Tennessee Bill Seeks E-Cigarette Tax And Restrictions

Mar.11
Tennessee Bill Seeks E-Cigarette Tax And Restrictions
Tennessee legislature passes bill to tax and restrict e-cigarette sales, sparking debate over impact on youth and businesses.

Key points:

 

1. A bill regulating e-cigarette products in Tennessee has made legislative progress.
 

2. The proposal included a tax on e-cigarettes and restrictions on product sales.
 

3. Supporters said the measure will protect minors, while opponents warn of its impact on vape shops.

 


 

Tennessee’s legislative committee has introduced a bill to impose taxes on e-cigarette products and limit the types that can be sold, WJHL reported.

 

The bill passed the Government Operations Committee in a 12-1 vote on Monday. It would limit sales to e-cigarette products that are either approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or under FDA review. 

 

The proposal also included a tax of $0.07 per milliliter on disposable e-cigarettes and a 10% wholesale tax on refillable vaping products.

 

The bill's co-sponsor, David Hawk (R-Greeneville), stated during the committee hearings that the goal of the legislation is to prevent e-cigarette products from falling into the hands of children. 

 

However, opponents said the measure could lead to the closure of most, if not all, vape shops and drive more people to traditional tobacco products.

 

The bill will be submitted to the House Finance, Ways, and Means Committee. The Senate version of the bill was introduced by Senator Chuck Yager (R-Kingston) and is scheduled to be discussed on Tuesday.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

NSW Landlords Could Face Jail or $165,000 Fine for Allowing Illegal Vape and Tobacco Sales
NSW Landlords Could Face Jail or $165,000 Fine for Allowing Illegal Vape and Tobacco Sales
According to The Guardian, landlords in New South Wales who knowingly allow tenants to sell illicit tobacco or illegal vapes could face fines of up to AUD 165,000, a year in prison, or both. The new offences are part of the state government’s broader crackdown on Australia’s growing black market for cigarettes and vaping products.
Nov.12 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Denver Flavored-Tobacco Ban Spurs Ballot Fight; Former NYC Mayor Donates $1.5 Million to Back Sales Ban
Denver Flavored-Tobacco Ban Spurs Ballot Fight; Former NYC Mayor Donates $1.5 Million to Back Sales Ban
Michael R. Bloomberg donated $1.5M to back Denver’s flavored-tobacco ban ahead of a Nov. 4 referendum, which vape retailers oppose.
Oct.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai
ZYN’s Trademark Dilemma in China | Legal Opinion Submitted to 2Firsts
ZYN’s Trademark Dilemma in China | Legal Opinion Submitted to 2Firsts
ZYN faces trademark revocation and enforcement challenges in China. In this legal commentary submitted to 2Firsts, the author examines regulatory gaps, enforcement hurdles, and the high legal risks surrounding nicotine pouch trademarks.
Oct.14
PMI Launches IQOS ILUMA i in the Philippines, Debuts via Official Stores and Online Channels
PMI Launches IQOS ILUMA i in the Philippines, Debuts via Official Stores and Online Channels
PMFTC, the Philippine affiliate of Philip Morris International (PMI), has introduced the heated tobacco device IQOS ILUMA i in the Philippines, featuring induction-heating technology and multiple smart functions. PMI aims to increase the share of smoke-free products to around 66% of its net revenues by 2030. Previously, PMFTC had already launched ZYN nicotine pouch products in Manila.
Nov.25 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Over 1,900 e-cigarettes seized in Johor; Malaysia to enforce nationwide ban from 2016
Over 1,900 e-cigarettes seized in Johor; Malaysia to enforce nationwide ban from 2016
Over 1900 e-cigarette products seized in Johor shopping center; state-wide ban enforced since 2016; 10 illegal traders issued notices; national ban planned by 2026.
Oct.17 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Bangladesh Approves Philip Morris Factory for Nicotine Pouches, Sparks Controversy: Regulator Says It’s “Completely Legal”
Bangladesh Approves Philip Morris Factory for Nicotine Pouches, Sparks Controversy: Regulator Says It’s “Completely Legal”
Philip Morris Bangladesh Limited (PMBL) has received approval to invest USD 5.82 million in a nicotine pouch factory in Narayanganj. Regulators say the project is legal under existing laws, while health groups argue it breaches a 2016 Supreme Court order and poses youth addiction risks.
Nov.07 by 2FIRSTS.ai