Investigation into Illegal Importation of e-cigarette in Australia by Chinese Freight Forwarder

Aug.27.2024
Investigation into Illegal Importation of e-cigarette in Australia by Chinese Freight Forwarder
Australian authorities investigate Chinese freight company for illegal e-cigarette imports amid concerns over underage sales.

According to a report by the Newcastle Herald on August 27, the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) has launched an investigation into a Chinese freight forwarding company that claims to be able to supply illegal e-cigarette products to buyers by the kilogram.

Investigation into Illegal Importation of e-cigarette in Australia by Chinese Freight Forwarder
Australian National Party Senator Ross Cadell from New South Wales | Image source: Newcastle Herald


According to current Australian law, only companies that hold an import permit issued by the Office of Drug Control are allowed to import e-cigarettes into Australia. Importers must also notify the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) if the e-cigarettes meet relevant standards.

Investigation into Illegal Importation of e-cigarette in Australia by Chinese Freight Forwarder
Huawell Trade Export Shipping's e-cigarette advertisement on Facebook. Image source: Shutterstock.


In New South Wales, selling non-prescription nicotine e-cigarettes to individuals under the age of 18 could result in a fine of $1650 or six months imprisonment.


Since the nationwide ban on importing disposable e-cigarettes took effect on January 1st, Australian border officials and the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) have seized nearly 4 million e-cigarettes. This is estimated to account for only a small fraction of the e-cigarette products entering the country.


New South Wales Nationals Senator Ross Cadell stated,


A supplier told me that out of every nine batches of goods, one batch will be seized, and this is just a cost of doing business.


Most products are flowing into convenience stores and tobacco shops.


According to the Newcastle Herald, there are at least 10 stores in the city center of Newcastle that sell e-cigarette products.


The Australian Community Media (ACM) emphasized last week that tech giant Meta is promoting the sales of banned e-cigarette devices by allowing advertisements.


The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) has verified that 15 paid advertising pages running on the Meta platform (including Facebook, Instagram, and Reels) have violated Australian laws and Meta company's advertising standards.


The Newcastle Herald revealed that the Chinese freight forwarding company, Huawell Trade Export Shipping, recently posted an advertisement on Meta website claiming to be able to directly import e-cigarettes to Australia. The company also stated that they can import construction materials, decorations, hardware, and lighting fixtures, and offer to deliver e-cigarettes to buyers' doorsteps at a price of 34.5 Australian dollars per kilogram.


After being alerted by the media, the Australian Department of Health and Aged Care conducted an investigation into the social media post.


A spokesperson stated that...


The company's advertising has been referred to the TGA and is currently under review. The TGA will collaborate with other departments to investigate the company's activities, including allegations of illegal imports, advertising, and supply of e-cigarettes to Australia.


As of this Monday (the 26th), the company still has at least one post remaining on Facebook.


The company did not respond to a request for comment from the Newcastle Herald.


A spokesperson stated that the TGA is closely collaborating with digital platforms, including Meta, to crack down on and remove advertisements for unapproved therapeutic goods and e-cigarette products.


In addition, the TGA can request internet service providers to block websites containing suspected illegal content, including those operated by individuals or companies outside of Australia. This action is only taken when the responsible parties behind overseas websites cannot be identified or when the websites are unwilling to comply with Australian regulations.


A spokesperson from Meta stated last week to ACM that Meta prohibits the buying, selling, or promotion of illegal drugs on its platform, and will remove such content immediately upon discovery.


Senator Kaderl stated that recent legislative changes have not stopped the sale of e-cigarettes, but rather have increased profits from the black market sales.


Since the ban was implemented, the only change I have seen is the prices. A shop that used to sell for 25 to 30 Australian dollars is now selling for 50 to 60 Australian dollars. The ban has only allowed organized crime to make more money, rather than stopping it.


Senator Cardel stated that there are reports suggesting that some young people are turning to purchasing illegal tobacco products because they cannot afford e-cigarettes.


I hope that children will never come into contact with e-cigarettes again, but this is not possible. If they are going to access e-cigarettes, I would prefer it to be regulated products that meet the standards.


