FDA Marketing Application Review Expected to Complete by June 30th

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Jan.23.2024
FDA Marketing Application Review Expected to Complete by June 30th
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has announced plans to complete all covered marketing applications by June 30.

According to tobacco industry reporter sources, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of the United States has stated that it aims to complete all the marketing applications by June 30.

 

In its latest court order status report, the organization stated that further review is needed in recent judicial decisions, including the decision by the District Court of Fontem US (a subsidiary of Imperial Tobacco) in the case.

 

In addition, several of these incomplete applications involve complex scientific issues that require careful scrutiny and consideration.

 

In the Fontem case, the court issued a unanimous decision supporting the regulatory agency's refusal to approve Fontem's application to sell flavored e-cigarette products, aligning with previous precedents set by the district circuit court. However, the court rejected the FDA's refusal of Fontem's application for flavorless products.

 

The organization stated that they are also facing challenges from manufacturers' requests to modify their Pre-Market Tobacco Product Applications (PMTAs) after several court rulings have been made.

 

These modifications consist of a wealth of data and scientific explanations," the agency wrote. "The length of these modifications varies from a few pages to several hundred pages and is received in a rolling manner, with the most recent modification submitted in December 2023.

 

Furthermore, on January 3rd, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) displayed "arbitrary and capricious" behavior in rejecting the pre-market tobacco product applications (PMTAs) of Wages and White Lion Investments (also known as Triton Distribution) and Vapetasia.

 

The court, in Judge Andrew S. Oldham's opinion, stated that the FDA "has been leading e-cigarette manufacturers on a wild goose chase," providing them with approval conditions for selling flavored e-cigarette products and then rejecting all applications.

 

Regulatory agencies have been ordered by the court to regularly submit status reports on pending PMTAs for new tobacco products on the market until August 8, 2016.

 

In order to legally sell such new tobacco products in the United States, the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act requires the FDA to conduct a substantive review of each new tobacco product's pre-market tobacco application (PMTA) and issue a marketing authorization allowing the sale of that product.

 

The court-imposed deadline stems from a lawsuit filed by a health organization against the FDA, seeking a court order to establish a final review deadline of September 9, 2020, for the submission of PMTAs to the agency.

 

The original deadline set was September 9, 2021, but the FDA was unable to complete the review by that date due to the overwhelming number of PMTA submissions from manufacturers.

 

The FDA submitted its latest and seventh status report on October 23, 2023. In these reports, the FDA provided updates on the progress of pending PMTA "covering applications" being reviewed by the agency.

 

Covered applications" refer to new e-cigarette/vapor products on the market as of August 8, 2016, which were submitted to the FDA for PMTA by brands such as Juul, Vuse, Njoy, Logic, Blu, Smok, Suorin, or Puff Bar before September 9, 2020, and account for 2% or more of retail sales volume in various NielsenIQ e-cigarette sales reports.

 

The organization further states that they anticipate taking action on 94% of the pending applications by March 31st. The FDA also indicates that they will submit another status report by April 22nd or earlier.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Philippines BIR Steps Up Illicit Vape Enforcement Ahead of Christmas Shopping
Philippines BIR Steps Up Illicit Vape Enforcement Ahead of Christmas Shopping
The Philippines’ Bureau of Internal Revenue is intensifying enforcement against illicit vape and tobacco products ahead of the Christmas shopping season, directing regional and enforcement offices to strengthen monitoring of production sites, warehouses, distribution channels and retail outlets. The BIR destroyed 240,550 illicit vape products in August with an estimated tax liability of about PHP1.53 billion. A nationwide tax-compliance operation in July also inspected 3,590 businesses involved in tobacco and vapor products.
Regulations
Sep.17 by 2Firsts Perspectives
NAS 2026 | Cliff Douglas: Risk Continuum Should Play a Central Role in Tobacco Policy
NAS 2026 | Cliff Douglas: Risk Continuum Should Play a Central Role in Tobacco Policy
Cliff Douglas, a veteran U.S. tobacco-control and public health policy figure, told NAS 2026 that the “continuum of risk” should play a central role in tobacco policy. He called for clearer market pathways, stronger risk communication, differentiated regulation and enforcement, and said possible FDA reforms to PMTA reviews could be a “welcome correction” if they create a more efficient, predictable route for scientifically substantiated lower-risk products. Read 2Firsts’ on-site coverage.
Sep.26
South Korea Constitutional Court Upholds Volume-Based E-Liquid Tax, With Challenged Rates at KRW 370 and KRW 628 per Milliliter
South Korea Constitutional Court Upholds Volume-Based E-Liquid Tax, With Challenged Rates at KRW 370 and KRW 628 per Milliliter
South Korea's Constitutional Court has upheld fixed taxes on nicotine-containing e-cigarette liquids based on solution volume, ruling that challenged provisions imposing KRW 370 per milliliter in individual consumption tax and KRW 628 per milliliter in tobacco consumption tax do not violate the Constitution. The cases stemmed from historical disputes involving importers that reported nicotine as being extracted from tobacco stems rather than leaves. South Korea has since broadened its tobacco definition to include synthetic nicotine, while current tax laws provide reduced rates for certain products not derived from tobacco.
Sep.18
Charlie’s Bets on Age-Gating and 678 PMTA Assets as U.S. Vape Enforcement Landscape Shifts
Charlie’s Bets on Age-Gating and 678 PMTA Assets as U.S. Vape Enforcement Landscape Shifts
Charlie’s Holdings said in its latest shareholder letter that it is moving to commercialize PACHA products and monetize its PMTA assets as the FDA changes enforcement priorities for unauthorized ENDS products. Thirty PACHA SKUs were previously tentatively identified for a proposed public list of products that the FDA generally does not intend to prioritize for enforcement. Charlie’s is also preparing test-market sales of age-gated flavored disposables and says it currently holds 678 PMTA-related product assets while seeking additional strategic transactions and partnerships.
Sep.11
Juul Sublicense Reshapes Vuse Alto Patent Bill as Court Ends R.J. Reynolds’ 5.25% Royalty Obligation to Altria
Juul Sublicense Reshapes Vuse Alto Patent Bill as Court Ends R.J. Reynolds’ 5.25% Royalty Obligation to Altria
According to Law360 on August 31, 2026, a federal judge in North Carolina ruled that a patent sublicense between R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co. and Juul Labs Inc. relieves Reynolds of its obligation to continue paying royalties to Altria Client Services LLC over Vuse Alto. A jury had previously found that Vuse Alto infringed three Altria patents and awarded approximately $95.2 million in past damages, after which Reynolds was ordered to pay an ongoing royalty equal to 5.25% of positive net sales. The new ruling finds that a valid sublicense can eliminate future infringement, potentially ending what Altria described as hundreds of millions of dollars in future royalties.
Sep.01
Special Report | Can Nicotine Be Replaced? 6-MN Is Already on the Market While Key Human Evidence Is Still Missing
Special Report | Can Nicotine Be Replaced? 6-MN Is Already on the Market While Key Human Evidence Is Still Missing
Nicotine analogues such as 6-methylnicotine are already appearing in e-cigarettes and oral pouches, even as key human evidence remains limited. A new Nixodine-S study adds nonclinical data showing differences from nicotine in cytotoxicity and receptor activity, while independent studies point to a more complex toxicological picture. With supply-chain activity growing and FDA seeking clearer authority over nicotine analogues, the industry now faces a larger question: what evidence is needed before these substances can credibly replace nicotine?
SCIENCE
Sep.23