UK Sets Separate Category for E-cigarettes in Lack of Recycling Facilities

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Mar.12.2024
UK Sets Separate Category for E-cigarettes in Lack of Recycling Facilities
A recent survey by UKVIA highlights lack of e-cigarette disposal facilities in public spaces across the UK.

According to Letsrecycle, the UK Vaping Industry Association (UKVIA) released details of a survey this week which extensively investigated the equipment and usage of e-cigarette disposal facilities in the UK. The survey revealed that, despite growing environmental pressures on the e-cigarette industry, there is a lack of disposal facilities for e-cigarettes in public places.

 

In the investigation, the association has issued Freedom of Information requests to 10 major provincial cities including Birmingham, Manchester, Cardiff, Glasgow, and Westminster, as well as 10 central London borough councils.

 

According to the results, only 60% of responding organizations stated that they provide disposal services for e-cigarette waste at public convenience facilities or designated collection sites, while only 10% of organizations have set up e-cigarette waste recycling bins in public places. Approximately one-third of organizations even gave negative responses, claiming that they do not provide any form of e-cigarette waste disposal containers or drop-off points.

 

The investigation also revealed that so far, only one municipal government has implemented curbside or household e-cigarette collection services. 80% of municipal governments have not included investment in new e-cigarette collection solutions in next year's budget - even before hearing the news of disposable e-cigarettes being banned.

 

In response, John Dunne, Secretary General of the UK E-cigarette Industry Association, said:

 

Advocating for the ban of disposable e-cigarettes in the name of environmental protection, without investing in the construction of e-cigarette waste collection facilities, especially when the demand for such facilities in public places - which are controlled by local governments - is so urgent, is simply contradictory. Even after disposable e-cigarettes are no longer sold at retail outlets, millions of rechargeable and refillable e-cigarettes are still sold every year, not to mention the growth of black market products resulting from the ban on disposable e-cigarettes. Therefore, the lack of investment in collection facilities and the lack of foresight in establishing centralized e-cigarette waste disposal facilities is shocking and raises great concerns.

 

Four days ago, the government proposed raising the collection level of WEEE (Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment), including consultation on implementing a separate category for e-cigarettes. The deadline for submitting opinions has just passed, and the survey results have been released, sparking high public interest.

 

The association also stated that it recognizes the need for the industry to demonstrate the highest level of environmental responsibility, but also insisted that local governments play a crucial role in providing necessary facilities for public spaces.

 

Dunne stated:

 

The British E-Cigarette Industry Association has also been involved in a newly submitted e-cigarette licensing proposal to lawmakers. If the proposal is adopted, retailers will be required to provide recycling facilities in their stores before being allowed to sell e-cigarettes.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Japan’s Heated Tobacco Tax Changes Reshape Consumer Choices, Survey Reveals Impact of Price and Income
Japan’s Heated Tobacco Tax Changes Reshape Consumer Choices, Survey Reveals Impact of Price and Income
A consumer survey by Japanese heated tobacco information platform RELAZO found that rising tobacco prices and planned heated tobacco tax changes may influence smoking decisions among Japanese consumers. The survey covered 49,879 men and women aged 20 to 69 nationwide. It found that around 40% of respondents cumulatively indicated they may consider quitting when a pack reaches ¥600 (approximately US$4.1), while nearly 90% expressed potential quitting intentions at a ¥1,000 (approximately US$6.8) price level. The survey also found significant differences by income level, with lower-income respondents showing greater sensitivity to price increases.
Jul.24
SMOORE’s DOJO by VAPORESSO to Launch New Global Brand Identity on September 1
SMOORE’s DOJO by VAPORESSO to Launch New Global Brand Identity on September 1
According to recent LinkedIn posts from people at VAPORESSO, SMOORE and a German distribution partner, vape brand DOJO will begin rolling out a new global brand identity on September 1, 2026, led by a redesigned handwritten logo. The new visual system will be gradually applied across product packaging, marketing materials and digital assets over the following months. Fabio Corsaro, Head of Marketing and Purchasing at MG Wesel GmbH, said the rebrand was related to trademark issues, but that explanation has not been publicly confirmed by DOJO, VAPORESSO or SMOORE. DOJO is currently promoting its Blast X product in Germany.
Aug.31
UK HMRC Urges Public to Report Suspicious Vape Shops in Crackdown on Tax Fraud, Money Laundering and Illicit Tobacco Sales
UK HMRC Urges Public to Report Suspicious Vape Shops in Crackdown on Tax Fraud, Money Laundering and Illicit Tobacco Sales
HM Revenue & Customs is urging members of the public to report vape shops, barber shops and other high-street businesses suspected of tax fraud, money laundering or other illegal activity, with informants not required to provide personal details. HMRC plans more than 30,000 interventions in 2026-27 targeting tax fraud, organised crime and illicit activity, including the sale of illegal vapes and tobacco. The push forms part of a broader UK effort to tackle organised crime on high streets, backed by a £30 million government enforcement programme.
Regulations
Aug.17 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Retail Case Study | Wisconsin Vape Market One Year After New Regulations: Johnny Vapes Reports 80% Sales Decline as Consumers Shift Online and Across State Lines
Retail Case Study | Wisconsin Vape Market One Year After New Regulations: Johnny Vapes Reports 80% Sales Decline as Consumers Shift Online and Across State Lines
According to WNCY on August 24, 2026, some independent vape retailers in Wisconsin say they have faced significant business pressure one year after new vape regulations took effect. Johnny Vapes, a retailer operating in northeast Wisconsin, said its store count fell from seven locations to four, sales declined by about 80%, and roughly 90% of its inventory was affected. Retailers said some consumers have shifted to online purchases or traveled to neighboring Michigan to buy vape products. The case highlights how local regulations can reshape retail operations, inventory management and consumer purchasing patterns.
Aug.28
New Zealand Associate Health Minister Casey Costello Warns on Illicit Cigarettes as Legal Tobacco Sales Halve Over Decade
New Zealand Associate Health Minister Casey Costello Warns on Illicit Cigarettes as Legal Tobacco Sales Halve Over Decade
New Zealand Associate Health Minister Casey Costello said legal tobacco sales in the country have fallen by more than half over the past decade, with sales declining more than 20% in 2025 compared with the previous year. She warned that the decline may not fully reflect lower smoking rates, as increased availability of illicit cigarettes could also be contributing. The government said it would continue strengthening tobacco and vape retail enforcement while monitoring the impact of illicit tobacco on public health and tax revenue.
Aug.26
Malaysia Withdraws Appeal Against Liquid Nicotine Ruling as Vape Regulation Framework Enters New Phase
Malaysia Withdraws Appeal Against Liquid Nicotine Ruling as Vape Regulation Framework Enters New Phase
Malaysia’s government has withdrawn its appeal against a High Court ruling concerning the regulatory status of liquid nicotine used in vape and e-cigarette products, according to reports by New Straits Times, Free Malaysia Today and CodeBlue on August 18, 2026. The Kuala Lumpur High Court ruled on May 15 that the government’s decision to remove liquid nicotine from the scheduled poisons list under the Poisons Act 1952 was irrational and made without proper consultation with the Poisons Board. The withdrawal ends the government’s appeal process, while the future regulatory framework for nicotine vape products remains under discussion.
Aug.21