Potential for Cannabis Consumption Spaces in BC省: Survey Results

Jan.11.2023
Potential for Cannabis Consumption Spaces in BC省: Survey Results
Canada's BC province released a report showing strong support for cannabis consumption facilities among users, but concerns about driving safety.

Special Statement:


This article is limited to conducting research on relevant industries and overseas markets. It does not recommend any products or provide commentary on any domestic policies.


The legitimacy of the product mentioned in the article is only applicable to its overseas location. Domestic readers are advised to take note and strictly adhere to relevant laws and regulations in China.


This article does not constitute any investment or financial advice.


This article is not suitable for minors to read.


The province of British Columbia in Canada has released a report titled "What We Heard", based on a 2022 investigation into the feasibility of marijuana consumption spaces.


A recent survey conducted through online and telephone channels has shown a strong support among marijuana consumers for marijuana-specific consumption venues, as well as concerns regarding the potential unsafe driving behavior caused by marijuana and alcohol consumption.


A total of 61% of phone survey respondents and 34% of online survey respondents expressed support for marijuana consumption facilities, according to a recent report. The report also suggests that variations in support may be linked to self-selection biases, as phone sampling is random while online surveys may be more targeted.


Compared to older Canadians, young people are also more likely to support cannabis consumption venues.


The feedback from this survey will help the provincial government to decide whether or not to allow cannabis consumption sites and how to implement them.


Although many people often think of smoking rooms or electronic cigarette lounges, the province's definition of cannabis consumption venues is broader, including specific cannabis consumption locations, consumption during festivals or other events, and even cannabis consumption in "non-cannabis primary locations".


As indoor smoking and vaping are prohibited by law, such venues are not being considered.


Earlier this year, the British Columbia government sought feedback from the public on what cannabis consumption spaces in the province could look like.


When considering how provincial marijuana policy will evolve, our top priority is health and safety," said Mike Farnworth, Minister of Public Safety and Solicitor General. "This report provides valuable insights into people's perceptions of marijuana in BC and will help guide our work to support a strong, diverse, and safe legal cannabis industry throughout the province.


The majority of survey respondents who reported using marijuana also expressed support for consumption venues, as did industry associations for marijuana retailers, producers, and those providing written opinions.


However, non-cannabis consumers and certain public health and safety organizations, as well as local governments, generally do not support such establishments.


A total of 730 individuals participated in the telephone survey, 15,362 completed the online survey, and 66 individuals, companies, and organizations provided written comments.


Exploring the feasibility of cannabis consumption venues is another way the province of British Columbia is working to support the success of the industry, said Brittany Anderson, Secretary of the Tourism Council. "With the recent introduction of farm sales licenses, understanding public attitudes towards cannabis-related hospitality and agritourism activities is the next practical step. The feedback in this report will play an important role in shaping provincial policy.


The ability to purchase and consume marijuana products, such as food and drink, in places where alcohol is also sold and consumed is a controversial topic. Among respondents who participated in a telephone survey, 42% support this model while 41% oppose it. In an online survey, 64% of respondents oppose this model, while only 32% support it.


