Scottish Aberdeenshire Faces New Pollution Issue with Disposable E-Cigarettes

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Dec.08.2023
Scottish Aberdeenshire Faces New Pollution Issue with Disposable E-Cigarettes
Scotland's Aberdeenshire is facing a new recycling pollution issue due to an increasing number of disposable e-cigarettes being found in battery recycling bags.

According to UK media outlet Grampianonline, Aberdeenshire in Scotland is facing a new pollution issue with an increasing number of disposable e-cigarettes being found in household battery recycling bags. Previously discarded e-cigarettes have become one of the fastest-growing sources of electronic waste in the UK, with over half a million being thrown into trash bins every week, totaling over one million.

 

According to local council regulations, e-cigarette devices should be taken to the small Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) container at household recycling centers.

 

If the battery inside an e-cigarette can be easily removed, then that battery can be independently extracted and disposed of at a battery recycling facility. Some reputable retail stores may offer a collection point or recycling program for this purpose.

 

This new type of pollution could potentially mean that battery recycling efforts in other households are being wasted due to some families mixing e-cigarette devices with their batteries.

 

Alan Turner, Chairman of the Municipal Facilities Service Committee and city councilor, expressed:

 

Considering the perspectives of safety and environmental protection, it is crucial to properly recycle small electronic devices like e-cigarette devices. If you are unsure of which container to place these items in, feel free to ask our staff at the household recycling center at any time.

 

The local government is investigating what measures need to be taken to reduce this new type of pollution that occurs during weekly battery collection. E-cigarettes, which are made from valuable resources on Earth such as steel, aluminum, copper, and lithium, make recycling them even more important. However, e-cigarette devices are also classified as toxic waste.

 

This is not the first occasion that the local government's waste and recycling services have suffered a loss of resources due to e-cigarette devices. In September 2022, a batch of disposable e-cigarettes exploded during the regular compression process at the Westhill recycling center. The reason behind this mishap was that they were mistakenly placed in a general waste skip instead of the designated WEEE (Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment) container.

 

The Scottish government is currently considering banning disposable e-cigarettes as part of their plan to protect public health and the environment.

 

According to estimates from Zero Waste Scotland, Scotland consumed and discarded up to 26 million disposable e-cigarettes last year, with 10% being casually littered and over half being incorrectly disposed of. Increasingly, local authorities in Scotland are expressing support for legislative changes, including the Aberdeenshire Council, which made a decision on this matter during its general assembly in June this year.

 

In Aberdeenshire, residents have the opportunity to recycle batteries every week on the streets. To take part, simply place the batteries in a pink household battery recycling bag and leave it on top of the trash bin designated for recycling that week. You can obtain these battery bags for free at your local household recycling center, service point, or library. If your battery bag is empty, it can still be attached to any of your trash bins, and staff members will provide you with a new roll if available.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Yinghe-Controlled Vape Maker SKE Ordered to Post £569,039 Security as It Pursues Crystal Bar Design Infringement Case in UK
Yinghe-Controlled Vape Maker SKE Ordered to Post £569,039 Security as It Pursues Crystal Bar Design Infringement Case in UK
The UK High Court has ordered Chinese vape manufacturer Shenzhen SKE Technology to provide £569,039 ($776,000) in security for costs in its design infringement proceedings against Vapepen London and other defendants over its Crystal Bar vape product. The court did not accept the defendants’ main argument that recovering costs from a China-based company would face significant enforcement obstacles, but found that SKE had not sufficiently disclosed its own financial position. The order is procedural and does not determine the underlying infringement claims.
News
Aug.21
Australia Extends Illicit Tobacco Crackdown From Tougher Penalties to Customs and Logistics Supply Chains
Australia Extends Illicit Tobacco Crackdown From Tougher Penalties to Customs and Logistics Supply Chains
Australia's federal government introduced a new illicit tobacco enforcement bill on September 10 that would strengthen evidentiary presumptions, representative sampling, seizure and forfeiture procedures, proceeds-of-crime powers and obligations for customs and logistics operators. The proposal follows the Combatting Illicit Tobacco Act 2026, which took effect in August and increased penalties while expanding investigative and asset-recovery tools. Together, the reforms extend Australia's crackdown from tougher criminal sanctions into import, logistics and evidentiary enforcement.
Sep.14
Imperial Brands Acquires Helwit Owner Yoik Group for SEK 515 Million, More Than Doubling Swedish Nicotine Pouch Share
Imperial Brands Acquires Helwit Owner Yoik Group for SEK 515 Million, More Than Doubling Swedish Nicotine Pouch Share
Imperial Brands has agreed to acquire 100% of Swedish modern oral nicotine company Yoik Group AB for an initial SEK515 million, equivalent to about US$53.9 million, plus a deferred payment linked to performance over the next two years. Yoik owns nicotine pouch brand Helwit, which held about 3.4% of Sweden’s modern oral nicotine market over the past 12 months. Imperial says the acquisition will more than double its existing share of the Swedish market. Helwit is also sold elsewhere in the Nordics, through European online channels and in selected UK retail outlets.
Sep.08
Couche-Tard Posts Double-Digit U.S. Same-Store Growth in Other Nicotine Products, Led by Pouches
Couche-Tard Posts Double-Digit U.S. Same-Store Growth in Other Nicotine Products, Led by Pouches
Alimentation Couche-Tard said U.S. same-store sales in its “other nicotine products” category grew at a double-digit rate in the first quarter of fiscal 2027, led by nicotine pouches, while overall U.S. same-store merchandise revenues increased 1.7%. The company also said its Canadian nicotine business continued to face regulatory pressure and illicit-market headwinds. The U.S. performance coincides with Couche-Tard's participation in efforts to reopen Canadian convenience-store access to authorized nicotine pouches, though the company has not established a direct causal link between the two.
Sep.14
Product | DOJO Launches 0+6ml BLAST7K Fresh in UK in September, Retaining 2+8ml Pod Compatibility Ahead of October Per-Milliliter Vaping Duty
Product | DOJO Launches 0+6ml BLAST7K Fresh in UK in September, Retaining 2+8ml Pod Compatibility Ahead of October Per-Milliliter Vaping Duty
DOJO officially launched the BLAST7K Fresh on September 17, 2026, introducing a UK-market prefilled pod product with 6ml of e-liquid and a manufacturer-rated capacity of up to 7,000 puffs. The device features a 1000mAh rechargeable battery, the INSTA-JUICED structure and COREX BLAST dual-mesh technology, while retaining compatibility with existing BLAST pods. The launch comes less than two weeks before the UK's Vaping Products Duty takes effect on October 1. At the new duty rate, 6ml of vaping liquid would correspond to £1.32 in VPD. DOJO has not stated that the product's 6ml format was designed in response to the new duty.
Sep.20
Ohio Supreme Court Weighs Whether State Consumer Law Can Restrict Flavored Vape Sales
Ohio Supreme Court Weighs Whether State Consumer Law Can Restrict Flavored Vape Sales
The Ohio Supreme Court is hearing a case involving flavored vape sales and whether state authorities can use consumer protection laws to take action against retailers selling unauthorized vape products. Ohio officials argue that selling unauthorized flavored vapes may constitute consumer deception, while retailers argue that tobacco product regulation falls under federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authority and that states cannot impose additional restrictions through consumer laws. The case could affect the scope of state-level vape regulation across the United States.
Aug.06