Max (Shenzhen) Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Declared Bankrupt

Dec.18.2024
Max (Shenzhen) Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Declared Bankrupt
Shenzhen Baotou District People's Court announces bankruptcy liquidation of Max (Shenzhen) Electronic Technology Co., Ltd.

Recently, the People's Court of Baoan District, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, issued a notice announcing the bankruptcy liquidation of Max (Shenzhen) Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Max Company").

Max (Shenzhen) Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Declared Bankrupt
Original text: Original text | Image source: People's Court of Baoan District, Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province.


The court, in a statement, announced that it has transferred Max Company to bankruptcy liquidation as requested by the applicant for execution, Dongguan Shuoxinda Technology Co., Ltd., on December 12, 2024, on the grounds that Max Company is unable to pay its due debts and its assets are insufficient to cover all debts.


According to the announcement, the court has made this decision in accordance with Article 10, Paragraph 1 of the Enterprise Bankruptcy Law of the People's Republic of China. The court also specifically pointed out that if Max Company has any objections to this decision, they should raise them in writing within seven days of receiving the notice and provide relevant evidence materials.


Previously, 2Firsts received a tip from a source in the e-cigarette industry, stating that Max Company has recently filed for bankruptcy with the Intermediate People's Court of Shenzhen. Max Company is primarily involved in the research and development, as well as the sales, of e-cigarette related products.


According to Tianyancha, it owns multiple trademarks including "Yueke", "PQZU", "MKPRO", "MAXECIG", "MCKESSE", and "BADKITTY".


Cover Image: ChatGpt Generated


We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Virginia appeals to the Fourth Circuit over partial block on flavored vape ban enforcement
Virginia appeals to the Fourth Circuit over partial block on flavored vape ban enforcement
Virginia has asked the Fourth Circuit to overturn a district court order that partially blocked enforcement of the commonwealth’s flavored vape ban. In a notice, the state told U.S. District Judge David J. Novak it seeks to upend his December ruling that Virginia’s Chapter 23.2 statute is preempted by the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act.
Jan.12 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Product | Airis, Kangvape and HAYATI Launch Christmas-Themed E-cigarettes in UK and US Online Markets
Product | Airis, Kangvape and HAYATI Launch Christmas-Themed E-cigarettes in UK and US Online Markets
As the Christmas holiday season approaches in Europe and North America, e-cigarette brands such as Airis, Kangvape and HAYATI have successively launched Christmas special editions featuring festive-themed designs and selected limited-time flavors, which are now available through online channels in both the United States and the United Kingdom.
Dec.15 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Harm Reduction Experts Warn: FCTC COP11 Policies Risk Marginalizing the Global South
Harm Reduction Experts Warn: FCTC COP11 Policies Risk Marginalizing the Global South
Two global tobacco harm reduction experts, in their submission to 2Firsts, argue that several COP11 policy proposals driven by high-income countries do not align with the capacities and conditions of low- and middle-income countries. They highlight research and funding gaps and call for a more equitable global support mechanism.
Nov.19
Singapore HSA bust links two vape warehouses; Malaysian man jailed 41 weeks
Singapore HSA bust links two vape warehouses; Malaysian man jailed 41 weeks
HSA officers in Singapore staked out a Bishan warehouse after a tip-off and found a Malaysian man in a site containing thousands of vaporisers and components. Checks on his phone led to a second warehouse in Ubi with large quantities of devices and parts.
Jan.07 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Selangor preparing regulatory policy that may gradually prohibit vape use
Selangor preparing regulatory policy that may gradually prohibit vape use
Selangor is drafting a policy paper outlining its regulatory direction for electronic cigarette products, including the possibility of gradually prohibiting vape use. The move aligns with the Tobacco Product Control Act for Public Health 2023 (Act 852) and aims to strengthen enforcement and youth health education.
Nov.21 by 2FIRSTS.ai
iMiracle and VPR Reach Preliminary Settlement in ‘Elf’ Trademark Dispute, Potentially Ending Three-Year Legal Battle
iMiracle and VPR Reach Preliminary Settlement in ‘Elf’ Trademark Dispute, Potentially Ending Three-Year Legal Battle
According to Law360, VPR Brands and iMiracle have filed a joint notice in federal court in Florida stating that they have signed a settlement term sheet and plan to finalize a global settlement within 30 days that would resolve multiple lawsuits. The dispute, which began in 2022 and centers on the “Elf” trademark, has involved injunctions, counterclaims and a key ruling by the Federal Circuit overturning a lower court’s order.
Dec.11 by 2FIRSTS.ai