RJ Reynolds Ordered to Pay Altria $95 Million in Patent Dispute

Sep.08.2022
RJ Reynolds Ordered to Pay Altria $95 Million in Patent Dispute
RJR ordered to pay Altria over $95 million for patent infringement on Vuse e-cigarette.

In this illustration, a woman is holding a cigarette in front of the Altria logo. Source: Reuters/Dado Ruvic.


On Wednesday, a jury in North Carolina ruled that RJ Reynolds Vapor Co must pay over $95 million to tobacco giant Altria Group after finding that RJR's best-selling Vuse series of e-cigarettes infringed on three of Altria's patents.


Altria, headquartered in Richmond, Virginia, has accused its competitor RJR of infringing on patents related to e-cigarette devices used for storing and heating liquid nicotine pods. Altria is seeking over 5% in royalties on sales of RJR's Vuse Alto device.


Altria announced in a press release that a Greensboro, North Carolina jury accepted its proposed royalty rates when calculating $95.2 million in past damages awarded, and that RJR may be subject to additional ongoing damages following the expiration of its patents in 2035 after post-trial proceedings.


A copy of the verdict cannot be obtained immediately.


A spokesperson for RJR, based in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, expressed disappointment with the ruling and stated that the company will vigorously defend outstanding issues in court and appeal if necessary.


Murphy Gagné, Executive Vice President and General Counsel of Altria, stated that the company is "pleased that the jury recognized the importance of Altria's innovation and the value of its patents.


On Wednesday, a verdict was reached in a case where Philip Morris International won a $10 million judgement in June in Virginia. The company accused RJR of infringing on two e-cigarette patents with their Vuse Solo and Alto devices.


RJR has filed a lawsuit against Philip Morris and Altria in Virginia, alleging that Philip Morris' IQOS heated tobacco device infringes on its e-cigarette patents. Last November, RJR won an order to block the importation of IQOS from the International Trade Commission.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information and is intended for industry-related communication and education purposes only.


This article does not represent the viewpoint of 2FIRSTS and 2FIRSTS is not able to confirm the authenticity or accuracy of the article's content. The translation of this article is intended only for industry-related communication and research.


Due to limitations in the compilation ability, the compiled article may not fully convey the original expression. Please refer to the original text for accuracy.


2FIRSTS is completely aligned with the Chinese government in regards to any domestic, Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan, or foreign issues and positions.


The copyright of compiled information belongs to the original media and author, and if there is any infringement, please contact us to request removal.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

South Korea Moves Against Synthetic Nicotine Regulatory Gap as Three Companies Face Tobacco Business Act Probe
South Korea Moves Against Synthetic Nicotine Regulatory Gap as Three Companies Face Tobacco Business Act Probe
South Korea’s Ministry of Finance and Economy said on May 4 that it requested the Daejeon Metropolitan Police Agency and Gyeonggi Nambu Provincial Police Agency to investigate three sales companies on suspicion of violating the Tobacco Business Act.
May.06 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Malaysia Nicotine Vape Market Faces Legal Uncertainty Over Tax and Poisons List Ruling
Malaysia Nicotine Vape Market Faces Legal Uncertainty Over Tax and Poisons List Ruling
Malaysia’s Finance Minister Anwar Ibrahim said duties and taxes on nicotine-containing vape products will be determined in line with the Court of Appeal’s ruling on whether liquid or gel nicotine can be exempted from the Poisons List under the Poisons Act 1952, a case that could affect the legal basis for vape taxation, retail sales and future ban policy.
Jun.29
UK Parliament Briefing Puts Vape Hardware Design and Materials in Regulatory Focus
UK Parliament Briefing Puts Vape Hardware Design and Materials in Regulatory Focus
The UK Parliament’s Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology (POST) has published a scientific briefing reviewing current evidence on the health effects of vape device components, including heating elements, power settings, metals, plastics, batteries and e-liquid ingredients, signalling growing regulatory attention to device design and whole-product systems beyond e-liquids, flavours and packaging.
Special Report
Jun.29
 RFK Jr. Spokesman Resigns Over FDA Authorization of Fruit-Flavored Vapes
RFK Jr. Spokesman Resigns Over FDA Authorization of Fruit-Flavored Vapes
Richard Danker, a senior public affairs official in Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s team, resigned from his role at HHS over the FDA’s recent authorization of fruit-flavored vaping products. In a resignation letter addressed to President Donald Trump, Danker argued that the products could expose minors to nicotine addiction, lung damage, and increased cancer risks, while also conflicting with recent HHS guidance on youth risks associated with flavored nicotine products.
News
May.15
Trump’s Tobacco Investments and Industry Donations Draw Scrutiny as FDA Eases Vape and Nicotine Pouch Rules
Trump’s Tobacco Investments and Industry Donations Draw Scrutiny as FDA Eases Vape and Nicotine Pouch Rules
A report by KFF Health News says that as the Trump administration pursued a series of policies favorable to the nicotine and tobacco industry, President Donald Trump increased his holdings in tobacco companies while benefiting from substantial industry-linked political donations, prompting questions from public health advocates about potential conflicts of interest and regulatory direction.
Jun.12
AP Questions FDA Rationale as Glas Fruit-Flavored Vapes Won Authorization Without Added Cessation Benefit
AP Questions FDA Rationale as Glas Fruit-Flavored Vapes Won Authorization Without Added Cessation Benefit
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently authorized two fruit-flavored vaping products from Glas, but a newly released agency memo shows the products did not demonstrate greater smoking-cessation benefits than tobacco-flavored e-cigarettes. The Associated Press said the findings are likely to raise further questions about the FDA’s regulatory rationale and standards for flavored vaping products.
Jun.12