Juul Labs settles $438.5 million lawsuit with U.S. states.

Sep.07.2022
Juul Labs settles $438.5 million lawsuit with U.S. states.
Juul Labs agrees to a $438.5 million settlement with 34 US states and territories over accusations of marketing to minors.

Recently, e-cigarette manufacturer Juul Labs agreed to pay a settlement of $438.5 million (approximately RMB 3.039 billion) to resolve lawsuits raised by 34 states and regions in the United States. These lawsuits allege that Juul underestimated the risk of its products and targeted underage customers.


On Tuesday, Connecticut Attorney General William Tong announced a deal representing several states and Puerto Rico. Puerto Rico joined the group in 2020 to investigate Juul's early marketing practices and claimed its technology as a safe and beneficial alternative to smoking.


The settlement resolved one of the major legal threats facing the company that was in crisis. However, the company still faces nine separate lawsuits from other states. In addition, Juul is also facing hundreds of personal lawsuits filed by teenagers and others who claim they were addicted to the company's electronic cigarette products.


According to a statement, a national investigation has found that Juul marketed their e-cigarettes to underage teenagers through sponsoring parties, giving away product samples and advertising, as well as using social media posts featuring young models.


In this settlement, we have obtained billions of dollars to help reduce the use of nicotine, and have forced Juul to accept a series of strict prohibitions to end adolescent marketing and combat underage sales," Tong said in a press release.


A total of $438.5 million will be paid over a period of six to ten years. Tong stated that at least $16 million of the funds paid by Connecticut will be dedicated towards prevention and education efforts. Juul had previously settled lawsuits in Arizona, Louisiana, North Carolina, and Washington.


Most of the restrictions imposed by the Tuesday settlement will not affect Juul's operations, as the company had ceased the use of parties, giveaways, and other promotional activities several years ago, when it came under scrutiny.


Since the launch of Juul in 2015, there has been a significant increase in the number of young people using e-cigarettes, prompting the US Food and Drug Administration to declare it an "epidemic" among underage users. Health experts warn that this unprecedented growth could lead to a generation of young people becoming addicted to nicotine.


Since 2019, Juul has mostly been in retreat, giving up all U.S. advertising and removing its fruit and candy flavors from store shelves.


The biggest blow occurred earlier this summer when the FDA started banning all Juul e-cigarettes from the market. Juul challenged this decision in court, prompting the FDA to conduct a scientific review of the company's technology.


The FDA's review is part of a comprehensive investigation into the multi-billion dollar electronic cigarette industry, following years of regulatory delays. The agency has authorized some e-cigarettes for adult smokers looking for less harmful alternatives.


Although Juul initially focused its marketing on young urban consumers, the company has since shifted to positioning its product as a nicotine replacement for traditional cigarette users.


As part of a settlement, Juul has agreed to avoid a series of marketing tactics. This includes not using cartoons, paying influential social media users, advertising on billboards and public transportation, and placing ads on any channel with less than 85% adult viewership.


