New Mexico Sues Tobacco Companies over Breach of Settlement Agreement

Dec.06.2022
New Mexico Sues Tobacco Companies over Breach of Settlement Agreement
New Mexico sues tobacco companies for breach of settlement agreement and conspiracy, alleging over $84 million in losses.

The state of New Mexico is currently suing several tobacco companies, alleging they conspired and breached contracts.


New Mexico Attorney General Hector Balderas announced a legal challenge on Tuesday, alleging that tobacco companies have been withholding annual payments required by a multi-state settlement that resolved dozens of lawsuits seeking reimbursement for healthcare costs related to smoking-related illnesses.


Complaints from New Mexico are focused on a specific provision of a 1998 settlement agreement, alleging that the company's abuse of that provision has resulted in the state losing over $84 million in the past 14 years.


In a statement, Balderrama said, "These baseless tactics of delay have no end, and now is the time to compel tobacco companies to pay the damages owed to New Mexico - providing funding for much-needed health initiatives.


The companies did not immediately respond to requests for comment regarding the lawsuit in the state of New Mexico.


According to a settlement agreement, each company is obligated to make annual payments to the state of New Mexico. However, the Attorney General's office claims that these companies often raise disputes every year, resulting in a certain percentage of payments being withheld and potentially leading to arbitration procedures that could last for years.


For example, the arbitration payment made in 2004 concluded last month, while the arbitration payments made from 2005 to 2007 have only recently begun.


Officials from the state government have stated that the average annual cost paid is between $30-40 million, which only covers less than 5% of New Mexico's healthcare costs directly attributed to smoking. They estimate that healthcare costs related to smoking will exceed $980 million by 2021.


In 2020, Montana launched a similar legal challenge and successfully retrieved over $49 million in payments that tobacco companies had wrongly withheld. The state also reached an agreement with these companies, ensuring they would not contest annual payments to Montana over the next ten years.


Officials in the state of New Mexico have stated that the amount of settlement money being withheld each year is increasing.


According to the lawsuit, defendants - including tobacco giants Philip Morris and RJ Reynolds - did not disclose to the state of New Mexico how much money they withheld or where the funds were held. The practice of withholding taxes may also vary from year to year.


According to state prosecutors, the best estimates suggest that defendants in New Mexico are withholding between $6 million and $9 million annually due to a lack of transparency. "This scheme is a calculated strategy designed to permanently and fraudulently reduce the contractual payments defendants are obligated to pay under settlement agreements, and to undermine the purpose of such agreements," the complaint stated.


The Office of the Attorney General has stated that many states have been renegotiating with tobacco companies for years to avoid continuing arbitration regarding annual payments and to concede more favorable terms to the companies.


Officials in New Mexico state that only eight states are still demanding full payment of the funds they are entitled to under a settlement agreement.


2FIRSTS will continue to report on this topic, with future updates available on the "2FIRSTS APP." Scan the QR code below to download the app.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Japan Survey Finds 49.5% Would Cut Tobacco Use if Prices Rise, 64.6% Show Interest in Nicotine-Free Alternatives
Japan Survey Finds 49.5% Would Cut Tobacco Use if Prices Rise, 64.6% Show Interest in Nicotine-Free Alternatives
A September online survey commissioned by Japanese smoking-accessories company Lightec found that 49.5% of respondents would consider reducing tobacco use if prices rose further, while 25.1% would consider switching to cheaper brands and 14.5% would consider using or combining alternatives such as vapes and nicotine-free herbal sticks. Another 64.6% expressed some level of interest in such alternatives. The survey covered 1,088 respondents aged 20 to 70 and was conducted by a company that sells NICOLESS nicotine-free vaping and herbal-stick products, meaning its findings should not be treated as representative of Japan's smoking population.
DATA
Oct.12
Altria’s USSTC Starts $250 Million Kentucky Expansion, Adding More Than 200 Jobs
Altria’s USSTC Starts $250 Million Kentucky Expansion, Adding More Than 200 Jobs
U.S. Smokeless Tobacco Company, an Altria Group company, has broken ground on an approximately $250 million manufacturing expansion in Hopkinsville, Kentucky. The roughly 270,000-square-foot facility is expected to create more than 200 jobs and absorb processing, manufacturing and packaging operations currently split between Hopkinsville and Nashville, Tennessee. USSTC previously said production at its Nashville facility is expected to wind down by early 2028. The project forms part of Altria’s broader effort to modernize and consolidate its U.S. smokeless tobacco manufacturing network.
Sep.10
Virginia Tobacco Retail Permit Takes Effect October 1, Covering Vapes as More Than 3,000 Businesses Apply in September
Virginia Tobacco Retail Permit Takes Effect October 1, Covering Vapes as More Than 3,000 Businesses Apply in September
Virginia's new retail tobacco permit system took effect October 1, requiring sellers of vapes, nicotine products and related devices and accessories to obtain a Retail Tobacco Permit for each business location. Virginia ABC said more than 3,000 businesses applied in September alone, creating a processing backlog. Qualifying applicants that filed before October 1 may temporarily operate under a Letter of Authorization. The new store-level permit also sits alongside Virginia's existing vape product directory, where sales of unlisted liquid nicotine or nicotine vapor products can trigger civil penalties starting at $5,000.
Regulations
Oct.03
NAS 2026 | Former FDA Tobacco Chief Mitch Zeller Calls for Shift From “End Game” to “End State”
NAS 2026 | Former FDA Tobacco Chief Mitch Zeller Calls for Shift From “End Game” to “End State”
At the 2026 New Approaches Summit in New York, former FDA Center for Tobacco Products Director Mitch Zeller called for the tobacco harm reduction debate to shift from the traditional “end game” toward defining a desired “end state.” He also highlighted unresolved concerns around dual use, argued that biomarkers of exposure may be more meaningful than cigarettes-per-day in assessing risk reduction, and said nicotine misperceptions remain a major barrier to public health progress.
Sep.25
Special Report|From CrossBar 20K to 6-Methyl Nicotine KUMI: Two Routes Into U.S. State Vape Directories?
Special Report|From CrossBar 20K to 6-Methyl Nicotine KUMI: Two Routes Into U.S. State Vape Directories?
Several U.S. states have incorporated the September 9, 2020 PMTA filing deadline into eligibility rules for certain vaping products. CrossBar 20K drew attention after appearing on Pennsylvania's 163-entry directory. A broader 2Firsts investigation found that related registration businesses also listed KUMI and CROSSBAR SIX products, with 171 KUMI-related entries across Louisiana, Nebraska and Wisconsin. Corporate records link Scott Silverman to Blue Nine LLC and VR Products I LLC. PMTA compliance expert Mr. K said historical applications and nicotine-analogue products may offer two different approaches to state-directory access.
Regulations
Oct.26
India Duty-Free Nicotine Pouch Sales Face Regulatory Test as ZYN, FOX Classification Remains Open
India Duty-Free Nicotine Pouch Sales Face Regulatory Test as ZYN, FOX Classification Remains Open
The Bombay High Court has ruled that airport duty-free shops are not exempt from India's domestic regulatory laws merely because they operate beyond the customs barrier, leaving in place a sales halt covering ZYN and FOX nicotine pouches at Mumbai's international airport. The court, however, did not determine that the products necessarily qualify as "drugs" under India's Drugs and Cosmetics Act. The retailers have four weeks to submit product information to the appropriate authorities, including CDSCO, which must complete its review within 30 days of receiving the submissions.
Sep.24