LG Chem Faces Lawsuit in Mississippi Over E-cigarette Battery Explosion

Oct.26.2022
LG Chem Faces Lawsuit in Mississippi Over E-cigarette Battery Explosion
LG Chem may face lawsuit in Mississippi for supplying batteries to e-cigarettes resulting in burns to the plaintiff.

The Supreme Court of Mississippi recently ruled that South Korean company LG Chem could face a lawsuit in Mississippi for providing batteries that powered "e-cigarette devices," even though the company has no physical presence or registered business in the state.


Melissa Dilworth is suing LG Chem after suffering severe burns when the battery in her electronic cigarette exploded. In addition to LG Chem, the plaintiff is also suing the electronic cigarette store, its supplier, and the manufacturer of the electronic cigarette device.


LG Chem is attempting to refute allegations by arguing that the batteries it produces were not made specifically for sale in Mississippi, but rather intended for use by established companies for specific applications. However, the court rejected this argument, finding that the South Korean company had intended to tap into Mississippi's lithium-ion battery market knowing that its products would be sold in the state, either alone or as part of another product. The batteries only reached consumers through third-party distributors selling unauthorized products for personal use.


Similarly, the issue of jurisdiction is not affected by whether the claimed injury was caused by unintentional use of the product. The court believes that this issue concerns the merits of the case rather than a threshold issue of jurisdiction. Ultimately, the court found that Mississippi has a strong interest in adjudicating this dispute, as a resident of Mississippi was injured by a product purchased in Mississippi.


Dilworth's decision serves as a reminder that a company may not necessarily conduct business operations in Mississippi, or even in the United States, but can still be subject to lawsuits in Mississippi. This ruling also indicates that the Mississippi Supreme Court follows a broader commercial test adopted by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.


Companies in Mississippi that are involved in the medical marijuana industry should be aware that medical marijuana products will soon be available for qualified patients in the state. These products will come in various forms, including electronic smoking devices similar to those used by Juul.


Foreign companies producing equipment parts for growing or processing marijuana must be aware that even if they do not specifically sell those parts to people in Mississippi, simply putting them into commercial circulation that leads to the state could have serious consequences. In such cases, any notion that the company is completely outside of Mississippi's jurisdiction should be dispelled.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information and is intended for industry exchange and learning.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the truthfulness or accuracy of the article's content. The translation of this article is only intended for industry exchange and research purposes.


Due to limitations in the level of translation, the translated article may not fully reflect the original text. Please refer to the original article for accuracy.


2FIRSTS maintains full alignment with the Chinese government on any domestic, Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan, and foreign-related statement and position.


Copyright of the compiled information belongs to the original media and the author. If there is any infringement, please contact us to remove it.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

Sarawak Cabinet Approves Gradual Ban on Vape Products to Curb Rising Youth Use
Sarawak Cabinet Approves Gradual Ban on Vape Products to Curb Rising Youth Use
The Sarawak Cabinet has agreed to implement a phased ban on vape products amid growing concern over rising use among youths. Welfare, Community Wellbeing, Women, Family and Childhood Development Minister Datuk Seri Fatimah Abdullah said the move demonstrates the state’s firm commitment to safeguarding young people’s health and future.
Nov.17 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Japan Tobacco launches limited-edition Ploom AURA color “Bronze Royal,” priced at about $27
Japan Tobacco launches limited-edition Ploom AURA color “Bronze Royal,” priced at about $27
Japan Tobacco (JT) announced that Ploom AURA has added a second limited-edition colorway, “Bronze Royal,” which will be available in limited quantities through official channels starting November 11, priced at approximately $27.3.
Nov.12 by 2FIRSTS.ai
WHO's First Global E-Cigarette Data: Over 100 Million Users, Youth Risk 9 Times Higher
WHO's First Global E-Cigarette Data: Over 100 Million Users, Youth Risk 9 Times Higher
The WHO's first global estimate on October 6 showed over 100 million people use e-cigarettes, including at least 15 million adolescents (aged 13–15). The report warned that in reporting countries, children are nine times more likely to vape than adults.
Oct.07 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Report: Smoking Rates Remain Unchanged Despite Kazakhstan’s Vape Ban
Report: Smoking Rates Remain Unchanged Despite Kazakhstan’s Vape Ban
According to Exclusive.KZ, Kazakhstan’s Strategy Public Foundation released a study finding that strict tobacco and vape bans have not reduced smoking rates, which remain at 18–20%. The report calls for harm reduction approaches based on international best practices.
Nov.06 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Expert Warns in 2Firsts Op-ed: Proposed COP11 Ban on Nicotine Pouches Would Be a Global Public Health Mistake
Expert Warns in 2Firsts Op-ed: Proposed COP11 Ban on Nicotine Pouches Would Be a Global Public Health Mistake
As global delegates prepare for COP11, a leaked EU position paper has sparked fresh debate over the future of nicotine pouch regulation. In an exclusive op-ed submitted to 2Firsts, Dr. Nveed Chaudhary, Chair of GINN’s Scientific Committee, argues that banning nicotine pouches would be a profound public health mistake—one that ignores harm reduction science and risks reversing global progress in smoking cessation.
Nov.03
ARAC to 2Firsts | FDA’s Nicotine Pouch Pilot: What Hasn’t Changed Matters Most
ARAC to 2Firsts | FDA’s Nicotine Pouch Pilot: What Hasn’t Changed Matters Most
In a contribution to 2Firsts, U.S. regulatory consultancy ARAC analyzes the FDA’s nicotine pouch PMTA pilot, cautioning that core evidentiary standards remain unchanged. The firm warns against overinterpreting the pilot and urges companies to act now rather than wait for uncertain regulatory shifts.
Oct.21