Ohio City Lawsuit Challenges State Tobacco Sales Restrictions as Unconstitutional

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Apr.11.2024
Ohio City Lawsuit Challenges State Tobacco Sales Restrictions as Unconstitutional
Ohio cities, including Columbus and Cincinnati, are suing the state over tobacco sales restrictions violating local autonomy.

According to a report by halfwheel on April 10th, earlier this year, the Ohio State Legislature passed a bill that will restrict the sale of tobacco products, including flavored tobacco, within city limits, and prohibit municipalities from implementing tobacco regulations stricter than those set by the state.

 

Subsequently, 14 cities, including Columbus, Bexley, Cincinnati, Cleveland, Dublin, Gahanna, Grandview Heights, Heath, Hilliard, Oxford, Reynoldsburg, Upper Arlington, and Worthington, filed lawsuits against the new law. They filed the lawsuits in Franklin County on Tuesday, April 9, alleging that the law violates the local government's autonomy. In particular, they argued that the constitution explicitly states that cities have the power to "exercise all local self-government powers and to enact and enforce within their limits such local police, sanitary and other similar regulations, not in conflict with general laws." They contend that this ban would have a negative impact on citizens.

 

The incident began in December 2022 when the Columbus City Council proposed a ban on the sale of flavored tobacco products. The flavor tobacco ban went into effect on January 1, prohibiting the sale of fruit-flavored, candy-flavored, vanilla-flavored, mint-flavored, or menthol-flavored e-cigarettes, cigarettes, small cigars, chewing tobacco, and any other flavored tobacco products. The Ohio state legislature, controlled by Republicans, quickly passed a priority law prohibiting municipalities from implementing tobacco regulations stricter than state law, which was then vetoed by Governor Mike DeWine. The ban was subsequently passed again by the state legislature, this time as part of a budget proposal, and once again vetoed by DeWine. In January of this year, the state Senate overturned Governor Mike DeWine's veto.

 

With the veto in place, the new state law will go into effect on April 24, meaning cities like Columbus will no longer be able to enforce their ban on flavored tobacco sales after that date.

 

Columbus City Attorney Zach Klein stated in a press release, "Depriving cities of the right to make decisions in the interest of residents is not only unconstitutional, but also harmful policy that undermines public health, disrupts our progress in reducing tobacco use, and keeps these products out of the hands of youth."

 

At the same time, these cities argue that the law also threatens tobacco sales age restrictions that differ from those set by the state. In recent years, cities such as Columbus, Reynoldsburg, and others in central Ohio have passed ordinances to restrict tobacco sales to those aged 21 and older. According to data from the Ohio Department of Health, the smoking rate among adults in Franklin County decreased by 14% from 2016 to 2020, while tobacco use, especially e-cigarette use, has surged among teenagers statewide.

 

These cities have requested the state court to issue a temporary restraining order on the legislation to prevent the statewide ban from taking effect on April 23rd.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Philippines’ DTI Proposes Mandatory Advertising Permits for Vape Products
Philippines’ DTI Proposes Mandatory Advertising Permits for Vape Products
The Philippine Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) has released a draft Department Administrative Order (DAO) seeking public feedback on a new permitting system for advertising and promoting vaporized nicotine and non-nicotine products.
Dec.08 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Canada’s B.C. Passes First Vaping Cost-Recovery Framework, Allowing Government to Sue Manufacturers Over Health Expenses
Canada’s B.C. Passes First Vaping Cost-Recovery Framework, Allowing Government to Sue Manufacturers Over Health Expenses
According to the Nelson Star, British Columbia has passed the Vaping Product Damages and Health Care Costs Recovery Act by a 49–42 vote. The legislation enables the provincial government to seek recovery of future public health costs from vape manufacturers, following models used in opioid and tobacco litigation.
Dec.03
South Korea Formalizes Harmful Substance Controls for Cigarettes and E-cigarettes
South Korea Formalizes Harmful Substance Controls for Cigarettes and E-cigarettes
South Korea’s Ministry of Food and Drug Safety has issued a notice establishing testing items and methods for harmful substances in tobacco products, including cigarettes and e-cigarettes.
Dec.18 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Pakistan Senate bill seeks strict control of vapes and e-cigarettes in Islamabad, including under-18 sales ban
Pakistan Senate bill seeks strict control of vapes and e-cigarettes in Islamabad, including under-18 sales ban
Following approval by the Senate Standing Committee on National Health Services, the Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (Regulation) Bill is set to be tabled in the Senate to impose strict controls on the sale, marketing and use of vapes and e-cigarettes in Islamabad.
Jan.08 by 2FIRSTS.ai
France drops a vaping clause from the 2026 finance bill after use of Article 49.3
France drops a vaping clause from the 2026 finance bill after use of Article 49.3
A provision in France’s 2026 finance bill intended to regulate vaping products was abandoned after Sébastien Lecornu used Article 49.3 on January 20 to commit the government’s responsibility on the “revenue” section of the state budget.
Jan.21 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Azerbaijan Considers Comprehensive Ban on E-cigarettes
Azerbaijan Considers Comprehensive Ban on E-cigarettes
Azerbaijan is advancing legislative amendments to prohibit the circulation of electronic cigarettes and their components. The proposed changes, discussed at a joint meeting of several parliamentary committees, aim to ban the import, export, production, storage, wholesale and retail sale, and use of e-cigarettes.
Dec.17 by 2FIRSTS.ai