New Legislation Amendments for E-Cigarettes and Tobacco Products in Poland

Dec.16.2024
New Legislation Amendments for E-Cigarettes and Tobacco Products in Poland
New legislation amendments regarding e-cigarettes and tobacco products in Poland are set to be implemented in the second quarter of 2025.

According to Prawo.pl's report on December 14th, a new legislative amendment regarding the use of e-cigarettes and tobacco products is expected to be implemented in the second quarter of 2025. This delay is due to the European Commission's notification procedure and additional transitional provisions, significantly extending the period for the regulations to take effect. Despite the fact that the project should have been submitted for cabinet review months ago, it has yet to be realized. Additionally, the Ministry of Health unexpectedly proposed a new amendment to the project, adding several pages of new legislative provisions. This move has sparked controversy as it bypassed the public consultation process.


The amendment adjusts the nicotine pouch market. In October, the Health Department originally intended to ban the use of synthetic nicotine pouches through standalone legislation. Now, this provision has been incorporated into the e-cigarette legislative process as an amendment. The amendment argues that synthetic nicotine pouches currently on the market are not regulated by existing tobacco product regulations and therefore urgently need to be managed through legislation.


The amendment aims to establish a detailed definition for nicotine pouches, categorizing them as "relevant products," while also prohibiting their sale to individuals under the age of 18. In addition, the sale of these products will be prohibited in specific locations such as hospitals, schools, and sports facilities, and restrictions will be placed on online and vending machine sales. The Ministry of Health explains that these measures are intended to protect minors from the harmful effects of nicotine addiction.


Lawyer Marcin Bandurski pointed out that the widespread use of nicotine pouches has become a hidden concern for public health, especially among teenagers. Although the Ministry of Health had previously stated plans to completely ban nicotine pouches, the current amendment does not include a total ban. Countries like Belgium have already implemented a full ban on nicotine pouches, while Poland's amendment may actually lead to their legalization, contradicting the European "smoke-free" goal.


The Business Centre Club in Poland emphasizes the need for extensive public consultations during the legislative process, as well as a reasonable legal grace period to allow stakeholders to adapt to new regulations. Legal advisor Katarzyna Fortak-Karasińska stated that this amendment did not follow the normal legislative procedure and should undergo social consultations to ensure that its impact on the market is fully evaluated.


We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Canada’s B.C. Passes First Vaping Cost-Recovery Framework, Allowing Government to Sue Manufacturers Over Health Expenses
Canada’s B.C. Passes First Vaping Cost-Recovery Framework, Allowing Government to Sue Manufacturers Over Health Expenses
According to the Nelson Star, British Columbia has passed the Vaping Product Damages and Health Care Costs Recovery Act by a 49–42 vote. The legislation enables the provincial government to seek recovery of future public health costs from vape manufacturers, following models used in opioid and tobacco litigation.
Dec.03
Russia's Finance Ministry Proposes Regional Vape Sales Bans from 2026
Russia's Finance Ministry Proposes Regional Vape Sales Bans from 2026
Russian Finance Ministry has drafted amendments allowing regional governments to ban the retail sale of vapes and e-liquids between September 1, 2026, and September 1, 2031. Regions must enact their own legislation and notify the Federal Service for Alcohol and Tobacco Control (Rosalkogoltabakkontrol), which will publish a list of participating regions.
Dec.08 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Energy Marketers of America Backs White House Crackdown on Illicit Vape Shops, Urges Cleanup of ‘Gray Area’ Market
Energy Marketers of America Backs White House Crackdown on Illicit Vape Shops, Urges Cleanup of ‘Gray Area’ Market
The Energy Marketers of America (EMA) has publicly endorsed the White House’s enforcement campaign against illicit vape shops, saying it will help address the regulatory “gray area” that has emerged since 2020 due to delayed product approvals. EMA noted that a large volume of unauthorized imported disposable e-cigarettes worth about $86.5 million has been seized and called for stronger, more localized enforcement efforts to ease the burden on compliant convenience retailers.
Dec.04 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Malaysia’s MOH aims to implement a vape ban in 2026, starting with open pod systems
Malaysia’s MOH aims to implement a vape ban in 2026, starting with open pod systems
Bernama (Malaysia’s national news agency) reported that Health Minister Datuk Seri Dr Dzulkefly Ahmad said the Ministry of Health aims to implement a vape ban this year, beginning with open pod systems, and will not compromise on enforcing the Control of Smoking Products for Public Health Act 2024 (Act 852).
Jan.06 by 2FIRSTS.ai
China’s E-Cigarette Exports Fall Slightly to USD 10.6 Billion in 2025, U.S. Market Further Consolidates Lead
China’s E-Cigarette Exports Fall Slightly to USD 10.6 Billion in 2025, U.S. Market Further Consolidates Lead
China’s e-cigarette exports totaled approximately USD 10.60 billion in 2025, down 3.3% year-on-year from USD 10.96 billion in 2024, according to annual trade data released by the General Administration of Customs of China. Despite the mild decline, exports remained firmly above the USD 10 billion mark, with a clear rebound in the fourth quarter.
Jan.20 by 2FIRSTS.ai
NJOY and Altria ask federal court to halt ITC proceeding, alleging multiple constitutional defects
NJOY and Altria ask federal court to halt ITC proceeding, alleging multiple constitutional defects
A filing in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Richmond Division) shows NJOY and Altria entities submitted a plaintiffs’ reply supporting their motion for summary judgment, arguing the challenged ITC proceeding is unconstitutional on multiple grounds, including ALJ appointment authority, removal protections, and Article III limits under the Jarkesy framework. The plaintiffs seek summary judgment and a permanent injunction barring continuation of the ITC proceeding.
Jan.08 by 2FIRSTS.ai