Juul Labs suffers 23% revenue drop in Q1 2022

Jul.21.2022
Juul Labs suffers 23% revenue drop in Q1 2022
Juul Labs Inc. reported a 23% revenue drop and $28 million loss in Q1 2022, amid pressure from government regulators.

According to insiders, Juul Labs Inc. suffered a loss in the first quarter of 2022, with revenue dropping by 23% compared to the previous year. The company has been trying to regain public trust during the government's crackdown on youth vaping.


According to sources, Juul presented financial data during its search for rescue financing. As of March 31st, Juul generated revenue of $259 million in the first quarter, with a pre-adjustment loss of $28 million due to interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. In the same period last year, the company reported revenue of $29 million.


Due to regulatory efforts to crack down on underage e-cigarette use, Juul is facing increasing sales pressure. In June, the FDA banned the placement of Juul products on shelves in the United States, citing a lack of evidence demonstrating the overall safety of the company's products and noting Juul's disproportionate role in the rise of youth e-cigarette use. Juul then won an emergency court order, temporarily halting the decision and allowing the company to continue selling its products. Juul is also facing a series of consumer lawsuits that could result in millions of dollars in damages.


The company is currently attempting to raise funds in order to gain some breathing room prior to several repayment deadlines.


According to unnamed sources, Juul currently has $323 million in cash on hand as of the first quarter, which is lower than the $428 million they had during the same period last year. Their total debt amounts to around $2.15 billion, which includes a $394 million term loan due in August 2023 and approximately $1.7 billion in "physically settled securities" notes due in 2025 that allow the company to defer interest payments.


Consideration of bankruptcy.


In addition to considering financing options, the company has been exploring various alternatives, including filing for bankruptcy. According to a Bloomberg report earlier this month, Kirkland & Ellis and Alvarez & Marsal have been providing Juul with litigation and restructuring advice.


The potential ban by the FDA is part of a long-running movement by the government to control electronic cigarette manufacturers. Flavorings such as mango and crème brûlée have helped Juul's founders become billionaires, and seem to be aimed at attracting young customers, despite the company's claims that its products offer a safer way for smokers to consume nicotine.


In 2019, Juul ceased the sale of most flavors, and the following year, the FDA prohibited the entry of sweet and fruity flavors into the market.


A spokesperson for Juul has stated that the company is exploring alternative financing options in light of ongoing FDA scrutiny and has yet to decide on any particular course of action. The statement also affirms the company's commitment to providing their product to adult consumers seeking an alternative to traditional cigarettes.


Translate into standard journalistic English:


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

RJR Vapor Loses Tax Refund Case as Texas High Court Finds VELO Pouches Taxable
RJR Vapor Loses Tax Refund Case as Texas High Court Finds VELO Pouches Taxable
The Texas Supreme Court issued a case summary on May 8, 2026, describing its decision in Hancock v. RJR Vapor Co. LLC. The dispute centered on whether RJR Vapor’s VELO oral nicotine pouches are taxable as “tobacco products” under the Texas Tax Code. Lower courts had held that the pouches were not taxable tobacco products, but the Texas Supreme Court reversed, concluding that VELO pouches are taxable because they are made of “a tobacco substitute.”
May.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Special Report | Tax Veteran Takes Helm at China’s Tobacco Regulator, Leadership Change Fuels Reform Watch
Special Report | Tax Veteran Takes Helm at China’s Tobacco Regulator, Leadership Change Fuels Reform Watch
China’s tobacco system has appointed a new top internal leader with a long background in public finance and taxation, drawing renewed attention to whether the country’s tobacco monopoly may enter a new phase of reform debate. The appointment itself does not signal a defined policy shift.But it places a veteran fiscal official at the center of a key state sector amid unresolved questions on tax reform, structure, and emerging tobacco products.
Mar.20
Japan Tobacco Releases Three Ploom AURA Collaboration Panels Inspired by “Sake”
Japan Tobacco Releases Three Ploom AURA Collaboration Panels Inspired by “Sake”
Japan Tobacco announced that it will sponsor “CRAFT SAKE WEEK 2026,” to be held at Roppongi Hills Arena, and set up a dedicated smoking area called “Ploom LOUNGE.” Three Ploom AURA collaboration front panels inspired by the theme of “sake” will be offered at the venue, along with trial use, sales, and related original content.
Apr.13 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Kentucky Governor Signs Tobacco, Nicotine, and Vapor Product Licensing Bill Into Law
Kentucky Governor Signs Tobacco, Nicotine, and Vapor Product Licensing Bill Into Law
A Kentucky bill relating to tobacco, nicotine, and vapor product licensing was signed by the governor on April 10, 2026, and enacted as Acts Chapter 70. The measure sets application requirements for tobacco, nicotine, and vapor product licenses, governs batch licensing, renewals, ownership changes, and denial grounds, and requires the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control to publish application forms and related regulations within 30 days of the law’s effective date.
Apr.14 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Philippine DTI Says Flavored Vape Products With Minor-Appealing Descriptors Are “100 Percent Smuggled”
Philippine DTI Says Flavored Vape Products With Minor-Appealing Descriptors Are “100 Percent Smuggled”
A Philippine Department of Trade and Industry official told a Senate hearing on vaping regulations that flavored vape products marketed with descriptors attractive to minors are “100 percent smuggled” and did not pass the agency’s licensing process.
Mar.16 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Philippine Anti-Smoking Groups Urge DTI Action Over Alleged Vape Law Violations by ZYN and IQOS
Philippine Anti-Smoking Groups Urge DTI Action Over Alleged Vape Law Violations by ZYN and IQOS
Several anti-smoking and health advocacy groups in the Philippines urged the Department of Trade and Industry to take action against tobacco companies accused of violating the Vape Regulation Act of 2022. The groups said three consecutive complaints had been filed involving nicotine pouch brand ZYN and heated tobacco product company IQOS Philippines.
Apr.27 by 2FIRSTS.ai