LA Mayor Signs Order to Restrict Flavored Tobacco Sales

Aug.25.2022
LA Mayor Signs Order to Restrict Flavored Tobacco Sales
Los Angeles bans flavored tobacco sales, effective January 2023, citing harm to public health and disproportionately affecting minority groups.

On June 13th, Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti signed an ordinance to restrict the sale of menthol cigarettes and other flavored tobacco products. The ordinance will take effect on January 1, 2023. As of June 16th, 2022, the Smoke-Free Kids campaign reported that 127 local governments in California have passed restrictions on the sale of flavored tobacco products. At least 108 of those jurisdictions have restricted the sale of menthol cigarettes in addition to other flavored tobacco products.


In July, California Attorney General Rob Bonta joined a bipartisan coalition of state attorneys general calling on the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to adopt final regulatory standards to ban the production and sale of menthol cigarettes and flavored cigars in the US market. In a written statement, Bonta said, "Every day, millions of Californians smoke and begin down a dangerous path, leading to devastating health consequences." "There is no time to waste. We urge the FDA to swiftly finalize proposed regulations to ban menthol cigarettes and flavored cigars, which primarily harm young people and people of color. Any delay will only result in more lives lost.


Last year, the law exempting menthol cigarettes faced opposition from members of the Black Caucus, Mark Ridley-Thomas, Marqueece Harris Dawson, and Curren Price. They argued that studies have shown that African Americans are the most likely ethnic group to use menthol cigarettes, with a likelihood 25 times greater than that of white Americans.


Bonta has joined a coalition that includes attorneys general from Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Idaho, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Vermont, Washington D.C. as well as Guam, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.


In a letter to the FDA, the Association of Attorneys General emphasized the need to remove these products from the market to protect public health and address the disproportionate and systemic impact on vulnerable minority communities.


The FDA should have taken action to ban menthol cigarettes and flavored cigars long ago, with sufficient scientific backing. They reference a study that found menthol cigarettes disproportionately harm vulnerable populations, particularly African Americans.


Overwhelming scientific evidence, including the FDA's own findings and statements, indicates that menthol cigarettes have a significant negative impact on public health, leading to increased smoking and tobacco use that result in more sickness and deaths.


A recent study published in the "Tobacco Control" journal found that mint-flavored cigarettes "caused over 10 million smokers and 378,000 premature deaths" between 1980 and 2018.


Mint flavoring masks the harsh taste of tobacco, which remains the primary reason young people start and become addicted to smoking - over half of adult smokers aged 18-34 use mint-flavored cigarettes.


In the LGBTQ+ community, among smokers with mental health issues, and in socioeconomically disadvantaged groups, the usage of menthol cigarettes is also high.


In August 2020, Governor Gavin Newsom signed Senate Bill 793, a bipartisan effort aimed at eliminating flavored electronic cigarettes, including candy and mint flavors, which he said "would addict our children." Last year, Newsom called on the FDA to ban mint-flavored cigarettes, saying it was "an important step in the right direction." In April 2021, Newsom urged the federal government to follow California's lead in protecting public health and promoting racial equality by banning menthol-flavored cigarettes. "For decades, Big Tobacco has targeted Black communities and profited from them by selling menthol cigarettes, making smoking-related illnesses the leading cause of death for African Americans in this country," he said.


The alliance stated in its letter that the proposed ban on menthol by the FDA is a crucial step in promoting health equity and protecting public health, and it will not significantly increase illegal trade.


Removing menthol cigarettes from the US market and banning flavors in cigars could potentially decrease smoking among young people, lead to better smoking cessation outcomes among adults, promote health equity, and benefit public health. This is according to a signed letter from 23 attorneys general representing various states and territories, who argue that inaction in these areas each year results in the loss of thousands of lives and has an adverse impact on the overall health of the public.


On the ballot for the November 8th election, Proposition 31 is a referendum on SB 793, aimed at lifting the current ban on the sale of flavored e-cigarettes, including mint and menthol, and flavored tobacco products in stores. A majority vote in favor will maintain the ban on flavored tobacco products, while a majority vote against will lift the ban.


