Ohio City Lawsuit Challenges State Tobacco Sales Restrictions as Unconstitutional

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Apr.11.2024
Ohio City Lawsuit Challenges State Tobacco Sales Restrictions as Unconstitutional
Ohio cities, including Columbus and Cincinnati, are suing the state over tobacco sales restrictions violating local autonomy.

According to a report by halfwheel on April 10th, earlier this year, the Ohio State Legislature passed a bill that will restrict the sale of tobacco products, including flavored tobacco, within city limits, and prohibit municipalities from implementing tobacco regulations stricter than those set by the state.

 

Subsequently, 14 cities, including Columbus, Bexley, Cincinnati, Cleveland, Dublin, Gahanna, Grandview Heights, Heath, Hilliard, Oxford, Reynoldsburg, Upper Arlington, and Worthington, filed lawsuits against the new law. They filed the lawsuits in Franklin County on Tuesday, April 9, alleging that the law violates the local government's autonomy. In particular, they argued that the constitution explicitly states that cities have the power to "exercise all local self-government powers and to enact and enforce within their limits such local police, sanitary and other similar regulations, not in conflict with general laws." They contend that this ban would have a negative impact on citizens.

 

The incident began in December 2022 when the Columbus City Council proposed a ban on the sale of flavored tobacco products. The flavor tobacco ban went into effect on January 1, prohibiting the sale of fruit-flavored, candy-flavored, vanilla-flavored, mint-flavored, or menthol-flavored e-cigarettes, cigarettes, small cigars, chewing tobacco, and any other flavored tobacco products. The Ohio state legislature, controlled by Republicans, quickly passed a priority law prohibiting municipalities from implementing tobacco regulations stricter than state law, which was then vetoed by Governor Mike DeWine. The ban was subsequently passed again by the state legislature, this time as part of a budget proposal, and once again vetoed by DeWine. In January of this year, the state Senate overturned Governor Mike DeWine's veto.

 

With the veto in place, the new state law will go into effect on April 24, meaning cities like Columbus will no longer be able to enforce their ban on flavored tobacco sales after that date.

 

Columbus City Attorney Zach Klein stated in a press release, "Depriving cities of the right to make decisions in the interest of residents is not only unconstitutional, but also harmful policy that undermines public health, disrupts our progress in reducing tobacco use, and keeps these products out of the hands of youth."

 

At the same time, these cities argue that the law also threatens tobacco sales age restrictions that differ from those set by the state. In recent years, cities such as Columbus, Reynoldsburg, and others in central Ohio have passed ordinances to restrict tobacco sales to those aged 21 and older. According to data from the Ohio Department of Health, the smoking rate among adults in Franklin County decreased by 14% from 2016 to 2020, while tobacco use, especially e-cigarette use, has surged among teenagers statewide.

 

These cities have requested the state court to issue a temporary restraining order on the legislation to prevent the statewide ban from taking effect on April 23rd.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Judge Dismisses Some Claims in Arkansas THC Vape Class Action
Judge Dismisses Some Claims in Arkansas THC Vape Class Action
U.S. District Judge Brian S. Miller has dismissed some claims from a proposed class action alleging that vape products contained THC levels above legal limits, while allowing others to proceed. The court rejected warranty and drug liability claims but upheld RICO, negligence, and fraud allegations against multiple defendants.
Nov.11 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Philippines Probe Agency Seizes 800 Smuggled Vape Products in Manila, Stores Face Multiple Charges
Philippines Probe Agency Seizes 800 Smuggled Vape Products in Manila, Stores Face Multiple Charges
The National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) recently seized around PHP 250,000 (approximately USD 4,250) worth of smuggled and unregistered vape devices and liquids—about 800 items in total—from two stores in Manila. Authorities said the devices could be modified to discreetly consume cannabinoids and other illegal drugs, and that those involved will face charges under the Philippines’ Vaporized Nicotine and Non-Nicotine Products Regulation Act and the Consumer Act.
Dec.02 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Philip Morris Korea Launches New TEREA Packaging for IQOS ILUMA to Mark Third Anniversary
Philip Morris Korea Launches New TEREA Packaging for IQOS ILUMA to Mark Third Anniversary
Philip Morris Korea has announced a new packaging design for TEREA, the dedicated tobacco stick brand for its heat-not-burn device IQOS ILUMA, to celebrate the third anniversary of its launch in South Korea. The newly designed products are now available at nine IQOS flagship stores and major convenience stores across the country.
Nov.13 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Ukraine Military Voices Concern Over Potential Vape and Pouch Ban
Ukraine Military Voices Concern Over Potential Vape and Pouch Ban
Verkhovna Rada is reviewing six bills to regulate new nicotine products such as pouches and vapes. The main bill, No.14110, proposes a total ban on production, import, and sale, while alternative proposals seek regulation instead of prohibition.
Nov.10 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Smoking Rate Drops to 17.9%, Vaping Rate Climbs to 9.3% in South Korea
Smoking Rate Drops to 17.9%, Vaping Rate Climbs to 9.3% in South Korea
The Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (KDCA) released its 2025 Community Health Survey results covering more than 230,000 adults. Traditional cigarette smoking dropped to 17.9%, down 1 percentage point from last year, while e-cigarette use increased to 9.3%, up 0.6 points. Overall tobacco product use stood at 22.1%, a slight decline from 2024 but still 0.5 points higher than 2019.
Dec.08 by 2FIRSTS.ai
California DOJ Outlines Next Steps for Unflavored Tobacco List; Enforcement to Target “Obviously Flavored” Products
California DOJ Outlines Next Steps for Unflavored Tobacco List; Enforcement to Target “Obviously Flavored” Products
The California DOJ issued Information Bulletin No. 2025-DLE-17 on November 10, 2025, providing an update on the state’s flavored tobacco enforcement. The Attorney General’s office is set to launch the Unflavored Tobacco List (UTL) by December 31, 2025, identifying tobacco products without characterizing flavors that may legally be sold in California. Enforcement will continue to focus on “obviously flavored” products, while unregistered products remain subject to seizure and penalties.
Nov.17 by 2FIRSTS.ai