Reynolds files lawsuit in California over tobacco products

May.15.2023
Reynolds files lawsuit in California over tobacco products
Reynolds Tobacco files lawsuit in California to defend its non-menthol tobacco products against flavor ban allegations.

On May 12th, Convenience Store News reported that Reynolds Tobacco filed a lawsuit against officials, including California Attorney General Robert Bonta, in response to several notices issued by Bonta alleging that Reynolds Tobacco and certain brands under the Empire Tobacco umbrella "presumptively" marketed flavored tobacco products.


Renault believes that the new product complies with California law.


Tobacco company Reynolds American Inc. has announced that it is taking action to maintain the availability of its legal "non-menthol" tobacco products in the California market. The company filed a lawsuit in California court seeking declaratory and injunctive relief, including the overturning of warning notifications from California authorities.


Renault Tobacco has expressed its support for its new products and believes that they comply with California's laws and can continue to be sold. Renault stated that it had followed all applicable pre-market regulatory requirements before launching these products for sale.


The company's statement stated:


The new Camel and Newport brand tobacco products do not have any discernible flavor or scent other than tobacco, and explicitly state that they are non-menthol on the market.


Renault Tobacco believes that the notification from the California Attorney General's office failed to acknowledge the fact that the newly launched product is prominently labeled as non-menthol and is being sold in the market.


California Attorney General Accuses Reno of Violating Flavoring Ban with New Product.


Previously, California's Attorney General, Xavier Becerra, issued warning letters to Reynolds and Imperial Tobacco stating that California law enforcement officials discovered through a review of cigarette packaging and promotional materials that several products were "presumed to be flavored products in violation of California's flavor ban.


The California Attorney General's office has identified seven products from R.J. Reynolds Tobacco, including Camel Crush Oasis Silver, Camel Crush Oasis Blue, Camel Crush Oasis Green, Camel Crisp, Newport EXP Non-Menthol Mix, Newport EXP Non-Menthol Max, and Newport Non-Menthol Green, as "flavored" tobacco products. Similarly, two products from Imperial Tobacco, Kool Non-Menthol and Kool Blue Non-Menthol, have been identified as "flavored" tobacco products as well.


These two companies are required to respond to these notices before June 23rd.


The Battle Against Flavored Tobacco in California.


On November 8th, 2022, California approved Proposition 31 with approximately 62.3% of voters in favor and 37.7% against. Proposition 31 upholds the state law banning the sale of flavored tobacco, including menthol.


The vote result was immediately met with opposition from tobacco companies, with companies such as Renault suing the California government in the US Supreme Court. However, on December 12th, the US Supreme Court rejected the plea of multiple tobacco companies to halt the implementation of the state's ban on the sale of flavored tobacco products.


According to Renault, the company has repeatedly urged law enforcement officials in California to take action against illegal and unregulated disposable electronic cigarettes that are being smuggled into the state from unknown sources through its ports.


Reference:


Reynolds has initiated legal action in California with the aim of safeguarding the legal sale and distribution of its tobacco products.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

Fourth Circuit weighs federal preemption challenge to North Carolina’s vape sales restrictions
Fourth Circuit weighs federal preemption challenge to North Carolina’s vape sales restrictions
Vape manufacturers and sellers urged the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit to find that the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) preempts North Carolina’s new law restricting the sale of certain e-cigarette/ENDS products.
Feb.03 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Six Years of Data Show FDA Clearing PMTA Backlog
Six Years of Data Show FDA Clearing PMTA Backlog
FDA data from FY2020 to FY2025 show how the PMTA system for e-cigarette products evolved after an early surge of submissions created prolonged front-end delays. Millions of applications accumulated at the Acceptance stage before entering substantive review. Since 2023, the number of applications pending acceptance has declined sharply, and industry participants report shorter initial decision timelines in late 2025.
Feb.06
Fifth Circuit Upholds FDA’s 2021 PMTA Rule, Citing Statutory Health-Study Requirements
Fifth Circuit Upholds FDA’s 2021 PMTA Rule, Citing Statutory Health-Study Requirements
A Fifth Circuit panel upheld the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s 2021 final rule requiring companies seeking premarket authorization for new tobacco products to include information on health-risk investigations. In a published opinion, the court found FDA satisfied the Regulatory Flexibility Act’s procedural requirements and reasonably relied on the economic analysis from the 2016 “deeming rule” as a factual basis to certify limited impact on small businesses.
Feb.27 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Elfbar warns flavour bans could push over 50,000 Scottish vapers back to smoking
Elfbar warns flavour bans could push over 50,000 Scottish vapers back to smoking
Elfbar said restricting vape flavour choices—potentially under the Tobacco and Vapes Bill—could disrupt established quitting behaviours and increase relapse risk among former smokers. An Opinium survey commissioned by the company reported fruit and sweet flavours have risen in popularity among adult vapers quitting smoking in Scotland, with 62% now using them most often to quit, up from 34% in December 2024.
Feb.28 by 2FIRSTS.ai
KT&G’s Heated Tobacco Brand “lil” Named to Korea’s Brand Hall of Fame for Eighth Consecutive Year
KT&G’s Heated Tobacco Brand “lil” Named to Korea’s Brand Hall of Fame for Eighth Consecutive Year
KT&G said its heated tobacco brand “lil” was selected as an outstanding brand in the heated tobacco category of the “2026 Korea Brand Hall of Fame,” marking its eighth straight year on the list. The awards are organized by the Industrial Policy Research Institute (IPS) and determined through a composite evaluation of customer satisfaction, brand value and market performance.
Jan.26 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Malaysia moves ahead with vape sales ban plan; PMI urges Japan-style differentiated excise taxes
Malaysia moves ahead with vape sales ban plan; PMI urges Japan-style differentiated excise taxes
Malaysia plans to implement a ban or restrictions on e-cigarettes and vaping products as early as mid-2026 and no later than year-end. The head of Philip Morris Malaysia and Singapore said the government should look to Japan’s approach of regulating and taxing different tobacco and nicotine products differently, warning that an outright ban could push demand into illicit channels.
Feb.02