Declaration


This article is compiled from third-party information and is intended only for industry exchange and learning.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the truthfulness or accuracy of the content. The compilation of this article is solely for internal industry research and communication purposes.


Due to limitations in translation ability, the translated article may not fully express the original text. Please refer to the original text for accuracy.


2FIRSTS maintains full alignment with the Chinese government on any domestic, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, or foreign-related statements and positions.


The copyright of the compiled information belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us for removal.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Japan’s Heated Tobacco Tax Reform Drives Price Increase as JT Raises All Ploom Sticks by ¥40
Japan’s Heated Tobacco Tax Reform Drives Price Increase as JT Raises All Ploom Sticks by ¥40
Japan Tobacco Inc. (JT) has applied to Japan’s finance minister for approval to revise retail prices of its Ploom heated tobacco sticks following planned changes to the heated tobacco tax system from October 1, 2026. If approved, all 31 Ploom stick products will increase by ¥40. After the adjustment, EVO products will cost ¥620 per 20-stick pack, MEVIUS products ¥590 and CAMEL products ¥570. JT said the price revision is intended to respond to tax changes while maintaining product quality and brand value. The tax reform is expected to narrow the tax gap between combustible cigarettes and heated tobacco products, potentially reshaping pricing strategies in Japan’s heated tobacco market.
Jul.22
  South Korea Reopens Cigarette Tax Debate as 63% Back Higher Tobacco Taxes
South Korea Reopens Cigarette Tax Debate as 63% Back Higher Tobacco Taxes
South Korea’s cigarette tax debate has resurfaced after the Ministry of Health and Welfare said tobacco price policy needed review, with a poll showing 63% of respondents support higher tobacco taxes.
Regulations
Jun.22
Canada Faces Growing Debate as Youth Nicotine Pouch Use Reaches 34.8%
Canada Faces Growing Debate as Youth Nicotine Pouch Use Reaches 34.8%
New Canadian research shows that 34.8% of people aged 17 to 27 have tried nicotine pouches, up more than fourfold from 7.6% in 2022. The findings come as Conservative politicians, Alberta’s government and the tobacco industry push Ottawa to relax current restrictions on pouch sales.
Jun.12
FDA Sued Over Allowing Some Unauthorized Vapes and Nicotine Pouches to Stay on Market
FDA Sued Over Allowing Some Unauthorized Vapes and Nicotine Pouches to Stay on Market
Public health groups, pediatricians and parents sued the U.S. Food and Drug Administration on July 14, 2026, challenging a May enforcement guidance that they say allows unauthorized e-cigarettes and nicotine pouches to remain on the market while applications are under review.
Jul.15
Bringing Tax and Insurance Into Nicotine Regulation: Insights From a Tobacco Harm-Reduction Report
Bringing Tax and Insurance Into Nicotine Regulation: Insights From a Tobacco Harm-Reduction Report
A smoke-free nicotine policy report argues that tobacco harm reduction should move beyond product bans and health warnings into tax policy, insurance pricing and risk-based regulation. While some projections remain open to debate, the report highlights a wider challenge: nicotine products, technologies and consumer behavior have changed sharply over the past decade, and regulatory systems may need new tools to better align tobacco control with harm-reduction goals.
Jun.08
Reuters: India Seeks to Dismiss Adani Nicotine Pouch Challenge as Mumbai Airport Dispute Moves to Court
Reuters: India Seeks to Dismiss Adani Nicotine Pouch Challenge as Mumbai Airport Dispute Moves to Court
Reuters reported on July 13, 2026, that India is seeking to dismiss Adani Airports’ legal challenge over nicotine pouch sales at Mumbai International Airport’s duty-free shops. Adani denies wrongdoing and argues that existing drug and cosmetics regulations do not apply to duty-free sales or nicotine pouches.
Innovation
Jul.14 by 2Firsts Perspectives