Juul Agrees to Pay $438.5 Million in Settlement with 33 States

Sep.07.2022
Juul Agrees to Pay $438.5 Million in Settlement with 33 States
Juul settles with 33 states for $438.5 million and agrees to stop marketing to youth. Funds will go towards anti-vaping efforts.

E-cigarette company Juul has reached a settlement with 33 states, including Connecticut and Puerto Rico, agreeing to halt certain commercial practices, such as marketing to minors, and pay $438.5 million. The states have stated that the compensation will be used to implement bans on e-cigarettes and reduce nicotine activity.


Connecticut Attorney General William Tong stated in a press release that Juul's advertising campaigns have created a new generation of nicotine addicts.


They ruthlessly sell e-cigarette products to minors, manipulate their chemical composition to cater to non-smokers, use inappropriate age verification procedures, and mislead consumers about the nicotine content and addictive potential of their products. The consequences of this improper behavior on public health are still unclear.


The settlement marks the end of a two-year multi-state investigation. Juul has also agreed to refrain from any sponsorship or naming agreements, cease marketing to all youths, and avoid depicting individuals under the age of 35 in their advertisements.


After an appeal in court in June and reaching a temporary agreement with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Juul has continued to sell its products in the U.S. However, due to FDA regulation and legal battles, the company's market share in the vaping industry has significantly dropped. Back in May 2019, Juul held a dominant 75% market share, but according to VaporVoice, as of June 22, it had dropped to around 34.4%, with competitor Vuse narrowly surpassing Juul in the U.S. Meanwhile, the FDA is pushing for Juul to remove all of its products from U.S. shelves, continuing a thorough safety review of the products.


A spate of illnesses associated with the underground electronic cigarette market across the United States has further damaged Juul's public relations efforts.


In 2019, Juul Labs abandoned a campaign worth $11.6 million aimed at reversing San Francisco's ban on e-cigarette sales. In June 2020, the company announced that it was relocating its headquarters from San Francisco to Washington D.C. and expressed a desire to distance itself from the Silicon Valley startup culture and be closer to politicians and regulators.


According to a report by the Associated Press, Juul is still facing nine independent lawsuits from other states. These include a lawsuit filed by California and Los Angeles in November 2019, which focuses on the company's youth-targeted advertising and alleged failure to warn young consumers about the health risks of vaping. In June, a federal judge in San Francisco allowed a lawsuit against Juul Labs and parent company Altria Group Inc. to proceed on various issues related to misleading marketing.


The Associated Press reports that the company is still facing hundreds of individual consumer lawsuits.


A spokesperson for Juul stated in a press release to the Associated Press, "As we continue to fulfill our mission, we remain focused on our future of transitioning adult smokers from the leading cause of preventable death, combustible cigarettes, while combating underage use.


Statement


This article is sourced from compiled third-party information and is intended for industry communication and learning purposes only.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS is unable to confirm the authenticity and accuracy of its content. The translation of this article is solely intended for communication and research within the industry.


Due to limitations in our translation abilities, the translated article may not accurately reflect the original text. Please refer to the original article for accuracy.


2FIRSTS maintains complete alignment with the Chinese government on any statements or positions related to domestic, Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan, and foreign affairs.


