Review: Evolution of Cigarette Consumption Tax Policy in China (Pt.1)

Industry Insight by Huoxing Liaoran, translated by 2FIRSTS Reese & edited by Sophia
Aug.09.2024
Review: Evolution of Cigarette Consumption Tax Policy in China (Pt.1)
Since the "System of Tax Disbribution" reform in 1994, China's cigarette consumption tax policy has undergone several significant adjustments. These changes not only reflect the evolution of the economic situation but also reveal the profound impact of policy makers on the structure of the tobacco industry. Let's review how these policies, from the initial uniform tax rate to the complex graded tax system, have shaped today's cigarette market.

Special announcement:

2FIRSTS have been authorized by Source Media (WeChat Public Account "Huoxing Liaoran") to republish;

The entire text represents the views and stance of Huoxing Liaoran.


 

The third plenary session of the 20th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China was held in Beijing from July 15th to 18th, 2024. At the session, the Central Committee heard and discussed a report on the work of the Political Bureau, emphasized on further comprehensive and deepening reforms, advancing issues related to China's modernization, and considered and adopted the Resolution of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on Further Deepening Reform Comprehensively to Advance Chinese Modernization.

 

Review: Evolution of Cigarette Consumption Tax Policy in China (Pt.1)

 

Speculation in the public suggests that the country is soon to introduce a trillion-level consumption tax reform. China's consumption tax is a central tax, all of which is directly handed over to the state. According to data from the Ministry of Finance, in 2023, the national consumption tax revenue was 1.61 trillion yuan, accounting for 8.9% of the overall tax revenue. The consumption tax reform means that when local governments no longer have income from selling land, the nation will allocate some of the consumption tax revenue to them.

 

Cigarette consumption tax is the main part of the consumption tax. Now let's take a look at the changes in cigarette consumption tax policy together.

 

China's Adjustments to Cigarette Consumption Tax

 

The tobacco consumption tax in our country has been adjusted five times in 1994, 1998, 2001, 2009, and 2015.

 

1.Before 1994, tobacco was subject to the same 60% product tax as other industries.

 

After the implementation of the "System of Tax Disbribution" in 1994, the product tax was changed to Value Added Tax, and a new cigarette consumption tax was added. All types of cigarettes were taxed at a uniform rate of 40% based on the factory price. Through the implementation of this policy, tobacco production enterprises were encouraged to produce more high-end cigarettes with higher profits, shifting the product structure from low-end to high-end. Brands such as "Furong Wang" (1994), "Huanghelou" (1995), "Jiaozhi" (1995), and "Liqun" (1995) were born or revamped during this period.

 

Review: Evolution of Cigarette Consumption Tax Policy in China (Pt.1)
Image Source | Huoxing Liaoran

 

2. In 1998, the cigarette consumption tax system was reformed once again.

 

The tax system had changed from a single tax rate to a tiered tax rate, with three tiers: 50% for Category 1 tobacco, and 40% for Category 2 and 3, and 25% for Category 4 and 5. Following the implementation of this policy, sales of low-grade cigarettes had significantly increased, and some small and medium-sized tobacco factories had experienced a revival due to the tax reduction. During this period, tobacco consumption tax had been levied based on the ex-factory price, and was only collected at the production stage.

 

Review: Evolution of Cigarette Consumption Tax Policy in China (Pt.1)
Image Source | Huoxing Liaoran

 

3. In 2001, the adjustment of cigarette consumption tax was implemented using a composite taxation method that combined both volume-based and value-based taxes.

 

A fixed tax of 150 yuan was levied on every 50,000 cigarettes, while an ad-valorem tax was adjusted to two tiers: 45% for cigarettes with an allocation price of 50 yuan or more, and 30% for cigarettes with an allocation price below 50 yuan. Following the tax reform, the tax rate for low-end cigarettes had been increased from 25% to 30%, along with an additional fixed tax of 150 yuan per box, significantly increasing the tax burden on low-end cigarettes and reflecting a policy focused on supporting larger enterprises. Small and medium-sized enterprises producing less than 100,000 boxes of low-end cigarettes annually were experiencing severe losses, leading to closures and conversions, allowing for smoother restructuring of the cigarette industry.

 

Review: Evolution of Cigarette Consumption Tax Policy in China (Pt.1)
Image Source | Huoxing Liaoran

 

Conclusion

 

Looking back at the tax reforms from 1994 to 2001, we can see how policies have aimed to strike a balance between market demand and economic conditions. These adjustments not only altered the market landscape of the tobacco industry, but also laid the foundation for future policy making. In the next edition, I will delve into the adjustments made in 2009 and 2015 and their far-reaching impacts on the industry, so stay tuned.

 

 

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Ukrainian Committee Chair Says Nicotine Pouches Should Be Fully Banned for Sale to Minors
Ukrainian Committee Chair Says Nicotine Pouches Should Be Fully Banned for Sale to Minors
Mykhailo Radutskyi, chair of the Verkhovna Rada Committee on National Health, Medical Assistance and Medical Insurance, said nicotine pouches should be fully banned for sale to minors and their advertising should be restricted.
Apr.07 by 2FIRSTS.ai
USITC Launches Section 337 Probe Into Disposable and Closed-System ENDS, Involving 16 Companies
USITC Launches Section 337 Probe Into Disposable and Closed-System ENDS, Involving 16 Companies
The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) voted to institute a Section 337 investigation into certain disposable and other closed-system electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) devices and components thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-1486). The investigation stems from a complaint filed on January 13, 2026 by R.J. Reynolds entities based in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, supplemented on February 3, 2026.
Mar.05 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Ohio Supreme Court takes up appeal that could define state limits on illegal vape sales enforcement
Ohio Supreme Court takes up appeal that could define state limits on illegal vape sales enforcement
The Ohio Supreme Court has agreed to hear Attorney General Dave Yost’s appeal seeking to revive lawsuits against three Ohio vape retailers. Lower courts dismissed the cases, finding that federal law governs whether vaping products may be marketed and sold.
Mar.06 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Philippines DOH reiterates: vaping is not safer than smoking, citing irreversible health risks
Philippines DOH reiterates: vaping is not safer than smoking, citing irreversible health risks
The Philippine Department of Health reiterated Saturday that vaping should not be promoted as an alternative to cigarette smoking, Health Secretary Teodoro “Ted” Herbosa said in a radio interview, according to the Tribune. Herbosa said both vaping and smoking pose irreversible health risks and cited E-cigarette or Vaping Product Use-Associated Lung Injury (EVALI), claiming it led to the death of a 22-year-old male with no smoking history in 2025.
Feb.28 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Japan to Raise Tobacco Taxes and Corporate Income Tax From April 1 to Help Fund Defense Spending
Japan to Raise Tobacco Taxes and Corporate Income Tax From April 1 to Help Fund Defense Spending
Japan will raise tobacco product taxes and corporate income tax from April 1 as part of a package of levies to help fund a five-year defense spending increase totaling JPY 43 trillion. Tobacco taxes will be raised in two stages, with the first increase taking effect on April 1 and the second in October, while personal income tax is planned to rise in January.
Mar.27 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Fontem Drops Texas Lawsuit and Plans to Refile in D.C. Over FDA Handling of Zone Application
Fontem Drops Texas Lawsuit and Plans to Refile in D.C. Over FDA Handling of Zone Application
Fontem US, the maker and seller of Zone nicotine pouches, has voluntarily dismissed its lawsuit against the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, which it had accused of unfairly delaying its market application.
Mar.25 by 2FIRSTS.ai