Philippine Congress Investigates E-cigarette Brand for Tax Evasion

Nov.29.2023
Philippine Congress Investigates E-cigarette Brand for Tax Evasion
The Philippine House of Representatives has called for an investigation into Flava, an e-cigarette brand, for suspected tax evasion.

According to a report from Inquirer.net, the Philippine House of Representatives has demanded the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) to verify the license and product specifications of an e-cigarette brand that is being investigated for allegedly evading billions of pesos in taxes. The committee has also issued another subpoena to e-cigarette product brand Flava and the local company DenKat Trading, believed to be involved in importing this brand.


Congressman Joey Sarte Salceda, who chairs the House Committee, has formally requested the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) to send letters to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Department of Trade and Industry's Bureau of Product Standards (BPS) to verify Flava's product specifications. He also added that he has requested the BIR to examine the licenses posted on Flava's online store.


On November 28, the House Committee investigated the seizure of 1.4 million 10ml Flava disposable e-cigarettes at a warehouse in Valenzuela City on October 27. These e-cigarettes were found to lack the necessary documentation. According to Sarseda, it is suspected that Flava falsely labeled their products as traditional freebase e-cigarettes, which are taxed at a rate of 60 pesos per 10ml, rather than nicotine salts, which have a higher concentration and are taxed at a rate of 52 pesos per ml.


He pointed out that according to Article 263 of the National Internal Revenue Code, illicit transactions of variable products will face fines no less than ten times the value of the unpaid consumption tax. "The product in question, marketed as freebase nicotine, should be taxed at a rate of 60 pesos per 10 milliliters, but reports have shown that the product may have been misreported and should actually be taxed as nicotine salts, a more concentrated product with a tax rate of 52 pesos per milliliter," Salceda stated.


He added that Flava's marketing "implies that it is actually salt nicotine." According to the Vaporized Nicotine and Non-Nicotine Products Act (Republic Ordinance No. 11900), compared to freebase nicotine, salt nicotine has lower taxes because the latter is more concentrated and potent.


For a 10-milliliter equivalent, the main salt nicotine products in the market can provide 2,800 puffs. Flava markets claim to offer 6,000 to 10,000 puffs. Just based on this, one can imagine that the product is concentrated. This could potentially be a case of tax evasion amounting to 728 million pesos. If multiplied by 10, the final amount would reach 7.3 billion pesos (approximately 940 million yuan)," Salceda stated.


He also called on the Department of Finance and the BIR to come up with strategies to curb the illicit trade of e-cigarettes. "The purpose of this hearing is not just to prosecute one company, but to find ways to prevent the illegal trade of e-cigarettes, which would harm legitimate companies while allowing unregulated hazardous substances to exist in the market," said Salseda.


We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Vietnam Decree 371: vaping and heated tobacco use fined up to $190
Vietnam Decree 371: vaping and heated tobacco use fined up to $190
Vietnam’s Government Decree 371, effective December 31, 2025, stipulates that users of e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products will be fined VND 3–5 million (about $114–$190) and required to destroy the products. The decree also provides that individuals who allow use at premises they own or manage will be fined VND 5–10 million (about $190–$380), with fines doubled for organizations.
Jan.04 by 2FIRSTS.ai
St. Petersburg May Become Russia’s First Region to Ban Vape Sales
St. Petersburg May Become Russia’s First Region to Ban Vape Sales
St. Petersburg may become the first region in Russia to ban the sale of vapes. Senator Andrei Kutepov announced during a session of the Legislative Assembly that he is working to introduce restrictions on vape sales in the city, in line with President Vladimir Putin’s recent statement supporting a nationwide ban.
Nov.12 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Bangladesh High Court Questions Legality of BEZA’s Approval for Philip Morris Nicotine Pouch Factory
Bangladesh High Court Questions Legality of BEZA’s Approval for Philip Morris Nicotine Pouch Factory
The High Court in Bangladesh has asked government bodies to explain why the approval granted to Philip Morris to establish a nicotine pouch factory should not be deemed illegal. Petitioners argue the decision contradicts existing policies and a 2016 Appellate Division ruling that restricts new tobacco-related enterprises. Authorities have ten days to respond.
Nov.20 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Imperial Brands’ blu adds “Creamy Tobacco” flavour, rolling out across device kits and pod products
Imperial Brands’ blu adds “Creamy Tobacco” flavour, rolling out across device kits and pod products
Imperial Brands’ vaping brand blu has outlined its flavour roadmap for 2026 on its official website, adding a new “Creamy Tobacco” flavour that has been rolled out across the rechargeable blu bar kit and its compatible blu kit pods. The brand describes the flavour as offering a more velvety tobacco taste.
Dec.19
Wisconsin Lawmakers Revive Bill to Raise Legal Age for Tobacco and Vaping Purchases to 21
Wisconsin Lawmakers Revive Bill to Raise Legal Age for Tobacco and Vaping Purchases to 21
Wisconsin Senate Bill 524 (SB 524) has been reintroduced to raise the legal purchasing age for tobacco and electronic nicotine products from 18 to 21, aiming to eliminate the gap between state law and the federal “Tobacco 21” standard. Some retailers in Madison have already voluntarily adopted the 21-year age limit, while the American Lung Association is urging swift legislative action.
Dec.04 by 2FIRSTS.ai
EUIPO Rejects Imiracle’s Opposition to ‘Crystal’ Trademark, Citing Lack of Proof of Actual Use in Slovakia
EUIPO Rejects Imiracle’s Opposition to ‘Crystal’ Trademark, Citing Lack of Proof of Actual Use in Slovakia
The EUIPO has ruled that Imiracle failed to demonstrate actual commercial use of its “Elfbar Crystal” brand in Slovakia, and therefore rejected in full the company’s opposition to Shenzhen SKE Technology’s application to register the “Crystal” trademark. The EUIPO noted that the sales records submitted by Imiracle were limited in scope and that the product packaging was in Ukrainian, which it found insufficient to prove that the products had been placed on the Slovak market.
Dec.10 by 2FIRSTS.ai