South Korea Considers Taxation on Synthetic Nicotine Products

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
May.13.2024
South Korea Considers Taxation on Synthetic Nicotine Products
South Korea debates taxing synthetic nicotine e-cigarettes, sparking concern about potential price hikes in the market.

According to the South Korean news media "NEWS 1" reported on May 13, as the South Korean government actively promotes harmful research on whether synthetic nicotine should be regulated, there is growing concern about the potential rise in prices of liquid e-cigarettes.

 

If synthetic nicotine is included in the regulation of tobacco activities, previously untaxed "synthetic nicotine" liquid e-cigarettes will be subject to tobacco tax and additional tax. According to relevant departments, health authorities will commission a study this month to evaluate the harmfulness of synthetic nicotine. Congress is currently discussing whether to include the regulation of synthetic nicotine in their agenda for review and research.

 

Currently, there is controversy in Congress over the regulation of synthetic nicotine. Some argue that it should not be classified as "tobacco" before its harmful effects are proven, while others believe it should be regulated as "tobacco" and are calling for government research. It is understood that currently, synthetic nicotine cigarettes made from chemical substances are not subject to legal restrictions as "tobacco.

 

In the liquid smoke on the market, although there are natural nicotine products, according to the government, the majority use synthetic nicotine. Because these products are not considered tobacco under tobacco business laws, they can be sold and promoted online, which regular tobacco cannot do. The products also do not need warning texts and images that can harm health, and they do not need to collect legal tobacco-related taxes and fees. Compared to regular tobacco, consumers can purchase synthetic nicotine tobacco at a lower price, while sellers can make more profit.

 

Global tobacco company British American Tobacco (BAT) recently announced plans to launch a synthetic nicotine e-cigarette exclusively in South Korea, sparking further controversy. The controversy intensified as BAT stated that they would pass the savings from tax and excise duties on to consumers, along with criticism of their strategy of exploiting regulatory loopholes in South Korea.

 

Taking advantage of these regulatory loopholes, the synthetic nicotine e-cigarette market is rapidly expanding. According to data submitted to Democratic Representative Kim Young-soo's office by the Korea Customs Service, imports of e-cigarettes containing synthetic nicotine solution have more than doubled in two years, growing from 56 tons in 2020 to 119 tons in 2022. The import volume in the first half of last year alone reached 91 tons, showing a very strong growth momentum.

 

If synthetic nicotine is included in the definition of "tobacco" under the Tobacco Products Act, e-cigarettes that use synthetic nicotine liquid will automatically be subject to tobacco tax and additional fees. This is because under the Tobacco Products Act, all tobacco products are subject to individual consumption taxes and tobacco consumption taxes, as well as additional fees for public health promotion.

 

Recently, there has been a growing discussion surrounding the regulation of synthetic nicotine, with analysts predicting that this will ultimately lead to a broader taxation on liquid e-cigarettes. When designing research tasks, the government seems to have already taken into consideration the possibility of taxing synthetic nicotine, as they have included a comparison of the harmfulness of synthetic nicotine and natural nicotine in their considerations.

 

In tobacco control laws, the taxation of various forms of tobacco, such as cigarettes and e-cigarettes, is typically determined based on their level of harm. Therefore, a credible assessment is needed to determine the tax rate and tax unit for synthetic nicotine. There are voices in the industry that believe that even if synthetic nicotine is taxed, it should be taxed at a lower rate than traditional tobacco, so preparations should be made for this.

 

If taxes are implemented, it is inevitable that the price of liquid e-cigarettes will rise. In the high-cost, high-interest rate environment, the expansion of discussions on consumption taxes such as tobacco taxes may lead to debates about increasing consumer burden of taxes. For the government, which is focusing on restoring livelihoods, this is a heavy burden.

 

Despite the controversy surrounding regulatory gaps, the Ministry of Finance has not clearly expressed its stance on whether to recognize synthetic nicotine as a legal "tobacco" issue, analysts believe this is due to the current situation. The Ministry of Finance is cautious about whether synthetic nicotine needs to be regulated, in contrast to health authorities who emphasize the need for regulation of synthetic nicotine. Health authorities unanimously emphasize the need to regulate synthetic nicotine as part of the legal "tobacco." In reality, an immediate ban on sales is quite difficult, so it is necessary to include synthetic nicotine in the definition of "tobacco" under tobacco control laws and actively regulate it.

