LG Chem Faces Lawsuit in Mississippi Over E-cigarette Battery Explosion

Oct.26.2022
LG Chem Faces Lawsuit in Mississippi Over E-cigarette Battery Explosion
LG Chem may face lawsuit in Mississippi for supplying batteries to e-cigarettes resulting in burns to the plaintiff.

The Supreme Court of Mississippi recently ruled that South Korean company LG Chem could face a lawsuit in Mississippi for providing batteries that powered "e-cigarette devices," even though the company has no physical presence or registered business in the state.


Melissa Dilworth is suing LG Chem after suffering severe burns when the battery in her electronic cigarette exploded. In addition to LG Chem, the plaintiff is also suing the electronic cigarette store, its supplier, and the manufacturer of the electronic cigarette device.


LG Chem is attempting to refute allegations by arguing that the batteries it produces were not made specifically for sale in Mississippi, but rather intended for use by established companies for specific applications. However, the court rejected this argument, finding that the South Korean company had intended to tap into Mississippi's lithium-ion battery market knowing that its products would be sold in the state, either alone or as part of another product. The batteries only reached consumers through third-party distributors selling unauthorized products for personal use.


Similarly, the issue of jurisdiction is not affected by whether the claimed injury was caused by unintentional use of the product. The court believes that this issue concerns the merits of the case rather than a threshold issue of jurisdiction. Ultimately, the court found that Mississippi has a strong interest in adjudicating this dispute, as a resident of Mississippi was injured by a product purchased in Mississippi.


Dilworth's decision serves as a reminder that a company may not necessarily conduct business operations in Mississippi, or even in the United States, but can still be subject to lawsuits in Mississippi. This ruling also indicates that the Mississippi Supreme Court follows a broader commercial test adopted by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.


Companies in Mississippi that are involved in the medical marijuana industry should be aware that medical marijuana products will soon be available for qualified patients in the state. These products will come in various forms, including electronic smoking devices similar to those used by Juul.


Foreign companies producing equipment parts for growing or processing marijuana must be aware that even if they do not specifically sell those parts to people in Mississippi, simply putting them into commercial circulation that leads to the state could have serious consequences. In such cases, any notion that the company is completely outside of Mississippi's jurisdiction should be dispelled.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information and is intended for industry exchange and learning.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the truthfulness or accuracy of the article's content. The translation of this article is only intended for industry exchange and research purposes.


Due to limitations in the level of translation, the translated article may not fully reflect the original text. Please refer to the original article for accuracy.


2FIRSTS maintains full alignment with the Chinese government on any domestic, Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan, and foreign-related statement and position.


Copyright of the compiled information belongs to the original media and the author. If there is any infringement, please contact us to remove it.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

Smoore and EVE Energy Sign Procurement Framework Agreement Covering 2026–2028 Cell Supply
Smoore and EVE Energy Sign Procurement Framework Agreement Covering 2026–2028 Cell Supply
Smoore and EVE Energy have signed a procurement framework agreement for 2026–2028, under which Smoore Group will continue purchasing battery cells and related products. The agreement sets no specific transaction amount; actual figures will be determined by future orders, reflecting both parties’ intention to secure and extend their supply chain cooperation over the next three years.
Nov.21
Russian State Duma Passes Ban on Tobacco and Vape Sales at Public Transport Stops
Russian State Duma Passes Ban on Tobacco and Vape Sales at Public Transport Stops
Russia’s State Duma has approved, in its third reading, a law banning the sale of cigarettes and electronic cigarettes at public transport stops. The measure expands existing restrictions on tobacco sales at transport infrastructure facilities and aims to reduce accessibility, particularly among young people. The law includes an exemption for small settlements where such kiosks are the only sales points and will take effect on September 1, 2026.
Dec.18 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Portugal to Tax Nicotine Pouches from 2026 at €0.065 per Gram
Portugal to Tax Nicotine Pouches from 2026 at €0.065 per Gram
Portugal’s 2026 State Budget adds nicotine pouches to the IEC by inserting Article 104-D into the Excise Code’s tobacco chapter. A specific duty of €0.065/g applies from 2026, with rounding to whole grams. The Budget also defines pouches (natural nicotine, up to 12 mg, tobacco-free, oral mucosal absorption). Lusa projects €1.676B in tobacco excise for 2026; combined levies near €1.993B.
Oct.30 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Illegal Disposable Vapes Still Sold in Nottingham Six Months After UK Ban: LBC Investigation
Illegal Disposable Vapes Still Sold in Nottingham Six Months After UK Ban: LBC Investigation
According to LBC, a follow-up investigation in Nottingham found that four out of 14 shops visited still sold illegal disposable vapes, six months after the UK Government’s ban took effect. Although fewer retailers appeared to be offering banned products compared with an earlier visit, illegal vapes remain available despite ongoing enforcement efforts.
Dec.03 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Bloomberg-Backed Campaign Wins as Denver Votes to Ban Flavored Nicotine
Bloomberg-Backed Campaign Wins as Denver Votes to Ban Flavored Nicotine
Denver voters have upheld the city’s ban on flavored nicotine products—including fruity vapes and menthol cigarettes—with 72% in favor during the Nov. 4 election. The “Yes on 310” campaign, backed by $5 million from Michael Bloomberg, celebrated the result as a major victory for youth health. Opponents, mostly local vape shop owners, warned of economic harm and called the spending imbalance unfair.
Nov.05 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Feature | Vape Politics in Russia: Local Governments Push Forward Despite Legislative Deadlock
Feature | Vape Politics in Russia: Local Governments Push Forward Despite Legislative Deadlock
As Russia’s federal vape policy stalls, regional governors are racing to implement local bans—now with the backing of President Vladimir Putin. The divide between swift local action and delayed national legislation is fueling debate over health, regulation, and the country’s broader approach to nicotine control.
Oct.28