Juul Faces Market Withdrawal in the US: Implications and Controversies

Jul.08.2022
Juul Faces Market Withdrawal in the US: Implications and Controversies
The FDA ordered Juul products to be removed from the US market due to concerns over youth vaping.

On June 23, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced that all Juul products must be removed from the US market. This decision significantly expanded the existing ban on the company's nicotine e-cigarettes among teenagers to include adults as well. The following day, Juul appealed to the federal court to temporarily halt the ban and questioned the decision. The court agreed to temporarily suspend the ban, and currently, Juul products are still being sold in the US.


Lynn Kozlowski, a professor at the State University of New York at Buffalo's School of Public Health and Health Professions, has been researching nicotine and tobacco addiction for several decades. In this Q&A, he addresses the recent controversy surrounding Juul products and how they fit into broader discussions among adults and young people about e-cigarettes, tobacco use, and public health.


Why does the US Food and Drug Administration want to stop the sale of Juul products?


According to the FDA, the decision to remove certain flavored electronic cigarette products from the market is a preventative measure due to the lack of "sufficient evidence of product toxicology profiles" to ensure public health and safety. The FDA also noted that it has not received any information indicating that Juul products pose an imminent danger.


In a statement, FDA Commissioner Robert M. Califf addressed the impact of Juul products on youth e-cigarette use. This decision comes as some are hoping for new bans on Juul products and other adult e-cigarettes, in effort to decrease teen e-cigarette usage.


How do the health risks of electronic cigarettes compare to traditional smoking?


At least half of smokers die prematurely due to cancer, obstructive lung disease and cardiovascular diseases caused by smoking, which shorten their average lifespan by 10 years.


Currently, there is a lack of long-term epidemiological data on e-cigarettes. However, assessments conducted in the United States and the United Kingdom have concluded that while the harm from e-cigarettes may be much less than that of traditional cigarettes, they still pose some risks. Potential hazards include nicotine addiction and some cardiovascular risks, although it is estimated that these risks are lower than those associated with smoking cigarettes.


Can electronic cigarettes reduce the harm caused by traditional smoking?


I do not encourage anyone to vape if they do not need to. However, if someone smokes and e-cigarettes help them quit completely, they can be a useful tool in reducing smoking and health issues. Quitting smoking is indisputably good for your health. Research shows that if someone quits smoking before the age of 40, they can avoid 90% of their risk of death compared to continuing to smoke. If someone quits smoking before the age of 30, their health risks are almost the same as someone who has never smoked.


The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention states that there is limited evidence to suggest that e-cigarettes aid in smoking cessation. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved some e-cigarettes for sale, noting that they can be a beneficial tool for smokers in significantly reducing their tobacco use or quitting altogether.


Recent research has shown that electronic cigarettes are more effective in aiding smokers to quit than nicotine replacement therapy. The UK National Health Service has approved electronic cigarettes as a recognized form of smoking cessation aid.


Is vaping still popular among teenagers as it was before?


Teen e-cigarette use is on the decline, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In 2019, 27.5 percent of high school students reported having used e-cigarettes within the past month. That number dropped to 19.6 percent by 2020, and again to 11.3 percent by 2022. Just over a quarter of monthly users, or roughly 3 percent of high schoolers in 2022, reported using e-cigarettes daily.


Some of the reduction may be due to COVID-19, restrictions on young people's access, and government anti-vaping campaigns.


The widespread publicity around the serious respiratory illness caused by e-cigarettes, known as EVALI, is likely to deter many people from using them. However, research has ultimately shown that the illness is primarily caused by illicit THC-containing e-cigarette products sold on the black market.


Will teenagers who vape lead to a higher smoking rate among adolescents?


Although the decrease in teen e-cigarette use is encouraging, an important question worth asking is whether e-cigarettes directly lead to smoking later on.


Parents have valid reasons to be concerned that e-cigarettes may serve as a gateway to smoking. However, research does not necessarily support this strong causal relationship. Despite the recent surge in e-cigarette use across the country, smoking rates have actually decreased.


