The Dangers of E-Cigarettes as Smoking Cessation Aids

Aug.02.2022
The Dangers of E-Cigarettes as Smoking Cessation Aids
E-cigarettes have not been proven to aid in smoking cessation, and their use can lead to health problems.

The use of tobacco products, which contain the highly addictive substance nicotine, remains a leading preventable cause of death in the United States. While the use of combustible tobacco products such as cigarettes and cigars has decreased in recent decades, the tobacco industry has invented a new, trendy alternative that is just as addictive: e-cigarettes, also known as electronic nicotine delivery systems and vapes. To promote these products to the public, the tobacco industry claims they are smoking cessation aids, although the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not yet approved them for this use.


Despite many clinical trials tending to show a positive relationship between the use of electronic cigarettes and smoking cessation, this evidence has been evaluated as "consistently low." Moreover, these trials are often conducted under optimal treatment conditions, which means their research results are often not applicable to the real-world community environment in which electronic cigarettes are used as consumer products. In contrast, recent evidence from a nationally representative, prospective, real-world (observational) study in the United States did not show electronic cigarettes to be beneficial for smoking cessation attempts or as a substitute for cigarettes. The study was published in the journal Tobacco Control on February 7, 2022.


Electronic cigarettes are battery-powered devices that come in various shapes such as pens or flash drives and contain a liquid consisting primarily of nicotine extracted from tobacco, glycerin, propylene glycol, and flavorings. When used, these devices heat the liquid to produce an aerosol that users inhale into their lungs. The FDA recognizes that electronic cigarettes are not safe tobacco products. These addictive products not only expose users to tobacco-related diseases and death, but are also associated with lung injury, seizures, and other adverse reactions in the nervous system.


The use of electronic cigarettes is becoming increasingly common. As of 2018, there are currently 8 million adult e-cigarette users in the United States, accounting for 3% of the adult population. In addition, 5% and 21% of American middle and high school students are current e-cigarette users, respectively. Former Surgeon General of the United States, VADM Jerome Adams, declared that the use of e-cigarettes by children is an "epidemic". Many e-cigarette products have been legally sold in the United States for over a decade without regulation since October 2021. However, under pressure from the industry, the FDA has authorized their use in adults, claiming that this authorization will "protect public health." According to the FDA, as long as e-cigarette companies follow the agency's requirements for reducing youth access and acquisition of these products after being marketed.


This flawed balancing strategy has essentially thrown young people under the bus. According to the latest results from the National Youth Tobacco Survey, e-cigarettes are the most commonly used tobacco product among middle and high school students in 2021. This is because many teenage e-cigarette users are able to obtain these products through illegal means. On June 23, 2022, the FDA ordered all e-cigarette products produced by major seller JUUL Labs to be removed from the US market because the company did not provide sufficient evidence on the toxicological characteristics of these products, according to the agency. However, on July 5, 2022, the FDA suspended its order after JUUL filed a lawsuit against the agency and the agency determined the need for additional review of the company's application. Importantly, the FDA continues to authorize the use of numerous e-cigarette products manufactured by tobacco industry giants including Philip Morris and RJ Reynolds Vapor.


The study analyzed survey data collected in 2017 and 2019, during a time when electronic cigarette sales were rapidly increasing in the United States. The data was collected as part of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study, a longitudinal study of a nationally representative sample of community-dwelling adults in the US. The study has been conducted over several years with funding from the National Institutes of Health and the FDA.


As part of the original research, biological samples were collected from participants to verify their self-reported smoking behavior. Response rates for the 2017 and 2019 surveys were 68% and 88%, respectively. The initial PATH sample included 30,970 adults surveyed in 2017. Within this sample, there were 3,578 smoking participants who attempted to quit smoking in 2016 (most recent quit attempters). Among them, 1,323 respondents had successfully quit smoking by the time of the 2017 survey (most recent former smokers).


Recently, individuals attempting to quit smoking and former smokers were asked about their use of electronic cigarettes, nicotine replacement therapies (such as gum, inhalers, lozenges, nasal sprays, patches, and pills), bupropion (Wellbutrin SR and the recently discontinued Zyban brand), and varenicline (Chantix) during their last quit attempt in 2016. Researchers found that although electronic cigarette sales significantly increased in 2017, only 13% of recent quit attempters reported using electronic cigarettes to help them quit, a decrease from the previous year's 17%.


It is worth noting that as of 2019, only 10% of people who attempted to quit smoking using e-cigarettes were able to quit smoking (but not all tobacco products) for at least 12 months. This percentage is lower than those who attempted to quit smoking using only medication (15%) or without any products (19%). Additionally, as of 2019, only 4% of people who attempted to quit using e-cigarettes were able to quit all tobacco products (including e-cigarettes) for at least 12 months. This percentage is much lower than those who quit using only medication (13%) or without any products (14%).


After adjusting the analysis for potential differences in participant characteristics, researchers estimate that compared to pharmaceutical aids, the use of e-cigarettes reduces the number of successful quitters by 7 out of every 100 trying to quit smoking. This finding contradicts previous clinical trial evidence which estimated that e-cigarettes increased the number of successful quitters by 4 out of every 100 using pharmaceutical aids. Overall, the current PATH analysis suggests that switching to e-cigarettes does not reduce the risk of relapse compared to those who do not switch, as nearly 60% of daily e-cigarette users among former smokers resumed smoking by 2019. It is worth noting that during the study period, sales of high-nicotine e-cigarettes increased significantly, which closely resembled smoking behavior and experience, but only 2% of recent former smokers used these products. Therefore, the researchers conclude that the e-cigarette industry is less effective in encouraging smokers to quit using e-cigarettes compared to encouraging young people to start using these products with nicotine.


