LG Chem Faces Lawsuit in Mississippi Over E-cigarette Battery Explosion

Oct.26.2022
LG Chem Faces Lawsuit in Mississippi Over E-cigarette Battery Explosion
LG Chem may face lawsuit in Mississippi for supplying batteries to e-cigarettes resulting in burns to the plaintiff.

The Supreme Court of Mississippi recently ruled that South Korean company LG Chem could face a lawsuit in Mississippi for providing batteries that powered "e-cigarette devices," even though the company has no physical presence or registered business in the state.


Melissa Dilworth is suing LG Chem after suffering severe burns when the battery in her electronic cigarette exploded. In addition to LG Chem, the plaintiff is also suing the electronic cigarette store, its supplier, and the manufacturer of the electronic cigarette device.


LG Chem is attempting to refute allegations by arguing that the batteries it produces were not made specifically for sale in Mississippi, but rather intended for use by established companies for specific applications. However, the court rejected this argument, finding that the South Korean company had intended to tap into Mississippi's lithium-ion battery market knowing that its products would be sold in the state, either alone or as part of another product. The batteries only reached consumers through third-party distributors selling unauthorized products for personal use.


Similarly, the issue of jurisdiction is not affected by whether the claimed injury was caused by unintentional use of the product. The court believes that this issue concerns the merits of the case rather than a threshold issue of jurisdiction. Ultimately, the court found that Mississippi has a strong interest in adjudicating this dispute, as a resident of Mississippi was injured by a product purchased in Mississippi.


Dilworth's decision serves as a reminder that a company may not necessarily conduct business operations in Mississippi, or even in the United States, but can still be subject to lawsuits in Mississippi. This ruling also indicates that the Mississippi Supreme Court follows a broader commercial test adopted by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.


Companies in Mississippi that are involved in the medical marijuana industry should be aware that medical marijuana products will soon be available for qualified patients in the state. These products will come in various forms, including electronic smoking devices similar to those used by Juul.


Foreign companies producing equipment parts for growing or processing marijuana must be aware that even if they do not specifically sell those parts to people in Mississippi, simply putting them into commercial circulation that leads to the state could have serious consequences. In such cases, any notion that the company is completely outside of Mississippi's jurisdiction should be dispelled.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information and is intended for industry exchange and learning.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the truthfulness or accuracy of the article's content. The translation of this article is only intended for industry exchange and research purposes.


Due to limitations in the level of translation, the translated article may not fully reflect the original text. Please refer to the original article for accuracy.


2FIRSTS maintains full alignment with the Chinese government on any domestic, Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan, and foreign-related statement and position.


Copyright of the compiled information belongs to the original media and the author. If there is any infringement, please contact us to remove it.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

Exclusive | Shenzhen Tobacco Authorities Ask Licensed Chinese Vape Manufacturers to Submit STN Details for U.S.-Bound Products
Exclusive | Shenzhen Tobacco Authorities Ask Licensed Chinese Vape Manufacturers to Submit STN Details for U.S.-Bound Products
Shenzhen tobacco authorities have asked licensed Chinese vape manufacturers to submit STN details for U.S.-bound products, including CTP Portal or STN email screenshots, highlighting a new compliance signal in cross-border oversight.
Apr.02
Fiscal benefit, not health, strongest indicator for vape bans – Contributed by Samrat Chowdhery
Fiscal benefit, not health, strongest indicator for vape bans – Contributed by Samrat Chowdhery
Data shows 75% of nations with state stakes in tobacco trade ban modern substitutes compared to 10% in the free-market group. What is driving these divergent regulations?
Feb.04
Consultation opens for Tasmania’s Public Health Amendment Bill 2026
Consultation opens for Tasmania’s Public Health Amendment Bill 2026
Consultation opened on February 6, 2026 for the Public Health Amendment (Prohibited Tobacco and Other Products) Bill 2026. The Bill intends to address illicit trade in tobacco, nicotine pouches and e-cigarettes, which has increased significantly across Tasmania in recent years. It proposes changes to the Public Health Act 1997 to further protect the health of Tasmanians by reducing the sale and supply of illicit tobacco, vaping and other products, and to strengthen existing tobacco control laws.
Feb.06 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Australia’s NSW Finds Lower Vaping Rates Among Teenagers Aged 14 to 17
Australia’s NSW Finds Lower Vaping Rates Among Teenagers Aged 14 to 17
A new report from Cancer Council’s Generation Vape research project shows that fewer teenagers in New South Wales are trying vaping after the state government introduced tougher vaping goods laws. Among surveyed NSW teenagers aged 14 to 17, the proportion who had tried vaping fell from 29.6% in April 2024 to 20.1% in October 2025.
Mar.17 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Smoore, Distributors Move to Toss Cannabis Vape Price-Fixing Suit
Smoore, Distributors Move to Toss Cannabis Vape Price-Fixing Suit
Several vape manufacturers and distributors, including Shenzhen Smoore Technology Co. Ltd., Smoore International Holdings, 3Win Corp., Jupiter Research LLC, Canna Brand Solutions, and Greenlane Holdings Inc., have filed motions seeking dismissal of consumer claims in consolidated antitrust litigation in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
Events
Feb.24
Ireland’s Tobacco and Vape Retail Licensing Regime Takes Effect; BAT Says It Should Cover Nicotine Pouches
Ireland’s Tobacco and Vape Retail Licensing Regime Takes Effect; BAT Says It Should Cover Nicotine Pouches
Ireland’s retail licensing system took effect on Feb. 2, 2026, charging annual fees per point of sale and enforced by the Health Service Executive (HSE). British American Tobacco’s local unit, BAT Ireland, said excluding nicotine pouches could leave a regulatory gap.
Feb.04 by 2FIRSTS.ai