LG Chem Faces Lawsuit in Mississippi Over E-cigarette Battery Explosion

Oct.26.2022
LG Chem Faces Lawsuit in Mississippi Over E-cigarette Battery Explosion
LG Chem may face lawsuit in Mississippi for supplying batteries to e-cigarettes resulting in burns to the plaintiff.

The Supreme Court of Mississippi recently ruled that South Korean company LG Chem could face a lawsuit in Mississippi for providing batteries that powered "e-cigarette devices," even though the company has no physical presence or registered business in the state.


Melissa Dilworth is suing LG Chem after suffering severe burns when the battery in her electronic cigarette exploded. In addition to LG Chem, the plaintiff is also suing the electronic cigarette store, its supplier, and the manufacturer of the electronic cigarette device.


LG Chem is attempting to refute allegations by arguing that the batteries it produces were not made specifically for sale in Mississippi, but rather intended for use by established companies for specific applications. However, the court rejected this argument, finding that the South Korean company had intended to tap into Mississippi's lithium-ion battery market knowing that its products would be sold in the state, either alone or as part of another product. The batteries only reached consumers through third-party distributors selling unauthorized products for personal use.


Similarly, the issue of jurisdiction is not affected by whether the claimed injury was caused by unintentional use of the product. The court believes that this issue concerns the merits of the case rather than a threshold issue of jurisdiction. Ultimately, the court found that Mississippi has a strong interest in adjudicating this dispute, as a resident of Mississippi was injured by a product purchased in Mississippi.


Dilworth's decision serves as a reminder that a company may not necessarily conduct business operations in Mississippi, or even in the United States, but can still be subject to lawsuits in Mississippi. This ruling also indicates that the Mississippi Supreme Court follows a broader commercial test adopted by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.


Companies in Mississippi that are involved in the medical marijuana industry should be aware that medical marijuana products will soon be available for qualified patients in the state. These products will come in various forms, including electronic smoking devices similar to those used by Juul.


Foreign companies producing equipment parts for growing or processing marijuana must be aware that even if they do not specifically sell those parts to people in Mississippi, simply putting them into commercial circulation that leads to the state could have serious consequences. In such cases, any notion that the company is completely outside of Mississippi's jurisdiction should be dispelled.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information and is intended for industry exchange and learning.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the truthfulness or accuracy of the article's content. The translation of this article is only intended for industry exchange and research purposes.


Due to limitations in the level of translation, the translated article may not fully reflect the original text. Please refer to the original article for accuracy.


2FIRSTS maintains full alignment with the Chinese government on any domestic, Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan, and foreign-related statement and position.


Copyright of the compiled information belongs to the original media and the author. If there is any infringement, please contact us to remove it.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

Special Report | Belarus Rejects Vape Ban, Opts for Tighter Market Controls
Special Report | Belarus Rejects Vape Ban, Opts for Tighter Market Controls
After weeks of debate over a potential blanket prohibition, Belarus has decided against banning electronic cigarettes, choosing instead to tighten control over wholesale, imports and licensing. President Alexander Lukashenko warned that an outright ban could drive the market underground and undermine state revenues, as officials move to curb widespread illicit trade while keeping retail sales largely intact.
Mar.04
Special Report | Middle East Military Conflict Disrupts Global Air Corridors: Europe-Bound Vape Logistics Defy Seasonal Price Declines, Fuel Cost Risks Emerge
Special Report | Middle East Military Conflict Disrupts Global Air Corridors: Europe-Bound Vape Logistics Defy Seasonal Price Declines, Fuel Cost Risks Emerge
Escalating tensions involving Iran are disrupting air transit routes heavily used for China’s vape exports to Europe, preventing the usual post–Lunar New Year freight rate decline. While Europe-bound capacity reliant on Middle East hubs faces pressure, shipments to the United States remain largely unaffected for now. However, potential jet fuel price increases could broaden cost pressures globally.
Special Report
Mar.02
UK Tobacco and Vapes Bill Enters House of Lords Report Stage
UK Tobacco and Vapes Bill Enters House of Lords Report Stage
The Tobacco and Vapes Bill has entered the report stage in the UK House of Lords, with further examination scheduled to begin on February 24, 2026. The legislation aims to create the first “smoke-free generation” by ensuring that individuals who are 15 years old or younger in 2026 can never legally be sold tobacco.
Regulations
Feb.22
Singapore hikes vape penalties: users face up to S$10,000; importers up to 9 years
Singapore hikes vape penalties: users face up to S$10,000; importers up to 9 years
Singapore Parliament passes law to significantly increase penalties for e-cigarette possession, use, import, and sale, effective May 1.
Mar.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Reuters: More “Made in America” Vape Products Appear in the U.S. Amid Trump Tariffs and Crackdown
Reuters: More “Made in America” Vape Products Appear in the U.S. Amid Trump Tariffs and Crackdown
According to Reuters, the U.S. vaping market has recently seen an increase in products marketed as “Made in America” amid the Trump administration’s stronger enforcement against unauthorized vape brands and increased trade tariff pressure on Chinese goods. Since October 2025, at least eight new vape brands highlighting American credentials have entered the U.S. market, and none of them has authorization for sale. Brands mentioned by Reuters include Maxus Star and OneTank.
Apr.08
Indonesian Parliament Reviews Narcotics Law Draft, May Include Vape Ban Proposal
Indonesian Parliament Reviews Narcotics Law Draft, May Include Vape Ban Proposal
According to Beritasatu, Commission III of the Indonesian House of Representatives is reviewing the Draft Law on Narcotics and Psychotropics and considering including a proposal from the National Narcotics Agency (BNN) to ban vapes.
Apr.10 by 2FIRSTS.ai