Juul Labs to Pay Nearly $440 Million Settlement.

Sep.07.2022
Juul Labs to Pay Nearly $440 Million Settlement.
Juul Labs agrees to pay nearly $440 million to settle investigations into its marketing practices in 33 states.

Electronic cigarette manufacturer Juul Labs has agreed to pay nearly $440 million to settle a two-year investigation by 33 states into its marketing of high-nicotine e-cigarette products. These products have long been accused of being the main driver behind the surge in youth e-cigarette use nationwide.


Connecticut Attorney General William Tong announced the deal on Tuesday, on behalf of several states and Puerto Rico. Puerto Rico had joined forces in 2020 to investigate Juul's early promotional activities and claimed the safety and benefits of its technology as a smoking alternative.


The settlement has resolved one of the biggest legal threats facing the struggling company, however, it still faces nine separate lawsuits from other states. Additionally, Juul is also facing hundreds of individual lawsuits brought by teenagers and others who claim to have become addicted to the company's e-cigarette products.


According to a statement, a national investigation has found that Juul marketed its e-cigarettes to underage minors through parties, product giveaways, advertisements, and social media posts featuring young models.


Through this settlement, we have acquired hundreds of millions of dollars to aid in reducing nicotine use, and have compelled Juul to accept a series of strict prohibitory clauses aimed at ending their adolescent marketing tactics and combating underage sales," said Juul spokesperson Tong in a press release.


A sum of $438.5 million will be paid within a period of 6 to 10 years. Tong stated that at least $16 million paid by the state of Connecticut will be used for prevention and education efforts. Prior to this settlement, Juul had resolved lawsuits in Arizona, Louisiana, North Carolina, and Washington.


Most of the restrictions imposed by the settlement on Tuesday will not affect Juul's practices. Juul stopped using parties, giveaways, and other promotional activities a few years ago after being scrutinized.


Since its launch in 2015, the use of e-cigarettes by teenagers has surged, leading to the US Food and Drug Administration declaring a "epidemic" of underage e-cigarette use among youths. Health experts warn that this unprecedented growth could result in a generation of young people becoming addicted to nicotine.


Since 2019, Juul has mostly been in retreat, abandoning all US advertising and removing its fruit and candy flavors from store shelves.


The biggest blow occurred earlier this summer, when the FDA began banning all Juul e-cigarettes from entering the market. Juul challenged this decision in court, prompting the FDA to resume its scientific review of the company's technology.


The FDA's review is part of a comprehensive examination of the multi-billion-dollar electronic cigarette industry by regulatory authorities, following years of regulatory delays. The agency has authorized some electronic cigarettes for adult smokers who are looking for less harmful alternatives.


Although Juul initially focused on marketing to young urban consumers, the company has since shifted towards positioning its product as an alternative source of nicotine for older smokers.


The company stated that they will continue to focus on their future as they fulfill their mission to prevent the leading cause of preventable deaths among adult smokers, while also combating underage usage.


As part of a settlement agreement, Juul has agreed to avoid a series of marketing practices. These include not using cartoon characters, paying social media influencers, depicting individuals under the age of 35, advertising on billboards and public transportation, and advertising through any channel unless 85% of the audience is adults.


The deal also includes restrictions on the placement of Juul products in stores, age verification for all sales, and limitations on online and retail sales.


Statement


This article is compiled from third-party information and is intended for industry exchange and learning purposes only.


This article does not represent the viewpoint of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the truthfulness or accuracy of the content. The translation of this article is only intended for industry-related research and communication.


Due to limitations in translation proficiency, the compiled article may not fully convey the same meaning as the original. Please refer to the original article for accuracy.


2FIRSTS maintains full alignment with the Chinese government on any domestic, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, and foreign-related statements and positions.


