Review: Evolution of Cigarette Consumption Tax Policy in China (Pt.1)

Industry Insight by Huoxing Liaoran, translated by 2FIRSTS Reese & edited by Sophia
Aug.09.2024
Review: Evolution of Cigarette Consumption Tax Policy in China (Pt.1)
Since the "System of Tax Disbribution" reform in 1994, China's cigarette consumption tax policy has undergone several significant adjustments. These changes not only reflect the evolution of the economic situation but also reveal the profound impact of policy makers on the structure of the tobacco industry. Let's review how these policies, from the initial uniform tax rate to the complex graded tax system, have shaped today's cigarette market.

Special announcement:

2FIRSTS have been authorized by Source Media (WeChat Public Account "Huoxing Liaoran") to republish;

The entire text represents the views and stance of Huoxing Liaoran.


 

The third plenary session of the 20th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China was held in Beijing from July 15th to 18th, 2024. At the session, the Central Committee heard and discussed a report on the work of the Political Bureau, emphasized on further comprehensive and deepening reforms, advancing issues related to China's modernization, and considered and adopted the Resolution of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on Further Deepening Reform Comprehensively to Advance Chinese Modernization.

 

Review: Evolution of Cigarette Consumption Tax Policy in China (Pt.1)

 

Speculation in the public suggests that the country is soon to introduce a trillion-level consumption tax reform. China's consumption tax is a central tax, all of which is directly handed over to the state. According to data from the Ministry of Finance, in 2023, the national consumption tax revenue was 1.61 trillion yuan, accounting for 8.9% of the overall tax revenue. The consumption tax reform means that when local governments no longer have income from selling land, the nation will allocate some of the consumption tax revenue to them.

 

Cigarette consumption tax is the main part of the consumption tax. Now let's take a look at the changes in cigarette consumption tax policy together.

 

China's Adjustments to Cigarette Consumption Tax

 

The tobacco consumption tax in our country has been adjusted five times in 1994, 1998, 2001, 2009, and 2015.

 

1.Before 1994, tobacco was subject to the same 60% product tax as other industries.

 

After the implementation of the "System of Tax Disbribution" in 1994, the product tax was changed to Value Added Tax, and a new cigarette consumption tax was added. All types of cigarettes were taxed at a uniform rate of 40% based on the factory price. Through the implementation of this policy, tobacco production enterprises were encouraged to produce more high-end cigarettes with higher profits, shifting the product structure from low-end to high-end. Brands such as "Furong Wang" (1994), "Huanghelou" (1995), "Jiaozhi" (1995), and "Liqun" (1995) were born or revamped during this period.

 

Review: Evolution of Cigarette Consumption Tax Policy in China (Pt.1)
Image Source | Huoxing Liaoran

 

2. In 1998, the cigarette consumption tax system was reformed once again.

 

The tax system had changed from a single tax rate to a tiered tax rate, with three tiers: 50% for Category 1 tobacco, and 40% for Category 2 and 3, and 25% for Category 4 and 5. Following the implementation of this policy, sales of low-grade cigarettes had significantly increased, and some small and medium-sized tobacco factories had experienced a revival due to the tax reduction. During this period, tobacco consumption tax had been levied based on the ex-factory price, and was only collected at the production stage.

 

Review: Evolution of Cigarette Consumption Tax Policy in China (Pt.1)
Image Source | Huoxing Liaoran

 

3. In 2001, the adjustment of cigarette consumption tax was implemented using a composite taxation method that combined both volume-based and value-based taxes.

 

A fixed tax of 150 yuan was levied on every 50,000 cigarettes, while an ad-valorem tax was adjusted to two tiers: 45% for cigarettes with an allocation price of 50 yuan or more, and 30% for cigarettes with an allocation price below 50 yuan. Following the tax reform, the tax rate for low-end cigarettes had been increased from 25% to 30%, along with an additional fixed tax of 150 yuan per box, significantly increasing the tax burden on low-end cigarettes and reflecting a policy focused on supporting larger enterprises. Small and medium-sized enterprises producing less than 100,000 boxes of low-end cigarettes annually were experiencing severe losses, leading to closures and conversions, allowing for smoother restructuring of the cigarette industry.

