New Mexico Sues Tobacco Companies over Breach of Settlement Agreement

Dec.06.2022
New Mexico Sues Tobacco Companies over Breach of Settlement Agreement
New Mexico sues tobacco companies for breach of settlement agreement and conspiracy, alleging over $84 million in losses.

The state of New Mexico is currently suing several tobacco companies, alleging they conspired and breached contracts.


New Mexico Attorney General Hector Balderas announced a legal challenge on Tuesday, alleging that tobacco companies have been withholding annual payments required by a multi-state settlement that resolved dozens of lawsuits seeking reimbursement for healthcare costs related to smoking-related illnesses.


Complaints from New Mexico are focused on a specific provision of a 1998 settlement agreement, alleging that the company's abuse of that provision has resulted in the state losing over $84 million in the past 14 years.


In a statement, Balderrama said, "These baseless tactics of delay have no end, and now is the time to compel tobacco companies to pay the damages owed to New Mexico - providing funding for much-needed health initiatives.


The companies did not immediately respond to requests for comment regarding the lawsuit in the state of New Mexico.


According to a settlement agreement, each company is obligated to make annual payments to the state of New Mexico. However, the Attorney General's office claims that these companies often raise disputes every year, resulting in a certain percentage of payments being withheld and potentially leading to arbitration procedures that could last for years.


For example, the arbitration payment made in 2004 concluded last month, while the arbitration payments made from 2005 to 2007 have only recently begun.


Officials from the state government have stated that the average annual cost paid is between $30-40 million, which only covers less than 5% of New Mexico's healthcare costs directly attributed to smoking. They estimate that healthcare costs related to smoking will exceed $980 million by 2021.


In 2020, Montana launched a similar legal challenge and successfully retrieved over $49 million in payments that tobacco companies had wrongly withheld. The state also reached an agreement with these companies, ensuring they would not contest annual payments to Montana over the next ten years.


Officials in the state of New Mexico have stated that the amount of settlement money being withheld each year is increasing.


According to the lawsuit, defendants - including tobacco giants Philip Morris and RJ Reynolds - did not disclose to the state of New Mexico how much money they withheld or where the funds were held. The practice of withholding taxes may also vary from year to year.


According to state prosecutors, the best estimates suggest that defendants in New Mexico are withholding between $6 million and $9 million annually due to a lack of transparency. "This scheme is a calculated strategy designed to permanently and fraudulently reduce the contractual payments defendants are obligated to pay under settlement agreements, and to undermine the purpose of such agreements," the complaint stated.


The Office of the Attorney General has stated that many states have been renegotiating with tobacco companies for years to avoid continuing arbitration regarding annual payments and to concede more favorable terms to the companies.


Officials in New Mexico state that only eight states are still demanding full payment of the funds they are entitled to under a settlement agreement.


2FIRSTS will continue to report on this topic, with future updates available on the "2FIRSTS APP." Scan the QR code below to download the app.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

German Customs Crack Down on Tax Evasion at Intertabac Tradeshow, 22 Exhibitors Penalized
German Customs Crack Down on Tax Evasion at Intertabac Tradeshow, 22 Exhibitors Penalized
According to German media reports, German customs investigated and punished 22 exhibitors at the InterTabac exhibition for untaxed cigarettes, e-cigarettes and e-liquids, the highest number in recent years, and initiated criminal proceedings. The exhibitors involved were required to provide a guarantee of approximately 59,000 euros.
Sep.26 by 2FIRSTS.ai
U.S. Lawmakers Seek to Empower HHS to Destroy Counterfeit Chinese Tobacco Products
U.S. Lawmakers Seek to Empower HHS to Destroy Counterfeit Chinese Tobacco Products
Bipartisan members of the U.S. Congress have introduced the “Ensuring the Necessary Destruction of Illicit Chinese Tobacco Act” (END Act), seeking to amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to authorize the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to directly destroy adulterated, misbranded, or counterfeit imported tobacco products.Major tobacco companies, including Altria, along with several public health organizations, have announced their support for the bill.
Nov.11 by 2FIRSTS.ai
ACT Government Bill Targets Illicit Tobacco and Vapes with Tougher Powers
ACT Government Bill Targets Illicit Tobacco and Vapes with Tougher Powers
ACT Government Health Minister Rachel Stephen-Smith introduced the Tobacco and Other Smoking Products Amendment Bill 2025, expanding authorised officers’ inspection, seizure and penalty powers to address illicit tobacco and vaping. The Bill enables $1,600 infringement notices for selling prohibited smoking products and classifies illicit tobacco as a prohibited smoking product under Territory law.
Oct.23 by 2FIRSTS.ai
EPO Invalidates Philip Morris Heated Tobacco Patent After Imperial Brands Challenge
EPO Invalidates Philip Morris Heated Tobacco Patent After Imperial Brands Challenge
The European Patent Office invalidated Philip Morris International’s heated tobacco patent, ruling it lacked inventiveness after a challenge by Imperial Brands’ subsidiary Fontem Ventures BV.
Oct.11 by 2FIRSTS.ai
ZYN’s Trademark Dilemma in China | Legal Opinion Submitted to 2Firsts
ZYN’s Trademark Dilemma in China | Legal Opinion Submitted to 2Firsts
ZYN faces trademark revocation and enforcement challenges in China. In this legal commentary submitted to 2Firsts, the author examines regulatory gaps, enforcement hurdles, and the high legal risks surrounding nicotine pouch trademarks.
Oct.14
Interview with CFU: Biheat Dual Heating System + AI Intelligence Usher in a New Era for Global HTP Devices
Interview with CFU: Biheat Dual Heating System + AI Intelligence Usher in a New Era for Global HTP Devices
In September 2025, CFU Group unveiled the Biheat series at the InterTabac exhibition in Germany, featuring the world’s first “dual-heating system” along with AI control and a large interactive display. The innovation significantly enhances flavor consistency and usage duration. With its “efficiency–experience–intelligence” pathway, the product leads global heated tobacco innovation and underscores China’s continued leadership in heated tobacco technology.
Sep.19