KT&G Wins Lawsuit Against Journalist Over Unfair Reporting

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Dec.19.2023
KT&G Wins Lawsuit Against Journalist Over Unfair Reporting
KT&G wins lawsuit against journalist accusing its subsidiary of unfair acquisition; Supreme Court dismisses appeal.

According to a report from South Korean news outlet Newsway, tobacco company KT&G has achieved a final victory in a lawsuit filed by a journalist and other media outlets regarding alleged unfair practices during the acquisition process of its subsidiary. The case has gone through two trials before this ultimate triumph.

 

Legal experts have revealed that on November 30th, the Supreme Court's First Civil Division upheld a decision to dismiss the appeal brought by KT&G against Kang Jin-gu, a former journalist of "Kyung-Hyang Shinmun," for damages.

 

The concept of non-acceptance of appeals refers to the system in which the Supreme Court dismisses appeals without reviewing the case.

 

Previously, on February 26, 2020, Kang published an article titled "KT&G Accused of Concealing New Drug Toxicity and Coercive Unfair Mergers" in "京乡新闻" magazine.

 

An article alleges that KT&G suppressed the toxicological test results of its subsidiary, KT&G Life Science Company, and manipulated the merger ratio by inflating the enterprise value during the merger with its subsidiary Yongjin Pharmaceutical in 2016.

 

The article also claims that KT&G Life Science Company has an illicit undisclosed agreement, whereby if the initial public offering of the merger case fails, compensation will be provided to investors of KT&G Life Science Company. Additionally, the CEO of the progressive pharmaceutical company opposing the merger was dismissed and replaced by someone from the headquarters of KT&G.

 

KT&G has filed a lawsuit seeking damages against Kang and others, alleging that their statements are false and have harmed the company's public perception.

 

In August 2022, the initial court recognized the public interest of the report but ruled that there was no reason to believe Jiang's claims of undisclosed agreements and concealed toxicity tests were true. The court also supported KT&G's view, stating that the report not only failed to raise any doubts but also used conclusory language to defame KT&G, and the opposing views were not adequately countered.

 

In the second trial held in July of this year, the court stated that the content in the article written by former journalist Mr. Kang, including claims of "reaching agreements with investors," "unfair dismissal of management executives," and "concealing genetic toxicity," were found to be false. The initial ruling was deemed justified, and therefore, the defendant's appeal was dismissed on grounds of lack of merit.

 

On November 30th, the Supreme Court unreasonably rejected the case, bringing an end to the 3-year, 10-month long litigation with KT&G emerging as the ultimate victor.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Ohio Supreme Court Weighs Whether State Consumer Law Can Restrict Flavored Vape Sales
Ohio Supreme Court Weighs Whether State Consumer Law Can Restrict Flavored Vape Sales
The Ohio Supreme Court is hearing a case involving flavored vape sales and whether state authorities can use consumer protection laws to take action against retailers selling unauthorized vape products. Ohio officials argue that selling unauthorized flavored vapes may constitute consumer deception, while retailers argue that tobacco product regulation falls under federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authority and that states cannot impose additional restrictions through consumer laws. The case could affect the scope of state-level vape regulation across the United States.
Aug.06
Former ATF Official’s Claims on Chinese Vape Companies and 6-Methyl Nicotine Fuel US Regulatory Debate
Former ATF Official’s Claims on Chinese Vape Companies and 6-Methyl Nicotine Fuel US Regulatory Debate
Former ATF Deputy Director Edgar Domenech has warned that some Chinese vape companies may be using 6-methyl nicotine, a nicotine analogue, raising new questions over how US regulators should classify emerging nicotine compounds.
Jul.13
Tasmania Reports Annual Enforcement Results: 5.5 Million Illegal Cigarettes and Nearly 30,000 Vapes Seized, With IGET Products Visible in Official Images
Tasmania Reports Annual Enforcement Results: 5.5 Million Illegal Cigarettes and Nearly 30,000 Vapes Seized, With IGET Products Visible in Official Images
Tasmania reported its 2025/26 illicit tobacco enforcement results on July 14, with authorities seizing about 5.5 million illegal cigarettes, more than 2,500 kilograms of loose tobacco and nearly 30,000 vapes.
Jul.15
Italy and Greece Oppose Ireland’s Nicotine Product Bill, Raising EU Regulatory Concerns
Italy and Greece Oppose Ireland’s Nicotine Product Bill, Raising EU Regulatory Concerns
Italy and Greece have opposed Ireland’s proposed nicotine product regulations, arguing that the measures could affect EU market coordination and the free movement of products. Ireland plans to introduce stricter rules covering nicotine products including vapes and nicotine pouches, with measures involving packaging, marketing and sales controls. The dispute highlights differences among EU member states between stronger public health protections and maintaining regulatory consistency within the bloc’s single market.
Jul.29
Special Report | Russia, Ukraine and Belarus Launch Fresh Push to Rein in Vaping
Special Report | Russia, Ukraine and Belarus Launch Fresh Push to Rein in Vaping
Russia, Ukraine and Belarus are tightening vape regulation through different tools, from Ukraine’s stronger enforcement push and Belarus’s proposed advertising restrictions to Russia’s new GOST standard and regional sales-ban mechanism. As black-market concerns persist, some Russian experts argue that China’s tightly controlled but legalised model — built around licensing, traceability and taxation — may offer a more effective alternative to blanket prohibition.
Jul.15
FDA Sued Over Allowing Some Unauthorized Vapes and Nicotine Pouches to Stay on Market
FDA Sued Over Allowing Some Unauthorized Vapes and Nicotine Pouches to Stay on Market
Public health groups, pediatricians and parents sued the U.S. Food and Drug Administration on July 14, 2026, challenging a May enforcement guidance that they say allows unauthorized e-cigarettes and nicotine pouches to remain on the market while applications are under review.
Jul.15