New Mexico Sues Tobacco Companies over Breach of Settlement Agreement

Dec.06.2022
New Mexico Sues Tobacco Companies over Breach of Settlement Agreement
New Mexico sues tobacco companies for breach of settlement agreement and conspiracy, alleging over $84 million in losses.

The state of New Mexico is currently suing several tobacco companies, alleging they conspired and breached contracts.


New Mexico Attorney General Hector Balderas announced a legal challenge on Tuesday, alleging that tobacco companies have been withholding annual payments required by a multi-state settlement that resolved dozens of lawsuits seeking reimbursement for healthcare costs related to smoking-related illnesses.


Complaints from New Mexico are focused on a specific provision of a 1998 settlement agreement, alleging that the company's abuse of that provision has resulted in the state losing over $84 million in the past 14 years.


In a statement, Balderrama said, "These baseless tactics of delay have no end, and now is the time to compel tobacco companies to pay the damages owed to New Mexico - providing funding for much-needed health initiatives.


The companies did not immediately respond to requests for comment regarding the lawsuit in the state of New Mexico.


According to a settlement agreement, each company is obligated to make annual payments to the state of New Mexico. However, the Attorney General's office claims that these companies often raise disputes every year, resulting in a certain percentage of payments being withheld and potentially leading to arbitration procedures that could last for years.


For example, the arbitration payment made in 2004 concluded last month, while the arbitration payments made from 2005 to 2007 have only recently begun.


Officials from the state government have stated that the average annual cost paid is between $30-40 million, which only covers less than 5% of New Mexico's healthcare costs directly attributed to smoking. They estimate that healthcare costs related to smoking will exceed $980 million by 2021.


In 2020, Montana launched a similar legal challenge and successfully retrieved over $49 million in payments that tobacco companies had wrongly withheld. The state also reached an agreement with these companies, ensuring they would not contest annual payments to Montana over the next ten years.


Officials in the state of New Mexico have stated that the amount of settlement money being withheld each year is increasing.


According to the lawsuit, defendants - including tobacco giants Philip Morris and RJ Reynolds - did not disclose to the state of New Mexico how much money they withheld or where the funds were held. The practice of withholding taxes may also vary from year to year.


According to state prosecutors, the best estimates suggest that defendants in New Mexico are withholding between $6 million and $9 million annually due to a lack of transparency. "This scheme is a calculated strategy designed to permanently and fraudulently reduce the contractual payments defendants are obligated to pay under settlement agreements, and to undermine the purpose of such agreements," the complaint stated.


The Office of the Attorney General has stated that many states have been renegotiating with tobacco companies for years to avoid continuing arbitration regarding annual payments and to concede more favorable terms to the companies.


Officials in New Mexico state that only eight states are still demanding full payment of the funds they are entitled to under a settlement agreement.


2FIRSTS will continue to report on this topic, with future updates available on the "2FIRSTS APP." Scan the QR code below to download the app.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

RJR Vapor Loses Tax Refund Case as Texas High Court Finds VELO Pouches Taxable
RJR Vapor Loses Tax Refund Case as Texas High Court Finds VELO Pouches Taxable
The Texas Supreme Court issued a case summary on May 8, 2026, describing its decision in Hancock v. RJR Vapor Co. LLC. The dispute centered on whether RJR Vapor’s VELO oral nicotine pouches are taxable as “tobacco products” under the Texas Tax Code. Lower courts had held that the pouches were not taxable tobacco products, but the Texas Supreme Court reversed, concluding that VELO pouches are taxable because they are made of “a tobacco substitute.”
May.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Multi-State Coalition Urges F1 to End Nicotine Sponsorships, Citing Zyn and Velo
Multi-State Coalition Urges F1 to End Nicotine Sponsorships, Citing Zyn and Velo
Hawaii Attorney General Anne Lopez is co-leading a coalition of 19 states and jurisdictions urging the Fédération Internationale de l’Automobile (FIA) and Formula 1 to end sponsorships involving tobacco and nicotine products, including nicotine pouch brands such as Zyn and Velo.
News
Jun.09
Fifth Circuit Hears Challenge to FDA’s Standard for Reviewing Flavored Vape Applications
Fifth Circuit Hears Challenge to FDA’s Standard for Reviewing Flavored Vape Applications
A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit heard oral arguments on Tuesday in a case brought by seven small vape-liquid companies challenging the Food and Drug Administration’s denial of marketing authorization for their flavored electronic nicotine products.
Apr.30 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Oral Thin-Film Technology Firm CTT Pharma Eyes U.S. Nicotine Product Trials
Oral Thin-Film Technology Firm CTT Pharma Eyes U.S. Nicotine Product Trials
CTT Pharmaceutical Holdings said it has signed a letter of intent with a U.S. company to conduct clinical trials and testing for several potential nicotine products using its patented oral thin-film technology.
Jun.18
Ukrainian Lawmaker Proposes Ban on Vapes, Heated Tobacco Devices and Hookahs for Under-17s
Ukrainian Lawmaker Proposes Ban on Vapes, Heated Tobacco Devices and Hookahs for Under-17s
Ukraine’s Verkhovna Rada has registered a bill that would ban the use of tobacco products, vapes, hookahs, herbal smoking mixtures and heated tobacco devices by people under 17. The bill was introduced by People’s Deputy Georgiy Mazurashu and has already been sent to the relevant parliamentary committee. The author said one reason for the initiative is the prevalence of vaping among adolescents.
Apr.28 by 2FIRSTS.ai
AP Questions FDA Rationale as Glas Fruit-Flavored Vapes Won Authorization Without Added Cessation Benefit
AP Questions FDA Rationale as Glas Fruit-Flavored Vapes Won Authorization Without Added Cessation Benefit
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently authorized two fruit-flavored vaping products from Glas, but a newly released agency memo shows the products did not demonstrate greater smoking-cessation benefits than tobacco-flavored e-cigarettes. The Associated Press said the findings are likely to raise further questions about the FDA’s regulatory rationale and standards for flavored vaping products.
Jun.12