Scottish Aberdeenshire Faces New Pollution Issue with Disposable E-Cigarettes

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Dec.08.2023
Scottish Aberdeenshire Faces New Pollution Issue with Disposable E-Cigarettes
Scotland's Aberdeenshire is facing a new recycling pollution issue due to an increasing number of disposable e-cigarettes being found in battery recycling bags.

According to UK media outlet Grampianonline, Aberdeenshire in Scotland is facing a new pollution issue with an increasing number of disposable e-cigarettes being found in household battery recycling bags. Previously discarded e-cigarettes have become one of the fastest-growing sources of electronic waste in the UK, with over half a million being thrown into trash bins every week, totaling over one million.

 

According to local council regulations, e-cigarette devices should be taken to the small Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) container at household recycling centers.

 

If the battery inside an e-cigarette can be easily removed, then that battery can be independently extracted and disposed of at a battery recycling facility. Some reputable retail stores may offer a collection point or recycling program for this purpose.

 

This new type of pollution could potentially mean that battery recycling efforts in other households are being wasted due to some families mixing e-cigarette devices with their batteries.

 

Alan Turner, Chairman of the Municipal Facilities Service Committee and city councilor, expressed:

 

Considering the perspectives of safety and environmental protection, it is crucial to properly recycle small electronic devices like e-cigarette devices. If you are unsure of which container to place these items in, feel free to ask our staff at the household recycling center at any time.

 

The local government is investigating what measures need to be taken to reduce this new type of pollution that occurs during weekly battery collection. E-cigarettes, which are made from valuable resources on Earth such as steel, aluminum, copper, and lithium, make recycling them even more important. However, e-cigarette devices are also classified as toxic waste.

 

This is not the first occasion that the local government's waste and recycling services have suffered a loss of resources due to e-cigarette devices. In September 2022, a batch of disposable e-cigarettes exploded during the regular compression process at the Westhill recycling center. The reason behind this mishap was that they were mistakenly placed in a general waste skip instead of the designated WEEE (Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment) container.

 

The Scottish government is currently considering banning disposable e-cigarettes as part of their plan to protect public health and the environment.

 

According to estimates from Zero Waste Scotland, Scotland consumed and discarded up to 26 million disposable e-cigarettes last year, with 10% being casually littered and over half being incorrectly disposed of. Increasingly, local authorities in Scotland are expressing support for legislative changes, including the Aberdeenshire Council, which made a decision on this matter during its general assembly in June this year.

 

In Aberdeenshire, residents have the opportunity to recycle batteries every week on the streets. To take part, simply place the batteries in a pink household battery recycling bag and leave it on top of the trash bin designated for recycling that week. You can obtain these battery bags for free at your local household recycling center, service point, or library. If your battery bag is empty, it can still be attached to any of your trash bins, and staff members will provide you with a new roll if available.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Kelly White Bets on Female Consumers as Nicotine Pouch Competition Intensifies | 2Firsts Interview
Kelly White Bets on Female Consumers as Nicotine Pouch Competition Intensifies | 2Firsts Interview
Swedish nicotine pouch brand Kelly White is building its strategy around adult female consumers. Founder and CEO Sophia Wilsby told 2Firsts that women accounted for around 70% of the brand’s repeat customers on HAYPP in Sweden in 2025. The interview explores female consumer segmentation, product and design differentiation, gender stereotypes, packaging regulation, and how independent brands can compete with global players such as ZYN and VELO while considering funding, partnerships and future ownership options.
Business
Sep.24
JUUL2 Sued Within a Week of FDA Authorization as AJ Marketing Alleges Infringement of Programmable Vape Patent
JUUL2 Sued Within a Week of FDA Authorization as AJ Marketing Alleges Infringement of Programmable Vape Patent
Less than a week after JUUL2 received U.S. FDA marketing authorization on August 28, 2026, JUUL Labs was sued for patent infringement in federal court in Delaware. AJ Marketing LLC filed the complaint on September 3, alleging that both JUUL 1 and JUUL2 infringe U.S. Patent No. 8,851,068 B2. The patent covers aspects of programmable electronic vaporization devices, including controls over dose delivery, usage frequency and operating parameters. The plaintiff is seeking reasonable royalties and ongoing royalties tied to the remaining life of the patent. JUUL has not yet publicly responded to the case.
Sep.10
Australia’s Victoria Steps Up Illegal Tobacco Enforcement With Store Closures and Penalties of Up to A$2.5 Million
Australia’s Victoria Steps Up Illegal Tobacco Enforcement With Store Closures and Penalties of Up to A$2.5 Million
Australia’s state of Victoria has activated new powers allowing Tobacco Licensing Victoria and police to shut premises suspected of selling, supplying or possessing illicit tobacco for up to 90 days. Longer closures can be ordered by a magistrates’ court. Businesses subject to closure orders must generally cease all trading and will be placed on a public list. Breaching a closure order can carry penalties of up to A$2.5 million and 20 years in prison.
Sep.10
2Firsts Compliance Solutions Hosts PMTA Briefing on FDA Review Signals After JUUL2 Authorization
2Firsts Compliance Solutions Hosts PMTA Briefing on FDA Review Signals After JUUL2 Authorization
Following recent FDA authorizations for JUUL2 and ZYN ULTRA, 2Firsts Compliance Solutions held an online PMTA briefing on Sept. 4 to examine what the decisions may signal about review efficiency, scientific evidence and U.S. market access. Nearly 30 participants from brands, manufacturers, compliance service providers and investment firms joined the discussion.
2Firsts Events
Sep.06
South Korea Fully Reviews Nicotine-Analog and Nicotine-Free Vape Liquid Imports, With Over 99% From China and Chinese Supply-Chain Documents Under Scrutiny
South Korea Fully Reviews Nicotine-Analog and Nicotine-Free Vape Liquid Imports, With Over 99% From China and Chinese Supply-Chain Documents Under Scrutiny
Korea Customs Service has tightened import controls on nicotine-analog and nicotine-free e-cigarette liquids, placing the products under 100% document review and subjecting all e-cigarette liquid import declarations to pre-clearance ingredient analysis. As of September 20, 2026, South Korea had imported about 15 metric tons of nicotine-analog liquids, 99.99% from China, and about 316 metric tons of nicotine-free liquids, including roughly 315 metric tons, or 99.7%, from China. The measures follow South Korea's April expansion of its tobacco definition to include synthetic nicotine products and include new checks on Chinese manufacturing, transaction and export documentation.
Sep.24
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
Private antitrust litigation stemming from Altria's 2018 $12.8 billion investment for a 35% economic interest in JUUL is advancing before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Direct purchasers, indirect purchasers and indirect resellers of JUUL products filed answering briefs this week seeking to preserve class certifications granted by a California federal court in February. Altria and JUUL argue that individual consumers and large distributors differ too much in purchasing terms to remain in a single direct-purchaser class, while a separate dispute concerns whether California antitrust law can apply to indirect purchasers across 27 jurisdictions. A September trial has been put on hold during the appeal.
Sep.23