 

Review: Evolution of Cigarette Consumption Tax Policy in China (Pt.1)
Image Source | Huoxing Liaoran

 

Conclusion

 

Looking back at the tax reforms from 1994 to 2001, we can see how policies have aimed to strike a balance between market demand and economic conditions. These adjustments not only altered the market landscape of the tobacco industry, but also laid the foundation for future policy making. In the next edition, I will delve into the adjustments made in 2009 and 2015 and their far-reaching impacts on the industry, so stay tuned.

 

 

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Maine Approves Vape Stewardship Bill Requiring Producers to Manage End-of-Life Devices
Maine Approves Vape Stewardship Bill Requiring Producers to Manage End-of-Life Devices
The Maine Legislature has passed LD 1519, a bill that would establish a producer-funded stewardship program for electronic smoking devices, requiring manufacturers and importers to manage the collection, transportation, recycling and disposal of end-of-life products, particularly disposable vapes containing lithium-ion batteries.
Jun.12
Special Report|U.S.-Facing Retailer Lists RELX Creator Pro 15K: A Chinese Brand Signal Under FDA’s Lower-Priority Enforcement Window
Special Report|U.S.-Facing Retailer Lists RELX Creator Pro 15K: A Chinese Brand Signal Under FDA’s Lower-Priority Enforcement Window
Vapesourcing has listed RELX Creator Pro 15K as “Coming Soon” with U.S. warehouse shipping options; while the page does not show that RELX has entered the U.S. market through official channels or that the product has received FDA authorization, the listing suggests that Chinese brand-led ENDS products are becoming a new point of observation as the U.S. market reassesses regulatory risk following the FDA’s updated enforcement-priority policy.
Industry Insight
Jun.11
 BAT Raises Growth Outlook for Smokeless Products as Velo and Vuse Gain Momentum
BAT Raises Growth Outlook for Smokeless Products as Velo and Vuse Gain Momentum
British American Tobacco (BAT) has raised its growth outlook for smokeless products, forecasting “mid-teens” growth for its new category portfolio, including vaping and nicotine pouch products, while global cigarette volumes are expected to decline further.
BAT
Jun.02
FDA Expands ENDS Market Access With First Authorization of Non-Tobacco and Non-Menthol Products
FDA Expands ENDS Market Access With First Authorization of Non-Tobacco and Non-Menthol Products
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced on May 5, 2026 that it authorized the marketing of four Glas electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) products through the premarket tobacco product application (PMTA) pathway. The authorized products are Classic Menthol, Fresh Menthol, Gold and Sapphire pods, each containing 50mg/ml, or 5%, tobacco-derived nicotine.
May.06 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Ispire Reports Fiscal Q3 2026 Revenue of $18.7 Million and Net Loss of $9.5 Million
Ispire Reports Fiscal Q3 2026 Revenue of $18.7 Million and Net Loss of $9.5 Million
Ispire Technology reported financial results on May 7, 2026, for the third quarter of fiscal 2026, covering the three months ended March 31, 2026. Revenue was $18.7 million, compared with $26.2 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2025 and $20.3 million in the prior quarter. Gross profit was $2.0 million, with gross margin of 10.7%. Net loss was $9.5 million, or $0.17 per share. The company said it held $18.0 million in cash as of March 31, 2026, up $468,000 sequentially.
May.08 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Belgian Health Minister Calls Tobacco Industry “Criminal” After Court Undermines Supermarket Sales Ban
Belgian Health Minister Calls Tobacco Industry “Criminal” After Court Undermines Supermarket Sales Ban
Belgian Health Minister Frank Vandenbroucke described the tobacco industry as a “criminal” sector with “no future” during an appearance on VRT’s current affairs program Ter Zake. His comments came after Belgium’s Constitutional Court ruled that a government ban on cigarette and vape sales in supermarkets was discriminatory because it allowed small shops to sell tobacco products while prohibiting larger retailers from doing so.
May.07 by 2FIRSTS.ai