International Experts Challenge WHO Statement on E-cigarette Health Risks

Nov.21.2022
International Experts Challenge WHO Statement on E-cigarette Health Risks
Leading international THR experts challenge WHO's official health statement on e-cigarettes in a published white paper.

A group of prominent international tobacco harm reduction (THR) experts have compiled and published extensive research criticizing the World Health Organization's (WHO) official health statement on e-cigarettes.


A recently released white paper titled "Challenging Public Health: a Consumer Perspective" opposes the World Health Organization's claim that non-smoking underage individuals who use electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) are twice as likely to start smoking later in life.


Using Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS) does not lead to smoking. Instead, the same factors that influence young people to start smoking may also make them more likely to use ENDS. These factors could include genetics, family situations, mental health, school environments, crime, and risk-taking. This is referred to as a "shared responsibility," as highlighted in the white paper.


The 'gateway effect' has been repeatedly proven to be incorrect. Vaping is an exit from smoking, rather than an entrance. Rest assured that if e-cigarettes are not available, most young people who vape will either smoke or become smokers," said Nancy Loucas, Executive Coordinator of CAPHRA (the Coalition of Asia Pacific Tobacco Harm Reduction Advocates).


We strongly oppose the use of electronic cigarettes by minors, but we must also remember that smoking behind the bike shed in the past had a much more serious impact on health," she said.


The author opposes the World Health Organization's assertion that both tobacco products and ENDS pose health risks, and that the associated risks may depend on a variety of factors, some related to the product being used and others related to the individual user.


No respected scientist believes that the risks associated with electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) even come close to those of smoking. The white paper states, "The question of whether e-cigarettes are more dangerous than combustible cigarettes is itself an absolute scandal designed to introduce biased anchors.


Lucas stated that what really bothers advocates of Tobacco Harm Reduction (THR) is that the World Health Organization (WHO) continually compares deadly smoking to much less harmful products, making them appear equally dangerous. This is a deliberate comparison that leads to severe health consequences because people may abandon e-cigarettes and go back to smoking, or may not switch to safer nicotine products in the first place.


The white paper labels as "shameful and outright lies" the claims made by the World Health Organization, stating that there is increasing evidence indicating that electronic cigarettes cause lung damage.


There is no 'growing body of evidence' suggesting that ENDS may have caused the lung injuries seen in the US from June to December 2019. On the contrary, since July 2019, an increasing amount of evidence points to a clear and direct link between this outbreak and ENDS," the author countered.


We will continue to publish key parts of our review of the WHO guidelines, which astonishingly were provided to signatories and representatives of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC).


All we are asking for is evidence-based and objective policy discussions, decisions, and risk-appropriate regulation. This is how the FCTC will reduce the harm caused by combustible and unsafe tobacco products globally," said Nancy Loucas.


Ms. Loucas presented on "The Subversion of Public Health: A Consumer Perspective" at the 5th Asia Harm Reduction Forum (AHRF 2022) recently. To read the full white paper, please visit: https://caphraorg.net/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/white-paper-subversion_of_public_health.pdf.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information for the purpose of industry exchange and learning.


This article does not reflect the views of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the veracity or accuracy of the article's content. The translation of this article is only intended for internal industry exchange and research.


Due to the limitations of the translation process, the translated article may not fully express the same meaning as the original. Please refer to the original text for accuracy.


2FIRSTS maintains complete alignment with the Chinese government on any domestic, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, and foreign matters of discourse and stance.


