JSTE's Response to JFT Regarding Debt Situation: False Allegations, Litigation Underway

Business by 2FIRSTS
Jun.06.2024
JSTE's Response to JFT Regarding Debt Situation: False Allegations, Litigation Underway
JSTE Technology Mr. Liu De Wen responds to JFT's creditor letter, claiming it contains falsehoods. The full statement follows.

On June 6th at noon, Mr. Liu Dewen, the head of JSTE Electronic Technology (Dongguan) Co., Ltd., publicly responded to the "Letter to Creditors" released by JFT, stating that the letter contained falsehoods.

 

The complete response is as follows:

 

JFT Company confirmed in a December 2021 email that they had acquired a 50% stake in our JSTE factory, but they suddenly changed their minds in September 2022 and decided to sell their stake instead of acquiring it. They officially exited JSTE in January 2023 and received a significant amount of money from the stock transfer.

During the equity exit process, JFT company confirmed the value of over 60 million worth of JUSTFOG brand e-cigarettes under the original processing agreement, but they have been delaying payment and not taking delivery. After several months of dragging their feet, they suddenly notified of the termination of the processing partnership, leaving Jest in a difficult situation.

 

However, the European agents of JFT company continue to authorize domestic licensed trading companies to request small batches of JUSTFOG branded e-cigarettes for sale. Unfortunately, this led to a criminal charge of trademark infringement by JFT, claiming that the e-cigarettes produced under the original agreement were unauthorized. The malicious intent behind this action is surprising, and this absurdity cannot be justified. Jast company reserves the right to hold the criminal plaintiff accountable for their legal responsibility.

 

Subsequently, Jast Company employed legal methods such as litigation and arbitration to seek compensation, and successfully obtained an injunction to preserve JFT Company’s registered trademarks (such as JUSTFOG) in China, as well as its fully-owned subsidiary’s bank accounts and patents related to the e-cigarette business in China. The breach of contract case is scheduled to be heard in the near future.

 

At the same time, Gest also filed a patent confirmation lawsuit to the court. During the cooperation between both parties, JFT appointed a research and development manager who established a labor relationship with Gest, and transferred numerous patents to its wholly-owned subsidiary, severely infringing on Gest's rights.

 

As a leading media and think tank in the field of atomization technology, 2FIRSTS closely monitors the latest developments on this issue and maintains contact with various parties.


 

Click on the image to read: "Vape Debt Risk: How can the operational difficulties of a single company affect the entire industry chain?"

 

JSTE's Response to JFT Regarding Debt Situation: False Allegations, Litigation Underway

 

Click on the image to read: JSTE Electronic Technology (Dongguan) Co., Ltd. Announces Liquidation

 

JSTE's Response to JFT Regarding Debt Situation: False Allegations, Litigation Underway
Click on the image to read: JSTE Electronic Technology (Dongguan) Co., Ltd. Announces Liquidation

 

Click on the image to read: "JUSTFOG Official Response: JSTE's Liquidation is for Self-Protection after Serious Violations".

 

JSTE's Response to JFT Regarding Debt Situation: False Allegations, Litigation Underway
Click on the image to read: "JUSTFOG Official Response: JSTE's Liquidation is for Self-Protection after Serious Violations"

 

 

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Ohio Supreme Court Weighs Whether State Consumer Law Can Restrict Flavored Vape Sales
Ohio Supreme Court Weighs Whether State Consumer Law Can Restrict Flavored Vape Sales
The Ohio Supreme Court is hearing a case involving flavored vape sales and whether state authorities can use consumer protection laws to take action against retailers selling unauthorized vape products. Ohio officials argue that selling unauthorized flavored vapes may constitute consumer deception, while retailers argue that tobacco product regulation falls under federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authority and that states cannot impose additional restrictions through consumer laws. The case could affect the scope of state-level vape regulation across the United States.
Aug.06
Alaska Warns 1,500 Tobacco Retailers Over Unauthorized Vapes and Nicotine Pouches
Alaska Warns 1,500 Tobacco Retailers Over Unauthorized Vapes and Nicotine Pouches
Alaska Attorney General Stephen J. Cox has sent notices to more than 1,500 tobacco retailers and distributors warning them against selling vape and nicotine pouch products that lack authorization from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). According to the Alaska Department of Law, businesses were advised to verify products against FDA authorization databases and avoid selling unauthorized nicotine products. The action highlights how state-level enforcement is increasingly extending federal product authorization requirements to retail channels.
Jul.24
Product | JTI Expands Ploom Ecosystem as LYO Tobacco-Free Nicotine Sticks Roll Out Across Europe
Product | JTI Expands Ploom Ecosystem as LYO Tobacco-Free Nicotine Sticks Roll Out Across Europe
Japan Tobacco International (JTI) is expanding its Ploom heated product ecosystem with LYO tobacco-free nicotine sticks. Designed specifically for Ploom devices, LYO contains nicotine but no tobacco. Public information shows that the product has gradually entered several European markets, including Spain, Portugal and Germany, and was officially introduced in Romania in July 2026. The launch highlights JTI’s efforts to explore broader nicotine consumable formats beyond traditional tobacco-based sticks.
JTI
Jul.21 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Russian Strikes Destroy JTI and Imperial Brands Ukraine Warehouses, With Losses Reaching Tens of Millions of Hryvnias
Russian Strikes Destroy JTI and Imperial Brands Ukraine Warehouses, With Losses Reaching Tens of Millions of Hryvnias
According to Ukrainska Pravda, Russian strikes on the Kyiv region during the night of Aug. 4-5, 2026, damaged warehouses storing products of Japan Tobacco International (JTI) and Imperial Brands Ukraine. JTI said a finished goods warehouse in Kyiv Oblast was destroyed, with no employees injured, and that it did not expect disruptions to retail supplies. Imperial Brands Ukraine said products stored at warehouses of distributors and retail partners were affected and estimated losses from the strikes at “tens of millions of Ukrainian hryvnias” (roughly hundreds of thousands of U.S. dollars).
JTI
Aug.07
Virginia Tightens Vape and Tobacco Retail Enforcement, With Fines Up to $15,000 Per Unlisted Product
Virginia Tightens Vape and Tobacco Retail Enforcement, With Fines Up to $15,000 Per Unlisted Product
A new Virginia law that took effect on July 1, 2026, requires retailers to obtain permits to sell liquid nicotine, vape and tobacco products, while directing Virginia ABC to conduct inspections and verify that stores sell only products listed in the state directory.
Jul.20
BAT New Categories Revenue Rises 18% in H1 2026 as Broad Portfolio Offers More Ways to Win—and Lose
BAT New Categories Revenue Rises 18% in H1 2026 as Broad Portfolio Offers More Ways to Win—and Lose
British American Tobacco’s New Category revenue rose 18% at constant rates in the first half of 2026. Nicotine-pouch brand Velo expanded rapidly, while Vuse recovered as U.S. enforcement against illicit e-vapor products strengthened. Heated-tobacco platform glo remained under pressure, and cigarettes continued to provide most of the group’s profit and cash. Compared with PMI and JT, BAT has more routes to growth—but also greater regulatory, investment and execution risks across its broader portfolio.
BAT
Jul.30