New Mexico Sues Tobacco Companies over Breach of Settlement Agreement

Dec.06.2022
New Mexico Sues Tobacco Companies over Breach of Settlement Agreement
New Mexico sues tobacco companies for breach of settlement agreement and conspiracy, alleging over $84 million in losses.

The state of New Mexico is currently suing several tobacco companies, alleging they conspired and breached contracts.


New Mexico Attorney General Hector Balderas announced a legal challenge on Tuesday, alleging that tobacco companies have been withholding annual payments required by a multi-state settlement that resolved dozens of lawsuits seeking reimbursement for healthcare costs related to smoking-related illnesses.


Complaints from New Mexico are focused on a specific provision of a 1998 settlement agreement, alleging that the company's abuse of that provision has resulted in the state losing over $84 million in the past 14 years.


In a statement, Balderrama said, "These baseless tactics of delay have no end, and now is the time to compel tobacco companies to pay the damages owed to New Mexico - providing funding for much-needed health initiatives.


The companies did not immediately respond to requests for comment regarding the lawsuit in the state of New Mexico.


According to a settlement agreement, each company is obligated to make annual payments to the state of New Mexico. However, the Attorney General's office claims that these companies often raise disputes every year, resulting in a certain percentage of payments being withheld and potentially leading to arbitration procedures that could last for years.


For example, the arbitration payment made in 2004 concluded last month, while the arbitration payments made from 2005 to 2007 have only recently begun.


Officials from the state government have stated that the average annual cost paid is between $30-40 million, which only covers less than 5% of New Mexico's healthcare costs directly attributed to smoking. They estimate that healthcare costs related to smoking will exceed $980 million by 2021.


In 2020, Montana launched a similar legal challenge and successfully retrieved over $49 million in payments that tobacco companies had wrongly withheld. The state also reached an agreement with these companies, ensuring they would not contest annual payments to Montana over the next ten years.


Officials in the state of New Mexico have stated that the amount of settlement money being withheld each year is increasing.


According to the lawsuit, defendants - including tobacco giants Philip Morris and RJ Reynolds - did not disclose to the state of New Mexico how much money they withheld or where the funds were held. The practice of withholding taxes may also vary from year to year.


According to state prosecutors, the best estimates suggest that defendants in New Mexico are withholding between $6 million and $9 million annually due to a lack of transparency. "This scheme is a calculated strategy designed to permanently and fraudulently reduce the contractual payments defendants are obligated to pay under settlement agreements, and to undermine the purpose of such agreements," the complaint stated.


The Office of the Attorney General has stated that many states have been renegotiating with tobacco companies for years to avoid continuing arbitration regarding annual payments and to concede more favorable terms to the companies.


Officials in New Mexico state that only eight states are still demanding full payment of the funds they are entitled to under a settlement agreement.


2FIRSTS will continue to report on this topic, with future updates available on the "2FIRSTS APP." Scan the QR code below to download the app.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

Special Report | Belarus Rejects Vape Ban, Opts for Tighter Market Controls
Special Report | Belarus Rejects Vape Ban, Opts for Tighter Market Controls
After weeks of debate over a potential blanket prohibition, Belarus has decided against banning electronic cigarettes, choosing instead to tighten control over wholesale, imports and licensing. President Alexander Lukashenko warned that an outright ban could drive the market underground and undermine state revenues, as officials move to curb widespread illicit trade while keeping retail sales largely intact.
Mar.04
Malaysia’s Kuching court fines vape retailer USD 4921 over “BEST VALUE FOR MONEY” poster promotion
Malaysia’s Kuching court fines vape retailer USD 4921 over “BEST VALUE FOR MONEY” poster promotion
A vape retail company in Kuching, Malaysia, was fined RM20,000 (about USD 4,921.86) by the Magistrates’ Court on January 19, 2026, after pleading guilty to an offence under Section 9(1) of the Control of Smoking Products for Public Health Act 2024 (Act 852). The case concerned a poster displayed at the company’s premises on October 6, 2025, carrying the slogan “BEST VALUE FOR MONEY.”
Jan.21 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Two Florida Bills Move: One Restricts Vape Advertising, Another Rewrites Cigarette Tax Treatment for Heated Tobacco
Two Florida Bills Move: One Restricts Vape Advertising, Another Rewrites Cigarette Tax Treatment for Heated Tobacco
The Florida Senate Industries Committee advance SB 980, the “Florida Age-Gate Act,” which would restrict advertising, promotion, and open displays of certain nicotine dispensing devices that lack FDA marketing authorization, with escalating penalties. Separately, the Florida House Ways and Means Committee advance HB 377, which would exclude heated tobacco products from being taxed like cigarettes.
Jan.28 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Product | 22ml Combined E-Liquid Supply, Rated for 35,000 Puffs: OXBAR Launches the OX35K Open-System Pod Device
Product | 22ml Combined E-Liquid Supply, Rated for 35,000 Puffs: OXBAR Launches the OX35K Open-System Pod Device
The vaping brand OXBAR has recently listed its open-system, refillable pod device OX35K on its official website. The product features a “2ml built-in pod + two 10ml external refill bottles” e-liquid supply structure and supports top refilling, with a claimed puff count of up to 35,000. It is equipped with a 1000mAh built-in battery and offers dual power modes—BOOST and ECO—positioning the device to balance high-puff performance with an open-system form factor.
Jan.13 by 2FIRSTS.ai
UK OPSS launches vape safety campaign focusing on use, charging and disposal
UK OPSS launches vape safety campaign focusing on use, charging and disposal
The UK Office for Product Safety and Standards (OPSS) published information on March 4, 2026, launching a new campaign to raise awareness among young people about safety issues linked to using, charging and disposing of vapes.
Mar.06 by 2FIRSTS.ai
UK Barnsley: Town-centre vape shop and owner hit with £15,000+ bill after ignoring three improvement notices
UK Barnsley: Town-centre vape shop and owner hit with £15,000+ bill after ignoring three improvement notices
A Barnsley town-centre vape retailer and its owner have been ordered to pay more than £15,000 after admitting multiple offences linked to the continued sale of illegal single-use vapes and non-compliant food items, despite three formal improvement notices.
Feb.06 by 2FIRSTS.ai