Review: Evolution of Cigarette Consumption Tax Policy in China (Pt.1)

Industry Insight by Huoxing Liaoran, translated by 2FIRSTS Reese & edited by Sophia
Aug.09.2024
Review: Evolution of Cigarette Consumption Tax Policy in China (Pt.1)
Since the "System of Tax Disbribution" reform in 1994, China's cigarette consumption tax policy has undergone several significant adjustments. These changes not only reflect the evolution of the economic situation but also reveal the profound impact of policy makers on the structure of the tobacco industry. Let's review how these policies, from the initial uniform tax rate to the complex graded tax system, have shaped today's cigarette market.

Special announcement:

2FIRSTS have been authorized by Source Media (WeChat Public Account "Huoxing Liaoran") to republish;

The entire text represents the views and stance of Huoxing Liaoran.


 

The third plenary session of the 20th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China was held in Beijing from July 15th to 18th, 2024. At the session, the Central Committee heard and discussed a report on the work of the Political Bureau, emphasized on further comprehensive and deepening reforms, advancing issues related to China's modernization, and considered and adopted the Resolution of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on Further Deepening Reform Comprehensively to Advance Chinese Modernization.

 

Review: Evolution of Cigarette Consumption Tax Policy in China (Pt.1)

 

Speculation in the public suggests that the country is soon to introduce a trillion-level consumption tax reform. China's consumption tax is a central tax, all of which is directly handed over to the state. According to data from the Ministry of Finance, in 2023, the national consumption tax revenue was 1.61 trillion yuan, accounting for 8.9% of the overall tax revenue. The consumption tax reform means that when local governments no longer have income from selling land, the nation will allocate some of the consumption tax revenue to them.

 

Cigarette consumption tax is the main part of the consumption tax. Now let's take a look at the changes in cigarette consumption tax policy together.

 

China's Adjustments to Cigarette Consumption Tax

 

The tobacco consumption tax in our country has been adjusted five times in 1994, 1998, 2001, 2009, and 2015.

 

1.Before 1994, tobacco was subject to the same 60% product tax as other industries.

 

After the implementation of the "System of Tax Disbribution" in 1994, the product tax was changed to Value Added Tax, and a new cigarette consumption tax was added. All types of cigarettes were taxed at a uniform rate of 40% based on the factory price. Through the implementation of this policy, tobacco production enterprises were encouraged to produce more high-end cigarettes with higher profits, shifting the product structure from low-end to high-end. Brands such as "Furong Wang" (1994), "Huanghelou" (1995), "Jiaozhi" (1995), and "Liqun" (1995) were born or revamped during this period.

 

Review: Evolution of Cigarette Consumption Tax Policy in China (Pt.1)
Image Source | Huoxing Liaoran

 

2. In 1998, the cigarette consumption tax system was reformed once again.

 

The tax system had changed from a single tax rate to a tiered tax rate, with three tiers: 50% for Category 1 tobacco, and 40% for Category 2 and 3, and 25% for Category 4 and 5. Following the implementation of this policy, sales of low-grade cigarettes had significantly increased, and some small and medium-sized tobacco factories had experienced a revival due to the tax reduction. During this period, tobacco consumption tax had been levied based on the ex-factory price, and was only collected at the production stage.

 

Review: Evolution of Cigarette Consumption Tax Policy in China (Pt.1)
Image Source | Huoxing Liaoran

 

3. In 2001, the adjustment of cigarette consumption tax was implemented using a composite taxation method that combined both volume-based and value-based taxes.

 

A fixed tax of 150 yuan was levied on every 50,000 cigarettes, while an ad-valorem tax was adjusted to two tiers: 45% for cigarettes with an allocation price of 50 yuan or more, and 30% for cigarettes with an allocation price below 50 yuan. Following the tax reform, the tax rate for low-end cigarettes had been increased from 25% to 30%, along with an additional fixed tax of 150 yuan per box, significantly increasing the tax burden on low-end cigarettes and reflecting a policy focused on supporting larger enterprises. Small and medium-sized enterprises producing less than 100,000 boxes of low-end cigarettes annually were experiencing severe losses, leading to closures and conversions, allowing for smoother restructuring of the cigarette industry.

 

Review: Evolution of Cigarette Consumption Tax Policy in China (Pt.1)
Image Source | Huoxing Liaoran

 

Conclusion

 

Looking back at the tax reforms from 1994 to 2001, we can see how policies have aimed to strike a balance between market demand and economic conditions. These adjustments not only altered the market landscape of the tobacco industry, but also laid the foundation for future policy making. In the next edition, I will delve into the adjustments made in 2009 and 2015 and their far-reaching impacts on the industry, so stay tuned.