The copyright of compiled information belongs to the original media and authors. If there is any infringement, please contact us for immediate removal.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

As Regulators Focus on Nicotine Pouch Child Safety, Safeguard Pursues an External Packaging Route
As Regulators Focus on Nicotine Pouch Child Safety, Safeguard Pursues an External Packaging Route
As regulators pay closer attention to child safety in nicotine pouches, manufacturers face a practical challenge: how to strengthen child-resistant packaging without unnecessarily reworking products, production lines and regulatory submissions already in place. In a written interview with 2Firsts, Chemular detailed Safeguard’s external packaging approach, its customer-specific testing requirements and possible PMTA pathways. The model remains early-stage, but it offers a new way to think about an increasingly important regulatory and manufacturing issue.
Industry Insight
Sep.19
Product | BAT Expands VELO Peach Ice Medium to FamilyMart Stores Nationwide in Japan
Product | BAT Expands VELO Peach Ice Medium to FamilyMart Stores Nationwide in Japan
British American Tobacco Japan (BAT Japan) expanded VELO Peach Ice Medium to FamilyMart stores nationwide in Japan from September 7, 2026. The oral tobacco product first launched on July 6 and had previously been sold through VELO's official online store, glo Store Ginza and tobacco retailers. It combines peach flavor with menthol cooling at a Medium strength level and is priced at JPY 360. Japanese tobacco retailers list 15 pouches per pack. The move adds the new SKU to an existing nationwide FamilyMart distribution network for VELO rather than marking the brand's first entry into the convenience-store chain.
Sep.15
Product | Philip Morris Korea Launches TEREA Limona Pearl, Expanding Fresh Blend Capsule Lineup to Five
Product | Philip Morris Korea Launches TEREA Limona Pearl, Expanding Fresh Blend Capsule Lineup to Five
Philip Morris Korea launched TEREA Limona Pearl in South Korea on August 31, 2026, expanding the TEREA Fresh Blend capsule tobacco stick lineup from four variants to five. Designed for the IQOS ILUMA series, the new stick combines a capsule with what the company calls a Fresh Filter. Philip Morris Korea describes the product as offering an aromatic, refreshing flavor profile with a cooling sensation, with an additional fresh note released when the capsule is crushed. The recommended retail price is KRW 4,800 per pack, with sales through IQOS stores and convenience stores nationwide. No reliable evidence has been found that the same Limona Pearl SKU was previously officially launched in another major IQOS market.
Sep.01
AIR Global Starts Debt Refinancing Four Months After Nasdaq Listing With About $400 Million Notes Expected
AIR Global Starts Debt Refinancing Four Months After Nasdaq Listing With About $400 Million Notes Expected
AIR Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of AIR Global, has launched an offering of U.S. dollar-denominated senior unsecured notes, with proceeds primarily intended to repay its existing term loan and revolving credit facility. AIR has not disclosed the final size, maturity or coupon; Refinitiv, citing Moody's, reported an expected issuance of approximately $400 million and a Ba3 rating. AIR had about $412.4 million outstanding under the two bank facilities at June 30 and net debt of $344.8 million. In the first half of 2026, AIR's Al Fakher-led flavored shisha molasses business generated about 99% of company revenue, while New Growth Categories including Crown Switch produced $2.2 million in revenue and remained loss-making on an adjusted EBITDA basis.
Sep.23
IQOS Enters Kantar BrandZ Global Top 100 for First Time, Valued at $36.6 Billion and Ranked No. 74
IQOS Enters Kantar BrandZ Global Top 100 for First Time, Valued at $36.6 Billion and Ranked No. 74
Philip Morris International’s IQOS has entered the Kantar BrandZ Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands for the first time, ranking No. 74 with a brand value of $36.634 billion and becoming one of only three newcomers to the 2026 ranking. Kantar said the combined value of the Global Top 100 reached $13.1 trillion, up 22% year on year, while the threshold for entry rose to a record high. PMI says IQOS has more than 35 million users worldwide and surpassed $10 billion in annual net revenues within a decade of launch.
Sep.03
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
Private antitrust litigation stemming from Altria's 2018 $12.8 billion investment for a 35% economic interest in JUUL is advancing before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Direct purchasers, indirect purchasers and indirect resellers of JUUL products filed answering briefs this week seeking to preserve class certifications granted by a California federal court in February. Altria and JUUL argue that individual consumers and large distributors differ too much in purchasing terms to remain in a single direct-purchaser class, while a separate dispute concerns whether California antitrust law can apply to indirect purchasers across 27 jurisdictions. A September trial has been put on hold during the appeal.
Sep.23