The compiled information belongs to the original media and authors in terms of copyright. If there is any infringement, please contact us for deletion.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
Private antitrust litigation stemming from Altria's 2018 $12.8 billion investment for a 35% economic interest in JUUL is advancing before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Direct purchasers, indirect purchasers and indirect resellers of JUUL products filed answering briefs this week seeking to preserve class certifications granted by a California federal court in February. Altria and JUUL argue that individual consumers and large distributors differ too much in purchasing terms to remain in a single direct-purchaser class, while a separate dispute concerns whether California antitrust law can apply to indirect purchasers across 27 jurisdictions. A September trial has been put on hold during the appeal.
Sep.23
U.S. Customs Plan to Require Foreign Export Declarations Could Deal ‘Devastating’ Blow to China’s Vape Exports, Logistics gl Expert Says
U.S. Customs Plan to Require Foreign Export Declarations Could Deal ‘Devastating’ Blow to China’s Vape Exports, Logistics gl Expert Says
A U.S. Customs and Border Protection proposal to collect foreign export declarations and other overseas customs documents could expose discrepancies in the value, classification and description of China-made vape shipments entering the United States. A veteran Chinese logistics professional told 2Firsts that the measure, if implemented, could undermine the all-inclusive shipping model used by some unauthorized vape exporters and push parts of the trade toward costlier underground channels. The risk extends beyond higher duties: accurately declared products may also be more readily identified as unauthorized e-cigarettes subject to FDA enforcement.
Special Report
Sep.07
STIIIZY Redesign Fails to Escape PAX Labs Patent Import Ban as Section 337 Case Also Involves China ALD
STIIIZY Redesign Fails to Escape PAX Labs Patent Import Ban as Section 337 Case Also Involves China ALD
U.S. Customs and Border Protection ruled that STIIIZY had not shown that the redesigned cannabis-vape products covered by its latest request fall outside an ITC limited exclusion order tied to PAX Labs patents. CBP accepted some of STIIIZY’s claim-construction and non-infringement arguments, but the company did not address two additional claims in the same patent. Earlier STIIIZY redesigned cartridges and certain associated components imported with them had received separate CBP clearance.
Sep.16
FDA Appoints Former Tobacco Enforcement Deputy Jessica Zeller as Director as Agency Weighs PMTA Framework Changes
FDA Appoints Former Tobacco Enforcement Deputy Jessica Zeller as Director as Agency Weighs PMTA Framework Changes
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has named Jessica Zeller director of the Center for Tobacco Products' (CTP) Office of Compliance and Enforcement (OCE), effective November 1, 2026. Zeller, the office's inaugural deputy director, returns from medical device manufacturer Edwards Lifesciences with more than 20 years of regulatory and legal experience. The appointment follows CTP leadership changes and adjustments to tobacco regulation. Bret Koplow became permanent CTP director in September; the FDA revised enforcement priorities for unauthorized e-cigarettes and nicotine pouches in May and announced faster PMTA review procedures. On September 28, the agency said it would evaluate changes to the existing PMTA regulatory framework, including potential rulemaking to replace it.
FDA
Oct.20 by 2Firsts Perspectives
JTI Proposes 25-Cent Irish Cigarette Tax Increase, Says It Could Raise €45 Million
JTI Proposes 25-Cent Irish Cigarette Tax Increase, Says It Could Raise €45 Million
Japan Tobacco International's Irish business has proposed a €0.25 tax increase on a pack of 20 cigarettes in its pre-Budget 2027 submission, below the €0.50-or-more increases typically imposed in recent Irish budgets. JTI says the proposal could generate around €45 million in additional Exchequer revenue while limiting further movement toward illicit and non-Irish-tax-paid tobacco. Revenue's existing estimate for a comparable €0.25 increase, including pro-rata rises on other tobacco products, is about €18 million for a full year.
JTI
Sep.18 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Spain Cigarette Volumes Fall 5.2% in August, BAT Drops 14.5%, JTI Gains Share; France Down 8.3% on Adjusted Basis
Spain Cigarette Volumes Fall 5.2% in August, BAT Drops 14.5%, JTI Gains Share; France Down 8.3% on Adjusted Basis
Spain's cigarette volumes declined 5.2% year over year in August 2026, according to government data cited by UBS and reported by Investing.com on October 7. British American Tobacco's volumes fell 14.5%, followed by Imperial Brands at 8.8%, Philip Morris International at 6.6% and Japan Tobacco at 4.6%. JTI was the only one of the four companies to gain cigarette market share, rising six basis points to 26.7%. In France, official customs data showed an unadjusted 3.7% decline in cigarette deliveries. Adjusting for the difference in delivery days produces a decline of approximately 8.3%, consistent with the UBS figure. The bank also estimated the earnings exposure of major tobacco companies to both markets.
Market
Oct.13