FLAVA Vape Raid: OXVA & Romio may Suffer Heavy Losses as Philippines Market Sees Reshuffle

Business by 2FIRSTS, edited by Sophia
Mar.05.2024
FLAVA Vape Raid: OXVA & Romio may Suffer Heavy Losses as Philippines Market Sees Reshuffle
Philippine Customs seized unregistered, unauthorized e-cigarette products worth 4 billion pesos, impacting Chinese brands like Romio and OXVA.

On the evening of February 29th, the Philippine Bureau of Customs Intelligence and Investigation Services seized a shipment of e-cigarette products valued at 4 billion pesos (approximately 510 million RMB, 70 billion USD) that were not registered in the Philippines and lacked the necessary authorization certificates. The confiscated FLAVA vape products are believed to have originated from the Philippines. (Read more: Breaking: Philippines Authorities Seize $70 Million's Flava Products)

 

Against this backdrop, 2FIRSTS had discussions with several individuals who are familiar with the e-cigarette market in the Philippines to understand the current situation of the market.

 

FLAVA is the leading distribution brand in the Philippines. It is understood that the Philippines has three major distribution companies, namely FLAVA, DENKAT, and SHIFT. Any brand looking to enter the Philippine market through these channels needs to establish a co-branding partnership with them. For example, the e-cigarette brand OXBAR (from OXVA) sold in the Philippines market carries the FLAVA brand logo on its product packaging and promotional materials.

 

FLAVA Vape Raid: OXVA & Romio may Suffer Heavy Losses as Philippines Market Sees Reshuffle
OXBAR products sold in the Philippines market come with the FLAVA logo | Image source: OXBAR

 

According to sources, the recent seizure of goods by FLAVA has had a significant impact on the Chinese companies they were working with. FLAVA did not fully pay for the goods they were purchasing, with some orders only paying 30% to 50%, and even as low as 20%. 

 

According to sources familiar with the e-cigarette market in the Philippines, Romio (from Shenzhen Maoanda Technology Co., Ltd. according to QCC) and OXVA (from Shenzhen Future Tech CO., Limited according to QCC), which have the closest cooperation with FLAVA, are considered the two Chinese brands most affected by this event. Among the products released on FLAVA's official social media platforms, Romio and OXBAR, a brand under OXVA, are the two brands with the highest frequency of appearance.

 

FLAVA Vape Raid: OXVA & Romio may Suffer Heavy Losses as Philippines Market Sees Reshuffle
Romio products in collaboration with FLAVA | Image source: Filipino distribution website

 

Judging from FLAVA's social media account, the brands that are also associated with them include GEEK BAR, FLONQ, and NIMMBOX.

 

FLAVA Vape Raid: OXVA & Romio may Suffer Heavy Losses as Philippines Market Sees Reshuffle
Image source: FLAVA social media account

 

Sources revealed that the e-cigarette market in the Philippines is currently in a state of extreme chaos. Some brands planning to enter the market are feeling uneasy, as they are facing difficulties in collecting payments from distributors, who are refusing their requests. 

 

Furthermore, with FLAVA experiencing heavy losses, the e-cigarette market in the Philippines is currently undergoing a period of restructuring. Distributor SHIFT is seizing this opportunity to aggressively expand its channel business and has launched a promotion offering a free motorcycle with the purchase of an e-cigarette. As a result, many industry insiders speculate that after FLAVA's decline, SHIFT could become the "new king." According to insiders, SHIFT was founded by Filipino real estate and casino businessmen, with strong backing.