We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
According to VitalLaw on August 27, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated an FDA marketing denial order (MDO) against NicQuid LLC, ruling that the agency’s comparative-efficacy standard for electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) applications had become a substantive rule requiring notice-and-comment rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The court did not reject FDA’s authority to compare the public health benefits and risks of flavored vapes, but held that the agency could not establish a broadly binding standard through informal adjudications. The case was remanded to FDA for further proceedings.
Aug.28
Exclusive Analysis | Smoore H1 Revenue Rises 19.9% Amid Growth Concentration, Profit Pressure and Slowing Momentum
Exclusive Analysis | Smoore H1 Revenue Rises 19.9% Amid Growth Concentration, Profit Pressure and Slowing Momentum
Smoore’s first-half 2026 revenue rose 19.9%, but the results revealed growing structural risks beneath the headline growth. Heat-not-burn contributed about 61% of incremental revenue and remains driven largely by one core customer, while traditional vaping markets diverged, own-brand growth slowed and China enterprise revenue declined further. Gross profit and adjusted profit lagged revenue growth, while second-quarter revenue growth slowed to about 1.9%, putting greater focus on the quality, concentration and sustainability of Smoore’s expansion.
Capital Markets
Aug.20
UK HMRC Launches Vape Duty Stamps on October 1, Ushering in Supply-Chain Traceability as Chinese Exporters Face New Compliance Hurdles
UK HMRC Launches Vape Duty Stamps on October 1, Ushering in Supply-Chain Traceability as Chinese Exporters Face New Compliance Hurdles
HM Revenue & Customs put the UK's Vaping Products Duty and Vaping Duty Stamps Scheme into effect on October 1. All vaping liquids manufactured in or imported into the UK are now subject to duty at £2.20 per 10ml, regardless of nicotine content. The stamp regime will introduce digital functionality designed to provide traceability throughout the supply chain, with approved manufacturers, importers and warehousekeepers required to report product movements and retailers and consumers eventually able to scan stamps to verify authenticity. China exported $177 million of vape-related products to the UK in August, up 51.4% year over year, increasing the significance of the new compliance regime for China's Shenzhen-centered vape supply chain.
Regulations
Oct.04
Product | R.J. Reynolds Launches Four Flavored Vuse Pro Pods for Vuse Alto Devices in U.S.
Product | R.J. Reynolds Launches Four Flavored Vuse Pro Pods for Vuse Alto Devices in U.S.
R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company has introduced Vuse Pro prefilled pods in Peach, Berry, Watermelon and Fresh Mint in selected U.S. states. Vuse’s U.S. website says the pods are intended for use with existing Vuse Alto devices. Each contains 2.0 mL of e-liquid at 5.0% nicotine by weight, uses nicotine salts and is offered in two- and four-pod packs. Reynolds said the rollout includes mandatory ID scanning for every purchase, purchase limits, stronger retailer-accountability requirements and strict age-restricted marketing standards. The four pods have not received marketing authorization from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
Sep.10
Retail Case Study | Wisconsin Vape Market One Year After New Regulations: Johnny Vapes Reports 80% Sales Decline as Consumers Shift Online and Across State Lines
Retail Case Study | Wisconsin Vape Market One Year After New Regulations: Johnny Vapes Reports 80% Sales Decline as Consumers Shift Online and Across State Lines
According to WNCY on August 24, 2026, some independent vape retailers in Wisconsin say they have faced significant business pressure one year after new vape regulations took effect. Johnny Vapes, a retailer operating in northeast Wisconsin, said its store count fell from seven locations to four, sales declined by about 80%, and roughly 90% of its inventory was affected. Retailers said some consumers have shifted to online purchases or traveled to neighboring Michigan to buy vape products. The case highlights how local regulations can reshape retail operations, inventory management and consumer purchasing patterns.
Aug.28
Australia Adds 6-Methylnicotine to Schedule 9 Prohibited Substances, Effective October 1
Australia Adds 6-Methylnicotine to Schedule 9 Prohibited Substances, Effective October 1
Australia's Therapeutic Goods Administration published a final decision on September 25 to classify 6-methylnicotine as a Schedule 9 prohibited substance under the Poisons Standard, effective October 1, 2026. TGA said the chemical has been reported in e-cigarette liquids sold in Australia and marketed as nicotine-free or nicotine alternatives, while evidence also indicates its use in preparations such as oral pouches. The government originally proposed a Schedule 7 classification but ultimately adopted the stricter Schedule 9 designation, citing acute toxicity, dependence risk, use in unapproved consumer products and misleading marketing.
News
Sep.29 by 2Firsts Perspectives