New Zealand Health Minister Apologizes for Ambiguous Tobacco Policy Response
According to the New Zealand media nzherald.co.nz, recently, New Zealand's Deputy Minister of Health, Casey Costello, apologized to Parliament for giving ambiguous answers when questioned about her receipt of advice on tobacco policies.
Costello seeks permission to release a "personal statement" rather than a correction statement in response to her answer on January 30th whether she sought advice on freezing tobacco excise tax CPI adjustments.
In response to questioning about whether I had denied to the media that I had requested advice on a proposed freeze on tobacco taxes, I would like to clarify my position. Upon reviewing my previous responses, I believe there may have been some confusion due to a misunderstanding of the difference between seeking specific advice and accepting advice that is offered. I want to clarify that I did not intend to mislead the parliament, and I apologize for any confusion that may have arisen.
On the other hand, Labour Party leader Chris Hipkins has proposed a motion stating that Costello's statement is confusing because she did not specify which answer she was correcting. "I think in this House, nobody will understand which statement she just corrected," he said. This correction seems to be related to a question asked by Labour Party health spokesperson Dr. Ayesha Verrall, after it was officially disclosed that Costello had earmarked a tobacco tax freeze proposal.
Earlier, a lawmaker had asked whether there would be consideration in January 2024 of recommendations regarding the impact of three consecutive years of frozen tobacco-related CPI on tobacco tax increases. A document with a "yes" option was checked by Costello on December 20, 2023.
On January 30th, Villar questioned Costello in parliament, asking, "Did you indicate in the document annotated and signed on December 20th that you wanted advice from the Department of Health on freezing tobacco taxes?" Costello replied, "Yes, among a series of proposals, there was indeed a request for information on the impact of freezing tobacco taxes." Villar further asked, "In that case, why did she deny requesting specific advice on freezing cigarette taxes during a media interview?" The minister responded, "I did not say that I did not put forward specific proposals. I did include this issue in a series of questions I posed."
Finally, Costello's statement released today corrected this point, indicating that endorsing the official's recommendations is equivalent to requesting advice.
Notice
1. This article is provided exclusively for professional research purposes related to industry, technology and policy. Any reference to brands or products is made solely for the purpose of objective description and does not constitute an endorsement, recommendation, or promotion of any brand or product.
2. The use of nicotine products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and heated tobacco products, is associated with significant health risks. Users are required to comply with all relevant laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.
3. This article is strictly restricted from being accessed or viewed by individuals under the legal age.
Copyright
This article is either an original work by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with the original source clearly indicated. The copyright and usage rights of this article belong to 2Firsts or the original source. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other unauthorized use of this article by any entity or individual is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally responsible. For copyright-related matters, please contact: info@2firsts.com
AI Assistance Disclaimer
This article may have utilized AI to enhance translation and editing efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, errors may occur. Readers are advised to refer to the sources provided for more accurate information.
This article should not be used as a basis for any investment decisions or advice, and 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any errors in the content.