
Several leading international experts on tobacco harm reduction (THR) have compiled and published extensive research, criticizing the World Health Organization's (WHO) official health statement on electronic cigarettes. The paper, entitled "Disrupting Public Health: Consumer Perspectives," refutes the WHO's claim that "never-smoking youth who use ENDS (electronic nicotine delivery systems) are at 2x higher risk of smoking initiation in the future.
Using ENDS (electronic nicotine delivery systems) does not lead to smoking. Rather, the same influences that push young people to smoke also make them inclined to use ENDS. These factors may include genetics, family situation, mental health, school environment, crime, and risk-taking. This is known as "shared responsibility," according to the paper.
The 'gateway effect' has been repeatedly proven to be false. Vaping is an exit from smoking, not an entrance. Rest assured, if e-cigarettes are not readily available, the majority of young people who vape will either switch to traditional cigarettes or quit altogether," stated Nancy Loucas, executive coordinator of the Coalition of Asia Pacific Tobacco Harm Reduction Advocates (CAPHRA).
We strongly oppose underage vaping, but we must also remember that smoking behind the bike sheds in the past was much more detrimental to health," she added.
What really infuriates us at THR advocates is that the World Health Organization keeps comparing deadly smoking with much less harmful products, making them appear equally dangerous. This is a deliberate comparison that only leads to serious health consequences, as people may give up vaping and go back to smoking or not switch to safer nicotine products in the first place," Ms. Lucas continued.
Regarding the World Health Organization's claim that there is increasing evidence that electronic cigarettes can cause lung damage, the white paper considers this a "shameful and outright lie.
There is no mounting evidence to suggest that ENDS may have caused the type of lung injury outbreak seen in the United States between June and December 2019. On the contrary, since July 2019, an increasing amount of evidence has pointed to the fact that the current outbreak is, in fact, definitively linked to ENDS," the author countered.
We will continue to release key parts of our review of the WHO guidelines, which provide astonishing insights to signatories and representatives of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC).
What we are asking for is evidence-based and objective policy discussion, decision-making, and regulation that is proportional to the risks. This is how the FCTC will reduce the harm caused by combustible and unsafe tobacco products worldwide," said Nancy Loucas.
The author also disagrees with the World Health Organization's assertion that both tobacco products and ENDS pose health risks, and the associated risks may depend on a range of factors, some related to the product usage and some related to individual users.
No respected scientist believes that ENDS come close to the risks associated with smoking. The white paper states that the question of whether electronic cigarettes are more dangerous than combustible cigarettes is an absolute scandal and is intended to introduce biased anchoring.
Declaration:
This article is based on compiled information from third-party sources and is intended for industry-related communication and education purposes only.
This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the authenticity or accuracy of its content. The translation of this article is only intended for industry research and communication.
Due to limitations in translation abilities, the translated article may not fully express the original text. Therefore, please refer to the original text for accuracy.
2FIRSTS maintains complete alignment with the Chinese government on any domestic, Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan-related issues and international stances.
The copyright of compiled information belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us for deletion.
Disclaimer
This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.
Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.
The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.
This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.
Copyright Notice
This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.
No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.
For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.
AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice
Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.
Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.