 

A South Korean Ministry of Economy and Finance official stated, "The decision on whether to include synthetic nicotine in the tobacco business law involves tax issues, so we cannot provide an immediate answer." He also said, "We will coordinate with relevant departments based on research results.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Australian Coalition Unveils Illicit Tobacco Plan With 80% Excise Cut and Legal, Taxed Vapes and Nicotine Pouches
Australian Coalition Unveils Illicit Tobacco Plan With 80% Excise Cut and Legal, Taxed Vapes and Nicotine Pouches
Australia’s Coalition has unveiled a national illicit-tobacco policy that would cut tobacco excise by 80% and create legal, regulated and taxed adult markets for vaping products and nicotine pouches if it wins government. The plan proposes an excise of A$0.50 per millilitre of e-liquid and A$0.025 per milligram of nicotine in pouches, alongside A$200 million in additional enforcement and a A$60 million three-year public-awareness campaign. The Coalition says the package would narrow the price advantage of illicit products and undermine organised crime, while Labor and public-health groups warn that dramatically cheaper cigarettes could reverse long-term declines in smoking.
Sep.03
2Firsts Data | China’s Vape-Related Exports Rise 16.5% in July 2026 as U.S.-Bound Shipments Jump 53.5%
2Firsts Data | China’s Vape-Related Exports Rise 16.5% in July 2026 as U.S.-Bound Shipments Jump 53.5%
China’s vape-related exports reached $1.047 billion in July 2026, up 16.5% year on year and the highest monthly total of the year. Growth was heavily concentrated in the U.S., where exports jumped 53.5% to $404 million and accounted for 94.9% of the overall increase. Exports to all other markets rose just 1.2%. By category, nicotine-containing non-combustible products—primarily vapes—under HS24041200 rose 24.7% and generated 95.5% of the total increase. Vape-device exports under HS85434000 fell 0.4%, while other nicotine-substitute products under HS24041990 grew 88.9% but remained comparatively small.
DATA
Aug.24
U.S. House Defense Bill Includes Pilot Review of Vapes, Nicotine Pouches and Heated Tobacco for Military Smokers
U.S. House Defense Bill Includes Pilot Review of Vapes, Nicotine Pouches and Heated Tobacco for Military Smokers
On July 23, 2026, the U.S. House of Representatives passed its version of the Fiscal Year 2027 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which includes Section 707 provisions requiring the Department of Defense to evaluate tobacco use and nicotine alternatives among military personnel. The pilot program would examine products including vapes, nicotine pouches and heated tobacco products, primarily among active-duty service members who continue using combustible tobacco. The provision is a policy evaluation effort, not an authorization for military vaping promotion or a ban on vape products.
Jul.28
Senate Democrat Wyden Probes Trump Administration Vape Policy Shift, Seeks Records From HHS and Reynolds American
Senate Democrat Wyden Probes Trump Administration Vape Policy Shift, Seeks Records From HHS and Reynolds American
U.S. Senator Ron Wyden, the Democratic ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee, has launched an investigation into flavored vape policy changes and requested records from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Reynolds American and Botanic Tonics. The investigation focuses on a timeline involving Reynolds American’s $5 million donation to MAGA Inc. in April 2026 and subsequent vape policy developments. Wyden said the review aims to examine potential links between political donations, corporate communications and government decisions. The investigation does not represent a finding of wrongdoing.
Innovation
Aug.07 by 2Firsts Perspectives
UK Vape Maker Riot Enters Clacton By-Election to Fight Government 'White Packaging' Proposals
UK Vape Maker Riot Enters Clacton By-Election to Fight Government 'White Packaging' Proposals
British e-liquid manufacturer Riot Labs has introduced a fictional “candidate” called Riot Man around the Clacton parliamentary by-election, seeking to mobilize consumers and retailers against parts of the UK government’s proposed restrictions on vape packaging, device appearance and retail displays. Riot Man is not listed as an official candidate.
Aug.12
Japan’s Heated Tobacco Tax Changes Reshape Consumer Choices, Survey Reveals Impact of Price and Income
Japan’s Heated Tobacco Tax Changes Reshape Consumer Choices, Survey Reveals Impact of Price and Income
A consumer survey by Japanese heated tobacco information platform RELAZO found that rising tobacco prices and planned heated tobacco tax changes may influence smoking decisions among Japanese consumers. The survey covered 49,879 men and women aged 20 to 69 nationwide. It found that around 40% of respondents cumulatively indicated they may consider quitting when a pack reaches ¥600 (approximately US$4.1), while nearly 90% expressed potential quitting intentions at a ¥1,000 (approximately US$6.8) price level. The survey also found significant differences by income level, with lower-income respondents showing greater sensitivity to price increases.
Jul.24