Juul Faces Market Withdrawal in the US: Implications and Controversies

Jul.08.2022
Juul Faces Market Withdrawal in the US: Implications and Controversies
The FDA ordered Juul products to be removed from the US market due to concerns over youth vaping.

On June 23, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced that all Juul products must be removed from the US market. This decision significantly expanded the existing ban on the company's nicotine e-cigarettes among teenagers to include adults as well. The following day, Juul appealed to the federal court to temporarily halt the ban and questioned the decision. The court agreed to temporarily suspend the ban, and currently, Juul products are still being sold in the US.


Lynn Kozlowski, a professor at the State University of New York at Buffalo's School of Public Health and Health Professions, has been researching nicotine and tobacco addiction for several decades. In this Q&A, he addresses the recent controversy surrounding Juul products and how they fit into broader discussions among adults and young people about e-cigarettes, tobacco use, and public health.


Why does the US Food and Drug Administration want to stop the sale of Juul products?


According to the FDA, the decision to remove certain flavored electronic cigarette products from the market is a preventative measure due to the lack of "sufficient evidence of product toxicology profiles" to ensure public health and safety. The FDA also noted that it has not received any information indicating that Juul products pose an imminent danger.


In a statement, FDA Commissioner Robert M. Califf addressed the impact of Juul products on youth e-cigarette use. This decision comes as some are hoping for new bans on Juul products and other adult e-cigarettes, in effort to decrease teen e-cigarette usage.


How do the health risks of electronic cigarettes compare to traditional smoking?


At least half of smokers die prematurely due to cancer, obstructive lung disease and cardiovascular diseases caused by smoking, which shorten their average lifespan by 10 years.


Currently, there is a lack of long-term epidemiological data on e-cigarettes. However, assessments conducted in the United States and the United Kingdom have concluded that while the harm from e-cigarettes may be much less than that of traditional cigarettes, they still pose some risks. Potential hazards include nicotine addiction and some cardiovascular risks, although it is estimated that these risks are lower than those associated with smoking cigarettes.


Can electronic cigarettes reduce the harm caused by traditional smoking?


I do not encourage anyone to vape if they do not need to. However, if someone smokes and e-cigarettes help them quit completely, they can be a useful tool in reducing smoking and health issues. Quitting smoking is indisputably good for your health. Research shows that if someone quits smoking before the age of 40, they can avoid 90% of their risk of death compared to continuing to smoke. If someone quits smoking before the age of 30, their health risks are almost the same as someone who has never smoked.


The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention states that there is limited evidence to suggest that e-cigarettes aid in smoking cessation. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved some e-cigarettes for sale, noting that they can be a beneficial tool for smokers in significantly reducing their tobacco use or quitting altogether.


Recent research has shown that electronic cigarettes are more effective in aiding smokers to quit than nicotine replacement therapy. The UK National Health Service has approved electronic cigarettes as a recognized form of smoking cessation aid.


Is vaping still popular among teenagers as it was before?


Teen e-cigarette use is on the decline, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In 2019, 27.5 percent of high school students reported having used e-cigarettes within the past month. That number dropped to 19.6 percent by 2020, and again to 11.3 percent by 2022. Just over a quarter of monthly users, or roughly 3 percent of high schoolers in 2022, reported using e-cigarettes daily.


Some of the reduction may be due to COVID-19, restrictions on young people's access, and government anti-vaping campaigns.


The widespread publicity around the serious respiratory illness caused by e-cigarettes, known as EVALI, is likely to deter many people from using them. However, research has ultimately shown that the illness is primarily caused by illicit THC-containing e-cigarette products sold on the black market.


Will teenagers who vape lead to a higher smoking rate among adolescents?


Although the decrease in teen e-cigarette use is encouraging, an important question worth asking is whether e-cigarettes directly lead to smoking later on.


Parents have valid reasons to be concerned that e-cigarettes may serve as a gateway to smoking. However, research does not necessarily support this strong causal relationship. Despite the recent surge in e-cigarette use across the country, smoking rates have actually decreased.


According to data from a national survey of nearly 40,000 participants in the US over the past few years, researchers have found that less than 1% of those who tried e-cigarettes for the first time became long-term smokers. Compared to those who first tried cigarettes or other tobacco products, people who first tried e-cigarettes were also less likely to become smokers.


Another large-scale study on American youth found that once researchers controlled for general risky behavior, the history of using e-cigarettes was only moderately or insignificantly associated with increased smoking rates.


How do you balance adult usage with teenage safety?


Even though e-cigarettes are not a major factor contributing to youth smoking, the use of e-cigarette products by young people is still a cause for concern, despite the ban on selling e-cigarettes to those under the age of 21 in 2019.


Completely banning products that may be helpful for adult smokers who want to quit is not the only way to reduce young people's access to these services. As an example, a proposal suggests moving the sales of all nicotine and tobacco products to stores that only allow entry for individuals of 21 years or older.


While products like Juul deserve research and regulation, it is important to remember the established deadline for verification and the ease of access for cigarettes - whether it is for adults or the many teenagers who start smoking every year and will become adult smokers. Persuading as many smokers to quit as possible will save lives.


