including powdery mouthfeel, residue and limited release control, while also reducing reliance on existing cellulose-based patent portfolios. In patent examples, one fast-release formulation reached a nicotine release rate of 50% at 10 minutes and more than 90% at 20 minutes.
Sep.02
UK Vape Maker Riot Enters Clacton By-Election to Fight Government 'White Packaging' Proposals
UK Vape Maker Riot Enters Clacton By-Election to Fight Government 'White Packaging' Proposals
British e-liquid manufacturer Riot Labs has introduced a fictional “candidate” called Riot Man around the Clacton parliamentary by-election, seeking to mobilize consumers and retailers against parts of the UK government’s proposed restrictions on vape packaging, device appearance and retail displays. Riot Man is not listed as an official candidate.
Aug.12
Kumulus Vape2026 H1 Revenue Falls 8.3% but Profit Rises 24% as B2B Weakens and Consumer Channels Grow
Kumulus Vape2026 H1 Revenue Falls 8.3% but Profit Rises 24% as B2B Weakens and Consumer Channels Grow
French vaping company Kumulus Vape reported first-half 2026 revenue of €25.5 million, down 8.3% year over year, as its core B2B distribution business fell 11% to €21.6 million. B2C and store-network revenue rose 5.6% and 17.8%, respectively. Commercial margin increased to 26.3% from 21.7%, while net profit rose 24.1% to €0.8 million. The company attributed the profitability improvement to catalog optimization, logistics restructuring and the ramp-up of Labster, its in-house production unit for proprietary brands.
Market
Sep.17 by 2Firsts Perspectives
South Korea Extends Vape Rules to Unmanned Stores After Bringing Synthetic Nicotine Under Tobacco Law
South Korea Extends Vape Rules to Unmanned Stores After Bringing Synthetic Nicotine Under Tobacco Law
South Korea's Ministry of Gender Equality and Family said on September 14 that it plans to designate unmanned e-cigarette stores as businesses where minors are prohibited from entering or working. Operators would be required to verify customers' ages and display notices restricting access by minors. The proposal is open for public comment through October 6. The move follows an April expansion of South Korea's statutory tobacco definition that brought products made with natural or synthetic nicotine under the Tobacco Business Act. Nicotine-free liquids and products using nicotine analogues such as 6-methylnicotine, however, remain an emerging regulatory issue.
Sep.21
Yinghe-Controlled Vape Maker SKE Ordered to Post £569,039 Security as It Pursues Crystal Bar Design Infringement Case in UK
Yinghe-Controlled Vape Maker SKE Ordered to Post £569,039 Security as It Pursues Crystal Bar Design Infringement Case in UK
The UK High Court has ordered Chinese vape manufacturer Shenzhen SKE Technology to provide £569,039 ($776,000) in security for costs in its design infringement proceedings against Vapepen London and other defendants over its Crystal Bar vape product. The court did not accept the defendants’ main argument that recovering costs from a China-based company would face significant enforcement obstacles, but found that SKE had not sufficiently disclosed its own financial position. The order is procedural and does not determine the underlying infringement claims.
News
Aug.21