Phillip Morris Stops Drugstore Plan in Australia

Aug.10.2022
Phillip Morris Stops Drugstore Plan in Australia
Phillip Morris has halted its plan to pay pharmacies to stock its e-cigarette products. The move comes after criticism from medical groups.

Philip Morris Ltd. has suspended its pharmacy program, which offered financial incentives to stores that stocked its electronic cigarette products.


Last week, the world's largest tobacco company was called out by a leading healthcare organization in Australia for offering incentives to pharmacies that sell its e-cigarette products.


On Tuesday, August 2, the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP) called on Phillip Morris Limited to implement their secret payment plan through the pharmacy IT solution group PharmaPrograms. The details were leaked when chemists were invited to participate in the program.


Pharmacies ordering the VEEV pod and electronic cigarette will receive $275, with an additional $5 for each customer referred to a GP for a prescription of the product, $10 for educating customers on using the device, and $5 for "medication support" when distributing new scripts for the electronic cigarette product.


Just three days after receiving criticism, it has been reported that PharmaPrograms has decided to suspend the program. The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP) welcomed the decision on Friday, August 5, stating that it was a victory for ethical healthcare and common sense, thanks to the efforts of David and Goliath.


Philip Morris International has issued a rare statement criticizing the RACGP, the Pharmaceutical Society of Australia, and the Australian Medical Association, the latter of which has also condemned the scheme. The company expressed disappointment in these organizations for criticizing the plan, as they participated in the establishment of the prescriptive (nicotine e-cigarette products) model.


Australia's prescription-only model requires individuals who wish to consume nicotine to obtain a prescription from a medical professional. This is a unique measure aimed at protecting non-smokers from widespread exposure to e-cigarettes while allowing individuals to use these products under medical supervision to aid in smoking cessation.


According to Dr. Bruce Willett, Deputy President of the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, the costs associated with purchasing products from a pharmacy are entirely different from the requirements for a nicotine prescription.


Dr. Willett stated, "Supporting a prescription-based model for electronic cigarette products is one thing, but providing financial incentives to pharmacists to not only stock electronic cigarette products but also refer customers to primary care physicians and 'educate' people on the use of the device is completely another matter.


Meanwhile, Chair and Professor of RACGP, Karen Price, expressed her hope that this will be the last update we hear regarding the program.


I hope this nefarious plan not only gets delayed, but gets shelved permanently. It has the potential to undermine the community's trust in pharmacies, and we must remain vigilant against any attempts by big tobacco companies to lure in new, lifelong users because they lack creativity in new ideas," said Professor Price.


She stated that one reason for the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP) being cautious regarding the use of e-cigarettes is due to the strategy employed by large tobacco companies. E-cigarettes are often marketed as a healthier alternative to smoking.


Emily Banks, a professor of epidemiology and public health at the Australian National University's Research Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, has expressed her approval of the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners' (RACGP) stance on the program. She noted that these companies have no position in Australia's healthcare system.


People expect that the services provided in pharmacies or any part of the Australian healthcare system are based on best practice and not on what companies pay people," she said.


Smoking is Australia's deadliest habit and remains the leading cause of premature deaths and disabilities. According to Professor Banks, up to two-thirds of smokers will die due to their habit, and over 10% of deaths worldwide are attributed to tobacco. This is also the cause of 50% of deaths in Indigenous Australians aged 45 and above.


Research by the Australian government indicates that the use of electronic cigarettes is harmful to non-smokers, especially young people. Professor Banks' response to marketing strategies claiming that electronic cigarettes can aid smokers in quitting is that they may be beneficial for individuals who have tried other methods to quit smoking.


However, she stated that the majority of people who use electronic cigarettes continue to smoke regular cigarettes. They not only perpetuate a life-threatening habit, but also add unknown ingredients. Experts do not know how long-term use will affect issues such as cancer and cardiovascular health.


We don't know what they do in the long term; it is very important for individuals to avoid prolonged usage," stated Professor Banks.


As is widely known, electronic cigarettes can cause addiction, poisoning, epileptic seizures, burns, and injuries caused by exploding devices, as well as damage to the lungs. She stated that some disposable electronic cigarettes contain nicotine equivalent to nine or more packs of traditional cigarettes, and each puff of the product is equivalent to one on a regular cigarette.


According to Professor Banks, research suggests that young people who use e-cigarettes are more likely to start smoking, and the marketing of brightly colored and sweet-flavored e-cigarette products targets predominantly young people.


There is a lot of evidence to suggest that these companies are attempting to reinvent themselves as health-conscious entities. If they succeed in doing so, they will cease to sell cigarettes and stop adding new smokers, but they will continue doing these things.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information and is for industry exchange and learning purposes only.


This article does not represent the viewpoint of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the truthfulness or accuracy of the content of the article. The translation of this article is only intended for industry exchange and research.


Due to limitations in our translating abilities, the translated article may not fully express the same meaning as the original. Please refer to the original article for accuracy.