This article contains excerpts or reprints from third-party sources, and the copyright belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us for deletion. Any unit or individual who needs to reprint must contact the author, and direct reprinting is prohibited.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

India Duty-Free Nicotine Pouch Sales Face Regulatory Test as ZYN, FOX Classification Remains Open
India Duty-Free Nicotine Pouch Sales Face Regulatory Test as ZYN, FOX Classification Remains Open
The Bombay High Court has ruled that airport duty-free shops are not exempt from India's domestic regulatory laws merely because they operate beyond the customs barrier, leaving in place a sales halt covering ZYN and FOX nicotine pouches at Mumbai's international airport. The court, however, did not determine that the products necessarily qualify as "drugs" under India's Drugs and Cosmetics Act. The retailers have four weeks to submit product information to the appropriate authorities, including CDSCO, which must complete its review within 30 days of receiving the submissions.
Sep.24
South Korea Constitutional Court Upholds Volume-Based E-Liquid Tax, With Challenged Rates at KRW 370 and KRW 628 per Milliliter
South Korea Constitutional Court Upholds Volume-Based E-Liquid Tax, With Challenged Rates at KRW 370 and KRW 628 per Milliliter
South Korea's Constitutional Court has upheld fixed taxes on nicotine-containing e-cigarette liquids based on solution volume, ruling that challenged provisions imposing KRW 370 per milliliter in individual consumption tax and KRW 628 per milliliter in tobacco consumption tax do not violate the Constitution. The cases stemmed from historical disputes involving importers that reported nicotine as being extracted from tobacco stems rather than leaves. South Korea has since broadened its tobacco definition to include synthetic nicotine, while current tax laws provide reduced rates for certain products not derived from tobacco.
Sep.18
Ukraine Raises Excise Stamp Fees for Tobacco, Heated Tobacco and Vape Liquids by 30.5% as Parliament Backs E-Excise Delay to 2027
Ukraine Raises Excise Stamp Fees for Tobacco, Heated Tobacco and Vape Liquids by 30.5% as Parliament Backs E-Excise Delay to 2027
Ukraine's Cabinet of Ministers adopted Resolution No. 1259 on October 15, 2026, increasing excise stamp production fees for tobacco products and e-cigarette liquids by approximately 30.5%, from UAH 0.1643 to UAH 0.2144 per stamp. Fees for alcoholic beverages rose by about 30.2%. Separately, Ukraine's parliament passed Bill No. 15532 on October 13, proposing to postpone the full implementation of electronic excise stamps and traceability for alcohol, tobacco and e-cigarette liquids from November 1, 2026, to July 1, 2027. Parliament cited additional testing, configuration and integration requirements. The bill was sent to the president for signature on October 19.
Regulations
Oct.21
UK Vape Duty Starts in October as Hayati, DOJO and Others Launch Lower-Capacity Products With Lower Per-Unit Tax
UK Vape Duty Starts in October as Hayati, DOJO and Others Launch Lower-Capacity Products With Lower Per-Unit Tax
The UK's Vaping Products Duty will take effect on October 1, 2026, at a flat rate of £2.20 per 10ml of vaping liquid. Ahead of implementation, DOJO, PIXL and Hayati have introduced or been reported to be adding lower-capacity tiers alongside larger products. DOJO has added a 6ml BLAST7K Fresh below its 10ml BLAST10K Fresh, PIXL offers both a 12ml 8000 and a 6ml 5K, while retailer Ninja Vapes says Hayati is preparing a 7ml 4K alongside its existing 12ml 6K. The pattern points to a growing lower-capacity tier in the UK market, although the brands have not all explicitly linked the changes to the new duty.
Sep.23
UK Directors Banned After 352,688 Vapes Imported From China Were Misdeclared as Medical Nebulizers in £15 Million Tax Case
UK Directors Banned After 352,688 Vapes Imported From China Were Misdeclared as Medical Nebulizers in £15 Million Tax Case
The UK Insolvency Service said YSK Enterprises imported large quantities of vapes from China in 2023, with a shipment addressed to the company declared as medical nebulizers before Border Force found 352,688 vaping products. HMRC calculated nearly £15 million ($20.3 million) in unpaid VAT and customs duty, alongside about £437,000 in corporation tax. Two directors were disqualified for nine years. The case predates the UK's Vaping Products Duty, which will introduce vape-specific excise and duty-stamp requirements from October 2026.
Regulations
Sep.11
Sweden Finds ZYN Ingredient Labels Noncompliant Over Generic Flavoring Disclosure, Swedish Match Faces SEK 2 Million Monthly Penalty
Sweden Finds ZYN Ingredient Labels Noncompliant Over Generic Flavoring Disclosure, Swedish Match Faces SEK 2 Million Monthly Penalty
Sweden's Public Health Agency has found ingredient labels on ZYN nicotine pouches sold by Philip Morris International subsidiary Swedish Match to be noncompliant, according to Dagens industri. The products' packaging listed 10 to 13 ingredients, compared with 11 to 42 in regulatory submissions, with multiple flavoring ingredients grouped under the generic term "aromer." The agency ordered corrective action, warning of a conditional penalty of SEK 2 million per month for noncompliance. The order applies only to products manufactured after the decision becomes legally effective and does not require recalls. Swedish Match disputes the agency's interpretation and plans to appeal.
PMI
Oct.22