Poland Considers Ban on Disposable E-Cigarettes Amid Public Debate

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Apr.09.2024
Poland Considers Ban on Disposable E-Cigarettes Amid Public Debate
Poland considers banning disposable e-cigarettes amid concerns over youth impact and online sales, sparking public debate. Health Ministry weighs options.

According to a recent report by Bankier, a Polish media outlet, the country is currently embroiled in a heated public debate over disposable e-cigarettes. Sources say that in order to reduce the impact of e-cigarettes on young people and to control the public's ability to purchase them online, the Polish Ministry of Health is considering taking strict action, which may include a complete ban on the sale of disposable e-cigarettes in the market.

 

The Polish E-Cigarette Employers' Alliance (ZPBV) is concerned that such a sales ban measure may backfire. They are calling for consideration of the many overlooked perspectives of the public, urging the government to enforce the law effectively, engage in dialogue with the industry on this issue, and provide accurate education. They point out that in Australia, which has some of the strictest e-cigarette regulations in the world, as many as 92% of e-cigarette users purchase products from illegal sellers.

 

According to reports, ZPBV President Maciej Powroźnik stated that the public discussion surrounding the ban on disposable e-cigarette sales lacks professional knowledge, and that media reports mostly lean towards criticizing the product and repeating unverified information. He criticized the media for ignoring the potential negative impacts on public health and the economy that a ban on e-cigarettes could bring, emphasizing that a comprehensive ban could result in financial losses for the government and force many legally operating companies to close, thereby restricting adult consumers' access to products that have been tested and meet safety requirements. This could potentially increase harm to public health.

 

A recent study from the Yale School of Public Health suggests that restrictions on e-cigarette sales not only lead to an increase in sales of traditional tobacco products, but also cause people to become more dependent on regular cigarettes. The study's co-author, Abigail S. Friedman, points out that smoking traditional tobacco is much more harmful to health than using e-cigarettes. The findings further challenge the feasibility of a complete ban and its effectiveness in protecting public health.

 

According to experts in the field of public health, although the long-term effects of e-cigarettes are unknown, they may be a better option for those looking to quit or reduce smoking. In Poland, there are approximately 8.4 million smokers of traditional tobacco products, with nearly one-third of adults smoking daily, while only 1% use e-cigarettes. These numbers clearly highlight the issue at hand.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

U.S. vape firms appeal Mississippi synthetic-nicotine ban, citing FDA authority preemption
U.S. vape firms appeal Mississippi synthetic-nicotine ban, citing FDA authority preemption
A coalition of U.S. vape industry groups has appealed a Mississippi law banning the sale of e-cigarette products containing synthetic nicotine, arguing the statute effectively conditions sales on FDA authorization and unlawfully encroaches on federal regulatory authority. The law took effect in July 2025 and has already begun to be enforced.
Dec.17 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Tennessee’s “Tobacco Product Retail Licensing Act” Would Require New Licenses for Tobacco and Vapes
Tennessee’s “Tobacco Product Retail Licensing Act” Would Require New Licenses for Tobacco and Vapes
A newly introduced Tennessee bill, S.B. 2086, would create a statewide tobacco product retail licensing system, move oversight to the Tennessee Alcohol Commission, and impose fees and escalating penalties. The proposal also requires all tobacco product sales to occur as in-person, over-the-counter transactions at licensed locations—effectively banning direct-to-consumer shipping of cigars and potentially restricting curbside or phone-order pickup models.
Jan.28 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Police dismantle a network of 50+ stores selling unmarked nicotine products in the Moscow region
Police dismantle a network of 50+ stores selling unmarked nicotine products in the Moscow region
TASS reported that police dismantled a distribution network in the Moscow region selling nicotine-containing products, e-cigarettes and vapes without mandatory markings, with organizers earning more than 10 million rubles per month (more than about $130,000). Interior Ministry spokesperson Irina Volk said some items were labeled with counterfeit identification tools of the Chestny Znak system, while others had no codes.
Dec.30 by 2FIRSTS.ai
NZ Government Eyes Sale of Smokeless Tobacco; Critics Warn of “Backslide”
NZ Government Eyes Sale of Smokeless Tobacco; Critics Warn of “Backslide”
Associate Health Minister Casey Costello faced renewed scrutiny in Parliament’s health select committee over her handling of tobacco-related policy and alleged ties to the tobacco industry. The government is considering allowing smokeless nicotine products such as snus and nicotine pouches, provided they meet safety and youth-access regulations.
Dec.05 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Rosstandart: packaging and design requirements for vapes to be tightened in early 2026
Rosstandart: packaging and design requirements for vapes to be tightened in early 2026
Rosstandart head Anton Shalaev told TASS that Russia will tighten requirements for the packaging and design of vapes and other electronic nicotine delivery systems in early 2026.
Jan.12 by 2FIRSTS.ai
iMiracle and VPR Reach Preliminary Settlement in ‘Elf’ Trademark Dispute, Potentially Ending Three-Year Legal Battle
iMiracle and VPR Reach Preliminary Settlement in ‘Elf’ Trademark Dispute, Potentially Ending Three-Year Legal Battle
According to Law360, VPR Brands and iMiracle have filed a joint notice in federal court in Florida stating that they have signed a settlement term sheet and plan to finalize a global settlement within 30 days that would resolve multiple lawsuits. The dispute, which began in 2022 and centers on the “Elf” trademark, has involved injunctions, counterclaims and a key ruling by the Federal Circuit overturning a lower court’s order.
Dec.11 by 2FIRSTS.ai