Reynolds files lawsuit in California over tobacco products

May.15.2023
Reynolds files lawsuit in California over tobacco products
Reynolds Tobacco files lawsuit in California to defend its non-menthol tobacco products against flavor ban allegations.

On May 12th, Convenience Store News reported that Reynolds Tobacco filed a lawsuit against officials, including California Attorney General Robert Bonta, in response to several notices issued by Bonta alleging that Reynolds Tobacco and certain brands under the Empire Tobacco umbrella "presumptively" marketed flavored tobacco products.


Renault believes that the new product complies with California law.


Tobacco company Reynolds American Inc. has announced that it is taking action to maintain the availability of its legal "non-menthol" tobacco products in the California market. The company filed a lawsuit in California court seeking declaratory and injunctive relief, including the overturning of warning notifications from California authorities.


Renault Tobacco has expressed its support for its new products and believes that they comply with California's laws and can continue to be sold. Renault stated that it had followed all applicable pre-market regulatory requirements before launching these products for sale.


The company's statement stated:


The new Camel and Newport brand tobacco products do not have any discernible flavor or scent other than tobacco, and explicitly state that they are non-menthol on the market.


Renault Tobacco believes that the notification from the California Attorney General's office failed to acknowledge the fact that the newly launched product is prominently labeled as non-menthol and is being sold in the market.


California Attorney General Accuses Reno of Violating Flavoring Ban with New Product.


Previously, California's Attorney General, Xavier Becerra, issued warning letters to Reynolds and Imperial Tobacco stating that California law enforcement officials discovered through a review of cigarette packaging and promotional materials that several products were "presumed to be flavored products in violation of California's flavor ban.


The California Attorney General's office has identified seven products from R.J. Reynolds Tobacco, including Camel Crush Oasis Silver, Camel Crush Oasis Blue, Camel Crush Oasis Green, Camel Crisp, Newport EXP Non-Menthol Mix, Newport EXP Non-Menthol Max, and Newport Non-Menthol Green, as "flavored" tobacco products. Similarly, two products from Imperial Tobacco, Kool Non-Menthol and Kool Blue Non-Menthol, have been identified as "flavored" tobacco products as well.


These two companies are required to respond to these notices before June 23rd.


The Battle Against Flavored Tobacco in California.


On November 8th, 2022, California approved Proposition 31 with approximately 62.3% of voters in favor and 37.7% against. Proposition 31 upholds the state law banning the sale of flavored tobacco, including menthol.


The vote result was immediately met with opposition from tobacco companies, with companies such as Renault suing the California government in the US Supreme Court. However, on December 12th, the US Supreme Court rejected the plea of multiple tobacco companies to halt the implementation of the state's ban on the sale of flavored tobacco products.


According to Renault, the company has repeatedly urged law enforcement officials in California to take action against illegal and unregulated disposable electronic cigarettes that are being smuggled into the state from unknown sources through its ports.


Reference:


Reynolds has initiated legal action in California with the aim of safeguarding the legal sale and distribution of its tobacco products.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

Nebraska Lawmakers Consider Major Tax Hikes on Cigarettes, Vapes and Other Nicotine Products
Nebraska Lawmakers Consider Major Tax Hikes on Cigarettes, Vapes and Other Nicotine Products
Nebraska lawmakers are considering two tax bills targeting nicotine products. LB1124 would raise the cigarette tax from $0.64 to $1.64 per pack, while LB1238 would shift cigarettes to a 30% tax on the retailer’s purchase price and increase taxes on alternative nicotine and other tobacco products to 30%. The commentary argues the hikes could raise consumer costs, pressure small retailers, and increase cross-border shopping and illicit market activity.
Feb.04 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Iowa urges Eighth Circuit to allow enforcement of challenged e-cigarette directory law
Iowa urges Eighth Circuit to allow enforcement of challenged e-cigarette directory law
At the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, Iowa asked judges to allow enforcement of a challenged 2024 state law that penalizes manufacturers selling e-cigarette products not listed on a state-run directory. Products are listed only when a manufacturer or retailer meets certain premarket requirements established under the federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FDCA).
Jan.19 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Virginia appeals to the Fourth Circuit over partial block on flavored vape ban enforcement
Virginia appeals to the Fourth Circuit over partial block on flavored vape ban enforcement
Virginia has asked the Fourth Circuit to overturn a district court order that partially blocked enforcement of the commonwealth’s flavored vape ban. In a notice, the state told U.S. District Judge David J. Novak it seeks to upend his December ruling that Virginia’s Chapter 23.2 statute is preempted by the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act.
Jan.12 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Russian State Duma Passes Ban on Tobacco and Vape Sales at Public Transport Stops
Russian State Duma Passes Ban on Tobacco and Vape Sales at Public Transport Stops
Russia’s State Duma has approved, in its third reading, a law banning the sale of cigarettes and electronic cigarettes at public transport stops. The measure expands existing restrictions on tobacco sales at transport infrastructure facilities and aims to reduce accessibility, particularly among young people. The law includes an exemption for small settlements where such kiosks are the only sales points and will take effect on September 1, 2026.
Dec.18 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Cambodia: Phnom Penh authorities seize 2,000+ vape devices and arrest two alleged distributors
Cambodia: Phnom Penh authorities seize 2,000+ vape devices and arrest two alleged distributors
Kiripost reports that authorities seized more than 2,000 electronic smoking devices and arrested two alleged distributors in Phnom Penh’s Toul Kork district, prompting health advocates to warn that inconsistent enforcement is undermining Cambodia’s crackdown on illegal e-cigarettes and shisha.
Jan.13 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Single-Use Vape Ban Bill Sparks Debate in Irish Parliament
Single-Use Vape Ban Bill Sparks Debate in Irish Parliament
A bill seeking to ban the sale of single-use vapes has been introduced to Ireland’s Dáil, with lawmakers citing environmental damage and rising concerns over youth health. Industry representatives have urged full scrutiny of the bill, warning of enforcement challenges and potential loopholes.
Dec.18 by 2FIRSTS.ai