Statement: 1. This article's content is compiled from third-party information sources and is only intended for industry communication and learning purposes. 2. This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the truthfulness and accuracy of the article's content. The compilation of this article is only for industry communication and research purposes. 3. Due to limitations in the compilation process, the article's expressions may not entirely match the original text, so please refer to the original text for accuracy. 4. Regarding any domestic, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, or international statements and positions, 2FIRSTS is fully aligned with the Chinese government. 5. The copyright for the compiled information belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please request to have the content removed.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Canadian Court Allows Juul and Altria Vape Class Action to Move Forward Over Youth Marketing Claims
Canadian Court Allows Juul and Altria Vape Class Action to Move Forward Over Youth Marketing Claims
A Quebec Superior Court has allowed a class action lawsuit against Juul Labs and Altria Group related to vaping products to proceed, involving allegations concerning marketing practices, youth exposure and corporate responsibility. The ruling only allows the case to move forward and does not represent a finding that Juul or Altria are legally liable. The case highlights continued legal risks facing vape companies regarding product marketing, youth protection and corporate accountability.
Jul.28
Malaysia Liquid Nicotine Returns to Poisons List, Leaving Vape Retail and RM354 Million Tax Collection in Legal Uncertainty
Malaysia Liquid Nicotine Returns to Poisons List, Leaving Vape Retail and RM354 Million Tax Collection in Legal Uncertainty
Malaysia’s withdrawal of its appeal in a landmark liquid-nicotine case has left a High Court ruling that struck down the 2023 nicotine exemption in force, bringing liquid and gel nicotine used in vaping products back under the Poisons Act 1952. At the same time, the Control of Smoking Products for Public Health Act 2024 continues to provide a regulatory framework for vaping products, creating uncertainty over retail sales, taxation and existing inventory. MPs are calling for nicotine vape sales and excise collection to stop, including refunds of more than RM354 million collected since 2023, while industry and consumer groups are asking the government to clarify the current legal position.
Sep.04
China’s Jiangsu Tobacco Monopoly Bureau and Drug Regulator Target Illegal Vape Sales Disguised as Medical Devices, Define Six Violations
China’s Jiangsu Tobacco Monopoly Bureau and Drug Regulator Target Illegal Vape Sales Disguised as Medical Devices, Define Six Violations
China’s Jiangsu Tobacco Monopoly Bureau and Jiangsu Provincial Medical Products Administration have issued a joint notice targeting illegal production and sales of vape products disguised as medical devices. The notice identifies six categories of violations, including obtaining medical licenses through false materials, misusing medical device credentials, expanding production beyond approved scopes, and using medical device-related online platforms to promote or sell vape products. The action is based on China’s tobacco and medical device regulations and aims to strengthen vape oversight and consumer protection.
Aug.04
Juul Sublicense Reshapes Vuse Alto Patent Bill as Court Ends R.J. Reynolds’ 5.25% Royalty Obligation to Altria
Juul Sublicense Reshapes Vuse Alto Patent Bill as Court Ends R.J. Reynolds’ 5.25% Royalty Obligation to Altria
According to Law360 on August 31, 2026, a federal judge in North Carolina ruled that a patent sublicense between R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co. and Juul Labs Inc. relieves Reynolds of its obligation to continue paying royalties to Altria Client Services LLC over Vuse Alto. A jury had previously found that Vuse Alto infringed three Altria patents and awarded approximately $95.2 million in past damages, after which Reynolds was ordered to pay an ongoing royalty equal to 5.25% of positive net sales. The new ruling finds that a valid sublicense can eliminate future infringement, potentially ending what Altria described as hundreds of millions of dollars in future royalties.
Sep.01
Ohio Supreme Court Weighs Whether State Consumer Law Can Restrict Flavored Vape Sales
Ohio Supreme Court Weighs Whether State Consumer Law Can Restrict Flavored Vape Sales
The Ohio Supreme Court is hearing a case involving flavored vape sales and whether state authorities can use consumer protection laws to take action against retailers selling unauthorized vape products. Ohio officials argue that selling unauthorized flavored vapes may constitute consumer deception, while retailers argue that tobacco product regulation falls under federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authority and that states cannot impose additional restrictions through consumer laws. The case could affect the scope of state-level vape regulation across the United States.
Aug.06
Indonesia’s BNN Pushes Total Vape Ban as Health Ministry Tightens Tobacco Packaging Rules, Putting $40 Billion Industry at Risk
Indonesia’s BNN Pushes Total Vape Ban as Health Ministry Tightens Tobacco Packaging Rules, Putting $40 Billion Industry at Risk
Indonesia is entering a new phase of debate over vape and tobacco regulation. The National Narcotics Agency (BNN) has proposed a total vape ban, with some lawmakers supporting stronger restrictions. At the same time, the Health Ministry is advancing tobacco and nicotine regulations under Government Regulation No. 28/2024, including measures such as plain packaging and product controls. Tobacco and vape industries have warned that tighter rules could affect a sector worth around $40 billion, supporting about 6 million jobs and contributing significant tax revenue.
Jul.27