Max (Shenzhen) Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Declared Bankrupt

Dec.18.2024
Max (Shenzhen) Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Declared Bankrupt
Shenzhen Baotou District People's Court announces bankruptcy liquidation of Max (Shenzhen) Electronic Technology Co., Ltd.

Recently, the People's Court of Baoan District, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, issued a notice announcing the bankruptcy liquidation of Max (Shenzhen) Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Max Company").

Max (Shenzhen) Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Declared Bankrupt
Original text: Original text | Image source: People's Court of Baoan District, Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province.


The court, in a statement, announced that it has transferred Max Company to bankruptcy liquidation as requested by the applicant for execution, Dongguan Shuoxinda Technology Co., Ltd., on December 12, 2024, on the grounds that Max Company is unable to pay its due debts and its assets are insufficient to cover all debts.


According to the announcement, the court has made this decision in accordance with Article 10, Paragraph 1 of the Enterprise Bankruptcy Law of the People's Republic of China. The court also specifically pointed out that if Max Company has any objections to this decision, they should raise them in writing within seven days of receiving the notice and provide relevant evidence materials.


Previously, 2Firsts received a tip from a source in the e-cigarette industry, stating that Max Company has recently filed for bankruptcy with the Intermediate People's Court of Shenzhen. Max Company is primarily involved in the research and development, as well as the sales, of e-cigarette related products.


According to Tianyancha, it owns multiple trademarks including "Yueke", "PQZU", "MKPRO", "MAXECIG", "MCKESSE", and "BADKITTY".


Cover Image: ChatGpt Generated


We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

FDA Issues Draft PMTA Guidance for Flavored E-Cigarettes, Maintaining Higher Evidence Bar for Fruit and Sweet Flavors
FDA Issues Draft PMTA Guidance for Flavored E-Cigarettes, Maintaining Higher Evidence Bar for Fruit and Sweet Flavors
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on March 9 released a draft guidance outlining its current thinking on premarket tobacco product applications (PMTAs) for flavored electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS). The document reiterates that fruit, candy, dessert, and other sweet-flavored e-cigarettes present a “significant public health risk” to youth and therefore face a higher evidentiary burden if manufacturers seek marketing authorization.
Mar.10 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Ireland’s 2026 amendment bill to regulate nicotine pouches and tighten rules on vaping products
Ireland’s 2026 amendment bill to regulate nicotine pouches and tighten rules on vaping products
The Irish government has approved the publication of the Public Health (Tobacco Products and Nicotine Inhaling Products) (Amendment) Bill 2026. The bill would ban the sale of nicotine consumption products such as nicotine pouches to those under 18 and further regulate nicotine vaping products.
Mar.05 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Philip Morris and BAT’s Nicoventures Win EPO Appeal to Revoke VMR Vape Patent
Philip Morris and BAT’s Nicoventures Win EPO Appeal to Revoke VMR Vape Patent
The EPO Technical Board of Appeal 3.2.02 (T 1319/24) revoked VMR Products LLC’s EP3613453 “VAPORIZER” patent after finding that a 2012 YouTube video of the Innokin iTaste VV (D3) disclosed the claimed electrical contact arrangement. Opponents Nicoventures Trading Ltd (BAT subsidiary) and Philip Morris Products S.A. prevailed.
BATPMI
Feb.17
SICPA Secures Five-Year UK Vape Tax Stamp Contract
SICPA Secures Five-Year UK Vape Tax Stamp Contract
HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) has awarded a five-year contract to Swiss technology company SICPA and Cartor Security Printers to implement the United Kingdom’s new vaping duty stamp and track-and-trace system, beginning in April 2026.
Market
Feb.24
Fontem Drops Texas Lawsuit and Plans to Refile in D.C. Over FDA Handling of Zone Application
Fontem Drops Texas Lawsuit and Plans to Refile in D.C. Over FDA Handling of Zone Application
Fontem US, the maker and seller of Zone nicotine pouches, has voluntarily dismissed its lawsuit against the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, which it had accused of unfairly delaying its market application.
Mar.25 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Ohio Supreme Court takes up appeal that could define state limits on illegal vape sales enforcement
Ohio Supreme Court takes up appeal that could define state limits on illegal vape sales enforcement
The Ohio Supreme Court has agreed to hear Attorney General Dave Yost’s appeal seeking to revive lawsuits against three Ohio vape retailers. Lower courts dismissed the cases, finding that federal law governs whether vaping products may be marketed and sold.
Mar.06 by 2FIRSTS.ai