Public health officials who oppose the co-location of cannabis consumption facilities with alcohol establishments cite concerns over double consumption and addiction as their main concerns. However, most cannabis industry affiliated organizations support co-existence with alcohol consumption venues. It is not yet clear what regulations the province will implement next with regards to cannabis consumption facilities.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Pennsylvania Vape Directory Enforcement Starts Oct. 19, Barring Retail Sales of Unlisted Products
Pennsylvania Vape Directory Enforcement Starts Oct. 19, Barring Retail Sales of Unlisted Products
Pennsylvania's Act 57 vape directory regime will reach the end of its 120-day inventory transition period on Oct. 19. Nicotine-containing e-cigarettes intended for retail sale in the state that are not listed on the Attorney General's ENDS directory will then be barred from retail sale and treated as contraband subject to seizure, forfeiture and destruction. Manufacturers face annual product certification, brand- and style-based fees and a minimum $50,000 surety bond, while retailers and wholesalers must source through licensed channels and monitor the directory.
Regulations
Oct.08
Swedish-Founded Nicotine Pouch Retailer GotPouches Shifts to U.S.-Based Operations, Reaching Over 25 States
Swedish-Founded Nicotine Pouch Retailer GotPouches Shifts to U.S.-Based Operations, Reaching Over 25 States
Swedish-founded online nicotine pouch retailer GotPouches has completed the localization of its U.S. operations under UpNorth Retail LLC, with corporate operations in Franklin, Tennessee, domestic fulfillment from Nashville and U.S.-based customer support. The company says its catalog covers more than 20 nicotine pouch brands and it currently serves customers in more than 25 U.S. states.
Sep.18
PMI Showcases ZYN, IQOS and U.S. Investments at NACS Show 2026
PMI Showcases ZYN, IQOS and U.S. Investments at NACS Show 2026
At the 2026 NACS Show in Las Vegas, Philip Morris International (PMI) showcased its ZYN nicotine pouches, IQOS heated tobacco products and U.S. investments. A 2Firsts review of FDA records found that several ZYN products displayed at the booth were not on the agency's marketing authorization list, including certain nicotine strengths and flavors. A PMI booth representative also confirmed that IQOS is currently sold in three U.S. states, while the newer IQOS ILUMA system remains under FDA review.
EXPO
Oct.10
UK HMRC Launches Vape Duty Stamps on October 1, Ushering in Supply-Chain Traceability as Chinese Exporters Face New Compliance Hurdles
UK HMRC Launches Vape Duty Stamps on October 1, Ushering in Supply-Chain Traceability as Chinese Exporters Face New Compliance Hurdles
HM Revenue & Customs put the UK's Vaping Products Duty and Vaping Duty Stamps Scheme into effect on October 1. All vaping liquids manufactured in or imported into the UK are now subject to duty at £2.20 per 10ml, regardless of nicotine content. The stamp regime will introduce digital functionality designed to provide traceability throughout the supply chain, with approved manufacturers, importers and warehousekeepers required to report product movements and retailers and consumers eventually able to scan stamps to verify authenticity. China exported $177 million of vape-related products to the UK in August, up 51.4% year over year, increasing the significance of the new compliance regime for China's Shenzhen-centered vape supply chain.
Regulations
Oct.04
STIIIZY Redesign Fails to Escape PAX Labs Patent Import Ban as Section 337 Case Also Involves China ALD
STIIIZY Redesign Fails to Escape PAX Labs Patent Import Ban as Section 337 Case Also Involves China ALD
U.S. Customs and Border Protection ruled that STIIIZY had not shown that the redesigned cannabis-vape products covered by its latest request fall outside an ITC limited exclusion order tied to PAX Labs patents. CBP accepted some of STIIIZY’s claim-construction and non-infringement arguments, but the company did not address two additional claims in the same patent. Earlier STIIIZY redesigned cartridges and certain associated components imported with them had received separate CBP clearance.
Sep.16
Special Report | Altria Subsidiaries Sue FDA to Vacate 2021 PMTA Rule as Agency Moves to Speed Reviews
Special Report | Altria Subsidiaries Sue FDA to Vacate 2021 PMTA Rule as Agency Moves to Speed Reviews
2Firsts reviewed the original federal court complaint filed by Altria subsidiaries Helix Innovations and NJOY on Sept. 2 challenging FDA’s 2021 PMTA rule. The lawsuit questions whether FDA’s review process complies with the Tobacco Control Act’s 180-day timeline, even as the agency moves to accelerate PMTA reviews and issues more marketing orders. Drawing on the complaint, FDA records, government audits and recent court rulings, 2Firsts examines the legal arguments, supporting evidence and potential implications for the U.S. tobacco review system.
Regulations
Sep.03