Potential for Cannabis Consumption Spaces in BC省: Survey Results

Jan.11.2023
Potential for Cannabis Consumption Spaces in BC省: Survey Results
Canada's BC province released a report showing strong support for cannabis consumption facilities among users, but concerns about driving safety.

Special Statement:


This article is limited to conducting research on relevant industries and overseas markets. It does not recommend any products or provide commentary on any domestic policies.


The legitimacy of the product mentioned in the article is only applicable to its overseas location. Domestic readers are advised to take note and strictly adhere to relevant laws and regulations in China.


This article does not constitute any investment or financial advice.


This article is not suitable for minors to read.


The province of British Columbia in Canada has released a report titled "What We Heard", based on a 2022 investigation into the feasibility of marijuana consumption spaces.


A recent survey conducted through online and telephone channels has shown a strong support among marijuana consumers for marijuana-specific consumption venues, as well as concerns regarding the potential unsafe driving behavior caused by marijuana and alcohol consumption.


A total of 61% of phone survey respondents and 34% of online survey respondents expressed support for marijuana consumption facilities, according to a recent report. The report also suggests that variations in support may be linked to self-selection biases, as phone sampling is random while online surveys may be more targeted.


Compared to older Canadians, young people are also more likely to support cannabis consumption venues.


The feedback from this survey will help the provincial government to decide whether or not to allow cannabis consumption sites and how to implement them.


Although many people often think of smoking rooms or electronic cigarette lounges, the province's definition of cannabis consumption venues is broader, including specific cannabis consumption locations, consumption during festivals or other events, and even cannabis consumption in "non-cannabis primary locations".


As indoor smoking and vaping are prohibited by law, such venues are not being considered.


Earlier this year, the British Columbia government sought feedback from the public on what cannabis consumption spaces in the province could look like.


When considering how provincial marijuana policy will evolve, our top priority is health and safety," said Mike Farnworth, Minister of Public Safety and Solicitor General. "This report provides valuable insights into people's perceptions of marijuana in BC and will help guide our work to support a strong, diverse, and safe legal cannabis industry throughout the province.


The majority of survey respondents who reported using marijuana also expressed support for consumption venues, as did industry associations for marijuana retailers, producers, and those providing written opinions.


However, non-cannabis consumers and certain public health and safety organizations, as well as local governments, generally do not support such establishments.


A total of 730 individuals participated in the telephone survey, 15,362 completed the online survey, and 66 individuals, companies, and organizations provided written comments.


Exploring the feasibility of cannabis consumption venues is another way the province of British Columbia is working to support the success of the industry, said Brittany Anderson, Secretary of the Tourism Council. "With the recent introduction of farm sales licenses, understanding public attitudes towards cannabis-related hospitality and agritourism activities is the next practical step. The feedback in this report will play an important role in shaping provincial policy.


The ability to purchase and consume marijuana products, such as food and drink, in places where alcohol is also sold and consumed is a controversial topic. Among respondents who participated in a telephone survey, 42% support this model while 41% oppose it. In an online survey, 64% of respondents oppose this model, while only 32% support it.


Public health officials who oppose the co-location of cannabis consumption facilities with alcohol establishments cite concerns over double consumption and addiction as their main concerns. However, most cannabis industry affiliated organizations support co-existence with alcohol consumption venues. It is not yet clear what regulations the province will implement next with regards to cannabis consumption facilities.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

Wales Passes Law Banning Tobacco Sales to Anyone Born After 2009
Wales Passes Law Banning Tobacco Sales to Anyone Born After 2009
The Welsh Parliament (Senedd) has approved new legislation banning tobacco sales to anyone born on or after January 1, 2009. The law, passed on December 9, 2025, also imposes stricter controls on how vapes and nicotine products are advertised and sold. Designed by the UK Government but voted on separately in Wales, the bill passed with 36 votes in favor, two abstentions, and nine against. It grants stronger enforcement powers to Trading Standards to combat illegal tobacco and vape sales.
Dec.10 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Federal Register notice: FDA seeks comments on “Warning Plans for Certain Tobacco Products”
Federal Register notice: FDA seeks comments on “Warning Plans for Certain Tobacco Products”
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a notice stating it has submitted a proposed information collection to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review under the Paperwork Reduction Act.
Jan.16 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Over 179,000 E-Cigarettes Destroyed in Samut Prakan as Thai Government Tightens Enforcement
Over 179,000 E-Cigarettes Destroyed in Samut Prakan as Thai Government Tightens Enforcement
Thailand’s Office of the Prime Minister, led by Minister Santi Piyatat, has destroyed nearly 179,000 confiscated e-cigarettes and accessories worth 33 million baht (approx. USD 1,020,000) as part of the government’s ongoing campaign for a “Vape-Free Thai Society.”Officials said the action demonstrates Thailand’s strict enforcement of anti-vaping laws and its commitment to protecting youth and public health.
Nov.27 by 2FIRSTS.ai
San Francisco reaches $1 million settlement with nicotine pouch retailer Lucy Goods
San Francisco reaches $1 million settlement with nicotine pouch retailer Lucy Goods
In the United States, California, San Francisco City Attorney David Chiu announced a $1 million settlement requiring online tobacco retailer Lucy Goods, Inc. to stop shipping illegal tobacco products into San Francisco.
Jan.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Bangkok Police Bust Illegal E-Cigarette Warehouse, Seize Vapes Worth Over $112,000
Bangkok Police Bust Illegal E-Cigarette Warehouse, Seize Vapes Worth Over $112,000
Thai police raided an illegal e-cigarette warehouse, arrested a man accused of selling vapes online, and seized a large quantity of improperly imported products worth more than 4 million baht (about $112,000).
Dec.25 by 2FIRSTS.ai
iMiracle and VPR Reach Preliminary Settlement in ‘Elf’ Trademark Dispute, Potentially Ending Three-Year Legal Battle
iMiracle and VPR Reach Preliminary Settlement in ‘Elf’ Trademark Dispute, Potentially Ending Three-Year Legal Battle
According to Law360, VPR Brands and iMiracle have filed a joint notice in federal court in Florida stating that they have signed a settlement term sheet and plan to finalize a global settlement within 30 days that would resolve multiple lawsuits. The dispute, which began in 2022 and centers on the “Elf” trademark, has involved injunctions, counterclaims and a key ruling by the Federal Circuit overturning a lower court’s order.
Dec.11 by 2FIRSTS.ai