New Zealand Government Neglects E-Liquid Regulation, Thousands of Retailers at Risk

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Apr.10.2024
New Zealand Government Neglects E-Liquid Regulation, Thousands of Retailers at Risk
Thousands of e-liquid retailers in New Zealand may escape legal consequences due to lack of government oversight.

According to the New Zealand media nzdoctor on April 10, if the New Zealand government continues to turn a blind eye and invest in the wrong areas, thousands of e-liquid retailers may potentially operate outside the law. Letitia Harding, CEO of the Asthma and Respiratory Foundation NZ, stated that the news of Health Ministry layoffs was regrettable but not surprising.

 

According to our understanding, they are not the ones enforcing the law on the thousands of e-liquid retailers. What we hope to see is the government shifting its focus towards investing in this area.

 

A survey conducted last year revealed that the Department of Health's e-liquid Regulatory Authority (VRA) has only one full-time employee, while the regulatory manager works only 10 hours per week, equivalent to a total of three-and-a-half full-time employees.

 

The foundation visited an e-liquid retailer last week and observed many non-compliant products. Hardin stated that the government has not committed to limiting the number of specialist e-liquid retailers (SVRs), of which there are currently 1530, so there is a need for continued investment in e-liquid compliance.

 

They need to invest in people who conduct door-to-door product inspections to ensure all products meet regulatory requirements. Perhaps this task should not fall on the Department of Health, but instead be handled by the Department of Legal Affairs, similar to how alcohol selling venues are regulated. Without this investment, our young people will continue to be addicted to e-cigarettes.

 

According to information provided to the foundation under the Official Information Act (OIA), the e-liquid regulatory authority has initiated an investigation into a company that operates two e-liquid websites for failing to comply with new e-liquid laws. This investigation comes after examining 29 websites to ensure compliance with safety requirements, including the company's failure to include removable batteries with products, not meeting nicotine strength labeling requirements, and not installing child safety mechanisms.

 

In order to protect the company's right to a fair trial, the Health Department has not disclosed the name and website domain of the company. The department has confirmed that no fines have been issued to date, but stated that "violations are not necessarily punishable offenses" in this case.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

EU Novel Tobacco Regulation Trends and Business Response | Guest Contribution by a European Legal and Compliance Expert
EU Novel Tobacco Regulation Trends and Business Response | Guest Contribution by a European Legal and Compliance Expert
Carlos Cabrera, founder of CabLab Law & Advocacy, contributes this article to 2Firsts, arguing that the EU’s evolving approach to novel tobacco regulation may unintentionally reinforce cigarette use by narrowing alternatives. He warns companies to watch signals on flavours, labelling, traceability, nicotine pouch rules and digital marketing, while grounding business decisions in realistic timelines, compliance planning and continuous monitoring.
Apr.22
BAT Uzbekistan and Regulators Discuss Production Modernization and Export Expansion
BAT Uzbekistan and Regulators Discuss Production Modernization and Export Expansion
A meeting was held at the Department for Combating Economic Crimes under the General Prosecutor’s Office of Uzbekistan with representatives of British American Tobacco Uzbekistan. Participants included the department’s leadership, the Inspectorate for Regulation of the Alcohol and Tobacco Market, and business representatives.
May.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai
New York’s Lawsuit Against Puff Bar and Other Flavored Vape Companies Survives Key Court Challenge
New York’s Lawsuit Against Puff Bar and Other Flavored Vape Companies Survives Key Court Challenge
According to Law360, a federal judge ruled that makers and distributors of flavored vape brands such as Puff Bar cannot escape New York’s lawsuit seeking to hold them responsible for the youth vaping epidemic. The court found that the state had adequately alleged the companies misrepresented how safe vaping is.
Apr.07 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Russia May Allow Regions to Introduce Experimental Vape Sales Bans
Russia May Allow Regions to Introduce Experimental Vape Sales Bans
Russia’s government commission on legislative activity has approved second-reading amendments to a bill on licensing trade in tobacco and nicotine-containing products that would allow Russian regions to introduce experimental bans on vape sales.
Mar.31 by 2FIRSTS.ai
UKVIA Says VApril 2026 Will Highlight Consumer Impact of Tobacco and Vapes Bill
UKVIA Says VApril 2026 Will Highlight Consumer Impact of Tobacco and Vapes Bill
The UK Vaping Industry Association said it will launch the ninth annual VApril campaign next month. The association described VApril as the world’s largest vape awareness initiative and said it has for almost a decade supported adult smokers looking to quit through vaping by providing evidence-based information, expert insights and practical guidance
Mar.24 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Cross-Party Romanian Lawmakers Propose Ban on E-Cigarettes and Heated Tobacco Use in All Enclosed Public Spaces
Cross-Party Romanian Lawmakers Propose Ban on E-Cigarettes and Heated Tobacco Use in All Enclosed Public Spaces
Lawmakers from Romania’s USR, PSD and PNL have submitted a bill that would ban e-cigarettes, vapes and heated tobacco devices in all enclosed public spaces. The proposal would redefine “smoking” so that inhaling aerosols produced by heating or vaporizing products containing tobacco, nicotine or other substances intended for inhalation would also be considered smoking, except for medical-use products.
Apr.17 by 2FIRSTS.ai