The Secretary of the Malaysian Vape Chamber of Commerce (MVCC), Rosli, has stated that these actions are meant to put pressure on the industry because it recently disagreed with the Health Ministry's proposal to regulate electronic cigarettes in the same way as traditional cigarettes. Raids and confiscations have affected many small and medium-sized e-cigarette companies in the Klang Valley, resulting in millions of dollars in revenue losses.
The Parliamentary Special Select Committee (PSSC) is currently finalizing the proposed Generation End Game (GEG) bill. "The industry supports the government's efforts to establish regulations for the e-cigarette industry, and we welcome PSSC's scrutiny and improvement of the bill," said Rosly.
He added, "Regulation is something that the industry has been waiting for for many years. It just needs improvement, especially with regard to certain important projects for the future of the e-cigarette industry.
Additionally, Rizani Zakaria, the president of the Malaysian Vaping Industry Advocacy (MVIA), has expressed confusion and concern over recent crackdowns by authorities that contradict earlier government announcements, resulting in many suffering losses. "The proposed bill is currently delayed as it requires further refinement and discussion according to the Health Minister's announcement. Therefore, do not plunder or seize from the vaping industry, causing harm to entrepreneurs who may become victims and bear the losses," he said.
According to Rizani, conducting surprise visits on industries willing to accept regulation would only affect that particular industry. "The Ministry of Health should issue regulatory guidelines while waiting for the reintroduction of this bill. This will enable the industry to formulate regulatory guidelines and prepare for the implementation of the legislative process.
This bill disregards science and supports safer nicotine alternatives.
The Federation of Private Medical Practitioners' Associations Malaysia (FPMPAM) has recently opposed proposed restrictions on electronic cigarettes, stating that they will hinder efforts to reduce tobacco harm.
The FPMPAM has stated that the proposed bill ignores overwhelming scientific evidence and supports the benefits of safer nicotine alternatives in reducing harm caused by tobacco. The group has also referenced the advice of the Royal College of Physicians in the UK, which has long recommended the use of these products for quitting smoking and/or reducing harm.
The medical association has criticized the government's proposal to ban the promotion of electronic cigarettes or vaping as a harm-reduction alternative to smoking. Dr. Stephen Chow, the president of FPMPAM, stated in a recent declaration that "the bill appears to completely ignore the overwhelming scientific data that THR can work within an appropriate regulatory framework.
In fact, a recent report from the Royal College of Physicians (RCP) reiterated that electronic cigarettes seem to be effective as a smoking cessation tool for smokers. "It is necessary to develop regulations to reduce the direct and indirect adverse effects of electronic cigarette use, but these regulations should not significantly inhibit smokers from developing and using harm reduction products.
Statement:
This article is compiled based on third-party information and is intended for industry communication and learning purposes only.
This article does not represent the viewpoint of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the authenticity or accuracy of the article's contents. The compilation of this article is solely for industry communication and research purposes.
Due to limitations in our translation ability, this article may not convey the same meaning as the original. Please refer to the original text for accuracy.
When it comes to domestic issues, matters concerning Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, and foreign affairs, 2FIRSTS maintains complete alignment with the Chinese government.
The copyright of the compiled information belongs to the original media and authors. If there is any infringement, please contact us to delete it.
This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.