 

 

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Special Report | Altria Subsidiaries Sue FDA to Vacate 2021 PMTA Rule as Agency Moves to Speed Reviews
Special Report | Altria Subsidiaries Sue FDA to Vacate 2021 PMTA Rule as Agency Moves to Speed Reviews
2Firsts reviewed the original federal court complaint filed by Altria subsidiaries Helix Innovations and NJOY on Sept. 2 challenging FDA’s 2021 PMTA rule. The lawsuit questions whether FDA’s review process complies with the Tobacco Control Act’s 180-day timeline, even as the agency moves to accelerate PMTA reviews and issues more marketing orders. Drawing on the complaint, FDA records, government audits and recent court rulings, 2Firsts examines the legal arguments, supporting evidence and potential implications for the U.S. tobacco review system.
Regulations
Sep.03
China Tobacco Plans CNY 60 Billion Investment in ICBC, Agricultural Bank as Strategic Ties Extend Beyond Equity
China Tobacco Plans CNY 60 Billion Investment in ICBC, Agricultural Bank as Strategic Ties Extend Beyond Equity
China National Tobacco Corporation and several subsidiaries plan to invest a combined CNY 60 billion ($8.7 billion) in share placements by Industrial and Commercial Bank of China and Agricultural Bank of China as strategic investors. The agreements extend beyond equity investment to corporate governance, banking services and supply-chain finance. The filings also disclose 2025 data on China Tobacco’s tax and profit contributions and industry scale.
Sep.07
Reynolds Seeks to Join Altria Lawsuit Challenging FDA PMTA Rule and Calculation of 180-Day Deadline
Reynolds Seeks to Join Altria Lawsuit Challenging FDA PMTA Rule and Calculation of 180-Day Deadline
Three R.J. Reynolds companies are seeking to intervene in a lawsuit filed by Altria subsidiaries Helix Innovations and NJOY challenging the FDA's 2021 PMTA final rule. The companies dispute how the agency uses Acceptance and Filing reviews and completeness determinations to establish when the Tobacco Control Act's 180-day decision period begins. Reynolds has also linked prolonged PMTA reviews to competition from unauthorized vaping products. The FDA, meanwhile, has been accelerating reviews and reducing its backlog.
Sep.14
Product | KT&G Launches lil HYBRID 3.0 Misty Rosé Edition II in South Korea With Two Pink Finishes at 88,000 Won
Product | KT&G Launches lil HYBRID 3.0 Misty Rosé Edition II in South Korea With Two Pink Finishes at 88,000 Won
South Korean tobacco company KT&G launched the limited-edition lil HYBRID 3.0 Misty Rosé Edition II on September 30, 2026, following the original Misty Rosé Edition introduced in November 2025. The new release comes in two pink finishes, Bloom Rosé and Viva Rosé, each priced at 88,000 won. Both versions initially went on sale through the lil Store online shop and lil MINIMALIUM flagship stores. From October 7, Bloom Rosé became available at approximately 1,500 lil Station retail outlets nationwide. The release retains the existing lil HYBRID 3.0 hybrid heated tobacco platform, with changes focused on exterior design and distribution.
product
Oct.10
Special Report|CrossBar's High-Puff Vapes Draw Attention on Pennsylvania's 163-Product Directory as Link Between Earlier 1.3mL PMTA Filings and New 13mL Products Remains Unclear
Special Report|CrossBar's High-Puff Vapes Draw Attention on Pennsylvania's 163-Product Directory as Link Between Earlier 1.3mL PMTA Filings and New 13mL Products Remains Unclear
Pennsylvania began enforcing its electronic nicotine delivery system directory restrictions on October 19, 2026. Among 163 product listings recorded before enforcement, four CrossBar 20K disposables stood out with 13mL capacity, advertised puff counts of up to 20,000 and a flattened design distinct from conventional pod systems and compact disposables. Historical records identify earlier 1.3mL CrossBar products associated with Romo LLC, while newer 13mL products appeared in several state directories beginning in 2025 under entities including Blue Nine LLC. PMTA compliance expert Mr. K identified amendments and application ownership transfers as possible regulatory mechanisms, although neither has been confirmed in this case. Separately, Reynolds' $7.5 million acquisition of 16 PACHA products and related assets illustrates the commercial value of products linked to historic PMTA submissions.
Special Report
Oct.22
U.S. Judge Stays Helix, NJOY Challenge to FDA PMTA Rule Pending New Rulemaking Court Stays Altria's Helix, NJOY Challenge to PMTA Rule as FDA Prepares New Rulemaking
U.S. Judge Stays Helix, NJOY Challenge to FDA PMTA Rule Pending New Rulemaking Court Stays Altria's Helix, NJOY Challenge to PMTA Rule as FDA Prepares New Rulemaking
A federal judge in Texas on Oct. 8 granted a joint request by the FDA and plaintiffs including Altria subsidiaries Helix Innovations and NJOY to stay litigation challenging the agency's 2021 PMTA rule. The court cited FDA's anticipated rulemaking concerning the regulation at issue. FDA announced on Sept. 28 that it intends to reassess the PMTA framework and could initiate new rulemaking to replace it. The parties must file a joint status report within 45 days and every 45 days thereafter. A motion by three Reynolds American companies to intervene remains pending.
Regulations
Oct.10