Translation: The compilation of information belongs to the original media and the authors, if there is any infringement, please contact us for removal.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Germany Expands Take-Back Rules for Disposable Vapes From July 1
Germany Expands Take-Back Rules for Disposable Vapes From July 1
Germany has expanded take-back obligations for disposable vapes from July 1, 2026, requiring consumers to be able to return used devices at stores that sell such products, including kiosks, petrol stations and vape shops, as e-cigarette regulation extends from sales to waste management and lithium-battery safety.
Market
Jul.06 by 2Firsts Perspectives
 $20 Million, a Permanent Injunction and Distributor Controls: Posh Deal Tightens Illinois Vape Compliance
$20 Million, a Permanent Injunction and Distributor Controls: Posh Deal Tightens Illinois Vape Compliance
An Illinois court ordered three companies tied to Posh vapes to pay $20 million and permanently restricted the sale, marketing and distribution in Illinois of products lacking required FDA authorization. The consent order also imposes downstream distributor controls, age-verification measures and social-media marketing limits, creating a new state-level compliance benchmark for disposable vape businesses.
Regulations
Aug.05
KT&G’s Lil Strengthens Market Lead in Korea as Heated Tobacco Share Reaches 47.4%
KT&G’s Lil Strengthens Market Lead in Korea as Heated Tobacco Share Reaches 47.4%
According to South Korea’s UpKorea, KT&G’s heated tobacco brand Lil reached a 47.4% share of Korea’s heated tobacco stick market in the first quarter of 2026. The company is expanding its next-generation products (NGP) business through product development, technology investment and overseas growth. KT&G reported NGP sales of 890.1 billion won (approximately US$650 million) in 2025, up significantly from 279.3 billion won in 2020. Lil products are now available in 34 markets, while KT&G continues building its technology portfolio through patents and multiple product platforms.
Jul.23
BAT UK Director Tolga Kilic Says Illicit Nicotine Market Squeezes Legal Retailers Amid Rising Compliance Costs
BAT UK Director Tolga Kilic Says Illicit Nicotine Market Squeezes Legal Retailers Amid Rising Compliance Costs
UK retail publication Grocery Trader has published a viewpoint article from Tolga Kilic, Commercial Director for BAT UK & Ireland, discussing the impact of illicit nicotine products on legitimate retail channels. Kilic said illegal vapes and other illicit nicotine products create competitive pressure for compliant retailers and called for stronger market controls and supply-chain oversight. The comments come as the UK advances policies including the disposable vape ban and Vaping Products Duty, creating a more complex operating environment for legal vape retailers.
Jul.28
Australia’s TGA Places Nicotine Pouches Under Therapeutic Goods Rules From July 24, Blocking Imports of Unapproved Products
Australia’s TGA Places Nicotine Pouches Under Therapeutic Goods Rules From July 24, Blocking Imports of Unapproved Products
Australia is strengthening controls on nicotine pouches under its existing therapeutic goods regulatory framework. According to the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), nicotine pouch products must meet regulatory requirements, and unapproved products cannot be legally imported. The move follows Australia’s broader approach of maintaining strict oversight of nicotine products, including nicotine-containing vapes. As nicotine pouches expand globally, Australia’s regulatory approach highlights growing differences in how countries manage emerging smoke-free nicotine products.
Regulations
Jul.27
Philippines Weighs Unified Vape Tax as Lawmakers Back Risk-Based Rates and Government Seeks to Fill ₱66 Billion Revenue Gap
Philippines Weighs Unified Vape Tax as Lawmakers Back Risk-Based Rates and Government Seeks to Fill ₱66 Billion Revenue Gap
Philippine lawmakers are considering an overhaul of the country's vape excise-tax regime to eliminate the wide gap between taxes on nicotine salt and freebase nicotine liquids and reduce incentives for misdeclaration. House Bill 5364, filed by Rep. Rufus Rodriguez and Rep. Maximo Rodriguez Jr., would impose a unified ₱10-per-milliliter tax on vapor products, with 5% annual increases beginning in 2027. Rodriguez says the proposal could generate an average ₱6 billion in annual collections from 2027 through 2030. The debate comes as the Philippine government considers tobacco, vape and other health-tax reforms to help offset around ₱66 billion in revenue expected to be forgone under a proposed tax-relief package.
Aug.18