The Dangers of Electronic Cigarettes: A Call for Regulation

Aug.29.2022
The Dangers of Electronic Cigarettes: A Call for Regulation
Electronic cigarette use in Brazil raises concerns despite the country's effective tobacco control policies. Potential health risks exist.

In recent years, electronic cigarettes have gained a lot of attention online, causing many people to have doubts about their safety. Despite Brazil's ban on the production and sale of electronic cigarettes since 2009, their usage has significantly increased in recent years due to their easy availability on both websites and physical storefronts.


Brazil is known as a global model for tobacco control public policy. Policies implemented over the years from 1989 to 2019 have reduced tobacco consumption among those aged 18 and over by about 60%. Some of these policies prevented children and adolescents from accessing tobacco products, thus preventing them from smoking. However, unlike all efforts to reduce smoking through public health, a new smoking trend emerged: electronic cigarettes. This includes a nicotine release device, whose first prototype was created in Pennsylvania in 1963, but it was never commercialized. In 2003, electronic cigarettes were created in China and spread around the world a decade later after a major tobacco industry company acquired a patent for them.


Many young people are drawn to the various formats, designs, and flavors of electronic cigarettes, making up a significant proportion of e-cigarette users. Research shows that in Brazil, one in five young people aged 18-24 have already used e-cigarettes. Additionally, 80% of those who use e-cigarettes are between the ages of 18 and 34. However, studies indicate that apart from nicotine, the aerosol may also contain other irritants and toxic substances such as formaldehyde, acrolein, diethylene glycol, acetaldehyde, benzene, and low doses of carcinogens. Tests on cells, tissues, and small animals exposed to liquids from different brands of e-cigarettes indicate that they are toxic to neurological, respiratory, and cardiovascular cells and may have adverse effects and cause birth defects during critical stages of fetal development.


The safety of electronic nicotine delivery systems has not been scientifically proven. In fact, the amount of nicotine dispensed by different e-cigarette devices can vary greatly, exposing consumers to much higher doses of the substance than traditional cigarettes. Reports have linked multiple incidents of severe burns, dismemberment and even death to explosions of e-cigarette batteries, dependent on the device's position at the time of detonation.


Although there is a lack of research evaluating the long-term consequences of inhaled substances from these devices, it is well-known that in the short-term, they may trigger or exacerbate symptoms of previously existing conditions such as coughing, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and hypertension. Additionally, in 2019, a series of severe cases of lung illness related to the use of electronic cigarettes, known as EVALI, was reported in the United States. By 2020, these cases resulted in over 2,800 hospitalizations, with many in intensive care units, and 68 deaths. The majority of cases were in young people, with one patient requiring a lung transplant.


Although the tobacco industry has attempted to convey the idea that e-cigarettes can aid in quitting smoking, this is not a good strategy. E-cigarette use operates through the same mechanism as traditional cigarettes, providing the brain with a nicotine rush. This explains why over 80% of those who use e-cigarettes to quit smoking still rely on nicotine (and e-cigarettes) after a year of follow-up. Scientifically proven and effective behavioral and pharmacological therapies are available to help quit smoking.


Since 2009, the use of electronic cigarettes has been prohibited in Brazil and will continue to be banned. However, children and teenagers are still able to obtain them, and the rate of experimentation is increasing daily. It is time to acknowledge that electronic cigarettes are not just vaporizers and to implement monitoring and restrictions on their sales.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information and is intended only for industry exchange and learning.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS is unable to confirm the authenticity and accuracy of the content. The compilation of this article is only intended for industry discussion and research.


Due to limitations in our translation abilities, the translated article may not fully convey the original meaning. Please refer to the original article for accuracy.


2FIRSTS maintains complete alignment with the Chinese government on all domestic, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, and foreign related statements and positions.


The compilation of information is owned by the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us for removal.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

PMI Oral Products Chief Says Lack of Rules May Push Nicotine Pouch Market Into Illicit Trade
PMI Oral Products Chief Says Lack of Rules May Push Nicotine Pouch Market Into Illicit Trade
Nick Ricketts, President of Oral Products at Philip Morris International (PMI), told Logos Press that nicotine pouches should be brought under clear regulatory frameworks covering nicotine limits, flavor rules, age verification, sales controls and marketing standards, arguing that the absence of clear rules or blanket bans may push consumer demand into illegal or semi-legal channels.
Jul.06
Russian Strikes Destroy JTI and Imperial Brands Ukraine Warehouses, With Losses Reaching Tens of Millions of Hryvnias
Russian Strikes Destroy JTI and Imperial Brands Ukraine Warehouses, With Losses Reaching Tens of Millions of Hryvnias
According to Ukrainska Pravda, Russian strikes on the Kyiv region during the night of Aug. 4-5, 2026, damaged warehouses storing products of Japan Tobacco International (JTI) and Imperial Brands Ukraine. JTI said a finished goods warehouse in Kyiv Oblast was destroyed, with no employees injured, and that it did not expect disruptions to retail supplies. Imperial Brands Ukraine said products stored at warehouses of distributors and retail partners were affected and estimated losses from the strikes at “tens of millions of Ukrainian hryvnias” (roughly hundreds of thousands of U.S. dollars).
JTI
Aug.07
Special Report | Russia, Ukraine and Belarus Launch Fresh Push to Rein in Vaping
Special Report | Russia, Ukraine and Belarus Launch Fresh Push to Rein in Vaping
Russia, Ukraine and Belarus are tightening vape regulation through different tools, from Ukraine’s stronger enforcement push and Belarus’s proposed advertising restrictions to Russia’s new GOST standard and regional sales-ban mechanism. As black-market concerns persist, some Russian experts argue that China’s tightly controlled but legalised model — built around licensing, traceability and taxation — may offer a more effective alternative to blanket prohibition.
Jul.15
Vape Vending Machine Concerns Rise in German-Speaking Europe as Schools and Age Checks Come Into Focus
Vape Vending Machine Concerns Rise in German-Speaking Europe as Schools and Age Checks Come Into Focus
Recent reports from Germany and Switzerland show growing concern over vape and tobacco vending machines near schools or in public settings, with parents, teachers and residents questioning youth access, age-verification controls and the sale of vapes alongside snacks and drinks.
Jul.06
Senate Democrat Wyden Probes Trump Administration Vape Policy Shift, Seeks Records From HHS and Reynolds American
Senate Democrat Wyden Probes Trump Administration Vape Policy Shift, Seeks Records From HHS and Reynolds American
U.S. Senator Ron Wyden, the Democratic ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee, has launched an investigation into flavored vape policy changes and requested records from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Reynolds American and Botanic Tonics. The investigation focuses on a timeline involving Reynolds American’s $5 million donation to MAGA Inc. in April 2026 and subsequent vape policy developments. Wyden said the review aims to examine potential links between political donations, corporate communications and government decisions. The investigation does not represent a finding of wrongdoing.
Innovation
Aug.07 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Pennsylvania Updates ENDS Certification List as Chinese-Linked Manufacturers Enter State Review
Pennsylvania Updates ENDS Certification List as Chinese-Linked Manufacturers Enter State Review
Pennsylvania’s June 26 Pending ENDS Certifications list includes 23 manufacturers under review, including Shenzhen Smoore, Shenzhen IVPS, YME Technology and China-linked Boulder International. The list shows state-level vape regulation moving beyond retail brands toward manufacturer-based market access alongside FDA oversight.
Regulations
Jul.06 by 2Firsts Perspectives