Juul Agrees to Pay $438.5 Million in Settlement with 33 States

Sep.07.2022
Juul Agrees to Pay $438.5 Million in Settlement with 33 States
Juul settles with 33 states for $438.5 million and agrees to stop marketing to youth. Funds will go towards anti-vaping efforts.

E-cigarette company Juul has reached a settlement with 33 states, including Connecticut and Puerto Rico, agreeing to halt certain commercial practices, such as marketing to minors, and pay $438.5 million. The states have stated that the compensation will be used to implement bans on e-cigarettes and reduce nicotine activity.


Connecticut Attorney General William Tong stated in a press release that Juul's advertising campaigns have created a new generation of nicotine addicts.


They ruthlessly sell e-cigarette products to minors, manipulate their chemical composition to cater to non-smokers, use inappropriate age verification procedures, and mislead consumers about the nicotine content and addictive potential of their products. The consequences of this improper behavior on public health are still unclear.


The settlement marks the end of a two-year multi-state investigation. Juul has also agreed to refrain from any sponsorship or naming agreements, cease marketing to all youths, and avoid depicting individuals under the age of 35 in their advertisements.


After an appeal in court in June and reaching a temporary agreement with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Juul has continued to sell its products in the U.S. However, due to FDA regulation and legal battles, the company's market share in the vaping industry has significantly dropped. Back in May 2019, Juul held a dominant 75% market share, but according to VaporVoice, as of June 22, it had dropped to around 34.4%, with competitor Vuse narrowly surpassing Juul in the U.S. Meanwhile, the FDA is pushing for Juul to remove all of its products from U.S. shelves, continuing a thorough safety review of the products.


A spate of illnesses associated with the underground electronic cigarette market across the United States has further damaged Juul's public relations efforts.


In 2019, Juul Labs abandoned a campaign worth $11.6 million aimed at reversing San Francisco's ban on e-cigarette sales. In June 2020, the company announced that it was relocating its headquarters from San Francisco to Washington D.C. and expressed a desire to distance itself from the Silicon Valley startup culture and be closer to politicians and regulators.


According to a report by the Associated Press, Juul is still facing nine independent lawsuits from other states. These include a lawsuit filed by California and Los Angeles in November 2019, which focuses on the company's youth-targeted advertising and alleged failure to warn young consumers about the health risks of vaping. In June, a federal judge in San Francisco allowed a lawsuit against Juul Labs and parent company Altria Group Inc. to proceed on various issues related to misleading marketing.


The Associated Press reports that the company is still facing hundreds of individual consumer lawsuits.


A spokesperson for Juul stated in a press release to the Associated Press, "As we continue to fulfill our mission, we remain focused on our future of transitioning adult smokers from the leading cause of preventable death, combustible cigarettes, while combating underage use.


Statement


This article is sourced from compiled third-party information and is intended for industry communication and learning purposes only.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS is unable to confirm the authenticity and accuracy of its content. The translation of this article is solely intended for communication and research within the industry.


Due to limitations in our translation abilities, the translated article may not accurately reflect the original text. Please refer to the original article for accuracy.


2FIRSTS maintains complete alignment with the Chinese government on any statements or positions related to domestic, Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan, and foreign affairs.


The compiled information belongs to the original media and authors in terms of copyright. If there is any infringement, please contact us for deletion.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

Rethinking Nicotine Harm Reduction: A Neuroscientist’s Perspective on Scientific Gaps and Future Directions — By Dr. Xin-an Liu
Rethinking Nicotine Harm Reduction: A Neuroscientist’s Perspective on Scientific Gaps and Future Directions — By Dr. Xin-an Liu
After France’s ANSES report on nicotine products and harm reduction, Dr. Xin-an Liu wrote to 2Firsts reassessing the field’s foundations. She argues the debate reveals gaps in evidence on long-term behavioral substitution, addiction pathways and neurobiological impacts, and calls for longitudinal research, integrated behavioral science and neuroimaging, clearer risk assessment and stronger transparency to ensure policy and next-generation product development rest on solid evidence.
Industry Insight
Feb.24
Michigan Senate Bill 786 Seeks to Ban Sale of Vapes With Metal Heating Elements
Michigan Senate Bill 786 Seeks to Ban Sale of Vapes With Metal Heating Elements
Michigan lawmakers introduced Senate Bill 786 on February 18, 2026, proposing to prohibit the sale or transfer of vapor products that contain heating elements unless those elements are made of or encased in glass or ceramic materials
Regulations
Feb.21
Can hookah go institutional? A hookah company seeking to go public makes its case with capital, technology and regulation
Can hookah go institutional? A hookah company seeking to go public makes its case with capital, technology and regulation
2Firsts explored whether hookah can evolve into a more mature and governable category by interviewing Dubai-based hookah company AIR. AIR argues that strong margins, OOKA’s closed-system model and the prospect of differentiated regulation could support that shift. The larger question is whether this is simply AIR’s capital-markets narrative, or an early sign that competition, regulation and category boundaries in hookah are beginning to change.
Apr.02
Russian Lawmaker Says Bill on Full Vape Sales Ban Is Before State Duma
Russian Lawmaker Says Bill on Full Vape Sales Ban Is Before State Duma
Yaroslav Nilov, chair of the State Duma Committee on Labour, Social Policy and Veterans’ Affairs, said a bill proposing a full ban on vape sales is currently before the State Duma, though no final decision has yet been made. He said the initiative has been signed by representatives of almost all factions and noted that support for a full ban has also been voiced at the regional governor level. Nilov also said vape use in Russia is increasing while the age of consumers is declining.
Mar.12 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Netherlands plans to raise nicotine purchase age to 21, including vapes
Netherlands plans to raise nicotine purchase age to 21, including vapes
The Netherlands is planning to raise the legal age for buying nicotine-containing products from 18 to 21, a change that would also cover vapes. The move, embedded in the governing coalition’s latest agreement, aligns with a wider European trend toward tighter youth nicotine controls, though industry groups have criticised the proposal and warned it could fuel illicit trade.
Feb.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai
HB337 Moves Forward: Cigarette and Nicotine Taxes Set to Rise in Utah
HB337 Moves Forward: Cigarette and Nicotine Taxes Set to Rise in Utah
Utah lawmakers are advancing HB337, a bill that would raise the state cigarette tax by $2 per pack and restructure taxes on other nicotine products. The proposal replaces weight-based taxes with percentage-based rates and removes reduced rates for certain modified risk products. Supporters say it will curb youth tobacco use, while opponents warn of cross-border shopping and harm to consumers seeking alternatives.
Feb.17