Impending Tax Policy Change Threatens E-cigarette Retailers

Market by 2FIRSTS.ai
Jan.15.2024
Impending Tax Policy Change Threatens E-cigarette Retailers
E-cigarette retailers face price hikes as the government plans to announce new taxation policies, according to betterretailing.

According to a report by betterretailing on January 12, e-cigarette retailers are facing price increases in the coming months due to the government's planned announcement of a new tax policy.

 

According to The Mirror, the cost of e-cigarettes could increase by at least a quarter, with specific plans set to be officially announced in the budget on March 6th. This move comes after Prime Minister Rishi Sunak revealed a plan to tackle teenage smoking. Proposed measures include imposing a tobacco ban targeted at the younger generation and limiting the flavors and appearance of e-cigarettes to reduce their appeal to children.

 

In response to concerns over the environment and underage smoking, the government has initiated a consultation process, which includes discussions on whether to increase the price of e-cigarettes to "reduce the number of young people using e-cigarettes." The government's response to the consultation is expected to be released in the near future.

 

Meanwhile, some well-known brands like Elfbar and Lost Mary have taken action by removing certain "dessert" flavors from their product lines. According to a spokesperson from Elfbar, this renaming and flavor elimination measure is aimed at curbing the appeal of e-cigarettes to children.

 

Overall, the report highlights the government's determination in addressing issues of youth smoking and environmental protection, while also reflecting that some brands have already started proactively adjusting their products to adapt to potential new regulations.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Canada’s B.C. Passes First Vaping Cost-Recovery Framework, Allowing Government to Sue Manufacturers Over Health Expenses
Canada’s B.C. Passes First Vaping Cost-Recovery Framework, Allowing Government to Sue Manufacturers Over Health Expenses
According to the Nelson Star, British Columbia has passed the Vaping Product Damages and Health Care Costs Recovery Act by a 49–42 vote. The legislation enables the provincial government to seek recovery of future public health costs from vape manufacturers, following models used in opioid and tobacco litigation.
Dec.03
Bangladesh High Court Questions Legality of BEZA’s Approval for Philip Morris Nicotine Pouch Factory
Bangladesh High Court Questions Legality of BEZA’s Approval for Philip Morris Nicotine Pouch Factory
The High Court in Bangladesh has asked government bodies to explain why the approval granted to Philip Morris to establish a nicotine pouch factory should not be deemed illegal. Petitioners argue the decision contradicts existing policies and a 2016 Appellate Division ruling that restricts new tobacco-related enterprises. Authorities have ten days to respond.
Nov.20 by 2FIRSTS.ai
2Firsts Monitor | FOGER website flags customs & tariff delays; some products out of stock
2Firsts Monitor | FOGER website flags customs & tariff delays; some products out of stock
2Firsts observed on FOGER’s online retail site “FOGER VAPES” that the platform indicates restocking delays due to customs and tariff factors. Several items show limited availability or “sold out” status, with a restock alert feature offered. A previous article on the site also referenced potential tariff changes that may affect pricing.
Nov.05
New Zealand Health Ministry launches e-cigarette and nicotine pod procurement project for smoking cessation services
New Zealand Health Ministry launches e-cigarette and nicotine pod procurement project for smoking cessation services
Health NZ launches e-cigarette and nicotine pod procurement project for 29 government-funded smoking cessation services, following WHO guidelines.
Oct.15 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Altria and NJOY Sue ITC, Claim Judge Appointment Process Is Unconstitutional
Altria and NJOY Sue ITC, Claim Judge Appointment Process Is Unconstitutional
Altria Group and its NJOY subsidiary have filed a lawsuit in Virginia federal court challenging the U.S. International Trade Commission’s process for appointing administrative law judges. The companies allege the system violates the U.S. Constitution and seek to halt an ITC patent investigation initiated by rival Juul.
Nov.10
NSW Landlords Could Face Jail or $165,000 Fine for Allowing Illegal Vape and Tobacco Sales
NSW Landlords Could Face Jail or $165,000 Fine for Allowing Illegal Vape and Tobacco Sales
According to The Guardian, landlords in New South Wales who knowingly allow tenants to sell illicit tobacco or illegal vapes could face fines of up to AUD 165,000, a year in prison, or both. The new offences are part of the state government’s broader crackdown on Australia’s growing black market for cigarettes and vaping products.
Nov.12 by 2FIRSTS.ai