In regards to any domestic, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, or international statements and positions, 2FIRSTS maintains complete alignment with the Chinese government.


The copyright of the compiled information belongs to the original media and authors. If there is any infringement, please contact us to request deletion.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Australia’s One Nation Proposes 75% Tobacco Tax Cut, Says Lower Prices Could Hit Illicit Market
Australia’s One Nation Proposes 75% Tobacco Tax Cut, Says Lower Prices Could Hit Illicit Market
Australia’s One Nation party has proposed cutting tobacco excise by 75%, arguing that lower legal cigarette prices could narrow the gap with illicit tobacco and reduce demand for black-market products. The proposal comes as Australia continues expanding enforcement against illicit tobacco supply chains through border controls, retail inspections and organised-crime investigations. Supporters argue high taxes have contributed to illicit-market growth, while opponents warn that lower tobacco prices could undermine public-health goals. The proposal is a party policy position and has not been adopted by the Australian government.
Aug.18
South Korea Fully Reviews Nicotine-Analog and Nicotine-Free Vape Liquid Imports, With Over 99% From China and Chinese Supply-Chain Documents Under Scrutiny
South Korea Fully Reviews Nicotine-Analog and Nicotine-Free Vape Liquid Imports, With Over 99% From China and Chinese Supply-Chain Documents Under Scrutiny
Korea Customs Service has tightened import controls on nicotine-analog and nicotine-free e-cigarette liquids, placing the products under 100% document review and subjecting all e-cigarette liquid import declarations to pre-clearance ingredient analysis. As of September 20, 2026, South Korea had imported about 15 metric tons of nicotine-analog liquids, 99.99% from China, and about 316 metric tons of nicotine-free liquids, including roughly 315 metric tons, or 99.7%, from China. The measures follow South Korea's April expansion of its tobacco definition to include synthetic nicotine products and include new checks on Chinese manufacturing, transaction and export documentation.
Sep.24
Philippines Customs Seizes PHP11.68 Billion($200 Million) in Illegal Tobacco and Vapes in First Seven Months of 2026
Philippines Customs Seizes PHP11.68 Billion($200 Million) in Illegal Tobacco and Vapes in First Seven Months of 2026
Philippines Customs data showed that illegal cigarettes and vape products seized during the first seven months of 2026 were valued at about PHP11.68 billion, exceeding the PHP2.516 billion recorded for the full year of 2025. The figures were disclosed by a Bureau of Customs official during a House Committee on Ways and Means hearing on tobacco excise tax reforms. Vape-related seizures were valued at about PHP1.65 billion, with most cases recorded at the Manila International Container Port. Customs officials said enforcement against illicit tobacco trade would continue.
Aug.26
JAMA Study: U.S. Vape Directories Fail to Sustainably Curb Unlisted Sales as Product Shifts May Redistribute Brand Share 2Firsts Recommended
JAMA Study: U.S. Vape Directories Fail to Sustainably Curb Unlisted Sales as Product Shifts May Redistribute Brand Share 2Firsts Recommended
A study by CDC Foundation researchers found no sustained decline in e-cigarette sales across Alabama, Oklahoma and Louisiana, the first three U.S. states to implement e-cigarette directory laws. Louisiana initially saw a significant sales decline, followed by a rebound and a persistent reduction in product availability. Sales also shifted from nontobacco-flavored disposables toward prefilled cartridges, with Vuse Alto driving much of the increase in menthol cartridges. By April 2025, unlisted products still accounted for more than half of e-cigarette nicotine sales in all three states.
Sep.18
Couche-Tard Posts Double-Digit U.S. Same-Store Growth in Other Nicotine Products, Led by Pouches
Couche-Tard Posts Double-Digit U.S. Same-Store Growth in Other Nicotine Products, Led by Pouches
Alimentation Couche-Tard said U.S. same-store sales in its “other nicotine products” category grew at a double-digit rate in the first quarter of fiscal 2027, led by nicotine pouches, while overall U.S. same-store merchandise revenues increased 1.7%. The company also said its Canadian nicotine business continued to face regulatory pressure and illicit-market headwinds. The U.S. performance coincides with Couche-Tard's participation in efforts to reopen Canadian convenience-store access to authorized nicotine pouches, though the company has not established a direct causal link between the two.
Sep.14
Malaysia’s Vape Rules Face Review as Health Minister Dzulkefly Ahmad Addresses Dropped Nicotine Appeal
Malaysia’s Vape Rules Face Review as Health Minister Dzulkefly Ahmad Addresses Dropped Nicotine Appeal
According to Free Malaysia Today on August 26, 2026, Malaysia’s Health Minister Dzulkefly Ahmad said the Health Ministry would explain the government’s decision to withdraw its appeal against a High Court ruling involving the exemption of liquid nicotine used in vape products from the Poisons List. The High Court previously ruled that the exemption decision was irrational. Dzulkefly said withdrawing the appeal did not mean the government would stop regulating vaping, and that future regulatory approaches would continue under existing legal frameworks.
Aug.28