LA Mayor Signs Order to Restrict Flavored Tobacco Sales

Aug.25.2022
LA Mayor Signs Order to Restrict Flavored Tobacco Sales
Los Angeles bans flavored tobacco sales, effective January 2023, citing harm to public health and disproportionately affecting minority groups.

On June 13th, Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti signed an ordinance to restrict the sale of menthol cigarettes and other flavored tobacco products. The ordinance will take effect on January 1, 2023. As of June 16th, 2022, the Smoke-Free Kids campaign reported that 127 local governments in California have passed restrictions on the sale of flavored tobacco products. At least 108 of those jurisdictions have restricted the sale of menthol cigarettes in addition to other flavored tobacco products.


In July, California Attorney General Rob Bonta joined a bipartisan coalition of state attorneys general calling on the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to adopt final regulatory standards to ban the production and sale of menthol cigarettes and flavored cigars in the US market. In a written statement, Bonta said, "Every day, millions of Californians smoke and begin down a dangerous path, leading to devastating health consequences." "There is no time to waste. We urge the FDA to swiftly finalize proposed regulations to ban menthol cigarettes and flavored cigars, which primarily harm young people and people of color. Any delay will only result in more lives lost.


Last year, the law exempting menthol cigarettes faced opposition from members of the Black Caucus, Mark Ridley-Thomas, Marqueece Harris Dawson, and Curren Price. They argued that studies have shown that African Americans are the most likely ethnic group to use menthol cigarettes, with a likelihood 25 times greater than that of white Americans.


Bonta has joined a coalition that includes attorneys general from Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Idaho, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Vermont, Washington D.C. as well as Guam, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.


In a letter to the FDA, the Association of Attorneys General emphasized the need to remove these products from the market to protect public health and address the disproportionate and systemic impact on vulnerable minority communities.


The FDA should have taken action to ban menthol cigarettes and flavored cigars long ago, with sufficient scientific backing. They reference a study that found menthol cigarettes disproportionately harm vulnerable populations, particularly African Americans.


Overwhelming scientific evidence, including the FDA's own findings and statements, indicates that menthol cigarettes have a significant negative impact on public health, leading to increased smoking and tobacco use that result in more sickness and deaths.


A recent study published in the "Tobacco Control" journal found that mint-flavored cigarettes "caused over 10 million smokers and 378,000 premature deaths" between 1980 and 2018.


Mint flavoring masks the harsh taste of tobacco, which remains the primary reason young people start and become addicted to smoking - over half of adult smokers aged 18-34 use mint-flavored cigarettes.


In the LGBTQ+ community, among smokers with mental health issues, and in socioeconomically disadvantaged groups, the usage of menthol cigarettes is also high.


In August 2020, Governor Gavin Newsom signed Senate Bill 793, a bipartisan effort aimed at eliminating flavored electronic cigarettes, including candy and mint flavors, which he said "would addict our children." Last year, Newsom called on the FDA to ban mint-flavored cigarettes, saying it was "an important step in the right direction." In April 2021, Newsom urged the federal government to follow California's lead in protecting public health and promoting racial equality by banning menthol-flavored cigarettes. "For decades, Big Tobacco has targeted Black communities and profited from them by selling menthol cigarettes, making smoking-related illnesses the leading cause of death for African Americans in this country," he said.


The alliance stated in its letter that the proposed ban on menthol by the FDA is a crucial step in promoting health equity and protecting public health, and it will not significantly increase illegal trade.


Removing menthol cigarettes from the US market and banning flavors in cigars could potentially decrease smoking among young people, lead to better smoking cessation outcomes among adults, promote health equity, and benefit public health. This is according to a signed letter from 23 attorneys general representing various states and territories, who argue that inaction in these areas each year results in the loss of thousands of lives and has an adverse impact on the overall health of the public.


On the ballot for the November 8th election, Proposition 31 is a referendum on SB 793, aimed at lifting the current ban on the sale of flavored e-cigarettes, including mint and menthol, and flavored tobacco products in stores. A majority vote in favor will maintain the ban on flavored tobacco products, while a majority vote against will lift the ban.


