Police: Menthol Ban Will ‘Create Crime’

Industry InsightInnovation
Jun.28.2022

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s proposed ban on menthol cigarettes could have unintended consequences, according to leading law enforcement officers.

 

Among other problems, it could boost the illicit cigarette market. In 2020, of the $203 billion cigarettes sold in the United States, 37 percent were menthol. “Transitioning from a regulated market to an illicit one will lead to about $30 billion of an illicit market,” said Major Neill Franklin, former executive director of the Law Enforcement Action Partnership, in a statement published by Menthol is Not a Crime.

 

If the FDA bans menthol cigarettes, this will “create crime,” and you will get “homemade menthol cigarettes,” said retired Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives agent John Rotunno.

 

Charles Giblin from the Center for the Advancement of Public Safety and Security stated, “Despite the good intentions … the ban will have unintended consequences. Cross-border smuggling will fill the gap of the prohibition.”

 

Others highlighted the racist implications of the ban since more than 80 percent of African Americans who smoke prefer menthol cigarettes.

 

“Bans do not work. During the war on drugs, more Black and Brown people went to jail than in all of slavery. About 90 percent of people targeted by stop-and-frisk were Black and Brown people,” according to John Dixon III, former police chief of Petersburg, Virginia, and former president of the National Organization of Black Law Enforcement Executives.

 

“We are not promoting people to smoke,” but “we don’t want another situation like that of Eric Garner [Garner was killed by New York Police Department officers after they approached him on suspicion of selling single cigarettes],” said Charles Billups, founding member of the NCJP, retired law enforcement officer and chairperson of the New York State Grand Council of Guardians.

 

Franklin expanded, “An illicit market is even more problematic for the Black community. Law enforcement will have no option other than to aggressively enforce smuggling and smoking bans … In an effort to identify smugglers, police will ‘creatively interact’ with citizens for minor crimes, like jaywalking, loitering, trespassing, traffic violations—using those crimes for leverage for information on their tobacco sources. This is the same tactic we use for locating guns and drugs.”

Philip Morris Ukraine Says Ukraine’s Flavored Vape Ban Still Lacks Effective Enforcement
Philip Morris Ukraine Says Ukraine’s Flavored Vape Ban Still Lacks Effective Enforcement
Mikhail Polyakov, deputy general director for corporate affairs at Philip Morris Ukraine, said Ukraine’s ban on flavored and aromatic additives for e-cigarettes, in force since July 11, 2024, has not worked in practice because compliance is not being enforced.
Mar.17 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Editorial says West Virginia’s HB 5437 “Vape Safety Act” goes too far, targeting residency and citizenship provisions
Editorial says West Virginia’s HB 5437 “Vape Safety Act” goes too far, targeting residency and citizenship provisions
A News and Sentinel editorial argues that West Virginia’s HB 5437, the “Vape Safety Act,” goes beyond reasonable regulation by adding provisions barring any part of a vape or smoke shop from being used as a residence and requiring owners to be U.S. citizens.
Feb.27 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Glas Says FDA Scientific Review Backed Several Flavored Products Before Senior Leaders Blocked Them
Glas Says FDA Scientific Review Backed Several Flavored Products Before Senior Leaders Blocked Them
Glas says newly released internal FDA records show agency scientific reviewers supported authorization for several flavored G2 products before senior leadership halted them. According to documents obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request, FDA’s Office of Science first recommended marketing authorization for all eight products in December 2025 and later supported six of them in February 2026. FDA ultimately authorized only the G2 device and one tobacco-flavored pod in March.
Apr.23 by 2FIRSTS.ai
New York’s Lawsuit Against Puff Bar and Other Flavored Vape Companies Survives Key Court Challenge
New York’s Lawsuit Against Puff Bar and Other Flavored Vape Companies Survives Key Court Challenge
According to Law360, a federal judge ruled that makers and distributors of flavored vape brands such as Puff Bar cannot escape New York’s lawsuit seeking to hold them responsible for the youth vaping epidemic. The court found that the state had adequately alleged the companies misrepresented how safe vaping is.
Apr.07 by 2FIRSTS.ai
U.S. Company Seeks Cancellation of “Lost Mary” Vape Trademark
U.S. Company Seeks Cancellation of “Lost Mary” Vape Trademark
North Carolina hemp provider JLT Imports Inc. has filed suit in California federal court seeking cancellation of the “Lost Mary” vape trademark held by Chinese company Imiracle (HK) Ltd.
Mar.30 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Study Says Europe’s Illicit Disposable Vape Market to Reach EUR 6.6 Billion in 2026
Study Says Europe’s Illicit Disposable Vape Market to Reach EUR 6.6 Billion in 2026
A new study by the Fraunhofer Institute says the rapidly expanding illicit market for disposable e-cigarettes is undermining European regulation, fuelling youth vaping and causing significant tax losses. The study says the illicit market is worth EUR 6.6 billion in 2026 and is projected to rise to EUR 10.8 billion by 2030. It adds that a significant share of the disposable vape market now operates outside the regulatory framework established by the EU Tobacco Products Directive.
Mar.13 by 2FIRSTS.ai