KTCL's Pan Masala Advertisements Violate Tobacco Control Laws

Dec.07.2022
KTCL's Pan Masala Advertisements Violate Tobacco Control Laws
KTCL's advertising of pan masala on buses violates tobacco laws and bid specifications. Raises ethical and health concerns.

According to the National Tobacco Control Organisations, advertising for pan masala found on Kadamba Transport Corporation Ltd (KTCL) buses has violated the 2003 Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act (COPTA) and the 1997 Goa Prohibition of Smoking and Spitting Act.


Dr. Shekhar Salkar, the president of NOTE, has stated that the current advertisements on KTCL buses are a deliberate form of marketing strategy designed to showcase paan masala and mouth freshener products and indirectly promote smokeless tobacco.


The President emphasized that the KTCL vide NIT KTC/GM/22/315 invitation dated August 12, 2021, to hire advertising agents, contained provisions stating that any company found to be in violation of the regulations would be barred from having their advertisements displayed by the central government or acting against good morals or current legal regulations.


Salkar said that the paan masala/mouth freshener advertisement currently displayed on your bus not only violates the COTPA act but also goes against the bidding specifications set by your office. Additionally, he criticized the ad for being in poor taste and unethical.


Taking into account that children and young people under the age of 15 are the largest users of KTCL services in the state, the aforementioned indirect promotions of tobacco products that pose a risk of oral cancer and other diseases can also be considered a violation of child rights in Goa, according to a law passed in 2003.


2FIRSTS will continue to track updates on this topic, with further information available on the "2FIRSTSAPP". Scan the QR code below to download the app.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

China Further Tightens E-Cigarette Capacity and Investment Controls, Supply Chain Faces Stronger Regulation and Accelerated Shakeout
China Further Tightens E-Cigarette Capacity and Investment Controls, Supply Chain Faces Stronger Regulation and Accelerated Shakeout
China is tightening controls over e-cigarette production capacity and investment as regulators move to curb disorderly competition and address oversupply risks, a new policy framework released on December 25 shows, signaling stronger oversight and a faster shakeout across the country’s e-cigarette supply chain, according to first-hand reporting by 2Firsts.
Dec.25
China Business Journal Reports: Multiple New E-Cigarette Policies Enter Public Consultation Phase in China, Covering Capacity Control and Credit Management
China Business Journal Reports: Multiple New E-Cigarette Policies Enter Public Consultation Phase in China, Covering Capacity Control and Credit Management
China Business Journal, citing a review of policy documents released by the State Tobacco Monopoly Administration in early 2026, said China’s latest e-cigarette rules target credit-based regulation, capacity controls and national standards revisions.Alan Zhao, co-founder of 2Firsts, said tighter oversight will speed consolidation, curb noncompliance and reduce destructive competition.
Jan.12 by 2FIRSTS.ai
BAT Subsidiary Warns of Surge in Illegal Nicotine Pouches in Canada, Calls for Unified Regulatory Framework
BAT Subsidiary Warns of Surge in Illegal Nicotine Pouches in Canada, Calls for Unified Regulatory Framework
Imperial Tobacco Canada, a subsidiary of British American Tobacco, has urged the federal government to respond to the spread of illegal nicotine pouches by allowing approved products to be sold through a wider range of adult retail channels. The company is also calling for stronger retail inspections, enhanced digital tracking, and closer coordination among provinces to build a consistent regulatory framework and restore the accessibility of the legal market.
Dec.05 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Nepal: 80 cartons of e-cigarettes seized, valued at US$150,000
Nepal: 80 cartons of e-cigarettes seized, valued at US$150,000
In Nepal’s Mustang district, authorities seized 80 cartons of e-cigarettes valued at NPR 22,459,320 (approximately US$150,000) in Lomanthang Rural Municipality-4, Nechung, and detained a 32-year-old man, Pema Lama. The account says the e-cigarettes were allegedly brought illegally from China three to four days earlier and loaded near the Korala Nepal–China border point before being intercepted.
Jan.13 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Juul, NJOY and Altria Clash Over Use of UCSF Public Documents in U.S. Patent Litigation
Juul, NJOY and Altria Clash Over Use of UCSF Public Documents in U.S. Patent Litigation
Juul Labs has asked a U.S. federal court to prevent NJOY and Altria from using documents stored in a public UCSF database in an ongoing patent lawsuit, arguing they are protected by attorney–client privilege. The defendants say the files have long been public and may contain evidence relevant to Juul’s patent conduct.
Dec.29 by 2FIRSTS.ai
U.S. Court Rules Zyn Marketing Dispute Can Proceed, Rejects Philip Morris International’s Bid to Dismiss
U.S. Court Rules Zyn Marketing Dispute Can Proceed, Rejects Philip Morris International’s Bid to Dismiss
A U.S. federal court in Florida denied Philip Morris International and its subsidiaries’ motion to dismiss, allowing consumers to proceed with claims under the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act alleging that Zyn nicotine pouches’ “tobacco-free” marketing is misleading. The court held that the allegations do not amount to a fraud claim and may move forward to the merits stage.
Dec.15 by 2FIRSTS.ai