Reynolds files lawsuit in California over tobacco products

May.15.2023
Reynolds files lawsuit in California over tobacco products
Reynolds Tobacco files lawsuit in California to defend its non-menthol tobacco products against flavor ban allegations.

On May 12th, Convenience Store News reported that Reynolds Tobacco filed a lawsuit against officials, including California Attorney General Robert Bonta, in response to several notices issued by Bonta alleging that Reynolds Tobacco and certain brands under the Empire Tobacco umbrella "presumptively" marketed flavored tobacco products.


Renault believes that the new product complies with California law.


Tobacco company Reynolds American Inc. has announced that it is taking action to maintain the availability of its legal "non-menthol" tobacco products in the California market. The company filed a lawsuit in California court seeking declaratory and injunctive relief, including the overturning of warning notifications from California authorities.


Renault Tobacco has expressed its support for its new products and believes that they comply with California's laws and can continue to be sold. Renault stated that it had followed all applicable pre-market regulatory requirements before launching these products for sale.


The company's statement stated:


The new Camel and Newport brand tobacco products do not have any discernible flavor or scent other than tobacco, and explicitly state that they are non-menthol on the market.


Renault Tobacco believes that the notification from the California Attorney General's office failed to acknowledge the fact that the newly launched product is prominently labeled as non-menthol and is being sold in the market.


California Attorney General Accuses Reno of Violating Flavoring Ban with New Product.


Previously, California's Attorney General, Xavier Becerra, issued warning letters to Reynolds and Imperial Tobacco stating that California law enforcement officials discovered through a review of cigarette packaging and promotional materials that several products were "presumed to be flavored products in violation of California's flavor ban.


The California Attorney General's office has identified seven products from R.J. Reynolds Tobacco, including Camel Crush Oasis Silver, Camel Crush Oasis Blue, Camel Crush Oasis Green, Camel Crisp, Newport EXP Non-Menthol Mix, Newport EXP Non-Menthol Max, and Newport Non-Menthol Green, as "flavored" tobacco products. Similarly, two products from Imperial Tobacco, Kool Non-Menthol and Kool Blue Non-Menthol, have been identified as "flavored" tobacco products as well.


These two companies are required to respond to these notices before June 23rd.


The Battle Against Flavored Tobacco in California.


On November 8th, 2022, California approved Proposition 31 with approximately 62.3% of voters in favor and 37.7% against. Proposition 31 upholds the state law banning the sale of flavored tobacco, including menthol.


The vote result was immediately met with opposition from tobacco companies, with companies such as Renault suing the California government in the US Supreme Court. However, on December 12th, the US Supreme Court rejected the plea of multiple tobacco companies to halt the implementation of the state's ban on the sale of flavored tobacco products.


According to Renault, the company has repeatedly urged law enforcement officials in California to take action against illegal and unregulated disposable electronic cigarettes that are being smuggled into the state from unknown sources through its ports.


Reference:


Reynolds has initiated legal action in California with the aim of safeguarding the legal sale and distribution of its tobacco products.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

Argentina’s New Nicotine Rules Draw Cautious Optimism and Market Concerns, Local Tobacco Harm Reduction Advocate Says
Argentina’s New Nicotine Rules Draw Cautious Optimism and Market Concerns, Local Tobacco Harm Reduction Advocate Says
Argentina’s new tobacco and nicotine framework marks a shift from prohibition toward registration, traceability and health surveillance. Argentine THR advocate Juan Facundo Teme told 2Firsts that adult consumers and parts of the local commercial sector are cautiously optimistic, but concerns remain over flavor limits, registration costs and market access. The policy’s implementation may determine whether Argentina can move informal sales into regulated channels.
May.11
Nicotine Beyond Tobacco? Cell Study Signals Emerging Shift in Production Systems
Nicotine Beyond Tobacco? Cell Study Signals Emerging Shift in Production Systems
Researchers at the Chinese Academy of Sciences reconstructed nicotine biosynthesis in non-tobacco plants and yeast systems, highlighting how advances in synthetic biology could gradually reshape future nicotine production technologies and challenge regulatory frameworks built around tobacco-derived definitions.
Special Report
May.07
Tasmanian Lower House Passes Tougher Tobacco Bill With Higher Penalties for Sales to Minors
Tasmanian Lower House Passes Tougher Tobacco Bill With Higher Penalties for Sales to Minors
The Tasmanian House of Assembly has passed a new bill aimed at cracking down on the sale of smoking products to children and curbing the illicit tobacco trade. Under the Public Health Amendment (Prohibited Tobacco and Other Products) Bill 2026, businesses caught selling tobacco products to minors would face steeper, tiered fines.
Apr.23 by 2FIRSTS.ai
RJR Vapor Loses Tax Refund Case as Texas High Court Finds VELO Pouches Taxable
RJR Vapor Loses Tax Refund Case as Texas High Court Finds VELO Pouches Taxable
The Texas Supreme Court issued a case summary on May 8, 2026, describing its decision in Hancock v. RJR Vapor Co. LLC. The dispute centered on whether RJR Vapor’s VELO oral nicotine pouches are taxable as “tobacco products” under the Texas Tax Code. Lower courts had held that the pouches were not taxable tobacco products, but the Texas Supreme Court reversed, concluding that VELO pouches are taxable because they are made of “a tobacco substitute.”
May.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai
 Philip Morris Lowers Profit Outlook as Zyn Faces Competition and FDA Delays
Philip Morris Lowers Profit Outlook as Zyn Faces Competition and FDA Delays
According to Reuters, Philip Morris International (PMI) lowered its 2026 adjusted earnings-per-share forecast amid regulatory uncertainty around Zyn nicotine pouches, rising competition and shipment pressure in the U.S. market.
PMI
Jun.02
Cross-Party Romanian Lawmakers Propose Ban on E-Cigarettes and Heated Tobacco Use in All Enclosed Public Spaces
Cross-Party Romanian Lawmakers Propose Ban on E-Cigarettes and Heated Tobacco Use in All Enclosed Public Spaces
Lawmakers from Romania’s USR, PSD and PNL have submitted a bill that would ban e-cigarettes, vapes and heated tobacco devices in all enclosed public spaces. The proposal would redefine “smoking” so that inhaling aerosols produced by heating or vaporizing products containing tobacco, nicotine or other substances intended for inhalation would also be considered smoking, except for medical-use products.
Apr.17 by 2FIRSTS.ai