New Zealand Government Neglects E-Liquid Regulation, Thousands of Retailers at Risk

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Apr.10.2024
New Zealand Government Neglects E-Liquid Regulation, Thousands of Retailers at Risk
Thousands of e-liquid retailers in New Zealand may escape legal consequences due to lack of government oversight.

According to the New Zealand media nzdoctor on April 10, if the New Zealand government continues to turn a blind eye and invest in the wrong areas, thousands of e-liquid retailers may potentially operate outside the law. Letitia Harding, CEO of the Asthma and Respiratory Foundation NZ, stated that the news of Health Ministry layoffs was regrettable but not surprising.

 

According to our understanding, they are not the ones enforcing the law on the thousands of e-liquid retailers. What we hope to see is the government shifting its focus towards investing in this area.

 

A survey conducted last year revealed that the Department of Health's e-liquid Regulatory Authority (VRA) has only one full-time employee, while the regulatory manager works only 10 hours per week, equivalent to a total of three-and-a-half full-time employees.

 

The foundation visited an e-liquid retailer last week and observed many non-compliant products. Hardin stated that the government has not committed to limiting the number of specialist e-liquid retailers (SVRs), of which there are currently 1530, so there is a need for continued investment in e-liquid compliance.

 

They need to invest in people who conduct door-to-door product inspections to ensure all products meet regulatory requirements. Perhaps this task should not fall on the Department of Health, but instead be handled by the Department of Legal Affairs, similar to how alcohol selling venues are regulated. Without this investment, our young people will continue to be addicted to e-cigarettes.

 

According to information provided to the foundation under the Official Information Act (OIA), the e-liquid regulatory authority has initiated an investigation into a company that operates two e-liquid websites for failing to comply with new e-liquid laws. This investigation comes after examining 29 websites to ensure compliance with safety requirements, including the company's failure to include removable batteries with products, not meeting nicotine strength labeling requirements, and not installing child safety mechanisms.

 

In order to protect the company's right to a fair trial, the Health Department has not disclosed the name and website domain of the company. The department has confirmed that no fines have been issued to date, but stated that "violations are not necessarily punishable offenses" in this case.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Imperial Brands to Close Langenhagen Cigarette Factory by 2027
Imperial Brands to Close Langenhagen Cigarette Factory by 2027
Imperial Brands said it will gradually close the Reemtsma factory in Langenhagen near Hanover by 2027 after efforts to find a buyer failed to produce a sustainable agreement. The factory has produced cigarettes since 1971 and currently affects around 600 employees. The company said it had examined all realistic options over recent months but did not receive a binding offer from a potential buyer.
Mar.27 by 2FIRSTS.ai
USITC Launches Section 337 Probe Into Disposable and Closed-System ENDS, Involving 16 Companies
USITC Launches Section 337 Probe Into Disposable and Closed-System ENDS, Involving 16 Companies
The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) voted to institute a Section 337 investigation into certain disposable and other closed-system electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) devices and components thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-1486). The investigation stems from a complaint filed on January 13, 2026 by R.J. Reynolds entities based in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, supplemented on February 3, 2026.
Mar.05 by 2FIRSTS.ai
U.S. Company Seeks Cancellation of “Lost Mary” Vape Trademark
U.S. Company Seeks Cancellation of “Lost Mary” Vape Trademark
North Carolina hemp provider JLT Imports Inc. has filed suit in California federal court seeking cancellation of the “Lost Mary” vape trademark held by Chinese company Imiracle (HK) Ltd.
Mar.30 by 2FIRSTS.ai
STMA Issues Trial Credit Management Rules for E-Cigarette Manufacturers and Wholesalers
STMA Issues Trial Credit Management Rules for E-Cigarette Manufacturers and Wholesalers
Mar.26 by 2FIRSTS.ai
China Boton Group Posts 2025 Revenue of RMB 1.496 Billion, With E-Cigarette Product Revenue Up 4.6%
China Boton Group Posts 2025 Revenue of RMB 1.496 Billion, With E-Cigarette Product Revenue Up 4.6%
China Boton Group reported its results for the year ended December 31, 2025. Revenue was RMB 1.496 billion, down about 9.5% from RMB 1.653 billion in 2024. Gross profit was RMB 377.1 million, with a gross margin of 25.2%, and the group recorded a net loss of RMB 1.000 billion for the year.
Mar.24 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Philippine Lawmakers Push Bill to Close Vape Tax Loopholes
Philippine Lawmakers Push Bill to Close Vape Tax Loopholes
Lawmakers in the Philippines are pushing House Bill 5207 (HB 5207), which seeks to harmonize excise tax rates on vapor products and address disparities between nicotine salt and freebase nicotine taxation. The bill, supported by more than 40 lawmakers including Deputy Speaker Kristine Singson-Meehan, would raise taxes on freebase nicotine products to align them with nicotine salt rates.
Regulations
Feb.22