The results of a new study, as well as previous analyses of the PATH survey, have raised concerns about the FDA's decision to authorize the use of e-cigarettes as consumer products. The agency could truly protect public health by banning all e-cigarette products and by rejecting the false claims made by the e-cigarette industry about the benefits of their products for the world. In addition to e-cigarettes, the FDA should seek to expand and exercise all of its legal powers over "non-nicotine" products in the US. This undoubtedly includes more actively assisting smokers in quitting and gradually phasing out combustible nicotine products from the US market.


This article is compiled from third-party information and is only intended for industry-related communication and learning purposes.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS and 2FIRSTS is unable to confirm the authenticity and accuracy of its content. The translation of this article is intended solely for communication and research purposes within the industry.


Due to limitations in the translator's proficiency, the translated article may not accurately convey the same meaning as the original text. Therefore, it is advised to refer to the original text for accurate information.


2FIRSTS maintains complete alignment with the Chinese government on any statements and positions related to domestic issues, as well as matters involving Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, and foreign affairs.


The copyright of compiled information belongs to the original media and author. If there is infringement, please contact us for deletion.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Russia Adds Vapes to “Strategic Goods” List, Illegal Cross-Border Trade Faces Up to Five Years in Prison
Russia Adds Vapes to “Strategic Goods” List, Illegal Cross-Border Trade Faces Up to Five Years in Prison
Russia will place e-cigarettes and related nicotine products under its “strategic goods” framework from August 20, 2026. According to TVP World’s report published on August 19, the newly listed items include e-cigarettes, electronic smoking devices, vape liquids and nicotine salts. Individuals who illegally move these products across Russia’s customs border or its state border with other Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) members could face up to five years in prison if shipment values exceed 100,000 rubles (about €1,000), provided all elements of a criminal offence are established.
Aug.20
FDA Grants PMTA Authorization to 11 ZYN ULTRA Nicotine Pouches, Bringing Total Authorized Pouches to 43
FDA Grants PMTA Authorization to 11 ZYN ULTRA Nicotine Pouches, Bringing Total Authorized Pouches to 43
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration authorized 11 ZYN ULTRA nicotine pouch products made by Swedish Match USA through the premarket tobacco product application pathway on August 21, 2026. Ten of the authorized products have a labeled nicotine content of 9 mg, while ZYN ULTRA Smooth was authorized at 11 mg. The reviews were conducted through FDA’s nicotine pouch PMTA pilot program. FDA has now authorized 43 nicotine pouch products, including 23 through the pilot.
Aug.24
Australia-China Operation Dismantles Tobacco Smuggling Network: 112 Containers, 60 Arrests and A$92 Million in Illicit Tobacco
Australia-China Operation Dismantles Tobacco Smuggling Network: 112 Containers, 60 Arrests and A$92 Million in Illicit Tobacco
According to The Maritime Executive on August 19, 2026, the Australian Border Force (ABF) and China’s Anti-Smuggling Bureau of General Administration of China Customs worked together to dismantle an international illicit tobacco smuggling network targeting Australia. According to information released by ABF on August 20, sustained information sharing and cooperation led to investigations into 112 shipping containers, with 91 found to contain illicit tobacco. Authorities seized more than 60 million cigarettes and 60 kilograms of loose-leaf tobacco, representing more than A$92 million in unpaid duties. More than 60 people suspected of involvement in the network were arrested in China.
Aug.20
UK HMRC Urges Public to Report Suspicious Vape Shops in Crackdown on Tax Fraud, Money Laundering and Illicit Tobacco Sales
UK HMRC Urges Public to Report Suspicious Vape Shops in Crackdown on Tax Fraud, Money Laundering and Illicit Tobacco Sales
HM Revenue & Customs is urging members of the public to report vape shops, barber shops and other high-street businesses suspected of tax fraud, money laundering or other illegal activity, with informants not required to provide personal details. HMRC plans more than 30,000 interventions in 2026-27 targeting tax fraud, organised crime and illicit activity, including the sale of illegal vapes and tobacco. The push forms part of a broader UK effort to tackle organised crime on high streets, backed by a £30 million government enforcement programme.
Regulations
Aug.17 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Philip Morris Malaysia Again Meets Religious Authority Over Cigarette Alternatives as Perlis Mufti Responds on Halal Criteria
Philip Morris Malaysia Again Meets Religious Authority Over Cigarette Alternatives as Perlis Mufti Responds on Halal Criteria
Philip Morris Malaysia Managing Director Naeem Shahab Khan met Perlis Mufti Mohd Asri Zainul Abidin on September 17 and presented the company's shift from conventional cigarettes toward alternative products. The mufti said a product could be considered halal if it is clean, its side effects are not harmful or can be controlled, and it does not involve excessive waste. His remarks did not mention IQOS or any other specific PMI product and did not amount to a new product-specific religious ruling. It was at least the second publicly reported engagement between Philip Morris Malaysia and a Malaysian religious institution over cigarette alternatives within six months.
Regulations
Sep.18 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Yinghe-Controlled Vape Maker SKE Ordered to Post £569,039 Security as It Pursues Crystal Bar Design Infringement Case in UK
Yinghe-Controlled Vape Maker SKE Ordered to Post £569,039 Security as It Pursues Crystal Bar Design Infringement Case in UK
The UK High Court has ordered Chinese vape manufacturer Shenzhen SKE Technology to provide £569,039 ($776,000) in security for costs in its design infringement proceedings against Vapepen London and other defendants over its Crystal Bar vape product. The court did not accept the defendants’ main argument that recovering costs from a China-based company would face significant enforcement obstacles, but found that SKE had not sufficiently disclosed its own financial position. The order is procedural and does not determine the underlying infringement claims.
News
Aug.21