Declaration


This article is compiled from third-party information and is intended only for industry exchange and learning.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the truthfulness or accuracy of the content. The compilation of this article is solely for internal industry research and communication purposes.


Due to limitations in translation ability, the translated article may not fully express the original text. Please refer to the original text for accuracy.


2FIRSTS maintains full alignment with the Chinese government on any domestic, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, or foreign-related statements and positions.


The copyright of the compiled information belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us for removal.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

Two Florida Bills Move: One Restricts Vape Advertising, Another Rewrites Cigarette Tax Treatment for Heated Tobacco
Two Florida Bills Move: One Restricts Vape Advertising, Another Rewrites Cigarette Tax Treatment for Heated Tobacco
The Florida Senate Industries Committee advance SB 980, the “Florida Age-Gate Act,” which would restrict advertising, promotion, and open displays of certain nicotine dispensing devices that lack FDA marketing authorization, with escalating penalties. Separately, the Florida House Ways and Means Committee advance HB 377, which would exclude heated tobacco products from being taxed like cigarettes.
Jan.28 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Multi-agency crackdown targets vape and convenience stores across Wirral, seizing illegal cigarettes and non-compliant pods
Multi-agency crackdown targets vape and convenience stores across Wirral, seizing illegal cigarettes and non-compliant pods
A multi-agency, intelligence-led enforcement operation took place on January 27, 2026, targeting vape and convenience stores across Wirral, including West Kirby, to disrupt the supply of illegal tobacco and vaping products. Six premises were inspected, with approximately 10,500 illegal cigarettes seized along with vape pods that were not in original packaging or did not meet UK regulatory requirements.
Feb.05 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Malaysia moves ahead with vape sales ban plan; PMI urges Japan-style differentiated excise taxes
Malaysia moves ahead with vape sales ban plan; PMI urges Japan-style differentiated excise taxes
Malaysia plans to implement a ban or restrictions on e-cigarettes and vaping products as early as mid-2026 and no later than year-end. The head of Philip Morris Malaysia and Singapore said the government should look to Japan’s approach of regulating and taxing different tobacco and nicotine products differently, warning that an outright ban could push demand into illicit channels.
Feb.02
Proposed vaping duty in Jersey: £467,000 forecast for 2026 as it takes effect in the second half of the year
Proposed vaping duty in Jersey: £467,000 forecast for 2026 as it takes effect in the second half of the year
Jersey is proposing a vaping duty. The Treasury Minister said the duty is forecast to raise £467,000 in 2026 because it will take effect in the second half of the year, and £955,000 per year from 2027 to 2029. Implementation is estimated to cost around £400,000 over four years, with an initial cost of £145,000 in 2026. The policy is described as aiming to reduce nicotine consumption and improve public health, while avoiding a shift to smoking.
Feb.26 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Guam names retailers fined for selling tobacco to under-21 customers; penalties range from $2,000 to $4,000
Guam names retailers fined for selling tobacco to under-21 customers; penalties range from $2,000 to $4,000
Guam disclosed enforcement details for its 2025 tobacco retail compliance program, showing a 97.1% compliance rate among 277 inspected retailers. Nine violations were recorded, including eight underage sales cases and one signage violation, with fines ranging from $500 to $4,000.
Feb.10 by 2FIRSTS.ai
NJOY and Altria ask federal court to halt ITC proceeding, alleging multiple constitutional defects
NJOY and Altria ask federal court to halt ITC proceeding, alleging multiple constitutional defects
A filing in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Richmond Division) shows NJOY and Altria entities submitted a plaintiffs’ reply supporting their motion for summary judgment, arguing the challenged ITC proceeding is unconstitutional on multiple grounds, including ALJ appointment authority, removal protections, and Article III limits under the Jarkesy framework. The plaintiffs seek summary judgment and a permanent injunction barring continuation of the ITC proceeding.
Jan.08 by 2FIRSTS.ai