According to data from a national survey of nearly 40,000 participants in the US over the past few years, researchers have found that less than 1% of those who tried e-cigarettes for the first time became long-term smokers. Compared to those who first tried cigarettes or other tobacco products, people who first tried e-cigarettes were also less likely to become smokers.


Another large-scale study on American youth found that once researchers controlled for general risky behavior, the history of using e-cigarettes was only moderately or insignificantly associated with increased smoking rates.


How do you balance adult usage with teenage safety?


Even though e-cigarettes are not a major factor contributing to youth smoking, the use of e-cigarette products by young people is still a cause for concern, despite the ban on selling e-cigarettes to those under the age of 21 in 2019.


Completely banning products that may be helpful for adult smokers who want to quit is not the only way to reduce young people's access to these services. As an example, a proposal suggests moving the sales of all nicotine and tobacco products to stores that only allow entry for individuals of 21 years or older.


While products like Juul deserve research and regulation, it is important to remember the established deadline for verification and the ease of access for cigarettes - whether it is for adults or the many teenagers who start smoking every year and will become adult smokers. Persuading as many smokers to quit as possible will save lives.


This article contains excerpts or reprints from third-party sources, and the copyright belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us for deletion. Any unit or individual who needs to reprint must contact the author, and direct reprinting is prohibited.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

British Columbia Sues Juul Over Youth Nicotine Addiction
British Columbia Sues Juul Over Youth Nicotine Addiction
British Columbia has filed a civil lawsuit against Juul Labs, alleging the company fuelled youth nicotine addiction through highly addictive products and deceptive marketing practices. The claim was submitted to the B.C. Supreme Court under the newly enacted Vaping Product Damages and Health Care Costs Recovery Act.
Dec.15 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Malaysia MOH: 25,643 enforcement operations and 496,247 premises inspected nationwide as of Nov. 30
Malaysia MOH: 25,643 enforcement operations and 496,247 premises inspected nationwide as of Nov. 30
Malaysia’s Ministry of Health said it conducted 25,643 enforcement operations involving inspections of 496,247 premises nationwide as of Nov.
Jan.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Mexican Senate Approves Nationwide Ban on E-Cigarettes and Vapes
Mexican Senate Approves Nationwide Ban on E-Cigarettes and Vapes
Mexico’s Senate passed a reform to the General Health Law banning the production, importation, sale, and advertising of e-cigarettes and vape products nationwide. The bill passed with 76 votes in favor, 37 against, and one abstention.
Dec.12 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Kyrgyzstan Extends Import Ban on E-Cigarettes and Nicotine Liquids by Six Months
Kyrgyzstan Extends Import Ban on E-Cigarettes and Nicotine Liquids by Six Months
The Kyrgyz government has extended its ban on the import of electronic cigarettes and nicotine-containing liquids for another six months. The decision, signed by the chairman of the Cabinet of Ministers, covers e-cigarettes, integrated nicotine delivery systems, and nicotine liquids used in such devices. The original ban was introduced in July and was due to expire soon.
Dec.24 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Croatian decree raises excise duties on tobacco products effective January 1, 2026
Croatian decree raises excise duties on tobacco products effective January 1, 2026
Croatian government decree provides that higher excise duties on tobacco manufactures and tobacco products take effect from January 1, 2026. Excise on e-liquid is set at €0.25 per millilitre, on heated tobacco products at €211.30 per kilogram, and on a new tobacco product at €126.90 per kilogram. The decree’s explanation says 2026 budget revenue from these excises is expected to increase by €129.1 million.
Jan.07 by 2FIRSTS.ai
South Korean Court Strikes Down Health Levy on Vape Nicotine Liquids, Citing Disproportionate Penalties
South Korean Court Strikes Down Health Levy on Vape Nicotine Liquids, Citing Disproportionate Penalties
A Seoul court has annulled South Korea’s health-levy assessments imposed on multiple importers of nicotine liquids used for vaping. While the court agreed the nicotine could be treated as “tobacco” because it was found to be leaf-derived, it ruled the levy—stacked with other taxes and calculated on a blunt, volume-only basis—was so severe it effectively deprived businesses of the ability to operate, breaching constitutional proportionality and equality standards.
Jan.26 by 2FIRSTS.ai