Max (Shenzhen) Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Declared Bankrupt

Dec.18.2024
Max (Shenzhen) Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Declared Bankrupt
Shenzhen Baotou District People's Court announces bankruptcy liquidation of Max (Shenzhen) Electronic Technology Co., Ltd.

Recently, the People's Court of Baoan District, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, issued a notice announcing the bankruptcy liquidation of Max (Shenzhen) Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Max Company").

Max (Shenzhen) Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Declared Bankrupt
Original text: Original text | Image source: People's Court of Baoan District, Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province.


The court, in a statement, announced that it has transferred Max Company to bankruptcy liquidation as requested by the applicant for execution, Dongguan Shuoxinda Technology Co., Ltd., on December 12, 2024, on the grounds that Max Company is unable to pay its due debts and its assets are insufficient to cover all debts.


According to the announcement, the court has made this decision in accordance with Article 10, Paragraph 1 of the Enterprise Bankruptcy Law of the People's Republic of China. The court also specifically pointed out that if Max Company has any objections to this decision, they should raise them in writing within seven days of receiving the notice and provide relevant evidence materials.


Previously, 2Firsts received a tip from a source in the e-cigarette industry, stating that Max Company has recently filed for bankruptcy with the Intermediate People's Court of Shenzhen. Max Company is primarily involved in the research and development, as well as the sales, of e-cigarette related products.


According to Tianyancha, it owns multiple trademarks including "Yueke", "PQZU", "MKPRO", "MAXECIG", "MCKESSE", and "BADKITTY".


Cover Image: ChatGpt Generated


We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Iowa urges Eighth Circuit to allow enforcement of challenged e-cigarette directory law
Iowa urges Eighth Circuit to allow enforcement of challenged e-cigarette directory law
At the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, Iowa asked judges to allow enforcement of a challenged 2024 state law that penalizes manufacturers selling e-cigarette products not listed on a state-run directory. Products are listed only when a manufacturer or retailer meets certain premarket requirements established under the federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FDCA).
Jan.19 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Russian consumer group urges Kremlin administration to reject regional vape sales bans
Russian consumer group urges Kremlin administration to reject regional vape sales bans
A Russian consumer organization has urged the Presidential Administration to block proposals that would let regions ban ENDS and e-liquid sales, warning it would create fragmented regulation and turbocharge the illicit market. The group cites WHO statistics and overseas experiences to argue for a more targeted regulatory model.
Feb.06 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Exclusive: Altria Confirms FDA Grants Marketing Authorization to on! PLUS, Ending More Than a Year of PMTA Review
Exclusive: Altria Confirms FDA Grants Marketing Authorization to on! PLUS, Ending More Than a Year of PMTA Review
Altria on December 19 confirmed that six on! PLUS nicotine pouch products had received U.S. FDA marketing authorization, ending a PMTA review lasting more than a year after the company moved ahead with launch plans before clearance.
Regulations
Dec.20
China National Tobacco Corp paid $222 bln into state finances in 2025
China National Tobacco Corp paid $222 bln into state finances in 2025
China National Tobacco Corporation (CNTC) paid a record $222 billion into China’s state finances in 2025, according to official industry data.
Special Report
Jan.23
Singapore to Extend Etomidate Controls and Table New Vape Legislation in 2026
Singapore to Extend Etomidate Controls and Table New Vape Legislation in 2026
Singapore will maintain etomidate’s classification under drug control laws while preparing new legislation targeting e-vaporisers, as authorities reinforce a hardline regulatory stance on vaping.
Feb.05
Russia’s Volgograd fines retailer 300,000 rubles for unlabelled nicotine products, orders confiscation and destruction
Russia’s Volgograd fines retailer 300,000 rubles for unlabelled nicotine products, orders confiscation and destruction
Volgograd, Russia say a retailer was caught selling unlabelled nicotine products, including electronic nicotine delivery devices flagged in the national “Honest Sign” tracking system as already withdrawn from circulation. A local court fined the entrepreneur 300,000 rubles and ordered 41 confiscated items to be destroyed, with the decision now in effect.
Feb.05 by 2FIRSTS.ai