 

2FIRSTS will continue to monitor the dynamics of the e-cigarette market in the Philippines and will provide updates on the 2FIRSTS mobile app and www.2firsts.com in a timely manner. Stay tuned for more information.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Russia’s Vape Device Labeling Regime Enters Force: Registration Starts in September, Mandatory Coding in December
Russia’s Vape Device Labeling Regime Enters Force: Registration Starts in September, Mandatory Coding in December
Russia's digital labeling regime for reusable e-cigarettes and similar personal vaping devices entered its first mandatory phase in September 2026. From September 1, manufacturers, importers and other market participants must register with the national Chestny ZNAK tracking system. From December 1, newly manufactured and imported covered devices will be required to carry digital identification codes and be reported as entering circulation. Russia has also issued new operational guidance for imports, marking the transition from a voluntary pilot to phased mandatory implementation.
Sep.15
FDA Authorizes Four More Nicotine Pouches as Review Pilot Expands Beyond Initial Decisions
FDA Authorizes Four More Nicotine Pouches as Review Pilot Expands Beyond Initial Decisions
The FDA has authorized four additional on! nicotine pouches, bringing the U.S. total to 30. The decision marks another outcome of the agency’s nicotine pouch review pilot, whose communication and review practices are now being applied more broadly across the category. It also extends Helix’s authorized portfolio from on! PLUS to the earlier on! line. Yet all FDA-authorized nicotine pouches still come from subsidiaries of PMI or Altria, underscoring how concentrated U.S. regulatory access remains.
Aug.05
Product | PMI Japan Launches SENTIA Passion Fruit Capsule, Expanding the IQOS ILUMA Flavor Portfolio
Product | PMI Japan Launches SENTIA Passion Fruit Capsule, Expanding the IQOS ILUMA Flavor Portfolio
Philip Morris Japan (PM Japan) has introduced SENTIA Passion Fruit Capsule, a new tobacco stick designed for the IQOS ILUMA heated tobacco platform. Featuring a crush-activated capsule, the product combines menthol with passion fruit flavor to provide an additional flavor experience. The product launched in Japan from August 3, 2026, through IQOS official channels, convenience stores and tobacco retailers.
Aug.04
China’s Jiangsu Tobacco Monopoly Bureau and Drug Regulator Target Illegal Vape Sales Disguised as Medical Devices, Define Six Violations
China’s Jiangsu Tobacco Monopoly Bureau and Drug Regulator Target Illegal Vape Sales Disguised as Medical Devices, Define Six Violations
China’s Jiangsu Tobacco Monopoly Bureau and Jiangsu Provincial Medical Products Administration have issued a joint notice targeting illegal production and sales of vape products disguised as medical devices. The notice identifies six categories of violations, including obtaining medical licenses through false materials, misusing medical device credentials, expanding production beyond approved scopes, and using medical device-related online platforms to promote or sell vape products. The action is based on China’s tobacco and medical device regulations and aims to strengthen vape oversight and consumer protection.
Aug.04
STIIIZY Redesign Fails to Escape PAX Labs Patent Import Ban as Section 337 Case Also Involves China ALD
STIIIZY Redesign Fails to Escape PAX Labs Patent Import Ban as Section 337 Case Also Involves China ALD
U.S. Customs and Border Protection ruled that STIIIZY had not shown that the redesigned cannabis-vape products covered by its latest request fall outside an ITC limited exclusion order tied to PAX Labs patents. CBP accepted some of STIIIZY’s claim-construction and non-infringement arguments, but the company did not address two additional claims in the same patent. Earlier STIIIZY redesigned cartridges and certain associated components imported with them had received separate CBP clearance.
Sep.16
UK HMRC Unveils Red and Yellow Transitional Vape Duty Stamps Ahead of October Tax Launch
UK HMRC Unveils Red and Yellow Transitional Vape Duty Stamps Ahead of October Tax Launch
HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) has released sample images of the UK’s transitional vaping duty stamps, showing red and yellow versions ahead of the new Vaping Products Duty and Vaping Duty Stamps Scheme starting on October 1, 2026. Transitional stamps contain physical security features but no digital scanning function. Approved businesses may purchase them through November 30 and affix them through December 31. HMRC has not stated that the red and yellow samples represent different product categories or tax statuses.
Regulations
Sep.02